Safety and long-term outcomes of early gastric cardiac cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection in 499 Chinese patients

Lymph Node Metastasis and Its Risk Factors for Early Gastritis Individuals Who Underwent Noncurative Endoscopic Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

In the present review, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze possible lymph node metastasis (LNM) hazards in individuals with endoscopic resection of gastric cancer.

Methods

Relevant literature was selected by evaluating the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar electronic databases since from inception to March 2022. Corresponding clinicopathological outcomes were summarized, and pooled log odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were assessed. The random effect model was preferred if variations among studies is high otherwise fixed effect model was preferred.

Results

Overall, 12 associated papers, including 4808 early gastric cancer individuals who endured more surgery after noncurative endoscopic resection, were entered into this analysis. The outcomes showed that submucosal invasion (log odd ratio 1.75, 95% (CI): 0.77-3.95, I2 = 80.0%); vertical margin (log odd ratio 6.53, 95% (CI): 2.81-15.17, I2 = 65%); horizontal margin (log Odd ratio 0.69 95% (CI): 0.22-2.14, I2 = 52%), lymphatic invasion (Odd ratio 6.33 95% (CI): 1.98-20.24, I2 = 91%), and vascular invasion (Odd ratio 3.55, 95% (CI): 1.31-9.58, I2 = 92%) was significantly related to metastasis of lymph node for these patients.

Conclusion

There was a significant association of LNM hazards in individuals with endoscopic resection of gastric cancer. Therefore, invasion to lymph, vascular, submucosa and positive vertical margin should be strongly noticed when selecting surgical treatment factors.

Characteristics of early gastric tumors with different differentiation and predictors of long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is a common malignant tumor of the digestive tract, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the preferred treatment for early-stage gastric cancer. The analysis of the epidemiological characteristics of gastric mucosal tumors with different differentiation degrees and the influencing factors of long-term ESD efficacy may have certain significance for revealing the development of gastric cancer and ESD.

AIM

To analyze the features of gastric mucosal tumors at different differentiation levels, and to explore the prognostic factors of ESD.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 301 lesions in 285 patients at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from 2014 to 2021, according to the latest Japanese guidelines (sixth edition), and divided them into low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN), and differentiated and undifferentiated early carcinoma. They are followed up by endoscopy, chest and abdominal computed tomography at 3, 6 and 12 months after ESD. We compared clinicopathologic characteristics, ESD efficacy, and complications with different degrees of differentiation, and analyzed the related factors associated with ESD.

RESULTS

HGIN and differentiated carcinoma patients were significantly older compared with LGIN patients (P < 0.001) and accounted for more 0-IIc (P < 0.001), atrophic gastritis was common (P < 0.001), and irregular microvascular patterns (IMVPs) and demarcation lines (DLs) were more obvious (P < 0.001). There was more infiltration in the undifferentiated carcinoma tissue (P < 0.001), more abnormal folds and poorer mucosal peristalsis (P < 0.001), and more obvious IMVPs, irregular microsurface patterns and DLs (P < 0.05) than in the LGIN and HGIN tissues. The disease-free survival rates at 2, 5, and 8 years after ESD were 95.0%, 90.1%, and 86.9%, respectively. Undifferentiated lesions (HR 5.066), white moss (HR 7.187), incomplete resection (HR 3.658), and multiple primary cancers (HR 2.462) were significantly associated with poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Differentiations of gastric mucosal tumors have different epidemiological and endoscopic characteristics, which are closely related to the safety and efficacy of ESD.

Clinicopathological significance of intestinal metaplasia in endoscopically resected early gastric carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of intestinal metaplasia (IM) in endoscopically resected early gastric carcinoma (EGC).

METHODS

Altogether 136 consecutive cases with EGC resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection over 5 years were included and divided into the early gastric cardiac (EGCC; n = 60) and non-cardiac carcinoma (EGNCC; n = 76) groups. Goblet cell IM and subtypes were determined with histology and immunostaining. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared among various IM groups.

RESULTS

IM was identified in 128 (94.1%) EGC cases, including complete IM (n = 39), incomplete IM (n = 27), and mixed IM (n = 62). Incomplete IM was significantly more common in EGCC and exhibited a lower frequency of en bloc resection than the complete subtype. The frequency of synchronous or metachronous gastric tumor was significantly more common in EGCC with complete IM than in those with incomplete IM. Compared to EGC without IM, EGC with IM showed a significantly higher frequency of non-poorly cohesive carcinoma, en bloc resection, and non-eCuraC-1 grade. EGNCC with IM was significantly associated with negative resection margins and en bloc resection. The 5-year RFS was significantly lower in EGNCC patients with incomplete IM compared with those with mixed IM. The independent risk factors for RFS included tumor size >2 cm and eCuraC-1 grade.

