The Use of a Synthetic Cartilage Implant for Hallux Rigidus: A Systematic Review

Cartiva interpositional arthroplasty versus arthrodesis in the treatment of Hallux rigidus: A retrospective comparative study with mean 2 year follow up

BACKGROUND

Hallux rigidus is a common condition characterised by first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) degeneration, pain and limited range of motion (ROM). The gold standard surgical treatment is arthrodesis, providing good pain relief, but sacrifices ROM. The Cartiva synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) has been utilised as an interpositional arthroplasty, aiming to reduce pain whilst preserving range of motion. Current evidence for Cartiva SCI is limited. The aim was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Cartiva SCI compared to arthrodesis undertaken in our centre.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, enrolling all adult patients who underwent primary first MTPJ SCI arthroplasty or arthrodesis for the treatment hallux rigidus. The primary outcome was a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). Secondary outcomes included EQ-5D, complication rates, VAS Pain and FAAM (ADL).

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2020 there were 33 cases divided into two groups (17 Cartiva SCI, 16 arthrodesis, mean age 59.0 ± 9.9 years) with a mean follow up of 2.3 years. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the MOXFQ, EQ-5D, VAS Pain or FAAM (ADL) outcome scores between the Arthrodesis and SCI groups (p > 0.05). The mean MOXFQ Index score was 7.2 ± 6.4 for the SCI group and 3.9 ± 5.8 for the Arthrodesis group at final follow up (p = 0.15). Although complications were high in both groups, the overall hallux reoperation rate was 29.4 % in the SCI cohort and 0.0 % for arthrodesis.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective comparative study found no significant superiority of Cartiva SCI over arthrodesis in terms of PROMs. Due to the higher rate of further surgical intervention in the SCI cohort, we recommend arthrodesis as the preferred surgical option for hallux rigidus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogel Hemiarthroplasty of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Hallux Rigidus

Background Hallux rigidus (HR) is the most common arthritic condition of the foot. Although first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis has been the historical gold-standard treatment, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel implants have gained popularity as a joint-sparing technique. However, recent studies have shown variable failure rates of PVA hydrogel implants. The purpose of this study was to report the five-year experience with PVA hydrogel implants performed by a single surgeon. Methodology Health records were queried from August 2016 to 2021 for patients who underwent primary PVA hydrogel implant hemiarthroplasty for symptomatic late-stage HR. Patient demographics and postoperative outcomes variables were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate implant survival. A total of 146 PVA hydrogel implant procedures were performed with a minimum six-month follow-up. Results The majority of patients were female (n = 103, 70.5%), with a mean age of 58.1 (±10.1) years, body mass index of 27.3 (±5.2) kg/m2, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score <3 (n = 131, 89.7%). The majority had stage II or III disease (n = 115, 78.8%). Patients experienced significant improvement in visual analog scale score (p < 0.0001) and hallux dorsiflexion (p = 0.0005). There were 22 (15.1%) complications, including implant subsidence (n = 15, 10.3%), deep infection (n = 6, 4.1%), and hypertrophic ossification (n = 1, 0.7%). Revision surgeries were required in 12.3% (n = 18) of patients at an average of 9.4 (±9.2) months postoperatively. This included nine (6.2%) revision PVA hydrogel implant procedures and nine (6.2%) first MTJP arthrodesis. The one- and two-year survival rates for MTPJ arthrodesis (n = 9) were 95.9% and 86.3%, respectively. Conclusions In the largest single-surgeon series reported, first MTPJ hemiarthroplasty with a PVA hydrogel implant significantly improved pain and hallux dorsiflexion at an average of 14.5 months postoperatively. There was a high two-year survivorship of 86.3% until failure which required first MTPJ arthrodesis. Future studies should be performed to refine the indications for PVA hydrogel implants and identify risk factors.

Assessment and Management of Atraumatic First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Pain

Nontraumatic pain in the first metatarsophalangeal joint is frequent and can be debilitating. The metatarsophalangeal joint complex comprises four articulating surfaces including the first metatarsal, the proximal phalanx, and tibial and fibular sesamoids, which are all contained within a synovial capsule. The most common causes of pain are hallux valgus and hallux rigidus. However, other diagnoses, such as functional hallux limitus, sesamoiditis, gout, and inflammatory autoimmune arthritis, need to be considered as well. A systematic approach is key to accurately diagnose the source of pain, which can sometimes be the result of more than one condition. The most important clinical information to obtain is a focused history, meticulous clinical examination based on understanding the precise anatomy and biomechanics of the first metatarsophalangeal joint, and analysis of the relevant imaging. Each pathology has a different treatment algorithm, as such, understanding the pathoanatomy and biomechanics is important in forming an effective treatment plan.

