Safety and effectiveness of multi-antenna microwave ablation-oriented combined therapy for large hepatocellular carcinoma

Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Lenvatinib Plus Sequential Microwave Ablation for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Up-to-Seven Criteria: A Retrospective Cohort Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with Lenvatinib plus sequential microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond up-to-seven criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study assessed the medical records of patients with large HCC who underwent TACE combined with Lenvatinib plus sequential MWA (TLM) or TACE plus sequential MWA (TM). Lenvatinib was administered to patients within 3-5 days after TACE and sequential MWA was performed once they met the criteria for curative ablation after TACE or the combination therapy. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related complications were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 81 patients who underwent TLM or TM, 64 who met the eligibility criteria were included in this study. Among them, 28 patients underwent TLM and 36 underwent TM. The inverse probability weighting method (IPTW) was used to balance differences between two groups. The TLM group had longer PFS than the TM group (median, before IPTW: 18.53 vs. 5.62 months, p < 0.001; median, after IPTW: 28.27 vs. 5.30 months, p < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that TLM and the maximum tumor diameter were independent prognostic factors for PFS. The overall incidence rate of minor complications related to TACE or MWA was lower in the TLM group (32.1% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

TACE combined with Lenvatinib plus sequential MWA can prolong the progression-free survival of patients with large HCC beyond up-to-seven criteria.

CT-guided 125I brachytherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk locations after transarterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation: a propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ¹²⁵I brachytherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk locations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM), this retrospectively study analyzed 49 patients who underwent TACE +MWA+¹²⁵I brachytherapy (group A) and 98 patients who only received TACE +MWA (group B). The evaluated outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment complications. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis survival was used to compare the two groups.

RESULTS

The patients in group A showed a longer PFS than group B (7.9 vs. 3.3 months, P = 0.007). No significant differences were observed in median OS between the two groups (P = 0.928). The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate of tumors in high-risk locations, and the ORR of intrahepatic tumors were 67.3%, 93.9%, and 51.0%, respectively, in group A, and 38.8%, 79.6% and 29.6%, respectively, in group B (P < 0.001, P = 0.025 and P = 0.011, respectively). TACE-MWA-¹²⁵I (HR = 0.479, P < 0.001) was a significant favorable prognostic factor that affected PFS. The present of portal vein tumor thrombosis was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR = 1.625, P = 0.040). The Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage (BCLC C vs. B) was an independent factor affecting OS (HR = 1.941, P = 0.038). The incidence of complications was similar between the two groups, except that the incidence of abdominal pain was reduced in the group A (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

TACE-MWA-¹²⁵I resulted in longer PFS and better tumor control than did TACE-MWA in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk locations.

Single-session transarterial chemoembolization combined with percutaneous thermal ablation in liver metastases 3 cm or larger

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with percutaneous thermal ablation in patients with liver metastases 3 cm in diameter or larger.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 39 patients with a total of 46 liver metastases treated. There were 14 men and 25 women, with a mean age of 55 ± 13.3 (SD) (age range: 28-77 years). All patients were treated with a combination of TACE and thermal ablation in a single session. Primary outcome was local tumor progression. Secondary outcomes were procedure related complications and systemic disease progression.

RESULTS

Mean tumor size was 3.6 ± 0.6 (SD) cm (range: 3-5 cm). Conventional TACE was performed in 32 liver metastases (32/46; 70%) and drug-eluting beads-TACE in 14 liver metastases (14/46; 30%) followed by radiofrequency ablation in 34 (34/46; 74%), microwave ablation in 11 (11/46; 24%) and cryoablation in one (1/46; 2%) metastasis. Four grade 2 (4/39; 10%) complications were observed. After a mean follow up of 31.9 ± 26.1 (SD) months (range: 2-113 months) overall local tumor progression rate was 15% (7/46). Local tumor progression rate at 12 months was 13% (6/46). Overall systemic disease progression was seen in 29 patients (29/39; 74%) with a systemic disease progression rate at 12 months of 59% (23/39).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of large liver metastases with TACE and thermal ablation in a single session is safe and achieves high local control rate.

Update on Percutaneous Local Ablative Procedures for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

 Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common tumor worldwide. Because many hepatocellular carcinomas are already unresectable at the time of initial diagnosis, percutaneous tumor ablation has become established in recent decades as a curative therapeutic approach for very early (BCLC 0) and early (BCLC A) HCC. The aim of this paper is to provide a concise overview of the percutaneous local ablative procedures currently in use, based on their technical characteristics as well as clinical relevance, taking into account the current body of studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 The literature search included all original papers, reviews, and meta-analyses available via MEDLINE and Pubmed on the respective percutaneous ablation procedures; the primary focus was on randomized controlled trials and publications from the last 10 years.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

 Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are well-established procedures that are considered equal to surgical resection in the treatment of stage BCLC 0 and A HCC with a diameter up to 3 cm due to their strong evidence in international and national guidelines. For tumors with a diameter between 3 and 5 cm, the current S3 guidelines recommend a combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and thermal ablation using RFA or MWA as combination therapy is superior to thermal ablation alone in tumors of this size and shows comparable results to surgical resection in terms of overall survival. Alternative, less frequently employed thermal procedures include cryotherapy (CT) and laser ablation (LA). Non-thermal procedures include irreversible electroporation (IRE), interstitial brachytherapy (IBT), and most recently, electrochemotherapy (ECT). Due to insufficient evidence, these have only been used in individual cases and within the framework of studies. However, the nonthermal methods are a reasonable alternative for ablation of tumors adjacent to large blood vessels and bile ducts because they cause significantly less damage to these structures than thermal ablation methods. With advances in the technology of the respective procedures, increasingly good evidence, and advancements in supportive techniques such as navigation devices and fusion imaging, percutaneous ablation procedures may expand their indications for the treatment of larger and more advanced tumors in the coming years.

