The initiation, design, and establishment of the Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation Patient Registry and Natural History Study

A systematic overview of rare disease patient registries: challenges in design, quality management, and maintenance

Patient registries serve to overcome the research limitations inherent in the study of rare diseases, where patient numbers are typically small. Despite the value of real-world data collected through registries, adequate design and maintenance are integral to data quality. We aimed to describe an overview of the challenges in design, quality management, and maintenance of rare disease registries.A systematic search of English articles was conducted in PubMed, Ovid Medline/Embase, and Cochrane Library. Search terms included "rare diseases, patient registries, common data elements, quality, hospital information systems, and datasets". Inclusion criteria were any manuscript type focused upon rare disease patient registries describing design, quality monitoring or maintenance. Biobanks and drug surveillances were excluded.A total of 37 articles, published between 2001 and 2021, met the inclusion criteria. Patient registries covered a wide range of disease areas and covered multiple geographical locations, with a predisposition for Europe. Most articles were methodological reports and described the design and setup of a registry. Most registries recruited clinical patients (92%) with informed consent (81%) and protected the collected data (76%). Whilst the majority (57%) collected patient-reported outcome measures, only few (38%) consulted PAGs during the registry design process. Few reports described details regarding quality management (51%) and maintenance (46%).Rare disease patient registries are valuable for research and evaluation of clinical care, and an increasing number have emerged. However, registries need to be continuously evaluated for data quality and long-term sustainability to remain relevant for future use.

The Role of Pharmacotherapeutic Agents in Children with Desmoid Tumors

Desmoid tumors (DT) are rare fibroblastic, soft-tissue tumors that do not metastasize but can aggressively infiltrate tissues causing significant chronic discomfort and/or functional impairment. In the pediatric population, the incidence of DT is greatest during infancy and adolescence but can occur at any age. Dysregulated β-catenin, most commonly resulting from mutations in either CTNNB1 or germline APC (adenomatous polyposis coli) drives DT. Most cases are sporadic but some are associated with predisposition syndromes such as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Historically, treatment has been surgery. However, the recurrence rate after surgery can be high. Various systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens used in other soft-tissue sarcomas have been applied to DT with differing results. Given the chronic and rarely life-threatening nature of this disease and the potential short- and long-term toxicity of these regimens, especially in children, alternative non-cytotoxic interventions have been investigated. Molecularly targeted agents such as tyrosine kinase and gamma secretase inhibitors have shown activity against DT. Innovative local control therapies are being employed as alternatives to surgery and radiation. Periods of prolonged stability and spontaneous regression in the absence of therapy in some patients has prompted wider adoption of an upfront active surveillance approach in the appropriate setting. This review will briefly summarize the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical presentation of DT in children, then focus on historical, current, and future pharmacotherapeutic management and finally, propose areas for future study.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Sarcoma: A scoping review

PURPOSE

Sarcoma is a heterogeneous group of tumours, usually affecting young patients and related to both endogenous and exogenous risk factors. The importance of obtaining the patient's perspective of the illness experience is imperative. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are the outcomes that come directly from the patient. They include symptoms, functional health, well-being, quality of life, psychological issues, among other indicators reported by the patients. The objective of this scoping review was to map the PROs in sarcoma patients and how they are measured.

METHODS

The review process was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for scoping reviews.

RESULTS

The search identified 116 potentially relevant studies, with 27 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. The most common PRO evaluated in the selected studies were health-related quality of life (HRQoL), followed by functional outcome, aspects of mental health, and specific symptoms. Generic HRQoL questionnaires were widely used. Quantitative studies usually applied more than one type of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to measure different PROs.

CONCLUSIONS

PROs should be carefully analysed to better understand the sarcoma patient's needs. The PROMs used in the selected studies about sarcoma were not specific to sarcoma, therefore, to better reflect on the perceptions of sarcoma patients, a different new and specific measurement strategy should be considered.