Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus nab-paclitaxel for patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy

Targeting mitotic regulators in cancer as a strategy to enhance immune recognition

Eukaryotic DNA has evolved to be enclosed within the nucleus to protect the cellular genome from autoinflammatory responses driven by the immunogenic nature of cytoplasmic DNA. Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase (cGAS) is the cytoplasmic dsDNA sensor, which upon activation of Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING), mediates production of pro-inflammatory interferons (IFNs) and interferon stimulated genes (ISGs). However, although this pathway is crucial in detection of viral and microbial genetic material, cytoplasmic DNA is not always of foreign origin. It is now recognised that specifically in genomic instability, a hallmark of cancer, extranuclear material in the form of micronuclei (MN) can be generated as a result of unresolved DNA lesions during mitosis. Activation of cGAS-STING in cancer has been shown to regulate numerous tumour-immune interactions such as acquisition of 'immunologically hot' phenotype which stimulates immune-mediated elimination of transformed cells. Nonetheless, a significant percentage of poorly prognostic cancers is 'immunologically cold'. As this state has been linked with low proportion of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), improving immunogenicity of cold tumours could be clinically relevant by exhibiting synergy with immunotherapy. This review aims to present how inhibition of vital mitotic regulators could provoke cGAS-STING response in cancer and improve the efficacy of current immunotherapy regimens.

Revalidation of the ATTRACTION-4 study in a real-world setting: a multicenter, retrospective propensity score matching study in China

Background

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy have been successfully used in clinical trials to treat advanced gastric cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in Chinese patients are unknown.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective study included patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) negative advanced gastric cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy or chemotherapy with an ICI between January 2019 and December 2022. Propensity score matching was used to compare progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, objective response rates, and adverse reactions between cohorts.

Results

After propensity score matching, 138 patients, who had balanced baseline characteristics, were included in the chemotherapy and combination treatment groups. The median follow-up duration was 16.90 months, and the median PFS was 8.53 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.77-9.28) in the combination treatment group and 5.97 months (95% CI 4.56-7.37) in the chemotherapy group. The median survival duration was 17.05 months (95% CI 14.18-19.92) in the combination treatment group and 16.46 months (95% CI 12.99-19.93) in the chemotherapy group. The PFS subgroup analysis revealed that age ≥65 years, women, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1, non-signet ring cell carcinoma, esophagogastric junction, liver metastasis, peritoneal metastasis, no massive ascites, only one metastatic organ, and combined platinum-based chemotherapy correlated with treatment benefit. The incidences of adverse events above grade 3 were comparable between groups.

Conclusions

Our study confirmed the ATTRACTION-4 trial results. Compared with chemotherapy, first-line ICIs combined with chemotherapy prolonged PFS but did not improve overall survival in patients with HER-2-negative advanced gastric cancer.

Immune-related adverse events associated with nab-paclitaxel/paclitaxel combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective

The combination of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX)/paclitaxel (PTX) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has demonstrated significant efficacy in cancer patients. However, the safety of these combination regimens remains conflicting in former researches. Therefore, in order to address this issue, we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate and compare the safety profile.

Methods

We performed a systematic review by searching randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science up to August 15, 2022. The primary outcomes were all-grade (grade 1-5) and high-grade (grade 3-5) immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Secondary outcomes were all-grade (grade 1-5) and high-grade (grade 3-5) irAEs of subgroups of ICIs.

Results

There were 22 RCTs included in the NMA, involving a total of 15 963 patients diagnosed with any type of cancer. ICIs+nab-PTX was associated with a noticeably decreased risk of grade 3-5 pneumonitis (odds ratio [OR]=0.28, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.09,0.90) compared to ICI monotherapy; ICIs+PTX showed a lower risk of grade 1-5 hyperthyroidism (OR=0.46, 95% CrI: 0.22-0.96) and grade 1-5 hypothyroidism (OR=0.49, 95% CrI: 0.26-0.93) than ICIs. Compared with PD-1, PD-1+PTX was associated with a statistically significantly lower risk of grade 1-5 pneumonitis (OR=0.32, 95% CrI: 0.11-0.92). PD-L1 resulted in a noticeably lower risk of grade 1-5 hypothyroidism (OR=0.34, 95% CrI: 0.12-1.00) than PD-L1+PTX. Nearly all treatment regimens containing ICIs demonstrated significantly higher risks of irAEs compared to the standard chemotherapy groups.

