1
|
Werner BC, Lin A, Lenters TR, Lutton D, Creighton RA, Port J, Doody S, Metcalfe N, Knopf D. Influence of backside seating parameters and augmented baseplate components in virtual planning for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:1352-1359. [PMID: 38081473 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary goal of this investigation was to examine the influence of a backside seating percentage variable on volume of reamed bone and contact area in virtual planning for glenoid baseplate placement for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). The secondary goal was to assess how the option of augmented glenoid baseplate components affected reamed volume and cortical contact area of virtually positioned baseplates. METHODS Nine surgeons virtually planned 30 RTSA cases using a commercially available software system. The 30 cases were chosen to span a spectrum of glenoid deformity. The study consisted of 3 phases. In phase 1, cases were planned with the backside seating percentage blinded and without the option of augmented baseplate components. In phase 2, the backside seating parameter was unblinded. In phase 3, augmented baseplate components were added as an option. Implant version and inclination were recorded. By use of computer-assisted design models, total volume of bone reamed, as well as reamed cortical volume and cancellous volume, was calculated. Total, cortical, and cancellous baseplate contact areas were also calculated. Finally, total glenoid lateralization was calculated for each phase and compared. RESULTS Mean implant version was clinically similar across phases but was statistically significantly lower in phase 3 (P = .006 compared with phase 1 and P = .001 compared with phase 2). Mean implant inclination was clinically similar across phases but was statistically significantly lower in phase 3 (P < .001). Phase 3 had statistically significantly lower cancellous and total reamed bone volumes compared with phase 1 and phase 2 (P < .001 for all comparisons). Phase 3 had statistically significantly larger cortical contact area, lower cancellous contact area, and larger total contact area compared with phase 1 and phase 2 (P < .001 for all comparisons). Phase 3 had significantly greater glenoid lateralization (mean, 10.5 mm) compared with phase 1 (mean, 7.8 mm; P < .001) and phase 2 (mean, 7.9 mm; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Across a wide range of glenoid pathology during virtual surgical planning, experienced shoulder arthroplasty surgeons chose augmented baseplates frequently, and the option of a full-wedge augmented baseplate resulted in statistically significantly greater correction of glenoid deformity, improved total and cortical baseplate contact area, less cancellous reamed bone, and greater glenoid lateralization. Backside seating information does not have a significant impact on how glenoid baseplates are virtually positioned for RTSA, nor does it impact the baseplate contact area or volume of reamed bone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Albert Lin
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - David Lutton
- Washington Circle Orthopaedic Associates, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Joshua Port
- University Orthopaedics Center, Altoona, PA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jennewine BR, James NF, Polio WP, Naser AM, Nieboer MJ, Schoch BS, Throckmorton TW, Bernholt DL, Azar FM, Brolin TJ. Superior humeral head osteophytes are associated with rotator cuff insufficiency in glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a retrospective analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & TRAUMATOLOGY : ORTHOPEDIE TRAUMATOLOGIE 2024; 34:893-900. [PMID: 37770594 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03727-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The primary goal of this study was to investigate whether superior humeral head osteophyte (SHO) size is associated with rotator cuff insufficiency, including rotator cuff tear (RCT), supraspinatus tendon thickness, and fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles. METHODS Patients ≥ 18 years who were diagnosed with glenohumeral osteoarthritis were retrospectively reviewed. SHO size was determined by radiograph. MRI measured SHO and RCT presence, type, and size; supraspinatus tendon thickness; and fatty infiltration of rotator cuff musculature. RESULTS A total of 461 patients were included. Mean SHO size was 1.93 mm on radiographs and 2.13 mm on MRI. Risk ratio for a RCT was 1.14. For each 1-mm increase in SHO size on radiograph, supraspinatus tendon thickness decreased by 0.20 mm. SHO presence was associated with moderate-to-severe fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus with a risk ratio of 3.16. CONCLUSION SHOs were not associated with RCT but were associated with higher risk of supraspinatus FI and decreased tendon thickness, which could indicate rotator cuff insufficiency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenton R Jennewine
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, 1211 Union Avenue, Suite 510, Memphis, TN, 38104, USA
| | - Nicholas F James
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, 1211 Union Avenue, Suite 510, Memphis, TN, 38104, USA
| | - William P Polio
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, 1211 Union Avenue, Suite 510, Memphis, TN, 38104, USA
| | - Abu Mohd Naser
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Micah J Nieboer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Bradley S Schoch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Thomas W Throckmorton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, 1211 Union Avenue, Suite 510, Memphis, TN, 38104, USA
| | - David L Bernholt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, 1211 Union Avenue, Suite 510, Memphis, TN, 38104, USA
| | - Frederick M Azar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, 1211 Union Avenue, Suite 510, Memphis, TN, 38104, USA
| | - Tyler J Brolin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, 1211 Union Avenue, Suite 510, Memphis, TN, 38104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sudah SY, Faccone RD, Imam N, Patankar A, Manzi JE, Menendez ME, Nicholson A. Poor evidence is used to support commercial payers' coverage policies for shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:2222-2231. [PMID: 37247779 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty has continued to increase over the past decade. In response, commercial payers have implemented strategies to control the medical requirement of these surgeries in attempt to contain the growing costs. For example, most payers require a prolonged trial of conservative management prior to shoulder arthroplasty for patients who may otherwise be surgical candidates. However, little is known regarding the evidence used to support these indications. The purpose of this study was to analyze the references used by commercial payers to substantiate their coverage policies for shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS Ten of the leading commercial payers for total shoulder arthroplasty were identified. Publicly available coverage policies were searched on the internet or requested directly from the payer via email or telephone. Cited references were reviewed independently by two authors for type of document, level of evidence, and mention of the efficacy of conservative management. RESULTS A total of 5 coverage policies were obtained with 118 references. The most common reference type was primary journal article (n = 70; 59.3%) followed by review or expert opinion articles (n = 35; 29.7%). Most references were of level IV evidence (n = 60; 52.2%), with only 6 (5.2%) of level I or II evidence. Only 4 (3.5%) references mentioned the efficacy of conservative management in patients who may be candidates for shoulder arthroplasty. CONCLUSION The majority of references used to substantiate the coverage policies for shoulder arthroplasty among major commercial payers within the United States are of low scientific evidence and fail to demonstrate the success of required nonoperative intervention strategies. Our study underscores the need for high-quality, comparative trials that evaluate the outcomes of conservative management vs. shoulder arthroplasty in end-stage glenohumeral osteoarthritis patients in order to determine the most cost-effective treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suleiman Y Sudah
- Department of Orthopedics, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, USA.
