Comparative risk of serious and fatal treatment-related adverse events caused by 19 immune checkpoint inhibitors used in cancer treatment: a network meta-analysis

The Clinical Analysis of Checkpoint Inhibitor Pneumonitis with Different Severities in Lung Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of immunotherapy would lead to the temporary or permanent discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Among them, checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is a potentially life-threatening irAE. This study aimed to identify the differences between patients with low-grade CIPs (grades 1-2) and high-grade CIPs (grades 3-5) and to explore the prognostic factors. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 916 lung cancer patients who were treated with ICIs. Patients with CIPs were identified after multidisciplinary discussion, and their clinical, laboratory, radiological, and follow-up data were analyzed. Among the 74 enrolled CIP patients, there were 31 low-grade CIPs and 43 high-grade CIPs. Compared with low-grade CIP patients, patients with high-grade CIPs were older (65.8 years vs. 61.5 years) and had lower serum albumin (35.2 g/L vs. 37.9 g/L), higher D-dimer (5.1 mg/L vs. 1.7 mg/L), and more pulmonary infectious diseases (32.6% vs. 6.5%) during follow-up. In addition, complication with pulmonary infectious diseases, management with intravenous immunoglobulin, tocilizumab, and longer duration of large dosage corticosteroids might be associated with worse outcomes for patients with CIPs. This study highlights potential risk factors for high-grade CIP and poor prognosis among lung cancer patients who were treated with anti-cancer ICIs.

Comparative severe dermatologic toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors in malignant melanoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have advanced the therapeutic landscape for malignant melanoma patients. However, they can cause permanent and irreversible dermatologic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that may lead to interruption of ICI treatment or become life-threatening. To assess the risk of severe dermatologic irAEs (grade 3 or higher) among ICIs for advanced melanoma, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

Phase II/III randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) involving ICIs were retrieved from various databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. These trials were published from the inception of databases to October 15, 2022. In addition, the risk of severe dermatologic irAEs associated with ICI types and doses was evaluated and compared by NMA.

RESULTS

This study included 20 Phase II/III RCTs with a total of 10 575 patients. The results indicated that ICIs carry a higher risk of severe dermatologic irAEs compared to chemotherapy. Additionally, the combinational therapy of Nivolumab + Ipilimumab was associated with a higher risk than ICI monotherapy. Comparatively, the latest treatment option involving dual ICI therapy with Relatlimab + Nivolumab showed a lower toxicity risk, but higher than Ipilimumab alone. Lastly, Nivolumab, at a dose of 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, was observed as the lowest-risk dosing regimen for severe dermatologic irAEs in patients with advanced melanoma.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that Nivolumab (1 mg/kg) + Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) administered every 3 weeks should be used cautiously in patients with advanced melanoma at high risk for dermatologic irAEs. While we recommend the preferred regimen of Nivolumab (dose = 3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks).

Adverse events induced by durvalumab and tremelimumab combination regimens: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown remarkable therapeutic outcomes among cancer patients. Durvalumab plus tremelimumab (DT) is under investigation as a new ICI combination therapy, and its efficacy has been reported in various types of cancer. However, the safety profile of DT remains unclear, especially considering rare adverse events (AEs).

Objective

We aimed to assess the frequency of AEs associated with DT.

Design

This study type is a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data Sources and Methods

Four databases were searched for articles. Randomized trials, single-arm trials, and prospective and retrospective observational studies were included. The type of cancer, previous treatment, and performance status were not questioned. Major AE indicators such as any AE and the pooled frequency of each specific AE were used as outcomes. As a subgroup analysis, we also compared cases in which DT was performed as first-line treatment with those in which it was performed as second-line or later treatment. The protocol for this systematic review was registered on the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center website (ID: UMIN000046751).

Results

Forty-one populations including 3099 patients were selected from 30 articles. Pooled frequencies of key AE indicators are shown below: any AEs, 77.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 67.9-87.6]; grade ⩾ 3 AEs, 29.3% (95% CI: 24.2-34.4); serious AEs, 34.9% (95% CI: 28.1-41.7); AE leading to discontinuation, 13.3% (95% CI: 9.3-17.4); treatment-related deaths, 0.98% (95% CI: 0.5-1.5). AEs with a frequency exceeding 15% are shown below: fatigue, 30.1% (95% CI: 23.8-36.3); diarrhea, 21.7% (95% CI: 17.8-25.6); pruritus 17.9% (95% CI: 14.4-21.3); decreased appetite, 17.7% (95% CI: 13.7-22.0); nausea, 15.6% (95% CI: 12.1-19.6). There were no significant differences in these pooled frequencies between subgroups.

