Hepatic venoocclusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome with normal portal vein flow mimicking aggravated chronic hepatic GVHD following inotuzumab ozogamicin salvage therapy: a case report of pathologic-radiologic discrepancy

Atypical features of hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after inotuzumab ozogamicin in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

PURPOSE

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) has demonstrated a safe bridging role to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). However, hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) is frequently observed. This study aimed to identify significant features of INO-associated VOD/SOS.

METHODS

We reviewed seven cases of hepatic VOD/SOS that developed either during INO salvage or after allogeneic HSCT following INO-induced complete remission (CR). Diagnosis and severity grading of VOD/SOS were based on the revised criteria from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Defibrotide was used to treat severe to very severe cases.

RESULTS

Four patients developed VOD/SOS during INO salvage therapy (at 21 and 36 days post-INO1, 77 days post-INO3, and 21 days post-INO5), while three were diagnosed at 2, 5, and 10 days post-HSCT following INO-induced CR. Doppler ultrasonography revealed preserved portal vein flow (range 10.2-26.0 cm/sec) and normal hepatic artery resistive index (RI, range 0.56-0.74) in all but one patient (RI 0.83). Despite this, all patients presented with massive ascites and progressively elevated total bilirubin levels. All cases were classified as severe to very severe; six were treated with defibrotide and one underwent liver transplantation. Most patients ultimately died owing to VOD/SOS progression.

CONCLUSION

Post-INO VOD/SOS manifested as two different clinical settings and was characterized by preserved portal vein flow, which complicated diagnosis. Despite timely defibrotide administration, clinical outcomes were poor. These findings emphasize the need for vigilance and potential consideration of prophylactic strategies for prevention of INO-associated VOD/SOS.

Superior survival outcome of blinatumomab compared with conventional chemotherapy for adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis

Background

Blinatumomab showed a higher complete remission (CR) rate and a safe bridging to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R BCP-ALL).

Objectives

We tried to analyze the outcome of blinatumomab compared with the real-world historical data. We expected superior outcome of blinatumomab compared with historical conventional chemotherapy.

Design

We conducted a retrospective study using real-world data in the Catholic Hematology Hospital.

Methods

Total 197 consecutive cases of R/R BCP-ALL were treated with conventional chemotherapy (n = 113) or blinatumomab, which was available since late 2016 (n = 84). Patients who achieved CR underwent allo-HCT if donor was available. We conducted a propensity score-matched cohort analysis using 5 criteria of age, CR duration, cytogenetics, previous allo-HCT, and salvage lines between historical group and blinatumomab.

Results

Each cohort consisted of 52 patients. In blinatumomab group, CR rate was higher (80.8% versus 53.8%, p = 0.006) and more patients proceeded to allo-HCT (80.8% versus 46.2%, p < 0.001). Among the CR patients with available minimal residual disease (MRD) results, 68.6% in blinatumomab group and 40.0% in conventional chemotherapy group were MRD-negative. Regimen-related mortality during the chemotherapy cycles was significantly higher in the conventional chemotherapy group (40.4% versus 1.9%, p < 0.001). Estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) was 33.2% (median, 26.3 months) after blinatumomab, and 15.4% (median, 8.2 months) after conventional chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Estimated 3-year non-relapse mortality were 30.3% and 51.9% (p = 0.004), respectively. In multivariate analysis, CR duration < 12 months showed more relapses and poor OS, and conventional chemotherapy showed higher non-relapse mortality and poor OS.

Conclusions

Matched cohort analysis showed superior outcomes of blinatumomab compared with conventional chemotherapy. However, large numbers of relapses and non-relapse mortalities continue to occur even after blinatumomab followed by allo-HCT. Novel therapeutic strategies are still needed for R/R BCP-ALL.