Suture button reconstruction of the central band of the interosseous membrane in Essex-Lopresti lesions: a comparative biomechanical investigation

Addressing the Central Band in Acute and Chronic Essex-Lopresti Injury: A Case Report and Technique Description

CASE

A 34-year-old man was acutely treated with radial head arthroplasty and central band repair following Essex-Lopresti injury. A 38-year-old man presented with chronic longitudinal instability following failed radial head arthroplasty, which was performed for failed fixation. Treatment with revision radial head arthroplasty and central band reconstruction restored longitudinal stability.

CONCLUSION

We have a low threshold to repair the central band in acute Essex-Lopresti injury with sufficient evidence of disruption. Nearly all chronic cases require central band reconstruction to restore longitudinal stability. We do not temporarily pin the DRUJ, and distal ulnar shortening is rarely indicated.

Does surgical reconstruction of the distal oblique bundle (DOB) provide similar stability as the intact bundle or Adams procedure? A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this review was to summarize the available evidence for biomechanical stability following surgical DOB reconstruction, and to determine whether distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) stability with a reconstructed DOB was similar to the native intact condition or that after the Adams procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines was performed using the databases PubMed and Embase. The following search algorithm was used: ("DOB" OR "Distal Oblique Bundle") AND "Reconstruction". Biomechanical or human cadaveric studies that measured stability of the DRUJ after reconstruction of the DOB were included.

RESULTS

Four articles were included in the final analysis. DOB incidence was reported to be between 50% and 70%. Two studies observed no differences between the intact situation and the reconstructed DOB, respectively the Adams procedure. A further author group found no signs of major instability after the Adams reconstruction or after DOB reconstruction, except for decreased stability during supination in the DOB sample. In another study, similar results could be shown for the Adams and DOB reconstruction groups; however, the DOB sample showed decreased dorsal translation of the radius during forearm supination.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, DOB reconstruction was proven to stabilize the DRUJ adequately. Moreover, the reconstructed DOB showed the same stability as the native DOB, except for one study, in which stability following reconstruction was reduced during supination. No significant difference between the DOB and the Adams reconstruction could be observed.

Essex-Lopresti Lesions and Longitudinal Radioulnar Instability: A Narrative Review

»

An Essex-Lopresti injury (ELI) is classically described as a radial head fracture with a concomitant interosseous ligament complex (IOC) injury. However, multiple injury patterns may be present, and an interosseous membrane (IOM) injury should be evaluated for in any axial load injury through the forearm. ELI may result in longitudinal radioulnar instability (LRUI).

»

Diagnosis of an IOC injury can be difficult. Evaluation begins with standard wrist and elbow radiographs and is supplemented with radiographs and intraoperative maneuvers to assess for proximal radial migration. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography may be useful in the acute setting, although indications and the clinical importance of the findings remain unclear.

»

Surgical management of an acute ELI is focused on restoration of radial length and temporary distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) stabilization. Radial head excision in the acute setting should be approached with caution because proximal migration may not be present acutely but may develop over time. The indication for acute IOM repair and reconstruction remains unclear.

»

Surgical management of a chronic ELI is focused on restoration of radial length, wrist leveling, and treatment of degenerative changes (either at the radiocapitellar joint or the DRUJ). Reconstruction of the central band can restore forearm load transfer and produce favorable functional outcomes, but its indications continue to be debated.

Acute Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability: Evaluation and Treatment

This article reviews the anatomy and mechanics of pronation and supination (axial rotation) of the forearm through the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), and the proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ). Injuries to the bones and/or ligaments of the forearm, wrist, or elbow can result in instability, pain, and limited rotation. Acute dislocations of the DRUJ commonly occur along with a fracture to the distal radius, radial metadiaphysis, or radial head. These injuries are all caused by high-energy trauma. Outcomes are predicated on anatomic reduction and restoration of stability to the DRUJ and PRUJ with or without ligamentous repair or reconstruction.

