1
|
Alizadeh M, Broomand Lomer N, Azami M, Khalafi M, Shobeiri P, Arab Bafrani M, Sotoudeh H. Radiomics: The New Promise for Differentiating Progression, Recurrence, Pseudoprogression, and Radionecrosis in Glioma and Glioblastoma Multiforme. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4429. [PMID: 37760399 PMCID: PMC10526457 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioma and glioblastoma multiform (GBM) remain among the most debilitating and life-threatening brain tumors. Despite advances in diagnosing approaches, patient follow-up after treatment (surgery and chemoradiation) is still challenging for differentiation between tumor progression/recurrence, pseudoprogression, and radionecrosis. Radiomics emerges as a promising tool in initial diagnosis, grading, and survival prediction in patients with glioma and can help differentiate these post-treatment scenarios. Preliminary published studies are promising about the role of radiomics in post-treatment glioma/GBM. However, this field faces significant challenges, including a lack of evidence-based solid data, scattering publication, heterogeneity of studies, and small sample sizes. The present review explores radiomics's capabilities in following patients with glioma/GBM status post-treatment and to differentiate tumor progression, recurrence, pseudoprogression, and radionecrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammadreza Alizadeh
- Physiology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14496-14535, Iran;
| | - Nima Broomand Lomer
- Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht 41937-13111, Iran;
| | - Mobin Azami
- Student Research Committee, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj 66186-34683, Iran;
| | - Mohammad Khalafi
- Radiology Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 51656-65931, Iran;
| | - Parnian Shobeiri
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14167-53955, Iran; (P.S.); (M.A.B.)
| | - Melika Arab Bafrani
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14167-53955, Iran; (P.S.); (M.A.B.)
| | - Houman Sotoudeh
- Department of Radiology and Neurology, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Müller M, Winz O, Gutsche R, Leijenaar RTH, Kocher M, Lerche C, Filss CP, Stoffels G, Steidl E, Hattingen E, Steinbach JP, Maurer GD, Heinzel A, Galldiks N, Mottaghy FM, Langen KJ, Lohmann P. Static FET PET radiomics for the differentiation of treatment-related changes from glioma progression. J Neurooncol 2022; 159:519-529. [PMID: 35852737 PMCID: PMC9477932 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04089-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the potential of radiomics applied to static clinical PET data using the tracer O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) to differentiate treatment-related changes (TRC) from tumor progression (TP) in patients with gliomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred fifty-one (151) patients with histologically confirmed gliomas and post-therapeutic progressive MRI findings according to the response assessment in neuro-oncology criteria underwent a dynamic amino acid PET scan using the tracer O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET). Thereof, 124 patients were investigated on a stand-alone PET scanner (data used for model development and validation), and 27 patients on a hybrid PET/MRI scanner (data used for model testing). Mean and maximum tumor to brain ratios (TBRmean, TBRmax) were calculated using the PET data from 20 to 40 min after tracer injection. Logistic regression models were evaluated for the FET PET parameters TBRmean, TBRmax, and for radiomics features of the tumor areas as well as combinations thereof to differentiate between TP and TRC. The best performing models in the validation dataset were finally applied to the test dataset. The diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients (25%) were diagnosed with TRC, and 114 (75%) with TP. The logistic regression model comprising the conventional FET PET parameters TBRmean and TBRmax resulted in an AUC of 0.78 in both the validation (sensitivity, 64%; specificity, 80%) and the test dataset (sensitivity, 64%; specificity, 80%). The model combining the conventional FET PET parameters and two radiomics features yielded the best diagnostic performance in the validation dataset (AUC, 0.92; sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 80%) and demonstrated its generalizability in the independent test dataset (AUC, 0.85; sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 70%). CONCLUSION The developed radiomics classifier allows the differentiation between TRC and TP in pretreated gliomas based on routinely acquired static FET PET scans with a high diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marguerite Müller
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany ,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Oliver Winz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany ,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Robin Gutsche
