Radioscapholunate fusion with triquetrum and distal pole of scaphoid excision: long-term follow-up

Outcomes after radioscapholunate arthrodesis for intra-articular malunion of distal radius fractures

PURPOSE

To study the clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes after of radioscapholunate (RSL) fusion for intra-articular malunion of the distal radius.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 26 patients (17 males and 9 females) with intra-articular malunion of distal radius fractures who underwent RSL arthrodesis using locked miniplates (without distal scaphoid excision) between 2012 and 2020. Their mean age was 43 years (range, 32-56). Patients were assessed radiographically for union and clinically for range of motion, grip strength, and pain (assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain). Functional evaluation was performed by using the Mayo modified wrist score (MMWS) and the Disabilities for the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.

RESULTS

All patients showed complete healing at the fusion site after a mean of 8.7 weeks (range, 8-12). The mean follow-up period was 72 months (range, 60-84). The pinch strength improved from a mean of 6.2 kg (range, 3-12) to a mean of 9.8 kg (range, 5-18) which represents 80% of the contralateral side. The mean pinch strength was 7 kg (range, 5-18) which presents 80% of the other side. VAS for pain showed a mean improvement of 72.6%. The DASH score improved to a mean of 19.2 (range, 14-24). The MMWS improved to a mean of 68 (range, 45-86). At the final follow-up period, no degenerative changes were detected in the midcarpal joint.

CONCLUSION

RSL arthrodesis (using locked miniplates without distal scaphoid excision) is a reliable surgical procedure to manage cases of radiocarpal OA after intra-articular malunion of distal radius fractures with good clinical and radiological outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV- therapeutic.

Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Radioscapholunate Arthrodesis in Patients With Inflammatory and Posttraumatic Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Radioscapholunate (RSL) fusion is performed for painful radiocarpal arthritis that is typically posttraumatic or inflammatory in nature. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with inflammatory conditions undergoing RSL fusion had comparable outcomes as those with posttraumatic arthritis and to determine factors impacting union.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of all RSL fusions over a 25-year period. Demographic information, wrist range of motion, postoperative complications, and surgical technique, including presence or absence of resection of distal scaphoid pole, data were collected. Radiographs were examined for evidence of healing of the RSL fusion site as well as development of midcarpal arthritis.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients underwent RSL fusion. Eight patients required revision of radiocarpal arthrodesis for painful nonunion. The fusion rate was 85.7%, and median 25th to 75th percentile (time to healing was 4.0 3.2-5.2) months. There were no differences in time to or rate of union by inflammatory arthropathy status. Grip strength increased significantly and pain decreased significantly with surgery. Union rate was 90% with the use of K-wires, screws, or staples, which was significantly greater than plates, fusion cups, or multiple implant types. The use of autologous bone graft significantly decreased the rate of nonunion and significantly decreased time to union by 3 months compared to allograft alone. Extension was significantly improved with scaphoid distal pole resection versus without distal scaphoid pole resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Radioscapholunate (RSL) fusion is an effective treatment for radiocarpal arthritis but has high nonunion rates. Fixation with K-wires, screws, or staples and use of autograft confers improved union rate.

Radiocarpal Fusion: Indications, Technique, and Modifications

Degenerative disorders of the wrist may affect isolated joints and inhibit normal functions of the wrist secondary to pain and stiffness. These processes that affect only the radiocarpal joint may be secondary to posttraumatic osteoarthritis, primary osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Radiocarpal wrist arthrodesis may help preserve some of the native wrist kinematics while alleviating pain and improving the range of motion. However, the surgeon must ensure that the patient's pathologic process primarily affects the radiocarpal articulations while relatively sparing the midcarpal articulations. Depending on the location of the pathology, isolated radiolunate or radioscapholunate arthrodesis have been described to preserve some motion in the midcarpal joint. To maximize motion in the midcarpal joint after radiocarpal arthrodesis, techniques for distal scaphoid and triquetrum excision have been described. We report patient outcomes for various techniques and describe our preferred technique for radioscapholunate arthrodesis using distal scaphoid excision.

The Biomechanical Effects of Simulated Radioscapholunate Fusion With Distal Scaphoidectomy, 4-Corner Fusion With Complete Scaphoidectomy, and Proximal Row Carpectomy Compared to the Native Wrist

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of simulated radioscapholunate fusion with distal scaphoid excision (RSLF+DSE), 4-corner fusion with scaphoidectomy (4-CF), and proximal row carpectomy (PRC) on the wrist's range of motion (ROM), contact pressure, and contact force in a cadaveric model.

