Self-assessment of treatment targets in patients with inflammatory bowel disease using a survey

Review article: Translating STRIDE-II into clinical reality - Opportunities and challenges

BACKGROUND

With the introduction of novel therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), 'treat-to-target' strategies are increasingly discussed to improve short- and long-term outcomes in patients with IBD.

AIM

To discuss opportunities and challenges of a treat-to-target approach in light of the current 'Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease' (STRIDE-II) consensus METHODS: The 2021 update of STRIDE-II encompasses 13 evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for treat-to-target strategies in adults and children with IBD. We highlight the potential implications and limitations of these recommendations for clinical practice.

RESULTS

STRIDE-II provides valuable guidance for personalised IBD management. It reflects scientific progress as well as increased evidence of improved outcomes when more ambitious treatment goals such as mucosal healing are achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective studies, objective criteria for risk stratification, and better predictors of therapeutic response are needed to potentially render 'treating to target' more effective in the future.

A survey on the impact of IBD in sexual health: Into intimacy

Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) are at increased risk of psychological and physical burden, including sexual dysfunction (SD). This study aimed to assess the prevalence of SD and to identify its predictive factors, in IBD patients. This unicentric cross-sectional case-control survey (ratio 2:1) included patients followed at the day hospital IBD consultation, in the Gastroenterology department of a tertiary referral center, for 2 years. Participants received anonymous questionnaires, concerning basic characteristics and sexual function, and a questionnaire on anxiety and depression, body image, fatigue, and IBD-specific health-related quality of life (QoL). We analyzed data from 120 IBD patients and 60 healthy controls. Forty-two female (56.8%) and 6 male (14.6%) IBD patients, and 6 women (15%) and 2 males (10%) of the control group presented SD. SD was significantly higher in IBD patients with age between 18 and 30 and 51 and 60 than in healthy controls (P < .05) Regarding multivariate analysis, age was a predictive factor for SD in males (P = .014), and anxiety and depression (P = .002) and fatigue (P = .043) in females. SD is a predictor of lower QoL among IBD patients, considering the last 15 (P < .001) and 60 days (P = .001), regarding univariate analysis. SD (P = .007), body image distortion (P < .001), and fatigue (P = .004) were predictors of low QoL (last 15 days, multivariate analysis). SD was more prevalent in IBD patients than in the control group and impacted negatively the QoL of patients. Age was a predictive factor for SD in men while anxiety and depression, and fatigue were predictive of SD in women.

Adherence improvement in patients with ulcerative colitis: a multidisciplinary consensus document

OBJECTIVES

1)To analyze evidence about poor adherence / non-adherence including their prevalences, associated factors, and interventions in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients; 2)To provide a framework to improve poor adherence / non-adherence.

METHODS

A qualitative approach was applied. A literature review was performed using Medline. Primary searches were performed with Mesh and free texts to identify articles that analyzed prevalence, causes, associated factors, and interventions designed to improve poor adherence/ non-adherence in UC patients. The studies' quality was evaluated using the Oxford scale. The results were presented and discussed in a nominal group meeting, comprising a multidisciplinary committee of six gastroenterologists, one psychologist, one nurse, and one patient. Several overarching principles and recommendations were generated. A consensus procedure was implemented via a Delphi process during which each committee member produced a score ranging from 0 = totally disagree to 10 = totally agree. Agreement was considered if at least 70% of the participants voted ≥7.

RESULTS

The literature review included 75 articles. Non-adherence rates ranged from 7%-72%. We found a great variability in the methods employed to assess adherence, associated factors, and interventions designed to improve adherence. Overall, eight overarching principles and six recommendations were generated, all of them achieving the pre-established agreement level, including, among others, the identification, classification, and management of non-adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor adherence / non-adherence are common in UC patients, being a relevant clinical concern. Health professionals should address this issue and actively involve the patients in implementing effective and individualized interventions to improve adherence.