A volar approach to on-top plasty for correction of radial polydactyly: a case series of 21 patients

Congenital Upper-Limb Differences: A 6-Year Literature Review

➤ The Oberg-Manske-Tonkin (OMT) classification of congenital hand and upper-limb anomalies continues to be refined as our understanding of the genetic and embryonic etiology of limb anomalies improves.➤ We have conducted an evaluation of graft and graftless techniques for syndactyly reconstruction; strengths and drawbacks exist for each technique.➤ Treatment for radial longitudinal deficiency remains controversial; however, radialization has shown promise in early follow-up for severe deformities.➤ Recent emphasis on psychosocial aspects of care has demonstrated that children with congenital upper-limb differences demonstrate good peer relationships and marked adaptability.

Recent Advancements in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Congenital Hand Differences

Congenital hand and upper limb differences include a wide spectrum of structural abnormalities that affect functional, appearance, and psychosocial domains of affected children. Ongoing advances in the understanding and treatment of these differences continue to shape management. Over the past 10 years, new developments have been made in areas of molecular genetics, noninvasive treatments, surgical techniques, and outcome measures in several commonly seen congenital hand differences. Applying these advances in knowledge and management of congenital hand differences will enable surgeons to achieve the best outcomes possible for these children.

Update of surgical treatment of polydactyly

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Polydactyly presents with variable extent of duplication and may involve preaxial/radial (hand)/medial (foot), postaxial/ulnar (hand)/lateral (foot) or central duplication. This review will summarize recent advancements in the surgical management of this common entity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Modifications to classification systems aim to help guide surgical management of polydactyly. Attempts have been made at quantifying preoperative angulation of the duplicated digits to minimize the chance of residual or recurrent deformity after surgical reconstruction. As a result, consideration should be given to the need for soft tissue correction vs. osteotomy to optimize the clinical outcome. On-top plasty is an option that may be beneficial in 'unequal' preaxial polydactyly, where neither duplicate is preferred on its own.

SUMMARY

Polydactyly is one of the most common congenital anomalies in the hands and feet. Determination of surgical intervention often begins with classification systems that exist, which primarily separate these into preaxial, postaxial, and central. Referral for surgical consideration is indicated, given the management is often surgical.

Surgical Results of Ulnar Component Excision and Radial Component Reconstruction in Patients With Preaxial Polydactyly of the Hand

PURPOSE

Resection of the underdeveloped digit and reconstruction of the robust digit is the standard treatment option for preaxial polydactyly of the hand. As an underdeveloped digit, the radial component is usually excised, whereas the ulnar component excision is rarely needed. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical results of ulnar component excision and radial component reconstruction in patients with preaxial polydactyly of the hand.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and radiographs of 809 patients (861 thumbs) who underwent surgery for preaxial polydactyly of the hand from November 2006 to June 2018. Among these, 22 (2.6%) thumbs in which the ulnar component was more hypoplastic or had more severe deformities than the radial component were treated with ulnar component excision and radial component reconstruction. The mean follow-up duration was 49 months (range, 12-142 months). We evaluated the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand scores and whether the patients were satisfied with the thumb function and appearance at the final follow-up. We also recorded any complications, such as reoperation.

RESULTS

The mean Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand score was 12.8 (range, 5-17). Six patients had poor results, 7 had fair results, and 2 had good results; however, none of the patients had an excellent result. Satisfaction with thumb function and appearance was reported in 11 (50%) and 6 (27%) cases, respectively. Thirteen of 22 (59.1%) cases involved reoperations, and the most common reason for reoperation was interphalangeal joint deviation of the remaining thumb.

CONCLUSIONS

Ulnar component excision and radial component reconstruction are rare operative choices in preaxial polydactyly of the hand. Surgeons and patients should be aware that a considerable number of patients treated with this method required reoperations and had low clinical outcome scores.

TYPE OF STUDY/ LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.