Interfacility Transfers for Isolated Craniomaxillofacial Trauma: Perspectives of the Facial Trauma Surgeon

Interfacility Transfer Guidelines for Patients With Isolated Facial Trauma-From Problem to Solution

This Viewpoint discusses the need to implement proposed guidelines for facial trauma assessment to prevent unnecessary interfacility transfer of patients with facial trauma despite most such patients having injuries that do not require surgical intervention.

Interfacility Emergency Department Transfer for Midface Fractures in the United States

PURPOSE

Interfacility hospital transfer for isolated midfacial fractures is common but rarely clinically necessary. The purpose of this study was to generate nationally representative estimates regarding the incidence, risk factors, and cost of transfer for isolated midface fractures.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample 2018 to identify patients with isolated midface fractures. The primary predictor variable was hospital trauma center designation (Level I, Level II, Level III, and nontrauma center). The primary outcome variable was hospital transfer. Total emergency department (ED) charges were also assessed. Covariates were demographic, medical, injury-related, and hospital characteristics. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were used to evaluate the incidence and predictors of interfacility transfer.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 161,022 ED encounters with a midface fracture as primary diagnosis, of which 5,680 were transferred (3.53%). In an unadjusted analysis, evaluation at a nontrauma center, level III trauma center, nonteaching hospital, and numerous demographic, medical, and injury-related variables were associated with transfer (P ≤ .001). In the adjusted model, the strongest independent predictors for hospital transfer were evaluation at a nontrauma center (odds ratio [OR] = 16.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 13.6-19.4), level III trauma center (OR = 13.4, 95% CI = 11.1-16.1) or level II trauma center (OR = 3.25, 95% CI = 2.66-3.98), any Le Fort fracture (OR = 12.0, 95% CI = 10.4-14.0), orbital floor fracture (OR = 3.73, 95% CI = 3.48-4.00), history of cerebrovascular event (OR = 2.74, 95% CI = 2.18-3.45), and cervical spine injury (OR = 5.87, 95% CI = 4.79-7.20) (P ≤ .001). The average ED charge per encounter was $7,206 ± 9,294 for a total nationwide charge of approximately 1.16 billion dollars. Transferred subjects had total ED charges of $97 million, not including additional charges at the recipient hospital.

CONCLUSION

Isolated midface fractures are transferred infrequently, but given the high incidence have substantial healthcare costs. Predictors of transfer were mixed rather than clustered within one variable type, although it is likely that transfers are driven in part by lack of access to maxillofacial specialists given the predominance of hospital covariates. Programs evaluating necessity of transfer and facilitating specialist evaluation in the outpatient setting may reduce healthcare expenditures for these injuries.

Isolated facial fractures transferred for higher level of care

BACKGROUND

Isolated facial fractures (IFF) have been identified as overtriaged injuries in multiple single-center studies. We sought to describe IFF in a national database.

METHODS

The 2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all patients with facial fractures and Abbreviated Injury Score<1 for other body regions. Descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS

Of 1,097,190 trauma patients, 36,077 (3.3%) had IFF. Median age was 39 [26-89], 92% had blunt mechanism, median Glasgow Coma Scale 15 [15-15], and vital signs were normal (ED systolic blood pressure 137 [125-153], ED pulse 86 [73-99]). 0.3% required unplanned intubation. 25.7% underwent operation after a median interval 26.4 [14.4-47.9] hours. IFF patients represented 4.4% of interfacility transfers and were more likely to have been transferred (34.4% vs 25%, p < 0.001). Hospital stay was 3 [2-4] days.

CONCLUSIONS

IFF are rarely surgical emergencies and frequently nonoperative, yet are disproportionately represented among transfers. IFFs may represent an opportunity for outpatient follow-up or telehealth consultation to decrease resource utilization.