METHODS

Ten freshly frozen cadaveric wrists were tested under 4 sequential conditions: native wrist, RSLF+DSE, 4-CF, and PRC. The simulated fusions were performed using two 1.6-mm Kirschner wires. The ROM in the flexion-extension and radioulnar deviation planes was evaluated. Contact area, contact pressure, and contact force were measured at the scaphocapitolunate joint for the RSLF+DSE simulation and radiocarpal joint for the 4-CF and PRC simulations. Mechanical testing was performed using a 35-N uniaxial load and pressure-sensitive film.

RESULTS

The RSLF+DSE and 4-CF groups had a decreased wrist arc ROM compared with the native wrist. The PRC group had a greater wrist arc ROM compared with the RSLF+DSE and 4-CF groups, but compared to the native wrist, it demonstrated a mildly decreased wrist arc ROM. The carpal pressure and contact force were significantly increased in the RSLF+DSE, 4-CF, and PRC groups compared with those in the native wrist. The RSLF+DSE group had the smallest increase in the carpal pressure and contact force, whereas the PRC group had the greatest increase.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study validates previous findings that PRC is motion-conserving but has the greatest contact force, whereas RSLF-DSE and 4-CF may cause a decrease in the ROM but have lower contact forces.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding the underlying native wrist biomechanics and alterations following different surgical treatments may assist hand surgeons in their clinical decision making for the treatment of stage II scapholunate advanced collapse.

A Systematic Review of Radiolunate and Radioscapholunate Arthrodesis

Purpose

The aims of this systematic review were to examine the use of radiolunate (RL) or radioscapholunate (RSL) arthrodesis as surgical management for patients with advanced radiocarpal arthritis that failed conservative management and to assess postoperative outcomes.

Methods

We reviewed articles from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from inception through December 2019. We identified complete manuscripts written in English reporting on RL or RSL arthrodesis for treatment of wrist pathology that included the primary outcomes (pain or grip strength) and at least 2 secondary outcomes (range of motion, patient-reported outcomes, or nonunion). Data pooling was used to calculate weighted averages.

Results

We identified 2,252 articles and selected 13 for inclusion. Across all studies, RSL arthrodesis was performed for 180 patients (49% female; 45 years old) and RL for 94 (87% female; 50 years old). Both procedures exhibited improvements in pain score and grip strength. Both cohorts demonstrated postoperative changes in flexion-extension arc, flexion, extension, ulnar deviation, supination, and pronation after data pooling. The nonunion rate for RSL was 15% versus 2% for RL, whereas the rate of progression to total wrist arthrodesis for RSL and RL was 4% and 0%, respectively.

Conclusions

Both RL and RSL arthrodesis can be successfully used to manage debilitating radiocarpal arthritis by affording patients with pain reduction. Each has its own benefits, in which RSL arthrodesis provides a total arc of motion within the functional demands of most activities of daily living, and RL arthrodesis has low rates of nonunion and progression to total wrist arthrodesis. Further research is needed to compare the 2 surgeries directly and prospectively in comparable patient groups.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic III.

A Biomechanical Comparison of Modified Radioscapholunate Fusion Constructs for Radiocarpal Arthritis

PURPOSE

This biomechanical study compared fixation constructs used in radioscapholunate (RSL) arthrodesis. We hypothesized that plates and screws, pin plate, and headless screws would all provide similarly stable fixation constructs.

METHODS

We chose 27 fresh-frozen cadaveric extremities, 14 of which were matched pairs and randomized them into 3 groups to match age, body mass index, and sex. An RSL arthrodesis was simulated with plates and screws, pin plates, or headless compression screws via a standard dorsal approach to the wrist. Specimens were mounted into a custom jig and cycled through an arc of 120° for 5,000 cycles to simulate 6 weeks range of motion (ROM). A 9-mm stroke differential variable reluctance transducer recorded continuous displacement, and gross hardware failure in the form of screw or pin cutout was investigated after the simulation.

RESULTS

Greater distraction across the RSL articulation was observed in the headless screws compared with the plate-and-screws and pin-plate constructs, with no difference between the plates and screws and pin plates. Greater average displacement was observed in the headless screws compared with the plate-and-screws and pin-plate constructs, with no difference between the pin plates and plates and screws. Gross hardware failure was observed least in plates and screws followed by pin plates.

