The methodological requirements for clinical examination and patient-reported outcomes, and how to test them

Validity and reliability of the Thai functional internal rotation scale for shoulder arthroplasty

Background

The Functional Internal Rotation Scale is an excellent clinical tool for evaluating patients with shoulder arthroplasty, but it has not been adapted to the Thai version. The objectives of this study were to translate the English version and culturally adapt the Functional Internal Rotation Scale to the Thai version and to examine the psychometric properties of the Thai Functional Internal Rotation Scale among Thai participants having shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

The Functional Internal Rotation Scale was translated to Thai, including cross-cultural adaptations, following standard guidelines. Psychometric properties were evaluated with shoulder arthroplasty patients. Content validity was evaluated using the content validity index (CVI). Criterion validity was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. An Independent t-test was used to evaluate construct validity. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine test-retest reliability over a 14-day interval.

Results

Of 45 participants, 20 total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) patients and 25 reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) patients, the majority of participants were female (69%) and retired (91%) with a mean age of 72.9 years (SD 9.1). CVI evaluation was acceptable, with a total CVI of 0.92. The correlation of the Thai Functional Internal Rotation Scale with the Thai version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (Thai ASES) and the internal rotation subscale (IR subscale) of the Thai ASES was 0.73 (P < 0.001) and 0.75 (P < 0.001), respectively. For construct validity, TSA patients scored, on average, 10.8 points higher than RSA patients (43.7 vs. 32.9, P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval 6.3-15.3). Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the Thai Functional Internal Rotation Scale was 0.95. The test-retest reliability revealed excellent reliability (ICC 0.99).

Conclusion

The Thai Functional Internal Rotation Scale has good validity and excellent reliability in assessing internal rotation function in Thai shoulder arthroplasty patients.

Measuring symptoms severity in carpal tunnel syndrome: score agreement and responsiveness of the Atroshi-Lyrén 6-item symptoms scale and the Boston symptom severity scale

Purpose

To assess score agreement between the Atroshi-Lyrén 6-item symptoms scale and the Boston 11-item symptom severity scale and compare their responsiveness in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome before and after carpal tunnel release surgery.

Methods

This prospective cohort study included 3 cohorts that completed the A-L and Boston scales (conventional score 1–5) on the same occasion: a preoperative and short-term postoperative cohort (212 patients), a mid-term postoperative cohort (101 patients), and a long-term postoperative cohort (124 patients). Agreement was assessed with Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient and Passing-Bablok regression analysis. Analyses using item response theory were conducted on responses from the preoperative/short-term postoperative cohort including testing of item infit/outfit. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach alpha. Overall and sex-specific effect sizes were calculated using Cohen’s d.

Results

Lin’s CCCs were high (0.81–0.91). Passing-Bablok analysis showed constant and proportional differences in all cohorts except preoperative to short-term postoperative change. Both scales showed high reliability (alpha, 0.88–0.93). The IRT-based analyses showed infit/outfit values within the desired range. With IRT-based scoring, the A-L scale had significantly higher responsiveness than the Boston scale, overall (d, 2.02 vs 1.59), in women (d, 2.22 vs 1.77) and in men (d, 1.74 vs 1.36).

Conclusion

The Atroshi-Lyrén 6-item symptoms scale and the Boston 11-item symptom severity scale show good agreement but are not equivalent in measuring CTS-related symptoms severity. When using IRT-based scoring, the Atroshi-Lyrén scale demonstrated significantly higher responsiveness.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-03039-1.

Survival analysis and influence of the surgical aggression of a cohort of orthopedic and trauma patients in a non-controlled spread COVID-19 scenario

Background

Determining the infection rate and mortality probability in healthy patients who have undergone orthopedic and trauma surgeries (OTS) during a period of uncontrolled COVID-19 transmission may help to inform preparations for future waves. This study performed a survival analysis in a cohort of non-infected OTS patients and determined the effect of COVID-19 on mortality.

Methods

This observational study included 184 patients who underwent OTS in the month before surgical activities ceased and before the implementation of special measures. Four groups of surgery (GS) were established based on the location of the surgery and the grade of inflammation produced. Crude risk of infection and infection rates were assessed. Survival and failure functions by GS were analyzed. Comparison of the Kaplan-Meier survival curves by GS was assessed. Cox regression and Fine-Gray models were used to determine the effect of different confounders on mortality.

Results

The crude risk of COVID-19 diagnosis was 14.13% (95% CI: 9.83–19.90%). The total incidence rate was 2.67 (1000 person-days, 95% CI: 1.74–3.91). At the end of follow-up, there was a 94.42% chance of surviving 76 days or more after OTS. The differences in K-M survivor curves by GS indicated that GS 4 presented a lower survival function (Mantel-Cox test, p = 0.024; Wilcoxon-Breslow test, p = 0.044; Tarone-Ware test, p = 0.032). One of the best models to determine the association with mortality was the age-adjusted model for GS, high blood pressure, and respiratory history, with a hazard ratio of 1.112 in Cox regression analysis (95% CI: 1.005–1.230) and a sub hazard ratio of 1.111 (95% CI: 1.046–1.177) in Fine-Gray regression analysis for competitive risk.

Conclusions

The infection risk after OTS was similar to that of the general population in a community transmission area; the grade of surgical aggression did not influence this rate. The survival probability was extremely high if patients had not previously been infected. With higher grades of surgical aggression, the risk of mortality was higher in OTS patients. Adjusting for age and other confounders (e.g., GS, high blood pressure and respiratory history) was associated with higher mortality rates.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04303-8.

Self-Perceived Hand Normality Before and After Surgical Treatment of Dupuytren Contracture

PURPOSE

To describe patients' self-reported hand normality before and after surgery for Dupuytren contracture and to determine whether this metric could be used as an adjunct to determine the success of surgery.

METHODS

Preoperative and 1-year postoperative Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-level scores were collected prospectively over 5 years. Patients were asked "How normal is your hand?" Scores were recorded on a 100-point visual analog scale. Outcomes were available for 296 patients (77%).

RESULTS

Median hand normality score improved significantly from 50 to 86 after surgery. Effect size of the change in normality was 1.2 SDs. The change in normality score correlated significantly with the Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. No significant floor or ceiling effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study introduced the concept of self-perceived hand normality in Dupuytren disease. Hand normality improved after surgery for Dupuytren disease, and this score performed favorably compared with preexisting outcome measures, which suggests it may be a useful adjunct to gauge the success of surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study introduces the concept of self-perceived hand normality in patients undergoing surgery for Dupuytren disease and quantifies improvement observed after surgery.

A Global View of Digital Replantation and Revascularization

Survival rates of digital replantation vary in different regions and countries, and Asian surgeons see more challenging cases and have developed some unique methods. Replantation of multiple digits in one or both hands can follow a structure-by-structure method or a digit-by-digit method. For replanting all 10 digits, 3 or 4 teams should be organized. Flow-through flaps, often venous flaps, can be taken from the distal forearm or lower extremity to repair defects of soft tissues and arteries. A pedicled digital artery flap from the adjacent digit can also repair tissue defects and supply blood to the replanted digit.