The serious full-length forearm injury - a case report and literature review

Background

Among upper limb injuries, carpal bone fractures and dislocation, Essex-Lopresti injury, and the terrible triad injury of the elbow are serious and relatively rare injuries. These injuries require surgical intervention. The surgical method is difficult, and the treatment effect is poor. These injuries have not been described in the same limb in the literature.

Case presentation

A 21-year-old male patient fell from a height in our institution and sustained multiple injuries, including carpal bone fracture-dislocation, Essex-Lopresti injury, and the terrible triad injury of the elbow of his right upper limb. After 2 surgeries and rehabilitation, he returned to work. We reviewed available reviews and related literature on serious upper-limb damage.

Conclusions

Full-length forearm injury is very rarely encountered, and the management of such fractures is difficult. Radial head replacement with a metal prosthesis, reconstructed the IOM with Tightrope, and fixed the DRUJ with a K-wire pin is appropriate treatment.

Reconstruction of the forearm interosseous membrane: a biomechanical study of three different techniques

Reconstruction of the interosseous membrane has the potential to re-establish a normal loading pattern through the forearm and enhance stability after an Essex-Lopresti lesion. The aim of our study was to assess the capacity of three different techniques, which all use a regionally harvested autograft, to restore longitudinal stability. Simulation of the Essex-Lopresti lesion was done by excising the radial head and sectioning the interosseous membrane in seven cadaveric specimens. Each technique was used in each specimen consecutively, using the pronator teres, the brachioradialis and the flexor carpi radialis tendons, respectively. The specimens were submitted to mechanical testing by applying proximally migratory forces to the radius and radioulnar displacement was assessed fluroscopically at wrist level. The pronator teres tendon achieved the greatest reduction (94% correction with respect to the intact interosseous membrane/radial head out state, followed by brachioradialis (92%) and flexor carpi radialis (85%). However, no statistically significant differences in displacement data or strength were detected between the techniques.

Immunofluorescence analysis of sensory nerve endings in the interosseous membrane of the forearm

The human interosseous membrane (IOM) is a fundamental stabilizer during forearm rotation. To investigate the dynamic aspects of forearm stability, we analyzed sensory nerve endings in the IOM. The distal oblique bundle (DOB), the distal accessory band (DAB), the central band (CB), the proximal accessory band (PAB), the dorsal oblique accessory cord (DOAC) and the proximal oblique cord (POC) were dissected from 11 human cadaver forearms. Sensory nerve endings were analyzed at two levels per specimen as total cell amount/mm² after immunofluorescence staining with low-affinity neurotrophin receptor p75, protein gene product 9.5, S-100 protein and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole on an Apotome microscope, according to Freeman and Wyke's classification. Sensory nerve endings were significantly more commonly found to be equally distributed throughout the structures, rather than being epifascicular, interstitial, or close to the insertion into bone (P ≤ 0.001, respectively). Free nerve endings were the predominant mechanoreceptor in all six structures, with highest density in the DOB, followed by the POC (P ≤ 0.0001, respectively). The DOB had the highest density of Pacini corpuscles. The DOAC and CB had the lowest amounts of sensory innervation. The high density of sensory corpuscles in the DOB, PAB and POC indicate that proprioceptive control of the compressive and directional muscular forces acting on the distal and proximal radioulnar joints is monitored by the DOB, PAB and POC, respectively, due to their closed proximity to both joints, whereas the central parts of the IOM act as structures of passive restraint.

Essex-Lopresti injuries: an update

Reconstruction of the central band of the interosseous membrane is an emerging procedure implemented in the treatment of longitudinal radioulnar dissociation (LRUD), usually in its chronic setting, after Essex-Lopresti injuries of the forearm.

There are no sufficient clinical data to support reconstruction of the central band of the interosseous membrane in acute LRUD injuries.

Clinical and cadaveric studies comparing autografts (palmaris longus, flexor carpi radialis and bone-patellar-bone), allografts (Achilles tendon) and synthetic ligaments have not shown superiority of one technique versus another; however, they have shown special concerns with respect to the use of synthetic grafts.