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany ,RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ralph T. H. Leijenaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Kocher
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany ,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Lerche
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany
| | - Christian P. Filss
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany ,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany ,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany
| | - Gabriele Stoffels
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany
| | - Eike Steidl
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joachim P. Steinbach
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany ,Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Gabriele D. Maurer
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany ,Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Alexander Heinzel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany ,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany ,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany ,Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Felix M. Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany ,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany ,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany ,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany ,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany ,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fayed N, Oliván B, Lopez Del Hoyo Y, Andrés E, Perez-Yus MC, Fayed A, Angel LF, Serrano-Blanco A, Roca M, Garcia Campayo J. Changes in metabolites in the brain of patients with fibromyalgia after treatment with an NMDA receptor antagonist. Neuroradiol J 2019; 32:408-419. [PMID: 31215319 DOI: 10.1177/1971400919857544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The aims of this work were to evaluate whether the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia with memantine is associated with significant changes in metabolite concentrations in the brain, and to explore any changes in clinical outcome measures. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy was performed of the right anterior and posterior insula, both hippocampi and the posterior cingulate cortex. Questionnaires on pain, anxiety, depression, global function, quality of life and cognitive impairment were used. Ten patients were studied at baseline and after three months of treatment with memantine. Significant increases were observed in the following areas: N-acetylaspartate (4.47 at baseline vs. 4.71 at three months, p = 0.02) and N-acetylaspartate+N-acetylaspartate glutamate in the left hippocampus (5.89 vs. 5.98; p = 0.007); N-acetylaspartate+N-acetylaspartate glutamate in the right hippocampus (5.31 vs 5.79; p = 0.01) and the anterior insula (7.56 vs. 7.70; p = 0.033); glutamate+glutamine/creatine ratio in the anterior insula (2.03 vs. 2.17; p = 0.022) and the posterior insula (1.77 vs. 2.00; p = 0.004); choline/creatine ratio in the posterior cingulate (0.18 vs. 0.19; p = 0.023); and creatine in the right hippocampus (3.60 vs. 3.85; p = 0.007). At the three-month follow-up, memantine improved cognitive function assessed by the Cognition Mini-Exam (31.50, SD = 2.95 vs. 34.40, SD = 0.6; p = 0.005), depression measured by the Hamilton Depression Scale (7.70, SD = 0.81 vs. 7.56, SD = 0.68; p = 0.042) and severity of illness measured by the Clinical Global Impression severity scale (5.79, SD = 0.96 vs. 5.31, SD = 1.12; p = 0.007). Depression, clinical global impression and cognitive function showed improvement with memantine. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy could be useful in monitoring response to the pharmacological treatment of fibromyalgia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Fayed
- Department of Radiology, Quirónsalud Hospital, Spain
| | - Barbara Oliván
- Department of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Spain.,Preventative Activities and Health Promotion Network (REDIAPP) (G06/170)
| | - Yolanda Lopez Del Hoyo
- Department of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Spain.,Preventative Activities and Health Promotion Network (REDIAPP) (G06/170)
| | - Eva Andrés
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, October 12 Hospital, Spain
| | | | - Alicia Fayed
- Department of Neurorehabilitation, San Juan de Dios Hospital, Spain
| | - Luisa F Angel
- Department of Radiology, Quirónsalud Hospital, Spain
| | - Antoni Serrano-Blanco
- Department of Psychiatry, Parc Sanitari St. Joan of God and the St. Joan of God Foundation, Spain.,Preventative Activities and Health Promotion Network (REDIAPP) (G06/170)
| | - Miquel Roca
- Health Sciences Research University Institute, Juan March Hospital, Illes Balears University, Spain.,Preventative Activities and Health Promotion Network (REDIAPP) (G06/170)
| | - Javier Garcia Campayo
- Department of Psychiatry, Miguel Servet Hospital and the University of Zaragoza. Aragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragon), Spain.,Preventative Activities and Health Promotion Network (REDIAPP) (G06/170)
| |
Collapse
|