Conclusions

The incidence of any AE in DT therapy was approximately 78%, and the incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was approximately 30%, which was independent of prior therapy.

Impact of Immune-Related Adverse Events on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treated Cancer Patients' Survival: Single Center Experience and Literature Review

Immune-related adverse events have emerged as a new challenge and its correlation with survival remains unclear. The goal of our study was to investigate the effect of irAE on survival outcomes in solid tumor patients receiving ICI treatment. This was a retrospective, single-center study at a university hospital involving patients with malignancy who received immune checkpoint inhibitors. Chart review was performed on each patient, noting any irAE, including new events or worsening of previous autoimmune condition after starting treatment with ICI. A total of 155 patients were included, 118 (76.1%) were male, with median age of 64 years. Median follow up time was 36 months. Seventy patients (45.2%) had at least one irAE. Of all irAE, nine (8.1%) were classified as grade 3 or higher according to the CTCAE version 5.0. There was one death secondary to pneumonitis. Median ICI cycles until first irAE onset was 4 (range: 2-99). The objective response rate was higher for patients who developed irAE (18.7% vs. 9.0%; p = 0.001), as was median overall survival (18 months (95% CI, 8.67-27.32) vs. 10 (95% CI, 3.48-16.52) months; p < 0.016) and progression free survival (10 months (95% CI, 5.44-14.56) vs. 3 months (95% CI, 1.94-4.05); p = 0.000). The risk of death in patients with irAE was 33% lower when compared to patients without such events (hazard ratio (HR): 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.99; p = 0.043). Development of irAE predicted better outcomes, including OS in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with ICI. Further prospective studies are needed to explore and validate this prognostic value.

The safety of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy for the treatment of solid tumors: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective

Combination treatment regimens consisting of both immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and chemotherapeutic agents have emerged as the standard of care for a range of cancers. This network meta-analysis (NMA) examined the toxicity profiles and safety rankings of these different ICI-based combination regimens.

Methods

The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published as of March 1, 2022 comparing two or more treatment regimens in which at least one arm was comprised of an ICI + platinum-based chemotherapeutic regimen. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade and AEs of grade 3 or higher were the primary endpoints for this analysis, while specific AE types were secondary endpoints. This NMA combined both direct and indirect comparisons when analyzing odds ratios (ORs) and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for different ICI-based treatment regimens.

Results

In total, 33 RCTs enrolling 19,012 cancer patients were included in this NMA. Of the analyzed regimens, avelumab + chemotherapy and camrelizumab + chemotherapy were associated with a significantly greater risk of AEs of any grade relative to ipilimumab + chemotherapy, durvalumab + chemotherapy, or pembrolizumab + chemotherapy. No significant differences in the risk of AEs of grade 3 or higher were observed when comparing different ICI regimens. Hepatotoxicity and pyrexia were the most common AEs associated with atezolizumab + chemotherapy treatment. Ipilimumab + chemotherapy was associated with a relatively higher risk of gastrointestinal and skin toxicity. Skin toxicity and hypothyroidism were the major AEs associated with nivolumab + chemotherapy. Fatigue and pneumonia were the most common AEs respectively associated with sugemalimab + chemotherapy and pembrolizumab + chemotherapy regimens.

Conclusions

Of the evaluated regimens, camrelizumab + chemotherapy and avelumab + chemotherapy were associated with significantly higher rates of AEs of any grade, whereas durvalumab and sintilimab were relatively safe PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors, respectively, when administered in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy. However, none of the evaluated ICI + chemotherapy regimens exhibited any differences with respect to the incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs, offering guidance that may be of value in routine clinical practice.

Adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with digestive system cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To study the incidence and distribution of adverse events in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for digestive system cancers and to provide a reference for the safe, rational, and effective use of immune detection site inhibitors.

Methods

We searched for articles published in English between January 1, 2010, and May 18, 2022. All clinical trials of ICI-based therapies for digestive system cancers were investigated, including only randomized controlled trials that reported data on the overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) or immune-related adverse reactions (irAEs) or tables.

