Methotrexate at middle and high accumulative doses might be associated with lower risk of new-onset cancers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide population-based cohort study

Hydroxychloroquine had neutral effect on long-term risk of malignancy in rheumatoid arthritis patients: A population-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The cancer risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients has been discussed. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) may exert protective effects against malignancy. The study investigated the association between HCQ use and the risk of subsequent malignancy in RA patients.

METHODS

Catastrophic illness certificated RA patients were extracted from the National Health Insurance Research Database. The index date was set 180 days after the RA diagnosis date to avoid immortal time bias. Two groups were matched in a 1-to-1 ratio by propensity score regarding age, gender, index date, relevant comorbidities, and comedication. HCQ users prior to the diagnosis of RA were exempted to ensure compliance with the new-user design. Cancers diagnosed before or less than 180 days after the index date were excluded to mitigate protopathic bias. The study adopted the Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional hazards model to examine the association between HCQ use and cancer risk. The assumption of proportional hazard was also tested.

RESULTS

Based on strict criteria, we included 492 eligible RA patients and divided them into study and control groups (N = 246 in each group). HCQ users exhibited a neutral risk of cancer relative to the controls (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.44-2.21, p > .05). The assumption of proportional hazard was not violated.

CONCLUSION

This study does not observe the effect of using HCQ as a primary regimen to prevent cancer in RA patients. We are assured that HCQ is not associated with an increased risk of subsequent malignancy in RA patients. Further mechanistic research is needed.

Real-World Experience of Methotrexate in the Treatment of Skin Diseases: an Italian Delphi Consensus

BACKGROUND

After decades of use, methotrexate displays an established safety and efficacy profile in both in-hospital and outpatient settings. Despite its widespread use, there is surprisingly little clinical evidence to guide daily practice with methotrexate in dermatology.

OBJECTIVES

To provide guidance for clinicians in daily practice for areas in which there is limited guidance.

METHODS

A Delphi consensus exercise on 23 statements was carried out on the use of methotrexate in dermatological routine settings.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on statements that cover six main areas: (1) pre-screening exams and monitoring of therapy; (2) dosing and administration in patients naïve to methotrexate; (3) optimal strategy for patients in remission; (4) use of folic acid; (5) safety; and (6) predictors of toxicity and efficacy. Specific recommendations are provided for all 23 statements.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to optimize methotrexate efficacy, it is essential to optimize treatment using appropriate dosages, carrying out a rapid drug-based step-up on a treat-to-target strategy and preferably using the subcutaneous formulation. To manage safety aspects appropriately, it is essential to evaluate patients' risk factors and carry out proper monitoring during the course of treatment.

An Unusual Presentation of Merkel Cell Carcinoma in the Setting of Immunosuppression on TNF-Alpha Inhibitor Therapy

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but deadly skin cancer, observed classically in the sun-damaged skin of older, white males. The cancer is characterized by rapid growth as well as high morbidity and mortality. In this article, we detail an atypical presentation of MCC in an African-American patient being treated with prednisone, methotrexate, and adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis. Initially presenting as a subcutaneous nodule, the tumor in our patient was misdiagnosed first as an abscess and treated accordingly. Only after the subcutaneous mass failed to resolve with antibiotics as well as repeated incision and drainage was a biopsy performed, which yielded the final diagnosis. In the text, we detail the patient's symptomatology as well as steps that eventually lead to diagnostic confirmation. Our case demonstrates the importance of heightened clinical suspicion for MCC in immunosuppressed patients with unexplained subcutaneous nodules. Prompt diagnosis is crucial for positive outcomes; therefore, we aim to provide information that may aid in identification of MCC tumors in future patients. With the increasing use of biologic agents such as adalimumab to treat rheumatic disease, the literature is demonstrating an increasing incidence of previously "rare" malignancies such as MCC. It is crucial for physicians to convey these risks when initiating a patient on chronic immunosuppressive therapy and to provide routine surveillance for MCC and other complications.

Oral Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs with Antineoplastic Potential: a Review

There is an increasing trend of malignancy worldwide. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are the cornerstones for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), but risk of malignancy is a major concern for patients receiving DMARDs. In addition, many IMIDs already carry higher background risks of neoplasms. Recently, the black box warning of malignancies has been added for Janus kinase inhibitors. Also, the use of biologic DMARDs in patients with established malignancies is usually discouraged owing to exclusion of such patients in pivotal studies and, hence, lack of evidence. In contrast, some conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) have been reported to show antineoplastic properties and can be beneficial for patients with cancer. Among the csDMARDs, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have been the most extensively studied, and methotrexate is an established chemotherapeutic agent. Even cyclosporine A, a well-known drug associated with cancer risk, can potentiate the effect of some chemotherapeutic agents. We review the possible mechanisms behind and clinical evidence of the antineoplastic activities of csDMARDs, including chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, cyclosporine, leflunomide, mycophenolate mofetil, mycophenolic acid, methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and thiopurines. This knowledge may guide physicians in the choice of csDMARDs for patients with concurrent IMIDs and malignancies.