Perforator-based propeller flaps reliability in upper extremity soft tissue reconstruction: a systematic review

Alternative Flap Options for Upper Extremity Reconstruction

For major upper limb defects, a wide range of established pedicled and free flap options can be used. These include the latissimus dorsi/thoracodorsal artery perforator, lateral arm, posterior interosseous artery, rectus abdominis, gracilis, and anterolateral thigh flaps. Technical proficiency is essential, and favorable success rates in terms of functional and esthetic outcomes can be achieved. Herein, alternative flap options (both pedicled and free) are introduced and discussed through a few illustrative case examples.

Outcomes and Reliability of Perforator Flaps in the Reconstruction of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Defects: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a common and debilitating disease, in which the only effective treatment involves a wide excision of the affected skin. Secondary wound healing and skin grafting are two well-known options for managing these defects, but perforator flaps provide a new therapeutic alternative by ensuring reconstructions of large defects, reducing donor site morbidity, and enhancing functional recovery. The aim of this study was to achieve a systematic review of perforator flaps use in HS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched from 1989 to 2021. The PRISMA statement was used in the study selection process and the review was registered on PROSPERO. Furthermore, patient characteristics, operative technique, complications, and recurrences were searched.

RESULTS

Thirty-six articles were selected including 286 patients and 387 flaps. Axillary localization was mostly represented (83.2%). Direct donor site closure was achieved in 99.1% of cases. In total, 15.1% of the flaps presented at least one of the following complications: wound dehiscence (5.5%), partial necrosis (2.9%), hematoma or seroma (2.1%), infection (2.1%), venous congestion (1.8%), and nerve injury (0.3%). Two cases of total necrosis were recorded. Recurrence of the disease was observed in 2.7% of the defects.

CONCLUSIONS

Pedicled perforator flaps are a reliable and reproducible technique in the reconstruction of HS defects. They are associated with a low recurrence rate while ensuring an effective reconstruction with reduced morbidity and faster recovery compared to the techniques classically used in this indication.

Propeller Flaps

A propeller flap is an islanded flap that reaches the recipient site through an axial rotation around its vascular axis. The degree of rotation varies from 90 degrees to 180 degrees. It is a highly reliable local reconstructive option. These flaps are simple, single-stage, easy to harvest, and not constrained by routine length-to-width ratios. Since their introduction, the technique has continued to evolve and more applications for the use of propeller flaps are being explored. In spite of their growing use in clinical practice in recent years, many reconstructive surgeons are unaware of their versatility, unsure of their safety, and apprehensive about using propeller flaps confidently. This article aims at understanding the nomenclature, key principles, biogeometry and planning, operative technical details, applications, and complications of propeller flaps.

Combined versus Single Perforator Propeller Flaps for Reconstruction of Large Soft Tissue Defects: A Retrospective Clinical Study

Sufficient wound closure of large soft tissue defects remains a challenge for reconstructive surgeons. We aimed to investigate whether combined perforator propeller flaps (PPFs) are suitable to expand reconstructive options. Patients undergoing PPF reconstruction surgery between 2008 and 2021 were screened and evaluated retrospectively. Of 86 identified patients, 69 patients received one perforator propeller flap, while 17 patients underwent combined PPF reconstruction with multiple flaps. We chose major complications as our primary outcome and defined those as complications that required additional surgery. Postoperatively, 27 patients (31.4%) suffered major complications. The propeller flap size, the type of intervention as well as the operation time were not associated with a higher risk of major complications. A defect size larger than 100 cm², however, was identified as a significant risk factor for major complications among single PPFs but not among combined PPFs (OR: 2.82, 95% CI: 1.01−8.36; p = 0.05 vs. OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.02−3.37; p = 0.32). In conclusion, combined PPFs proved to be a reliable technique and should be preferred over single PPFs in the reconstruction of large soft tissue defects at the trunk and proximal lower extremity.