Results

We searched 2048 records, of which 21 studies (7108 patients) were eligible for inclusion. The incidence of ICI trAEs of any grade was 82.7% (95% CI 73.9-90.0), and the incidence of grade 3 or higher trAEs was 27.5% (95% CI 21.3-34.1). The pooled rate of ICI irAEs of any grade was 26.3% (95% CI 11.8-44.0), and the incidence of grade 3 or higher irAEs was 9.4% (95% CI 1.1-24.6). In multivariate analysis, the incidence, characteristics, and distribution of AEs varied by cancer type, combination therapy modality (single/two-drug), and different agent types.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis summarizes AEs associated with ICI in digestive system cancers. The incidence, characteristics, and distribution of AEs vary by cancer type, combination therapy modality, and different agent types. These findings can be considered for the early identification of AEs and provide effective interventions to reduce the severity of these patients. It can provide a clinical reference and may contribute to clinical practice.

Pulmonary adverse events following immune checkpoint inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have rapidly become a mainstay of cancer treatment. However, immune modulation resulting from checkpoint inhibition can cause inflammation in any organ system, with pneumonitis being one of the most severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Here, we review the most recent literature on pulmonary adverse events following ICIs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses of data from trials of antiprogrammed death-1 (PD-1; nivolumab, pembrolizumab), anti-PD-ligand-1 (PD-L1; atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab) and anticytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4; ipilimumab or tremelimumab) in patients with advanced cancer have explored the relative risk and incidence of lung toxicity among different tumor types and therapeutic regimens. They have showed that the incidence of all-grade (1-4) and high-grade (3-4) pneumonitis is significantly higher in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with other tumor types. In addition, they have demonstrated that immunotherapy, especially monoimmunotherapy, has a significantly lower risk of irAEs compared to immune-chemotherapy. Treatment for lung cancer, preexisting interstitial lung disease, smoking history and male sex appear to increase the risk for ICI-related pneumonitis.

SUMMARY

Lung toxicity is an uncommon but potentially severe and even fatal complication of ICIs. Timely recognition is critically important but challenging, particularly in patients with lung cancer wherein drug toxicity can mimic disease progression or recurrence.

Adverse events induced by nivolumab and ipilimumab combination regimens

Background:

No meta-analysis has assessed the pooled frequencies of adverse events (AEs) induced by concomitant nivolumab plus ipilimumab regimen for anticancer-medications-naïve malignancies. Furthermore, no meta-analysis has compared detailed safety profiles between four doses of nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks (N3I1) and four doses of nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (N1I3). Objectives of this study was estimating AE frequencies, and comparison of AE frequencies between N3I1 and N1I3 regimens.

Methods:

Four major electronic databases were searched; both interventional and observational studies were included. All primary cancer types were permitted. Patients should not have been previously treated with any anti-cancer medications. The frequency of AEs was pooled using a random-model meta-analysis using the generic inverse variance method. Protocol registration: UMIN000044090.

Results:

Forty articles representing 48 populations with 4,677 patients were included in the study. The pooled frequencies for key indicators were as follows: any AE, 81.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 77.5-85.1); grade 3 or higher AE, 40.6% (95% CI: 35.7–45.5); serious AE, 32.7% (95% CI: 22.4–43.1); AE leading to discontinuation, 28.3% (95% CI: 23.7–32.8); and treatment-related death, 0.7% (95% CI: 0.4–1.1). AEs with the highest incidence were fatigue (27.9%, 95% CI: 22.6–33.3), followed by diarrhea (26.0%, 95% CI: 21.5–30.5), pruritus (24.6%, 95% CI: 20.3–28.8), rash (24.0% 95% CI: 19.3–28.7), and elevated aspartate aminotransferase (21.2%, 95% CI: 14.9–27.5). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that N3I1, compared to N1I3, less frequently induced any AE (N1I3 95.7%, N3I1 84.5%, p = 0.003), grade 3 or higher AE (N1I3 64.3%, N3I1 35.7%, p < 0.001), and serious AE (N1I3 61.4%, N3I1 47.8%, p = 0.004).

Conclusions:

Approximately 40% of patients had grade 3 or higher AE. The N3I1 regimen was substantiated to trigger fewer any AEs, high grade AEs, and serious AE than the N1I3 regimen.