Synthetic cartilage implant hemiarthroplasty versus cheilectomy for the treatment of hallux rigidus

Degenerative arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint, hallux rigidus, is the most common type of arthritis of the foot, affecting nearly 2.5% of the population over the age of 50. Hallux rigidus can be treated surgically with either Cheilectomy or Synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) hemiarthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes from a single institution on the treatment of hallux rigidus using cheilectomy and SCI hemiarthroplasty. Between 2012 and 2020, 49 patients underwent either a SCI (Polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels) hemiarthroplasty or Cheilectomy for the treatment of hallux rigidus. Functional scores were assessed pre and postoperatively using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle scoring System (AOFAS) and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score survey (FAOS). Plantar and Dorsal range of motion was also assessed pre and postoperatively. Outcomes, complications, and any reoperations were recorded for all patients. Mean pre-op AOFAS for Cheilectomy and SCI were 49.6 and 54.8, respectively, compared to 85.3 and 89.7, respectively, after surgery (p value < 0.05). Mean pre-op Dorsal range of motion (ROM) for Cheilectomy and SCI were 24.0 and 26.0 degrees, respectively, compared to 38.0 and 42.6 degrees, respectively, after surgery (p value < 0.05). SCI hemiarthroplasty patients had higher AOFAS and dorsal ROM at the latest follow up (p value < 0.05). Synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) hemiarthroplasty and cheilectomy both offer promising results and remain viable treatment options to decrease pain, improve function, and maintain motion for hallux rigidus. SCI hemiarthroplasty may offer superior range of motion and functional outcomes than cheilectomy for hallux rigidus. LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: 3.

Sliding Oblique Metatarsal Osteotomy Fixated With K-Wires Without Cheilectomy for All Grades of Hallux Rigidus: A Case Series of 76 Patients

Background

Studies on decompression metatarsal osteotomy without cheilectomy for hallux rigidus are limited. This study aimed to review the data of patients who underwent this surgery for all grades of hallux rigidus.

Methods

The medical records of patients who underwent this surgery between August 2017 and January 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) score, and the hallux dorsiflexion angle. Patients who were followed up for more than 2 years were included. The plantar shift of the first metatarsal head (PS) and the shortening of the first metatarsal (SH) were measured to supplementally investigate the associations with other measurements.

Results

A total of 76 patients (female, 42; male, 34; mean age, 60.3 years; mean body mass index, 23.1) with 80 feet were enrolled. Six patients (7.5%) were grade 1, 20 (25.0%) were grade 2, 30 (37.5%) were grade 3, and 24 (30.0%) were grade 4. The mean follow-up duration was 3.5 years. Overall, the mean VAS score improved from 63.2 to 6.2, the mean JSSF score from 59.0 to 82.6, and the mean dorsiflexion angle from 37.3 to 56.3 degrees. These measures improved for all grades, but the dorsiflexion angles and JSSF scores decreased as the grade advanced. No clear associations were found between the postoperative VAS and the PS and SH. Eight patients (10.5%) had complications: 4 (5.2%) had occasional plantar discomfort under the metatarsal head, 2 (2.6%) required shoe modification, 1 (1.3%) had wound pain, and 1 (1.3%) experienced breakage of a K-wire.

Conclusion

The VAS scores, dorsiflexion angles, and JSSF scores improved for all grades of hallux rigidus within a relatively short period of follow-up; however, the dorsiflexion angles and JSSF scores decreased as the grade advanced.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, retrospective case series.

The Surgical Treatment of Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis is a degenerative condition affecting the whole joint with the underlying bone, representing a major source of pain, disability, and socioeconomic cost worldwide. Age is considered the strongest risk factor, albeit abnormal biomechanics, morphology, congenital abnormality, deformity, malalignment, limb-length discrepancy, lifestyle, and injury may further increase the risk of the development and progression of osteoarthritis as well. Pain and loss of function are the main clinical features that lead to treatment. Although early manifestations of osteoarthritis are amenable to lifestyle modification, adequate pain management, and physical therapy, disease advancement frequently requires surgical treatment. The symptomatic progression of osteoarthritis with radiographical confirmation can be addressed either with arthroscopic interventions, (joint) preservation techniques, or bone fusion procedures, whereas (joint) replacement is preferentially reserved for severe and end-stage disease. The surgical treatment aims at alleviating pain and disability while restoring native biomechanics. Miscellaneous surgical techniques for addressing osteoarthritis exist. Advanced computer-integrated surgical concepts allow for patient personalization and optimization of surgical treatment. The scope of this article is to present an overview of the fundamentals of conventional surgical treatment options for osteoarthritis of the human skeleton, with emphasis on arthroscopy, preservation, arthrodesis, and replacement. Contemporary computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery concepts are further elucidated.

Metallic hemiarthroplasty or arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint as treatment for hallux rigidus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Arthrodesis and metallic hemiarthroplasty are two surgical interventions for the treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the two operations with regards to patient-reported outcomes, pain reduction, complications and revision rates.

METHODS

A systematic literature search identified all relevant studies. The methodological quality was assessed using two validated tools. Data of interest were derived and presented. For non-comparative studies, data was assessed for trends, while for comparative studies pooling statistics were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 33 studies were included for analysis. The majority of studies (>75%) reported an AOFAS-HMI score greater than 80 points after both metallic hemiarthroplasty and arthrodesis. The lowest VAS pain score was observed after arthrodesis (weighted mean difference -1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.16 to -1.00 P< 0.00001). Comparable numbers of complications (odds radio 1.48, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.73, P = 0.21, favoring: hemiarthroplasty) and revisions (odds ratio 1.16, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.15 P = 0.64, favoring: hemiarthroplasty) were observed after both interventions. The included non-comparative studies seem to confirm these findings of the comparative studies.

CONCLUSION

Metallic hemiarthroplasty and arthrodesis have excellent clinical outcomes and acceptable complication- and revision rates. Arthrodesis seems to be superior in pain reduction, while metallic hemiarthroplasty is a suitable alternative for patients performing activities that requires motion in the first metatarsophalangeal joint.