CONCLUSIONS

Plate-and-screw and pin-plate constructs are biomechanically superior in resisting RSL distraction compared with headless compression screws for RSL arthrodesis over 6 weeks of simulated ROM in the absence of healing.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results of this study demonstrated negligible arthrodesis site distraction in the plate-and-screws and pin-plate constructs when 6 weeks of ROM was simulated. When translated to a clinical scenario, these findings may allow earlier discontinuation of external immobilization after surgery.

Radioscapholunate fusion for posttraumatic osteoarthritis with consecutive excision of the distal scaphoid and the triquetrum: A comparative study

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes after radioscapholunate (RSL) fusion for posttraumatic osteoarthritis. This was a retrospective, dual-center study of all patients who underwent RSL fusion between 1995 and 2015 for posttraumatic radiocarpal osteoarthritis. Patients were assessed at the final review to determine clinical (pain, wrist range of motion and strength), self-reported (QuickDASH, PRWE and MWS scores) and radiological (degenerative osteoarthritis in the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) or midcarpal joint and radiocarpal fusion) outcomes. We analyzed three groups: RSL fusion alone, RSL fusion with distal scaphoid excision (DSE) and RSL fusion with DSE and triquetrum excision (TE). Eighty-five patients were included; 10 were lost to follow-up and 11 required conversion to total wrist fusion before the final review. Finally, 64 patients had both clinical and radiographic evaluations. The mean follow-up was 9.1 years (range 1-21.4). RSL fusion alone was performed in 29 patients, RSL fusion with DSE in 23 and RSL fusion with DSE and TE in 12. At the final follow-up, the three groups did not differ in their pain or wrist motion. Overall, 47 (73%) patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the procedure. DSE significantly decreased STT osteoarthritis and radiocarpal non-union. The total wrist osteoarthritis rate after RSL fusion was 55%. RSL fusion is an effective procedure to preserve some motion in wrists with posttraumatic radiocarpal osteoarthritis. DSE prevents STT osteoarthritis by removing bony impingement and increases the fusion rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Case series, Therapeutic studies.

Radioscapholunate Fusion for Radiocarpal Osteoarthritis: Prognostic Factors of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Background  Radioscapholunate (RSL) fusion is a surgical option to manage radiocarpal osteoarthritis. Many authors upgrade the procedure by adding distal scaphoid excision with or without excision of the triquetrum. Our objective was to identify the prognostic factors for good clinical and radiographic outcomes of RSL arthrodesis. Purpose  Distal scaphoid excision improves both scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal osteoarthritis and radiocarpal fusion, and excision of the triquetrum is not critical to achieving satisfactory outcomes. Methods  In this retrospective and bicentric investigation, all wrists were managed with RSL fusion for posttraumatic radiocarpal osteoarthritis. A total of 85 patients were included and evaluated at the revision by clinical (pain, wrist motion, and strength), functional (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation score, and Modified Mayo Wrist Score), and radiological (scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal, midcarpal osteoarthritis, and radiocarpal nonunion) examinations. We assessed prognostic factors for clinical and radiographic (osteoarthritis and nonunions) outcomes. Results  The average follow-up was 9.1 years (1-21.4). Work-related accidents adversely impacted the clinical outcomes, and distal scaphoid excision significantly improved them and decreased scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal osteoarthritis and nonunion. Neither distal scaphoid excision nor excision of the triquetrum influenced midcarpal osteoarthritis. Radiocarpal fusion was significantly promoted by memory staples and bone grafting. Discussion  Distal scaphoid excision should be preferred to improve the functional results while decreasing scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal osteoarthritis and radiocarpal nonunion rates. Excision of the triquetrum appears to be an alternative to radioulnar resection-arthroplasty to solve ulnocarpal impaction syndrome. Strict surgical procedure must be observed to promote RSL fusion combining solid bone fixation and the use of bone graft. Level of evidence  This is a level IV, case series, retrospective series.

Triquetrum Excision in Radioscapholunate Arthrodesis for Posttraumatic Radiocarpal Osteoarthritis With Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

Dependent on fracture type, concomitant carpal injuries, and operative treatment, distal radius fractures can lead to symptomatic radiocarpal osteoarthritis. In addition, radial shortening can cause ulnar impaction syndrome. Radiocarpal arthrodesis and ulnar shortening osteotomy are known and frequently applied surgical procedures for each of those pathologies. There are limited data concerning treatment options for a combined disorder. The presented technique in this article demonstrates that radioscapholunate arthrodesis with distal pole scaphoidectomy and total triquetrum excision successfully treats both symptomatic radiocarpal osteoarthritis and ulnar impaction syndrome without further surgery on the ulna.