CONCLUSIONS

Subtyping IM in EGC helped predict endoscopic resectability, prognosis, and risk of synchronous or metachronous gastric tumor. The significance of IM differed between EGCC and EGNCC. Large studies with longer follow-up are warranted to validate our findings.

Neural network-based prognostic predictive tool for gastric cardiac cancer: the worldwide retrospective study

BACKGROUNDS

The incidence of gastric cardiac cancer (GCC) has obviously increased recently with poor prognosis. It's necessary to compare GCC prognosis with other gastric sites carcinoma and set up an effective prognostic model based on a neural network to predict the survival of GCC patients.

METHODS

In the population-based cohort study, we first enrolled the clinical features from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data (n = 31,397) as well as the public Chinese data from different hospitals (n = 1049). Then according to the diagnostic time, the SEER data were then divided into two cohorts, the train cohort (patients were diagnosed as GCC in 2010-2014, n = 4414) and the test cohort (diagnosed in 2015, n = 957). Age, sex, pathology, tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) stage, tumor size, surgery or not, radiotherapy or not, chemotherapy or not and history of malignancy were chosen as the predictive clinical features. The train cohort was utilized to conduct the neural network-based prognostic predictive model which validated by itself and the test cohort. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was used to evaluate model performance.

RESULTS

The prognosis of GCC patients in SEER database was worse than that of non GCC (NGCC) patients, while it was not worse in the Chinese data. The total of 5371 patients were used to conduct the model, following inclusion and exclusion criteria. Neural network-based prognostic predictive model had a satisfactory performance for GCC overall survival (OS) prediction, which owned 0.7431 AUC in the train cohort (95% confidence intervals, CI, 0.7423-0.7439) and 0.7419 in the test cohort (95% CI, 0.7411-0.7428).

CONCLUSIONS

GCC patients indeed have different survival time compared with non GCC patients. And the neural network-based prognostic predictive tool developed in this study is a novel and promising software for the clinical outcome analysis of GCC patients.

Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes between early gastric cardiac and non-cardiac cancers: a retrospective single-center study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) between early gastric cardiac cancer (EGCC) and early gastric non-cardiac cancer (EGNCC), and investigate associated risk factors for non-curative resection.

METHODS

Early gastric cancer (EGC) patients who underwent ESD from January 2015 to September 2020 in Beijing Friendship Hospital were consecutively enrolled. The clinical, histopathological and endoscopic data were retrospectively analyzed. The study was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800017117).

RESULTS

Among 500 patients with 534 EGC lesions, 117 patients with 118 lesions were allocated to the EGCC group, and 383 patients with 416 lesions to the EGNCC group. The rates of en bloc resection, complete resection and curative resection in the EGCC group were 97.5%, 78.8% and 71.2%, respectively, significantly lower than those in the EGNCC group (99.8%, 94.5% and 90.4%, p = .010, <.001 and <.001). Among non-curative resected lesions, EGCC had more cases in both endoscopic curability (eCura) C-1 and C-2 groups than EGNCC (10.2% and 18.6% vs. 2.4% and 7.2%, p < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size (OR 2.393, 95% CI 1.388-4.126) and submucosal invasion (OR 11.498, 95% CI 3.759-35.175) were risk factors for non-curative resection in the EGCC group. For EGCC larger than 3 cm, none achieved curative resection, 86.7% were classified as eCura C-2 and 46.7% exhibited deep submucosal infiltration.

CONCLUSIONS

The curative resection rate of ESD for EGCC was lower than that for EGNCC. ESD for EGCC larger than 3 cm should be cautiously considered.

Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer

Simple Summary

Conventional gastrectomy combined with regional lymph node dissection has been the standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). This retrospective case–control study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and surgical resection for EGC in China. After propensity score-matching, there were no significant differences between the two groups for OS, RFS, and DSS. Additionally, with similar R0 resection and recurrence rates, the ESD group showed less blood loss, fewer adverse events, lower hospital cost, and a shorter operative time and hospital duration than the surgery group. Therefore, ESD can be a first-line treatment of EGC in addition to surgery.

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a preferred treatment option for early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of ESD and surgical resection for EGC. Methods: This was a retrospective case–control study. Patients with a diagnosis of EGC who underwent ESD or surgery in our hospital from 2011 to 2020 were enrolled. We compared the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of these two groups according to propensity score-matching. The primary outcome comparison was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and treatment-related events. Results: In the matched cohort, the ESD group showed comparable OS, RFS, and DSS with the surgery group. Statistical differences were shown in blood loss and adverse events. Furthermore, the ESD group showed lower hospital cost, as well as a shorter operative time and hospital duration than the surgery group. The R0 resection and recurrence rates were similar between the two groups. In Cox regression analysis, age, tumor size, poor differentiation, and lymphovascular invasion were regarded as independent factors of OS. Conclusions: With sufficient safety and advantages, ESD can be a first-line treatment of EGC. Preoperative evaluation is vital to the appropriate treatment and prognosis.