The proximal and distal position of the radius relative to the ulna through a full range of elbow flexion and forearm rotation

Reproduction of forearm rotation dynamic using intensity-based biplane 2D-3D registration matching method

This study aimed to reproduce and analyse the in vivo dynamic rotational motion of the forearm and to clarify forearm motion involvement and the anatomical function of the interosseous membrane (IOM). The dynamic forearm rotational motion of the radius and ulna was analysed in vivo using a novel image-matching method based on fluoroscopic and computed tomography images for intensity-based biplane two-dimensional-three-dimensional registration. Twenty upper limbs from 10 healthy volunteers were included in this study. The mean range of forearm rotation was 150 ± 26° for dominant hands and 151 ± 18° for non-dominant hands, with no significant difference observed between the two. The radius was most proximal to the maximum pronation relative to the ulna, moved distally toward 60% of the rotation range from maximum pronation, and again proximally toward supination. The mean axial translation of the radius relative to the ulna during forearm rotation was 1.8 ± 0.8 and 1.8 ± 0.9 mm for dominant and non-dominant hands, respectively. The lengths of the IOM components, excluding the central band (CB), changed rotation. The transverse CB length was maximal at approximately 50% of the rotation range from maximum pronation. Summarily, this study describes a detailed method for evaluating in vivo dynamic forearm motion and provides valuable insights into forearm kinematics and IOM function.

Muscle responses during radial nerve-biased upper limb neurodynamic test in asymptomatic individuals: a cross-sectional study

This laboratory cross-sectional study aimed at explore the muscle response (MR) of the upper trapezius, infraspinatus, biceps brachii and extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) during the radial nerve-biased upper limb neurodynamic test (RN-ULNT) in healthy participants. Myoelectric activity was stage-by-stage recorded during two sequencing variants of the RN-ULNT: S1, in which elbow extension was the last movement; and S2, in which wrist flexion was the last movement. Final elbow and wrist joint angle and sensory response (SR) in five zones (Z1-Z5) were also registered. MR was qualitatively categorized as 'absent' (No-MR), 'true' (TMR) or 'uneven' (UMR). In both sequences, significant increases in muscle activity occurred mostly during shoulder abduction and elbow extension (p ≤ 0.009). Also, elbow extension but not wrist flexion increased the activity of the ECRB muscle (p ≤ 0.009). S2 showed significantly higher upper trapezius (p = 0.04) and biceps brachii (p = 0.036) muscle activity during wrist flexion, and higher report of SR in Z1 and Z4 (p < 0.001) compared to S1. Only the ECRB muscle showed significant differences in the MR type between S1 and S2 (TMR, p = 0.016; UMR, = 0,012). Our results may be useful in the assessment of upper limb musculoskeletal disorders.

During forearm rotation the three-dimensional ulnolunate distance is affected more by translation of the ulnar head than change in ulnar variance

Ulnolunate abutment has been thought to be aggravated by pronation because of an increase in ulnar variance. We hypothesized that the ulnolunate distance might be greater in pronation because the ulnar head is dorsally translated. Twenty-one three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomographic scans of wrists taken in supination and pronation were investigated. The ulnolunate distance was measured in each position, and the change in ulnolunate distance from supination to pronation was calculated. The changes in ulnar variance from supination to pronation and the amount of translation of the ulnar head were measured directly by superimposing three-dimensional reconstructions. The mean ulnolunate distance in pronation was significantly greater than in supination. There was no significant correlation between the changes in ulnolunate distance and in the ulnar variance. The change in ulnolunate distance had a significant positive linear relationship with the amount of translation of the ulnar head. The change in ulnolunate distance during forearm rotation is determined by the amount of translation of the ulnar head rather than by change in ulnar variance. Level of evidence: IV.

Where Is the Ulnar Styloid Process? Identification of the Absolute Location of the Ulnar Styloid Process Based on CT and Verification of Neutral Forearm Rotation on Lateral Radiographs of the Wrist

Background

The location of the ulnar styloid process can be confusing because the radius and the hand rotate around the ulna. The purpose of this study was to identify the absolute location of the ulnar styloid process, which is independent of forearm pronation or supination, to use it as a reference for neutral forearm rotation on lateral radiographs of the wrist.