| | - Robert D Faccone
- Department of Research, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, AL, USA
| | - Nareena Imam
- Department of Orthopedics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Aneesh Patankar
- Department of Orthopedics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Joseph E Manzi
- Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Mariano E Menendez
- Oregon Shoulder Institute at Southern Oregon Orthopedics, Medford, OR, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lukasiewicz P, McFarland E, Hassebrock JD, McCarthy TP, Sylvia SM, McCarty EC, Weber SC. Anatomic glenohumeral arthroplasty: State of the art. J ISAKOS 2023; 8:296-305. [PMID: 37207983 DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty in its modern form where it reproduces the normal shoulder has been utilized clinically for more than half a century. As the technology and the designs have changed to recreate the humeral and glenoid sides of the joint, the sophistication of design has resulted in the growing number of cases annually worldwide. This increase is due in part to the increasing number of indications that the prosthesis can treat with successful results. On the humeral side, there have been design changes to better reflect the proximal humeral anatomy, and humeral stems are increasingly placed safely without cement. Platform systems which allow conversion of a failed arthroplasty to a reverse configuration without stem extraction is another design change. Similarly, there has been increasing utilization of short stem and stemless humeral components. Extensive experience with shorter stem and stemless devices, however, has yet to demonstrate the purported advantages of these devices, as recent studies have demonstrated equivalent blood loss, fracture rates, operative times, and outcome scores. Easier revision with these shorter stems remains to be definitively established, with only one study comparing the ease of revision between stem types. On the glenoid side, hybrid cementless glenoids, inlay glenoids, cementless all-polyethylene glenoids, and augmented glenoids have all been investigated; however, the indications for these devices remain unclear. Lastly, innovative surgical approaches to implanting shoulder arthroplasty and the use of patient specific guides and computerized planning, while interesting concepts, still await validation before they are utilized on a widespread basis. While reverse shoulder arthroplasty has been increasingly used to reconstruct the arthritic shoulder, anatomic glenohumeral replacement maintains a significant role in the armamentarium of the shoulder surgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Lukasiewicz
- Division of Shoulder Surgery, the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Edward McFarland
- Division of Shoulder Surgery, the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Hassebrock
- The University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Timothy P McCarthy
- The University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Stephen M Sylvia
- The University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Eric C McCarty
- The University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Stephen C Weber
- Division of Shoulder Surgery, the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schiffman CJ, Prabhakar P, Hsu JE, Shaffer ML, Miljacic L, Matsen FA. Assessing the Value to the Patient of New Technologies in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103:761-770. [PMID: 33587515 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.20.01853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Publications regarding anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) have consistently reported that they provide significant improvement for patients with glenohumeral arthritis. New TSA technologies that have been introduced with the goal of further improving these outcomes include preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans, 3-dimensional preoperative planning, patient-specific instrumentation, stemless and short-stemmed humeral components, as well as metal-backed, hybrid, and augmented glenoid components. The benefit of these new technologies in terms of patient-reported outcomes is unknown. METHODS We reviewed 114 articles presenting preoperative and postoperative values for commonly used patient-reported metrics. The results were analyzed to determine whether patient outcomes have improved over the 20 years during which new technologies became available. RESULTS The analysis did not identify evidence that the results of TSA were statistically or clinically improved over the 2 decades of study or that any of the individual technologies were associated with significant improvement in patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Additional research is required to document the clinical value of these new technologies to patients with glenohumeral arthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corey J Schiffman
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Pooja Prabhakar
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jason E Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Ljubomir Miljacic
- The Mountain-Whisper-Light Statistical Consulting, Seattle, Washington
| | - Frederick A Matsen
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|