The effect of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors on the risk of pneumonitis for solid tumours: a meta-analysis of phase III randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become one of the standard treatment options for solid tumours; however, treatment-related adverse events, including pneumonitis, sometimes disrupt the ongoing treatment. To evaluate the impact of ICI addition on the risk of pneumonitis, a meta-analysis was conducted.

METHODS

Phase III randomised controlled trials comparing ICIs and conventional therapy with conventional therapy alone were selected by searching databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. The odds ratio (OR) of any grade and grade III-V pneumonitis was calculated. Meta-analysis was performed to compare the incidence of pneumonitis between the treatment arm with additional ICIs and the arm with conventional therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 25 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) representing 16,343 patients for grade I-V and 23 RCTs with 15,006 patients for grade III-V pneumonitis were analysed. Adding ICIs was associated with a significant increase in pneumonitis (grade I-V: OR, 2.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.12-3.37, grade III-V: OR, 1.83, 95% CI: 1.26-2.65). In subgroup analyses based on the mechanism of action of ICIs, cancer types (lung and non-lung cancer) and each ICI, no significant difference in heterogeneity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding ICIs to the conventional treatment for solid tumours significantly increased both grade I-V and grade III-V pneumonitis regardless of the mechanisms of ICIs and cancer type. These results would be helpful for oncologists to choose the appropriate treatment options using ICIs, particularly for patients with known risk factors of pneumonitis or interstitial lung disease.

Fatal Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have previously been reported to have a promising potential in terms of the improvement of outcomes in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Fatal adverse events (FAEs) of ICIs are relatively uncommon, and the incidence and risk in NSCLC remain unclear. In the present study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of FAEs in NSCLC patients administered with ICIs.

Methods: Potentially relevant studies were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library database from inception to September 16, 2020. The systematic review and meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials that reported treatment-related FAEs in NSCLC. The pooled incidence and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated to evaluate prospective risk.

Results: Twenty clinical trials that included a total of 13,483 patients were selected for the meta-analysis. The overall incidence of FAEs was 0.65% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.31–1.07, I² = 50.2%] in ICI monotherapy, 1.17% (95% CI = 0.74–1.69, I² = 56.3%) in chemotherapy, and 2.01% (95% CI = 1.42–2.69, I² = 5.9%) in the combination therapy (ICI and chemotherapy). ICI monotherapy was associated with lower incidence of FAEs caused by blood system disorders (RR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.07–0.73, P = 0.013, I² = 0%) and infectious diseases (RR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.13–0.63, P = 0.002, I² = 0%). The incidence of pneumonitis significantly increased in immunotherapy (RR = 5.72, 95% CI = 1.14–28.80, P = 0.03, I² = 0%).

Conclusions: The results of the present study demonstrate that ICI monotherapy decreases the risk of FAEs, whereas the combined regimens with chemotherapy have the opposite tendency as compared to conventional chemotherapy. While the patients who received chemotherapy suffered the risks of death mainly from myelosuppression and infection, those who received immunotherapy were mainly threatened by immune-related pneumonitis.

Exosomal PD-L1: New Insights Into Tumor Immune Escape Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies

As a classical immune checkpoint molecule, PD-L1 on the surface of tumor cells plays a pivotal role in tumor immunosuppression, primarily by inhibiting the antitumor activities of T cells by binding to its receptor PD-1. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have demonstrated unprecedented promise in treating various human cancers with impressive efficacy. However, a significant portion of cancer patients remains less responsive. Therefore, a better understanding of PD-L1-mediated immune escape is imperative. PD-L1 can be expressed on the surface of tumor cells, but it is also found to exist in extracellular forms, such as on exosomes. Recent studies have revealed the importance of exosomal PD-L1 (ExoPD-L1). As an alternative to membrane-bound PD-L1, ExoPD-L1 produced by tumor cells also plays an important regulatory role in the antitumor immune response. We review the recent remarkable findings on the biological functions of ExoPD-L1, including the inhibition of lymphocyte activities, migration to PD-L1-negative tumor cells and immune cells, induction of both local and systemic immunosuppression, and promotion of tumor growth. We also discuss the potential implications of ExoPD-L1 as a predictor for disease progression and treatment response, sensitive methods for detection of circulating ExoPD-L1, and the novel therapeutic strategies combining the inhibition of exosome biogenesis with PD-L1 blockade in the clinic.