The distal radioulnar joint after distal radial fractures: when and how do we need to treat pain, stiffness or instability?

The reliability of clinical assessment of distal radioulnar joint instability among non-United Kingdom European surgeons

Clinical assessment of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability has been shown to be unreliable among experienced hand surgeons in the United Kingdom (UK). The aim of this study was to test the reliability of assessing DRUJ stability in European surgeons outside the UK. Four participants (eight wrists) with four unstable and four stable DRUJs as measured with a proven jig were assessed by 34 surgeons (22 men and 12 women) with a mean age of 43 years (range 29-61). Clinical assessment of DRUJ instability had a sensitivity of 32%, specificity of 88%, a positive predictive value of 72% and a negative predictive value of 56%. Surgeons who had attended a 1-hour workshop on clinical assessment of DRUJ stability the day before the testing were no more reliable at assessing DRUJ instability when compared with those who did not. This further highlights the need for better training with feedback when assessing the DRUJ and the need for objective assessment of DRUJ instability when reported in scientific studies.Level of evidence: V.

Round table discussion. Distal radioulnar joint instability after surgical treatment of distal radial fractures

Distal radioulnar joint instability is commonly seen after surgical fixation of a distal radial fracture, and surgeons' ability to reliably determine stability on examination is poor. Debate remains regarding whether to fix the ulnar styloid or reinsert the triangular fibrocartilaginous complex. Four surgeons with Level 5 expertise were asked to respond to questions surrounding this debate.

Analyzing the reduction quality of the distal radioulnar joint after closed K-wire transfixation in a cadaver model: is supination or neutral position superior?

INTRODUCTION

Distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instabilities are challenging and their optimal treatment is controversial. In special cases or when reconstruction of the stabilizing triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) fails, K-wire transfixation can be performed. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the rotational position of the forearm in which this should be done. Therefore, it was investigated whether anatomical reduction would best be achieved by transfixation in neutral position or supination of the forearm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve cadaveric upper limbs were examined before dissection of the DRUJ stabilizing ligaments and after closed transfixation in both positions by C-arm cone-beam CT. Whether this was first done in neutral position or in supination was randomized. The change in the radioulnar ratio (RR) in percentage points (%points) was analyzed using Student's t-test. RR was used since it is a common and sensitive method to evaluate DRUJ reduction, expressing the ulnar head's position in the sigmoid notch as a length ratio.

RESULTS

The analysis showed an increased change in RR in neutral position with 5.4 ± 9.7%points compared to fixation in supination with 0.2 ± 16.1%points, yet this was not statistically significant (p = 0.404).

CONCLUSIONS

Neither position leads to a superior reduction in general. However, the result was slightly closer to the anatomical position in supination. Thus, transfixation of the DRUJ should be performed in the position in which reduction could best be achieved and based on these data, that tends to be in supination. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings and to identify influential factors.

A proposed paradigm shift in the management of distal radius fractures

Background and objective

Distal radius fractures represent a remarkable orthopaedic entity. Most distal radius fractures can be treated conservatively with closed reduction and immobilisation with satisfactory results, while open reduction and internal fixation is reserved for displaced fractures. Our objective was to propose a paradigm shift in the management of distal radius fractures.

Methods

A literature search of management of distal radius fractures was conducted. PubMed and Cochrane databases were used for the search. English articles with open access or institutional subscription availability were included.

Key content and finding

Current literature supports operative management for younger active patients with defined radiographic inclusion parameters, but among the elderly there is little evidence of benefit. Most orthopaedic literature defines "elderly" as patients above 65 years of age. Non-surgical treatment for fractures of the distal radius tends to yield satisfactory functional results, and these favourable outcomes do not necessarily align with normal radiological parameters. For the minority of patients that have symptomatic malunion, corrective osteotomy is a good option to improve the function provided the symptoms can be clearly attributed to the malalignment.

Conclusion

The vast majority of distal radius fractures can be managed conservatively. Further studies are recommended to explore the feasibility of advocating for universal conservative treatment for patients with less functional demands while still having the option of staged surgery in the form of corrective osteotomy where there is symptomatic malunion amenable to anatomical correction. Future research should also aim to identify patients who would benefit most from surgical intervention by considering the type of functional recovery needed, rather than relying predominantly on the patient's chronological age as the determining factor in the decision-making process.