Latrogenic fracture, decrease of rotational range of movement, iatrogenic nerve injury (superficial radial and median nerve), donor site morbidity with autografts and recurrent instability are the complications reported in literature after interosseous membrane reconstruction.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:143-150. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180072

[The proximal radioulnar joint in consideration of the distal radioulnar joint]

The movement of the forearm follows a complex interplay of three main components: the proximal and distal radioulnar joint and the interosseous membrane. Injuries to one or even all components have a huge impact on the integrity of this system. The Essex-Lopresti lesion presented a high challenge in clinical diagnostics as well as therapy. Reconstructions of the length and stability are essential for a satisfactory postoperative outcome. If a reconstruction of the radial head by osteosynthesis is not possible, a radial head prosthesis should be implanted in the case of longitudinal instability - avoiding overlapping and/or oversizing. The reconstruction of the interosseous membrane should be considered, as well as the assessment of the distal radioulnar joint and/or the triangular fibrocartilage complex. Various reconstruction options are available in this regard.

A Novel Algorithmic Approach to Chronic Forearm Longitudinal Instability

Essex-Lopresti Lesions are rare injuries that are often missed in the acute setting. Delayed intervention may lead to chronic wrist and elbow pain and overall poor outcomes. The literature currently supports treatments that involve shortening of the ulna to reduce the relative degree of ulnar impaction, followed by attempted reduction of the distal radioulnar joint. Although such techniques may help to temporarily reduce wrist pain secondary to ulnar impaction, they do not address the proximal migration of the radius and ipsilateral radial head dislocation at the elbow. Subsequent procedures are often needed to replace or resect the radial head. We present a novel approach to chronic Essex-Lopresti lesions resulting in anatomic restoration of forearm length with return of elbow and wrist flexion/extension as well as improved forearm pronation/supination.

An uncommon variant of the Essex-Lopresti injury

The Essex-Lopresti injury is an extremely rare condition combining radial head or neck fracture, distal radio-ulnar joint dislocation and rupture of the interosseous membrane. However, there are rare or unusual varieties or associated injuries. We report a case of a 46-year-old woman with a posterior dislocation of the radio-humeral joint, a radial shaft fracture, and a distal radio-ulnar joint dislocation. She underwent open reduction and internal fixation of the radial shaft fracture followed by an immobilization by a long elbow splint in supination for 6 weeks. At 18 months of follow-up, she was asymptomatic and she had a full range of elbow and wrist motion and had resumed thoroughly her previous job. The Essex-Lopresti injury results from a complex injury to the forearm axis with resultant longitudinal instability, which can be challenging to treat. There are some variations that can lead to a missed diagnosis resulting in persistent pain and instability of the wrist. The best outcomes are reached with early diagnosis and prompt management.

Single- versus double-bundle suture button reconstruction of the forearm interosseous membrane for the chronic Essex-Lopresti lesion

PURPOSE

Reconstruction of the ruptured interosseous membrane (IOM) is critical to restore forearm stability for the chronic Essex-Lopresti injury. Positive outcomes have been reported following IOM reconstruction with a single-bundle suture button (Mini-Tightrope) construct, although recent work suggests that double-bundle Mini-TightRope^® IOM reconstruction is biomechanically superior. The purpose of this study was to determine whether double-bundle Mini-TightRope^® reconstruction of the forearm IOM results in superior clinical outcomes to the single-bundle technique.

METHODS

Five patients with chronic Essex-Lopresti injuries treated with double-bundle Mini-TightRope^® IOM reconstruction were matched to five patients treated with single-bundle Mini-TightRope^® reconstruction. Improvement in clinical examination measures and patient-reported outcomes was compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Results were good to excellent in all 10 patients. At final follow-up, forearm rotation was significantly better in the single-bundle group, while maintenance of ulnar variance was better in the double-bundle group. No significant differences were noted between the two groups for any other numerical outcomes, and no complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that while IOM reconstruction with a double-bundle Mini-TightRope^® construct results in greater resistance to proximal migration of the radius in the intermediate term, there is a modest concomitant loss of forearm rotation when compared to single-bundle reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.