Conclusion

Nab-PTX/PTX+ICIs demonstrated an approach leading to decreased risk of irAEs compared with ICI monotherapy. This finding supports that ICIs+nab-PTX/PTX may be a safer treatment strategy. Moreover, we also found that the combination regimens containing ICIs had a higher risk of irAEs than standard chemotherapy. Additionally, ICIs+nab-PTX demonstrated a decreased risk of irAEs compared to ICIs+PTX. PD-1 inhibitors were associated with a higher risk of irAEs than PD-L1 inhibitors.

Efficacy and safety of serplulimab plus nab-paclitaxel in previously treated patients with PD-L1-positive advanced cervical cancer: a phase II, single-arm study

Objective

We report the efficacy and safety of serplulimab, a novel humanized anti-programmed death-1 antibody, plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel in previously treated patients with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced cervical cancer.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with PD-L1-positive (combined positive score ≥1) cervical cancer were enrolled in this single-arm, open-label, phase II study. They were given serplulimab 4.5 mg/kg for up to 2 years (35 dosing cycles) plus nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2 for up to six cycles once every 3 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety and objective response rate (ORR) assessed by independent radiological review committee (IRRC) per RECIST version 1.1. Secondary endpoints included ORR assessed by the investigator, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

Between December 2019 and June 2020, 52 patients were screened and 21 were enrolled. IRRC-assessed ORR was 57.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 34.0-78.2%); 3 (14.3%) patients achieved complete response and 9 (42.9%) partial response. The median DOR was not reached (NR) (95% CI 4.1-NR). IRRC-assessed median PFS was 5.7 months (95% CI 3.0-NR), and median OS was 15.5 months (95% CI 10.5-NR). Investigator-assessed ORR was 47.6% (95% CI 25.7-70.2%). Seventeen (81.0%) patients experienced grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Grade ≥3 adverse drug reactions were reported in 7 (33.3%) patients. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 12 (57.1%) patients.

Conclusions

In previously treated patients with PD-L1-positive advanced cervical cancer, serplulimab plus nab-paclitaxel provided durable clinical activity and a manageable safety profile.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04150575.

Could S-1-based non-platinum doublet chemotherapy be a new option as a second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients? A multicenter retrospective study

Background

For patients who have contraindications to or have failed checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy remains the standard second-line option to treat non-oncogene-addicted advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of S-1-based non-platinum combination in advanced NSCLC patients who had failed platinum doublet chemotherapy.

Methods

During January 2015 and May 2020, advanced NSCLC patients who received S-1 plus docetaxel or gemcitabine after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy were consecutively retrieved from eight cancer centers. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. By using the method of matching-adjusted indirect comparison, the individual PFS and OS of included patients were adjusted by weight matching and then compared with those of the docetaxel arm in a balanced trial population (East Asia S-1 Trial in Lung Cancer).

Results

A total of 87 patients met the inclusion criteria. The ORR was 22.89% (vs. 10% of historical control, p < 0.001) and the DCR was 80.72%. The median PFS and OS were 5.23 months (95% CI: 3.91–6.55 months) and 14.40 months (95% CI: 13.21–15.59 months), respectively. After matching with a balanced population in the docetaxel arm from the East Asia S-1 Trial in Lung Cancer, the weighted median PFS and OS were 7.90 months (vs. 2.89 months) and 19.37 months (vs. 12.52 months), respectively. Time to start of first subsequent therapy (TSFT) from first-line chemotherapy (TSFT > 9 months vs. TSFT ≤ 9 months) was an independent predictive factor of second-line PFS (8.7 months vs. 5.0 months, HR = 0.461, p = 0.049). The median OS in patients who achieved response was 23.5 months (95% CI: 11.8–31.6 months), which was significantly longer than those with stable disease (14.9 months, 95% CI: 12.9–19.4 months, p < 0.001) or progression (4.9 months, 95% CI: 3.2–9.5 months, p < 0.001). The most common adverse events were anemia (60.92%), nausea (55.17%), and leukocytopenia (33.33%).

Conclusions

S-1-based non-platinum combination had promising efficacy and safety in advanced NSCLC patients who had failed platinum doublet chemotherapy, suggesting that it could be a favorable second-line treatment option.

Cancer nanomedicine toward clinical translation: Obstacles, opportunities, and future prospects

With the integration of nanotechnology into the medical field at large, great strides have been made in the development of nanomedicines for tackling different diseases, including cancers. To date, various cancer nanomedicines have demonstrated success in preclinical studies, improving therapeutic outcomes, prolonging survival, and/or decreasing side effects. However, the translation from bench to bedside remains challenging. While a number of nanomedicines have entered clinical trials, only a few have been approved for clinical applications. In this review, we highlight the most recent progress in cancer nanomedicine, discuss current clinical advances and challenges for the translation of cancer nanomedicines, and provide our viewpoints on accelerating clinical translation. We expect this review to benefit the future development of cancer nanotherapeutics specifically from the clinical perspective.