Methods

Computed tomography (CT) images of 23 forearms taken with elbow flexion of 70° to 90° were analyzed. The axial CT images were reconstructed to be perpendicular to the distal ulnar shaft. The absolute location of the ulnar styloid process in this study was defined as the position of the ulnar styloid process on the axial plane of the ulnar head relative to the long axis of the humeral shaft with the elbow set in the position for standard lateral radiographs of the wrist. To identify in which direction the ulnar styloid is located on the axial plane of the ulnar head, the angle between “the line of humeral long axis projected on the axial plane of the ulna” and “the line passing the center of the ulnar head and the center of the ulnar styloid” was measured (ulnar styloid direction angle). To identify how volarly or dorsally the ulnar styloid should appear on the true lateral view of the wrist, the ratio of “the volar-dorsal diameter of the ulnar head” and “the distance between the volar-most aspect of the ulnar head and the center of the ulnar styloid” was calculated (ulnar styloid location ratio).

Results

The mean ulnar styloid direction angle was 12° dorsally. The mean ulnar styloid location ratio was 1:0.55.

Conclusions

The ulnar styloid is located at nearly the ulnar-most (the opposite side of the humerus with the elbow flexed) and slightly dorsal aspects of the ulnar head on the axial plane. It should appear almost midway (55% dorsally) from the ulnar head on the standard lateral view of the wrist in neutral forearm rotation. These location references could help clinicians determine whether the forearm is in neutral or rotated position on an axial CT/magnetic resonance imaging scan or a lateral radiograph of the wrist.

Operative treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome: a systematic review

This article critically and systematically reviews the surgical treatments for ulnar impaction syndrome. Three types of treatments currently exist: arthroscopic wafer procedure, open wafer procedure, and ulna shortening osteotomy. A total of 36 articles were included from searching the electronic databases PubMed MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid EMBASE. Studies were evaluated for quality using the Modified Detsky Score. Of these, 14 articles had a Modified Detsky Score of 6/10 or higher. Satisfaction rates were 100% for arthroscopic wafer procedure, 89% for open wafer procedure, and 84% for ulna shortening osteotomy. The percentage of participants reporting an excellent or good outcome was 82% for arthroscopic wafer procedure, 87% for open wafer procedure, and 76% for ulna shortening osteotomy. In conclusion, available evidence shows that arthroscopic wafer procedure and open wafer procedure may be viable alternatives to the more popular ulna shortening osteotomy, but clinical superiority is yet to be established. Future research should focus on prospective cohort methods and should report participant outcomes using validated scoring methods.

Measurement of ulnar variance from the lateral radiograph: a comparison of techniques

PURPOSE

To determine the reliability of measuring ulnar variance on lateral wrist radiographs and to compare this technique with previously described methods.

METHODS

Ulnar variance was measured in 100 normal wrist radiographs using the methods of perpendiculars, central reference point, and the lateral radiograph by 3 surgeons on 2 occasions. Intraobserver repeatability and agreement between raters and methods were assessed and compared.

RESULTS

Intra- and interobserver reliability and agreement were both excellent using all 3 methods within a ± 1.0-mm cutoff. However, there was substantial pairwise disagreement in measures of ulnar variance between all 3 methods.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that, for measurement of ulnar variance, the methods of perpendiculars, central reference point, and lateral radiographic measurement each have clinically acceptable intraobserver repeatability and interobserver agreement. Despite their independent reliability, each method of radiographic determination of ulnar variance had considerable disagreement with the other methods, indicative of inherent inaccuracies in the techniques. The lateral radiograph uniquely allows for visualization of the amount of ulnar head protruding proximal or distal to the concave lunate facet and allows for a rapid estimation of pronosupination, which is known to affect ulnar variance.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Determination of ulnar variance can be an important component of surgical decision making in various pathological conditions of the hand and wrist. Traditionally, it has been measured through methods using the posteroanterior wrist radiograph, but there are potential shortcomings with these methods, and use of the lateral radiograph may provide a more clinically relevant picture of ulnar variance. This study shows that measurement from the lateral radiograph provides similar reliability to previously accepted techniques.