Disease activity 4.5 years after starting cladribine: experience in 264 patients with multiple sclerosis

Effects of cladribine on intrathecal and peripheral B and plasma cells

INTRODUCTION

Cladribine is a deoxyadenosine analogue that can penetrate the blood-brain barrier. It is used to treat multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the mechanistic understanding of the effect of this highly effective therapy on B cells and plasma cells in the central nervous system compartment is limited. The CLADRIPLAS study examined the effect of cladribine on peripheral and intrathecal B and plasma cell biology in people with MS.

METHODS

Thirty-eight people with progressive MS ineligible for- or rejecting-treatment with licenced therapies were recruited and supplied a baseline lumbar puncture. Those exhibiting gadolinium-enhancing or new/enlarging T2 magnetic resonance imaging lesions and/or elevated neurofilament levels were offered subcutaneous cladribine (Litak®). Seven people were eligible; one person died before treatment, and only five completed the first year of treatment. Twenty-two ineligible people were willing to provide a repeat lumbar puncture 12 months later.

RESULTS

The CLADRIPLAS study found no evidence of a difference in the odds of a positive cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal band result between the cladribine-treated and untreated group. This is probably explained by microarray and in vitro studies, which demonstrated that plasmablasts and notably long-lived plasma cells are relatively resistant to the cytotoxic effect of cladribine compared with memory B cells at physiological concentrations. This was consistent with the loss of intracellular deoxycytidine kinase during antibody-secreting cell differentiation.

CONCLUSION

CLADRIPLAS indicates that cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal bands are not rapidly eliminated in most people with MS. This may be explained by the relative lack of direct cytotoxic action of cladribine on long-lived plasma cells.

Identifying Cladribine prescription pattern in MS: an Italian multicentre study

Background

Characterizing Cladribine tablets prescription pattern in daily clinical practice is crucial for optimizing multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment.

Objectives

To describe efficacy, safety profile and new disease-modifying therapy (DMT) prescriptions following Cladribine treatment.

Design

Independent retrospective cohort study in patients followed at six Italian MS centres.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with relapsing MS (RMS) according to 2017 McDonald criteria, who initiated Cladribine between January 2019 and May 2023, were included. A generalized linear regression model was built for the outcome DMT after Cladribine course. Heatmaps were generated based on weighted pivot tables to visualize the proportion of patients requiring DMT post-Cladribine.

Results

A total cohort of 352 patients was enrolled, 134 naïve to any DMT, 218 switchers from other DMTs. The last DMT was an injectable first-line DMT for 48 (22%) patients, oral first-line DMT for 141 (64.7%) patients, SP1 inhibitor-Fingolimod for 23 (10.6%) patients, and Natalizumab for 6 (2.7%) patients. Overall, Cladribine was efficacious and well tolerated, 12% of patients required a new DMT prescription after a median time of 24 months. The regression model revealed that patients aged >40 years at Cladribine prescription had a 16% decrease in likelihood of receiving a new DMT. Heatmaps showed patients previously on Fingolimod had a lower rate (72.2%) of being free from therapy after Cladribine.

Conclusion

In our multicentric real-world Italian study, Cladribine therapy is generally effective during the investigated follow-up period. Understanding key characteristics of patients responding best to Cladribine can help tailor therapeutic strategies for optimal outcomes.

Treatment continuation with cladribine at 5 years after initiation in people with multiple sclerosis: A case series and literature review

BACKGROUND

Cladribine is an oral disease-modifying drug approved for the treatment of highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). The recommended number of treatment courses is two, with the courses given 1 year apart (i.e., in year 1 and year 2), followed by 2 years without treatment. Pivotal clinical trials showed that, compared with placebo, cladribine significantly reduced relapse rates, risk of disability progression and magnetic resonance imaging measures of disease activity for up to 4 years in treatment-naïve or -experienced adults with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). The management of patients and requirement for retreatment with cladribine beyond year 4 is unclear.

METHODS

We describe the treatment history and outcomes of three people with MS retreated with cladribine, given as a third course 5 years after treatment initiation. We also include a review of evidence on retreatment with cladribine from year 3 onwards and a discussion of patient selection criteria for retreatment.

RESULTS

The cases included a 53-year-old female patient with RRMS, a 43-year-old female patient with RRMS, and a 42-year-old male patient with RRMS. Six months after the third course of cladribine, all three patients were relapse-free and stable on magnetic resonance imaging, with no evidence of disease activity. At 11-12 months follow-up, all patients had clinical and radiological stability (i.e., no evidence of disease activity).

CONCLUSION

Continuation of oral cladribine treatment may be considered for people with MS beyond year 5 following completion of the initial two courses. Our real-world experience is ongoing and additional data are required to obtain insight into patient phenotypes which predict response to cladribine treatment.

De-escalation and Discontinuation of Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Long-term use of multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is standard practice to prevent accumulation of disability. Immunosenescence and other age-related changes lead to an altered risk-benefit ratio for older patients on DMTs. This article reviews recent research on the topic of de-escalation and discontinuation of MS DMTs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Observational and interventional studies have shed light on what happens to patients who de-escalate or discontinue DMTs and the factors, such as age, treatment type, and presence of recent disease activity, that influence outcomes. Though many questions remain, recent findings have been valuable for the development of an evidence-based approach to making de-escalation and discontinuation decisions in MS.

Holistic, Long-Term Management of People with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis with Cladribine Tablets: Expert Opinion from France

Cladribine tablets (CladT) has been available for therapeutic use in France since March 2021 for the management of highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). This high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) acts as an immune reconstitution therapy. In contrast to most high-efficacy DMTs, which act via continuous immunosuppression, two short courses of oral treatment with CladT at the beginning of years 1 and 2 of treatment provide long-term control of MS disease activity in responders to treatment, without the need for any further pharmacological treatment for several years. Although the labelling for CladT does not provide guidance beyond the initial treatment courses, real-world data on the therapeutic use of CladT from registries of previous clinical trial participants and patients treated in routine practice indicate that MS disease activity is controlled for a period of years beyond this time for a substantial proportion of patients. Moreover, this clinical experience has provided useful information on how to initiate and manage treatment with CladT. In this article we, a group of expert neurologists from France, provide recommendations on the initiation of CladT in DMT-naïve patients, how to switch from existing DMTs to CladT for patients with continuing MS disease activity, how to manage patients during the first 2 years of treatment and finally, how to manage patients with or without MS disease activity in years 3, 4 and beyond after initiating treatment with CladT. We believe that optimisation of the use of CladT beyond its initial courses of treatment will maximise the benefits of this treatment, especially early in the course of MS when suppression of focal inflammation in the CNS is a clinical priority to limit MS disease progression.