Combined atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in the treatment of triple negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis on their efficacy and safety

Background

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is clinically aggressive breast cancer with a poor prognosis. Approximately 20% of TNBC has been found to express programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), making it a potential therapeutic target. As a PD-L1 inhibitor, atezolizumab is a recently approved immunotherapeutic drug for TNBC, this meta-analysis (MA) was aimed to review the randomized controlled trial studies (RCTs) of combined atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in the treatment of TNBC and synthesize the evidence-based results on its effectiveness and safety.

Method

We searched PubMed, Embase, EBSCOhost and ClinicalTrials.gov for the eligible RCTs which compared the efficacy and safety of combined atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel with nab-paclitaxel alone. The outcomes analyzed included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse effects (AEs).

Results

A total of six RCTs were included in this MA. For efficacy, although OS was not significantly prolonged with combined atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel (HR 0.90, 95% CI [0.79, 1.01], p=0.08), this combination therapy significantly improved PFS (HR 0.72, 95% CI [0.59, 0.87], p=0.0006) and ORR (RR 1.25, 95% CI [0.79, 1.01] p<0.00001). For safety, any AEs, haematological, gastrointestinal, and liver AEs showed no statistically significant differences between the atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel combination group and nab-paclitaxel alone group. However, serious AEs, high grade, dermatological, pulmonary, endocrine, and neurological AEs were significantly lower with nab-paclitaxel alone compared to atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel combined (p-value range from <0.00001 to 0,02).

Conclusion

Atezolizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel was associated with improved outcomes in the treatment of TNBC; however, this combination resulted in more toxicity compared to nab-paclitaxel alone. While nab-paclitaxel alone produced chemotherapy-related AEs, the combination of atezolizumab with nab-paclitaxel produced AEs, especially immune-related AEs such as haematological, pulmonary, endocrine, and neurological AEs.

Trial registration

This research work of systematic review has been registered on PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42022297952).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10225-y.

Curcumin Suppresses the Progression of Colorectal Cancer by Improving Immunogenic Cell Death Caused by Irinotecan

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Irinotecan (IRI) is a common chemotherapeutic drug for colorectal cancer; however, the mechanism underlying its immunomodulatory effect remains unclear. Curcumin (CUR), an adjuvant drug with anti-inflammatory and antitumor effects, has been studied extensively, although its synergistic antitumor effect remains unclear. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The effects of CUR and IRI on oxidative stress and their antitumor effects were detected by flow cytometry. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-related proteins including CHOP and BiP, and immunogenic cell death (ICD) proteins including calreticulin (CALR) and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), were detected by Western blotting. IFN-γ and TNF-α levels in the serum of mice were detected by ELISA. <b><i>Results:</i></b> IRI in combination with CUR had synergistic antitumor effects in CT-26 colon carcinoma cells. Combination treatment with IRI and CUR was more effective than IRI or CUR alone. IRI and CUR combination treatment significantly upregulated ICD-related proteins including CALR and HMGB1 and had a greater antitumor effect than IRI or CUR single treatment in vivo. CUR may synergistically improve the antitumor effect of IRI by promoting the ICD effect. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Combination therapy with IRI and CUR may be an option for first-line chemotherapy in some patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Identification of immunophenotypes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on immune gene sets

PURPOSE

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a malignant tumor with high heterogeneity. Research on molecular mechanisms involved in the process of tumor origination and progression is extremely limited to investigating mechanisms of molecular typing for ESCC.

METHODS

After comprehensively analyzing the gene expression profiles in The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus databases, we identified four immunotypes of ESCC (referred to as C1-C4) based on the gene sets of 28 immune cell subpopulations. The discrepancies in prognostic value, clinical features, drug sensitivity, and tumor components between the immunotypes were individually analyzed.

RESULTS

The ranking of immune infiltration is C1 > C4 > C3 > C2. These subtypes are characterized by high and low expression of immune checkpoint proteins, enrichment and insufficiency of immune-related pathways, and differential distribution of immune cell subgroups. Poorer survival was observed in the C1 subtype, which we hypothesized could be caused by an immunosuppressive cell population. Fortunately, C1's susceptibility to anti-PD-1 therapy offers hope for patients with poor prognosis in advanced stages. On the other hand, C4 is sensitive to docetaxel, which may offer novel treatment strategies for ESCC in the future. It is worth noting that immunophenotyping is tightly bound to the abundance of stromal components and stem cells, which could explain the tumor immune escape to some extent. Ultimately, determination of hub genes based on the C1 subtypes provides a reference for the discovery of immunotarget drugs against ESCC.

