In Vivo Evaluation of the Potential of High-Frequency Ultrasound for Arthroscopic Examination of the Shoulder Joint

Enhancing the Reliability of Cartilage Repair Evaluation: A Simplified Volume-Based Approach

The purpose of this study was to explore methods for enhancing the reliability of arthroscopic cartilage repair evaluation. We compared a new volume-based scoring technique that assessed the extent of high-quality cartilage repair tissue in four quadrants of the repair tissue with the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score. Using a porcine cartilage repair model, we evaluated the inter- and intrarater reliability of the new volume-based technique. Nine defects were treated with a recombinant human Type III collagen/polylactide scaffold, whereas nine were left to heal spontaneously. The reliability of the volume-based score was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and external validation was performed by comparing the score with histological ICRS II results. The volume-based score demonstrated moderate to good interrater reliability (ICC 0.67-0.78) and intrarater reliability (ICC 0.58-0.84), outperforming the ICRS score in consistency. Moderate positive correlations were observed between the volume-based score and histological ICRS II subscores (rs = 0.62-0.64, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that the volume-based approach may improve the reliability of arthroscopic cartilage repair assessment without significantly compromising the alignment with histological evaluations. Although the simplified system offers advantages in reproducibility, further refinement is necessary to balance reliability with the need for comprehensive tissue evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostics, Level III (based on comparative studies in an animal model with blinding between observers). STATEMENT OF CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides insights into improving the reliability of arthroscopic cartilage repair evaluations, potentially leading to more consistent and accurate assessments in both clinical and research settings.

Comparison Between Arthroscopic and Histological International Cartilage Repair Society Scoring Systems in Porcine Cartilage Repair Model

OBJECTIVE

The arthroscopic and histological International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) scores are designed to evaluate cartilage repair quality. Arthroscopic ICRS score can give a maximum score of 12 and the histological score can give values between 0% and 100% for each of its 14 subscores. This study compares these methods in an animal cartilage repair model. This study hypothesizes that there is a significant correlation between these methods.

DESIGN

A chondral defect was made in the medial femoral condyle of 18 pigs. Five weeks later, 9 pigs were treated with a novel recombinant human type III collagen/polylactide scaffold and 9 were left untreated to heal spontaneously. After 4 months, the medial condyles were evaluated with a simulated arthroscopy using the ICRS scoring system followed by a histological ICRS scoring.

RESULTS

This porcine cartilage repair model produced repaired cartilage tissue ranging from good to poor repair tissue quality. The mean arthroscopic ICRS total score was 6.8 (SD = 2.2). Histological ICRS overall assessment subscore was 38.2 (SD = 31.1) and histological ICRS average points were 60.5 (SD = 19.5). Arthroscopic ICRS compared with histological ICRS average points or its overall assessment subscore showed moderate correlation (r = 0.49 and r = 0.50, respectively). The interrater reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficients for arthroscopic ICRS total scores, histological ICRS overall assessment subscore, and ICRS average points showed moderate to excellent reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic and histological ICRS scoring methods for repaired articular cartilage show a moderate correlation in the animal cartilage repair model.

Arthroscopic International Cartilage Repair Society Classification System Has Only Moderate Reliability in a Porcine Cartilage Repair Model

BACKGROUND

The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score was designed for arthroscopic use to evaluate the quality of cartilage repair.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the reliability of the ICRS scoring system using an animal cartilage repair model.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A chondral defect with an area of 1.5 cm² was made in the medial femoral condyle of 18 domestic pigs. Five weeks later, 9 pigs were treated using a novel recombinant human type III collagen/polylactide scaffold, and 9 were left to heal spontaneously. After 4 months, the pigs were sacrificed, then 3 arthroscopic surgeons evaluated the medial femoral condyles via video-recorded simulated arthroscopy using the ICRS scoring system. The surgeons repeated the evaluation twice within a 9-month period using their recorded arthroscopy.