Customized reconstruction of complex soft tissue defects in the upper extremities with variants of double skin paddle anterolateral thigh perforator flap

BACKGROUND

Complex soft tissue defects in the upper extremities are challenging to reconstruct. The purpose of this study was to share our experience with using four variants of double skin paddle Anterolateral Thigh Perforator (ALT) flap to achieve the customized reconstruction of the complex defects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2007 to December 2019, 15 patients (14 male and 1 female) aged 15-61 years underwent double skin paddle ALT flap reconstruction of the upper extremities. 10 wounds were located in the wrist or hand, while four wounds were located in the forearm, and one wound in the elbow. All the wounds were large with non-adjacent defects and with or without a dead space. Four variants of double skin paddle anterolateral thigh perforator flaps were harvested according to the patient's needs.

RESULTS

The flaps received were consisted of 7 classic double skin paddle ALT flap, 4 vastus lateralis muscle-chimeric double skin paddle ALT flap, 2 microdissected thin double skin paddle ALT flap, and 2 flow-through double skin paddle ALT flap. The size of the skin flap ranged from 6 × 6 cm² to 26 × 7 cm², and the size of the muscle segment ranged from 5 × 2 × 1 cm³ to 16× 6 × 2 cm³. Flap necrosis related to the pedicle kinking was observed in one patient, while the rest of the flaps survived without complications. The follow-up period ranged from 7 to 54 months, with a median of 15.6 months. The mean value of the qDASH scores at the last follow-up was 27.12 ± 16.51 (range, 11.4-59.1). None of the patients showed wrist flexion deformity. Postoperatively, three patients developed finger joint stiffness, which correlated with the severity of the injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Variants of double skin paddle ALT flaps provide versatile design and allow customized reconstruction of complex soft tissue defects in the upper extremities with limited donor site morbidity. We believe that the algorithm provided will help the surgeons with deciding among variants of double skin paddle ALT flap.

Soft tissue coverage of the upper limb: A flap reconstruction overview

Different opinions about the reconstructive choice for upper limb are described in literature: advancement or rotation flaps, regional flaps and free flaps are the most common reconstructive options. Local and regional flaps can be used to cover small defects while large wounds require the use of free flaps or distant pedicled flaps. The coverage of large wounds opens a discussion about when to use free flaps and when distant pedicled flaps. This review will describe the different methods used for the coverage of soft tissues injuries affecting hand and/or forearm (excluding fingers). The aim is to show all flap reconstructive options in order to support the inexperienced surgeon during the management of traumatic injuries of the upper limb.

Reliability of propeller flaps in post-traumatic reconstruction of wrist and hand defects

PURPOSE

This is a purely observational study with a literature comparison to assess the effectiveness of radial and ulnar arteries propeller perforator-based flaps in post-traumatic soft tissue reconstruction and identify the risk factors for complications.

METHODS

Sixteen patients were involved with post-traumatic wrist and hand soft tissue defects not exceeding 5 × 20 cm. Defects were covered with propeller radial and ulnar arteries perforator-based flaps. Patient demographics, soft tissue defects, complications and clinical outcomes were recorded. Assessment of patients' satisfaction for donor site morbidity and aesthetic outcome of the flap were performed.

RESULTS

Radial artery propeller perforator flap was performed in seven cases, and ulnar artery propeller perforator flap was done in nine cases. The size of the skin paddle ranged from 2.5 × 5 cm to 4.5 × 10.5 cm. Primary closure of the donor site was performed in all cases. One flap was lost, while superficial epidermolysis occurred in seven cases (45%). Edge necrosis ranging between 3 and 7 mm occurred in nine cases (60%). Patients' factors, mode of injury, associated injuries and interval between trauma and coverage were all correlated with complication incidence. The patients' satisfaction for donor site morbidity was very good and good in 80% of patients, while satisfaction for aesthetic outcome of the flap was very good and good in only 40%.