CONCLUSION

The identification of immunophenotypes in our study provides new therapeutic strategies for patients with ESCC.

Clickable Albumin Nanoparticles for Pretargeted Drug Delivery toward PD-L1 Overexpressing Tumors in Combination Immunotherapy

We present a simple methodology to design a pretargeted drug delivery system, based on clickable anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) antibodies (Abs) and clickable bovine serum albumin (BSA) nanoparticles (NPs). Pretargeted drug delivery is based on the decoupling of a targeting moiety and a drug-delivering vector which can then react in vivo after separate injections. This may be key to achieve active targeting of drug-delivering NPs toward cancerous tissue. In pretargeted approaches, drug-delivering NPs were observed to accumulate in a higher amount in the targeted tissue due to shielding-related enhanced blood circulation and size-related enhanced tissue penetration. In this work, BSA NPs were produced using the solvent precipitation methodology that renders colloidally stable NPs, which were subsequently functionalized with a clickable moiety based on chlorosydnone (Cl-Syd). Those reactive groups are able to specifically react with dibenzocyclooctyne (DBCO) groups in a click-type fashion, reaching second-order reaction rate constants as high as 1.9 M^-1·s^-1, which makes this reaction highly suitable for in vivo applications. The presence of reactive Cl-Syd was demonstrated by reacting the functionalized NPs with a DBCO-modified sulfo-cyanine-5 dye. With this reaction, it was possible to infer the number of reactive moieties per NPs. Finally, and with the aim of demonstrating the suitability of this system to be used in pretargeted strategies, functionalized fluorescent NPs were used to label H358 cells with a clickable anti-PD-L1 Ab, applying the reaction between Cl-Syd and DBCO as corresponding clickable groups. The results of these experiments demonstrate the bio-orthogonality of the system to perform the reaction in vitro, in a period as short as 15 min.

Synergistic effect of Abraxane that combines human IL15 fused with an albumin-binding domain on murine models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Nab‐paclitaxel (Abraxane), which is a nanoparticle form of albumin‐bound paclitaxel, is one of the standard chemotherapies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study determined the effect of Abraxane in combination with a fusion protein, hIL15‐ABD, on subcutaneous Panc02 and orthotopic KPC C57BL/6 murine PDAC models. Abraxane combined with hIL15‐ABD best suppressed tumour growth and produced a 40%–60% reduction in the tumour size for Panc02 and KPC, compared to the vehicle group. In the combination group, the active form of interferon‐γ (IFN‐γ)‐secreting CD8⁺ T cells and CD11b⁺CD86⁺ M1 macrophages in tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were increased. In the tumour drainage lymph nodes (TDLNs) of the combination group, there was a 18% reduction in CD8⁺IFN‐γ⁺ T cells and a 0.47% reduction in CD4⁺CD25⁺FOXP3⁺ regulatory T cells, as opposed to 5.0% and 5.1% reductions, respectively, for the control group. Superior suppression of CD11b⁺GR‐1⁺ myeloid‐derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and the induction of M1 macrophages in the spleen and bone marrow of mice were found in the combination group. Abraxane and hIL15‐ABD effectively suppressed NF‐κB‐mediated immune suppressive markers, including indoleamine 2,3‐dioxygenase (IDO), Foxp3 and VEGF. In conclusion, Abraxane combined with hIL15‐ABD stimulates the anticancer activity of effector cells, inhibits immunosuppressive cells within the tumour microenvironment (TME) of PDAC, and produces a greater inhibitory effect than individual monotherapies.

Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel and PD-1 inhibitor (sintilimab) combination therapy for soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study

Background

There is increasing evidence that combination therapy with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor is safe and efficacious in treating many types of malignant tumors. However, clinical data demonstrating the effect of this treatment combination for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are currently limited.