RESULTS

The porcine cartilage repair model produced cartilage repair tissue of poor to good quality. The mean ICRS total scores for all observations were 6.6 (SD, 2.6) in arthroscopy, 5.9 (SD, 2.7) in the first reevaluation, and 6.2 (SD, 2.8) in the second reevaluation. The interrater reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the ICRS total scores (ICC, 0.46-0.60) and for each individual subscore (ICC, 0.26-0.71) showed poor to moderate reliability. The intrarater reliability with the ICC also showed poor to moderate reliability for ICRS total scores (ICC, 0.52-0.59) and for each individual subscore (ICC, 0.29-0.58). A modified Bland-Altman plot for the initial arthroscopy and for the 2 reevaluations showed an evident disagreement among the observers.

CONCLUSION

In an animal cartilage repair model, the ICRS scoring system seems to have poor to moderate reliability.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Arthroscopic assessment of cartilage repair using the ICRS scoring method has limited reliability. We need more objective methods with acceptable reliability to evaluate cartilage repair outcomes.

Miniaturized Water-Jet Ultrasound Indentation System for Quantitative Assessment of Articular Cartilage Degeneration: A Validation Study

Osteoarthritis is a common joint disease affecting a large population especially the elderly where cartilage degeneration is one of its hallmark symptoms. There is a need to develop new devices and instruments for the early detection and treatment of cartilage degeneration. In this study, we describe the development of a miniaturized water-jet ultrasound indentation probe for this purpose. To evaluate the system, we applied it to characterize the degeneration of articular cartilage with the measurement of its morphologic, acoustic, and mechanical properties, using the enzymatic digestions of cartilage as a model of OA. Fifty cartilage samples were tested with 10 of them used for the reproducibility study and the other 40 for collagenase and trypsin digestions. Thickness, integrated reflection coefficient (IRC), effective stiffness, and energy dissipation ratio (EDR) were used to quantify the change of articular cartilage before and after degeneration. The measurement reproducibility as represented by the standardized coefficient of variation (SCV) was 2.6%, 10.2%, 11.5%, and 12.8% for thickness, IRC, stiffness, and EDR, respectively. A significant change of IRC, stiffness, and EDR was detected after degeneration by the designed probe (p < 0.05). There was also a significant difference of IRC, stiffness, and EDR between trypsin and collagenase digestions (p < 0.001). In conclusion, a miniaturized water-jet ultrasound indentation probe has been designed, which has been successfully used to detect and differentiate cartilage degeneration simulated by enzymatic digestions. This probe, with future development, can be potentially suitable for quantitative assessment of cartilage degeneration with an arthroscopic operation.

Ultrasound Arthroscopy of Hip in Treatment of Osteochondritis Dissecans

An ultrasound arthroscopy (UA) technique is a promising tool for the evaluation of the articular cartilage during arthroscopic examination. However, the applicability of UA for the evaluation of the hip joint is unknown. We describe a UA assessment of a patient with osteochondritis dissecans at the femoral head. An ultrasound catheter designed for intravascular imaging was inserted into the hip joint by use of conventional arthroscopic portals, and the cartilage surfaces of the femoral head and acetabulum were investigated with ultrasound. UA provided essential quantitative information on the integrity of the articular cartilage and the condition of the subchondral plate not assessable with conventional arthroscopy. Furthermore, the UA technique provided the possibility to monitor arthroscopy-assisted retrograde drilling and bone transplantation in the hip joint.

Regular chondrocyte spacing is a potential cause for coherent ultrasound backscatter in human articular cartilage

The potential of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) to assess the regular cellular spacing in the superficial cartilage zones was investigated experimentally and numerically. Nine osteochondral samples, extracted from two human cadaver knee joints, were measured using a 50-MHz ultrasound scanning device and evaluated using Mankin score. Simulated backscattered power spectra from models with an idealized cell alignment exhibited a pronounced frequency peak. From the peak, cell spacing in the range between 15 and 40 μm between cell layers was detected with an average error of 0.2 μm. The mean QUS-based cell spacing was 28.3 ± 5.3 μm. Strong correlation (R²= 0.59, p ≤ 0.001) between spacing estimates from light microscopy (LM) and QUS was found for samples with Mankin score ≤3. For higher scores, QUS-based spacing was significantly higher (p ≤ 0.05) compared to LM-based spacing. QUS-based spacing estimates together with other QUS parameters may serve as future biomarkers for detecting early signs of osteoarthrosis.