CONCLUSION

Radial and ulnar arteries have reliable perforators for flap elevation, which produce reliable outcome for small- and medium-sized soft tissue reconstruction. Effectiveness decreases in post-traumatic reconstructions. Complications are more frequent in crushing injuries especially if associated with bony fractures. Most complications in trauma cases were attributed to venous congestion, for which supercharging with a vein if accessible to the surgeon is recommended.

The role of reconstructive surgery after soft tissue sarcoma resection

Soft tissue sarcomas are rare malignant tumors with pejorative prognosis. They require a multidisciplinary approach in a specialized hospital belonging to the NetSarc network in France. In all cases treated with curative intent, the objective of excision surgery is to achieve wide, microscopically negative margins (R0 according to the UICC classification). When growing on a limb, sarcomas may threaten functionally relevant structures and even lead to amputation. Nowadays, when combined with radiation therapy, wide exeresis limb-sparing surgery is achievable in 90 to 95% of the cases, of which 25% will nevertheless require reconstructive surgery to preserve the limb, to limit postoperative complications and to manage possible sequelae. Progress in reparative surgery, particularly in microsurgery, has helped not only to improve limb salvage rates but also to create wider margins without altering oncologic goals of curative resection. After determining the range of resection, reconstructive surgery should be tailored to address the tissue defect. The converse is to be strongly discouraged. The extent of resection must not be compromised or reduced in order to facilitate reconstructive surgery. A plastic surgeon must master all the flap techniques, including microsurgery, while taking into account the impact of preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy on previously irradiated tissues or on wounds requiring adjuvant therapy. Recent developments, especially as regards perforator flaps, have helped to enhanced the quality of reconstruction procedure while reducing donor site morbidity. In our experience, perforator flaps are a workhorse in reconstructive surgeries subsequent to soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities. On a parallel track, lipofilling (otherwise known as fat grafting or fat transfer) has become the first-line treatment for patients with post-surgical functional or cosmetic sequalae. It is performed after long-term follow-up during disease-free survival. Strict clinical examination and MRI are mandatory prior to programming any local procedure. Usually, three to four sessions of fat grafting are needed to enhance local trophicity or the cosmetic aspect. Sequalae treatments are of great interest in terms of psychological as well as functional outcome.

Subacute reconstruction using flap transfer for complex defects of the upper extremity

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in microsurgical techniques of flap transfer, complex upper extremity trauma reconstruction remains a challenge for surgeons. This study aimed to present the outcomes in using flaps in the subacute reconstruction of complex upper extremity injuries.

METHODS

From July 2013 to December 2016, 35 patients ranging in age from 23 to 69 years with complicated upper extremity traumatic injuries were treated using flap reconstruction in subacute period. The number and causes of injury were 12 machine crush injuries, 18 machine strangulation injuries, two chainsaw accidents, two traffic accidents, and one incident of heavy bruising. Thirty-five patients underwent flap procedures, including 24 anterolateral thigh flaps (68.57%), five latissimus dorsi flaps (14.29%), and six lateral arm flaps (17.14%). Flap sizes ranged from 3 × 4 to 42 × 16 cm². The mean time of flap reconstruction was 14 days (range 5-29). During postoperative follow-up, flap appearance, sensory recovery, scarring and satisfaction were assessed.

RESULTS

The overall flap survival rate was 94.3%.Two flaps developed partial necrosis, both of which were later treated with skin grafting. Traumatic wound infections occurred in three patients. All upper limb injuries were completely covered. The follow-up periods ranged from 18 to 62 months with an average of 2.9 months. All skin flap textures were soft with varying degrees of pigmentation. Flap sensory recovery was S₁ in three cases, S₂ in eight cases, S₃ in 15 cases, and S₄ in nine cases. There were no donor site complications other than three cases with scar hyperplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

The severe upper limb soft tissue defects still achieved satisfactory function and appearance with negligible complications and low amputation rates during the subacute period.