Methods

The clinical data of patients with metastatic STS who received nab-paclitaxel plus PD-1 inhibitor (sintilimab) therapy between January 2019 and February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The effectiveness and safety of the combined treatment were evaluated in terms of the median progression-free survival (PFS), estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The univariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the relationship between clinicopathological parameters and PFS. All statistical analyses were two-sided; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 28 patients treated with nab-paclitaxel plus sintilimab were enrolled in this study. The objective response rate was 25%, the disease control rate was 50%, and the median PFS was 2.25 months (95% CI = 1.8–3.0 months). The most common grade 1 or 2 adverse events (AEs) were alopecia (89.3%; 25/28), leukopenia (25.0%; 7/28), fatigue (21.4%; 6/28), anemia (21.4%; 6/28), and nausea (21.4%; 6/28). The most common grade 3 AEs were neutropenia (10.7%; 3/28) and peripheral neuropathy (10.7%; 3/28). No grade 4 AEs were observed. Among the present study cohort, patients with angiosarcoma (n = 5) had significantly longer PFS (P = 0.012) than patients with other pathological subtypes, including undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 7), epithelioid sarcoma (n = 5), fibrosarcoma (n = 4), synovial sarcoma (n = 3), leiomyosarcoma (n = 2), pleomorphic liposarcoma (n = 1), and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 1); those who experienced three or more AEs had significantly longer median PFS than those who experienced less than three AEs (P = 0.018).

Conclusion

Nab-paclitaxel plus PD-1 inhibitor is a promising treatment regimen for advanced STS. Randomized controlled clinical trials are required to further demonstrate its efficacy and optimal application scenario.

Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); a new frontier

Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy has become a promising therapeutic strategy with encouraging therapeutic outcomes due to their durable anti-tumor effects. Though, tumor inherent or acquired resistance to ICIs accompanied with treatment-related toxicities hamper their clinical utility. Overall, about 60-70% of patients (e.g., melanoma and lung cancer) who received ICIs show no objective response to intervention. The resistance to ICIs mainly caused by alterations in the tumor microenvironment (TME), which in turn, supports angiogenesis and also blocks immune cell antitumor activities, facilitating tumor cells' evasion from host immunosurveillance. Thereby, it has been supposed and also validated that combination therapy with ICIs and other therapeutic means, ranging from chemoradiotherapy to targeted therapies as well as cancer vaccines, can capably compromise tumor resistance to immune checkpoint blocked therapy. Herein, we have focused on the therapeutic benefits of ICIs as a groundbreaking approach in the context of tumor immunotherapy and also deliver an overview concerning the therapeutic influences of the addition of ICIs to other modalities to circumvent tumor resistance to ICIs.

Various Uses of PD1/PD-L1 Inhibitor in Oncology: Opportunities and Challenges

The occurrence and development of cancer are closely related to the immune escape of tumor cells and immune tolerance. Unlike previous surgical, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapy, tumor immunotherapy is a therapeutic strategy that uses various means to stimulate and enhance the immune function of the body, and ultimately achieves the goal of controlling tumor cells.With the in-depth understanding of tumor immune escape mechanism and tumor microenvironment, and the in-depth study of tumor immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors represented by Programmed Death 1/Programmed cell Death-Ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors are becoming increasingly significant in cancer medication treatment. employ a variety of ways to avoid detection by the immune system, a single strategy is not more effective in overcoming tumor immune evasion and metastasis. Combining different immune agents or other drugs can effectively address situations where immunotherapy is not efficacious, thereby increasing the chances of success and alternative access to alternative immunotherapy. Immune combination therapies for cancer have become a hot topic in cancer treatment today. In this paper, several combination therapeutic modalities of PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors are systematically reviewed. Finally, an analysis and outlook are provided in the context of the recent advances in combination therapy with PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors and the pressing issues in this field.

Evaluation of efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab combined with or without docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC

Background

The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and chemotherapy has been clinically confirmed to be beneficial as the first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. This study aimed to assess the effect of nivolumab + docetaxel versus nivolumab monotherapy in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy.

Materials and methods

The efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab + docetaxel combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy were compared in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

Results

Between November 2017 and December 2019, 77 patients were included in this study, with 58 patients in the nivolumab group and 19 in the nivolumab + docetaxel group. The median follow-up was 18 months, and the PFS was 8 months for patients receiving nivolumab + docetaxel and 2 months for those receiving nivolumab alone (p = 0.001), respectively. Nivolumab + docetaxel showed superior OS compared with nivolumab, with the median OS unreached versus 7 months (p = 0.011). Among patients without EGFR/ALK variation, compared to nivolumab monotherapy, nivolumab + docetaxel showed better PFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p  = 0.05). There was no significant difference in grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) between the two groups (p = 0.253).

Conclusions

The combination of nivolumab and docetaxel demonstrated a meaningful improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival compared to nivolumab monotherapy, in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy, irrespective of EGFR/ALK variation status.