KEY POINTS

· RFA and MWA are considered equal to surgical resection as a first-line therapy for the curative treatment of stage BCLC 0 and A HCCs with a diameter of up to 3 cm.. · For HCCs with a diameter between 3 and 5 cm, a combination of TACE and RFA or MWA is recommended. This combination therapy yields results comparable to those of surgical resection in terms of overall survival.. · Due to insufficient evidence, alternative ablation methods have only been used in individual cases and within the framework of studies. However, nonthermal methods, such as IRE, IBT, and, most recently, ECT, are a reasonable alternative for ablation of HCCs adjacent to large blood vessels and bile ducts because they cause significantly less damage to these structures than thermal ablation methods..

CITATION FORMAT

· Luerken L, Haimerl M, Doppler M et al. Update on Percutaneous Local Ablative Procedures for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1768-0954.

Challenges Facing Percutaneous Ablation in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Extension of Ablation Criteria

As an emerging minimally invasive treatment method, percutaneous ablation is more and more widely used in the treatment of liver tumors. It has been recommended by guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as a curative treatment alongside surgical resection and liver transplantation. In recent years, with the continuous advancement and innovation of percutaneous ablation technologies, their clinical efficacy and safety have been significantly improved, which has led to the expanded application of percutaneous ablation in the treatment of HCC—more and more patients who were previously considered unsuitable for ablation therapies are now being treated with percutaneous ablation. Obviously, percutaneous ablation can reduce the risk of treatment changes from curative strategies to palliative strategies. Based on clinical practice experience, this review enumerates the advantages and disadvantages of different ablative modalities and summarizes the existing combinations of ablation techniques, thus will help clinicians choose the most appropriate ablative modality for each patient and will provide scientific guidance for improving prognosis and making evidence-based treatment decisions. In addition, we point out the challenges and future prospects of the ablation therapies, thereby providing direction for future research.

Stereotactic Percutaneous Electrochemotherapy as Primary Approach for Unresectable Large HCC at the Hepatic Hilum

Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a novel non-thermal ablative technique that combines chemotherapy and the application of electric pulses for reversible cell membrane electroporation. This method was recently performed in the treatment of deep-seated liver tumors during open surgery but experience about percutaneous ECT is rare and further developments like combination of percutaneous ECT with stereotactic navigated devices may be very promising. We report on a case of a 4.7 × 4.5 × 3.5 cm unresectable HCC at the hepatic hilum adjacent to the major vessels and the bile duct that was successfully treated using percutaneous ECT in combination with stereotactic navigation. Follow-up imaging 6 weeks and 6 months after ECT showed complete response.

Microwave ablation versus sorafenib for intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular carcinoma with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization refractoriness: a propensity score matching analysis

Purpose: To compared the benefits of sorafenib with microwave ablation (MWA) in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with tumor size ≤7 cm and tumor number ≤5 after Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) failure.Methods: A retrospective, single-center study was conducted using a one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and involved 52 intermediate-stage HCC patients with absence of evidence of intrahepatic vascular invasion and extrahepatic metastasis after TACE failure and underwent treatment with MWA or sorafenib between 2007 and 2019. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The factors with OS and PFS were determined by Cox regression.Results: Of the 52 patients included in our study, 30 (57.7%) underwent MWA and 22 (42.3%) received sorafenib. After PSM, 22 pairs were enrolled into different groups for further analysis. Patients in the MWA-group had a significantly longer median PFS than patients in the sorafenib-group on both before (median, 9.3 vs. 2.8 months, p = .001) and after PSM (median, 9.0 vs. 2.8 months, p = .006). They also had a significantly longer median OS than patients in the sorafenib-group on before (median, 48.8 vs. 16.6 months, p = .001) and after PSM (median, Not reached vs. 16.6 months, p = .001). Besides, Cox regression analysis showed that the treatment and age were the independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS (p＜0.05).Conclusions: MWA was superior to sorafenib in improving survival for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with tumor size ≤7 cm and tumor number ≤5 after TACE failure.Key PointsCompared with sorafenib, microwave ablation may be a more reasonable alternative treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with tumor size ≤7 cm and tumor number ≤5 after TACE refractoriness.The treatment (MWA vs sorafenib) and the age of patients were the independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with simultaneous DynaCT-guided microwave ablation in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the method and effectiveness of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with simultaneous DynaCT-guided Microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (SHCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2015 to May 2017, a total of 28 consecutive patients with SHCC received single treatment of TACE and 23 subjects received a combination treatment of TACE with simultaneous DynaCT-guided MWA. Following 1 month of treatment, the tumor response was assessed using the mRECIST criteria and the outcomes were analyzed including intervention-associated complications, changes in liver function, imaging response, and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100%. The rates of CR (65%) in the combined TACE and MWA group were higher than those of the TACE group (46%). The rate of common adverse events, such as liver abscess, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and liver dysfunction, in the combined TACE and MWA group (56%) was comparable to the corresponding rate of the TACE group (P > 0.411). The median and mean PFS of the TACE group were significantly lower than those of the combined TACE and MWA group (19.00 months vs. 29.00 months, 21.076 months vs. 24.693 months, p = 0.019, log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic DynaCT-guided MWA is a safe and effective method for the treatment of SHCC, which usually provides an effective tumor puncture path, notably for lesions that cannot be detected following TACE. Overall, the data suggested that this treatment method could improve the clinical outcome of patients with SHCC.