Reconstruction of post-traumatic upper extremity soft tissue defects with pedicled flaps: An algorithmic approach to clinical decision making

PURPOSE

Pedicled flaps are still the workhorse flaps for reconstruction of upper limb soft tissue defects in many centers across the world. They are lifeboat options for coverage in vessel deplete wounds. In spite of their popularity existing algorithms are limited to a particular region of upper limb; a general algorithm involving entire upper limb which helps in clinical decision making is lacking. We attempt to propose one for the day to day clinical practice.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent pedicled flaps for coverage of post-traumatic upper extremity (arm, elbow, forearm, wrist & hand) soft tissue defects within the period of January 2016 to October 2017 was performed. Patients were divided into groups according to the anatomical location of the defects. The flaps performed for different anatomical regions were enlisted. Demographic data and complications were recorded. An algorithm was proposed based on our experience, with a particular emphasis made to approach to clinical decision making.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twelve patients were included in the study. Mean age was 27.3 years (range: 1-80 years), 180 were male, and 32 were female. Overall flap success rate was 98%, the following complications were noted marginal flap necrosis requiring no additional procedure other than local wound care in 32 patients (15%), partial flap necrosis requiring flap advancement or extra flap in 15 patients (7%), surgical site infection in 11 patients (5%), flap dehiscence requiring re-suturing in 5 patients (2.4%), total flap necrosis 4 patients (2%).

CONCLUSION

The proposed algorithm allows a reliable and consistent method for addressing diverse soft tissue defects in the upper limb with high success rate.

Repair of soft tissue defects in finger, thumb and forearm: less invasive methods with similar outcomes

We review recent developments in using occlusive dressings, dermal templates, and venous flaps for less invasive approaches to treat soft tissue defects of the forearm and fingers. Occlusive dressings can be used for thumb tip or fingertip trauma with soft tissue defects of small or moderate sizes. They permit skin regeneration without use of skin graft or a flap transfer. This is currently a popular way to treat tip soft tissue defects in European countries. Extensive soft tissue defects in the thumb, fingers, hand and forearm require flap transfers traditionally, but in recent years, surgeons use dermal templates to cover the defect site to allow regeneration of subcutaneous tissues, over which a skin graft is used in lieu of a flap. Transfer of a venous flap is currently a reliable procedure and is less invasive compared with conventional flaps, which usually damage a named artery in the donor. We advocate that less invasive methods should be considered for soft tissue defects in the hand and forearm.

Risk factors for pedicled flap necrosis in hand soft tissue reconstruction: a multivariate logistic regression analysis

BACKGROUND

Few clinical retrospective studies have reported the risk factors of pedicled flap necrosis in hand soft tissue reconstruction. The aim of this study was to identify non-technical risk factors associated with pedicled flap perioperative necrosis in hand soft tissue reconstruction via a multivariate logistic regression analysis.

METHODS

For patients with hand soft tissue reconstruction, we carefully reviewed hospital records and identified 163 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The characteristics of these patients, flap transfer procedures and postoperative complications were recorded. Eleven predictors were identified. The correlations between pedicled flap necrosis and risk factors were analysed using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Of 163 skin flaps, 125 flaps survived completely without any complications. The pedicled flap necrosis rate in hands was 11.04%, which included partial flap necrosis (7.36%) and total flap necrosis (3.68%). Soft tissue defects in fingers were noted in 68.10% of all cases. The logistic regression analysis indicated that the soft tissue defect site (P = 0.046, odds ratio (OR) = 0.079, confidence interval (CI) (0.006, 0.959)), flap size (P = 0.020, OR = 1.024, CI (1.004, 1.045)) and postoperative wound infection (P < 0.001, OR = 17.407, CI (3.821, 79.303)) were statistically significant risk factors for pedicled flap necrosis of the hand.

CONCLUSION

Soft tissue defect site, flap size and postoperative wound infection were risk factors associated with pedicled flap necrosis in hand soft tissue defect reconstruction.