A retrospective comparison of salvage intensive chemotherapy versus venetoclax-combined regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

Venetoclax-based salvage therapy as a bridge to transplant is feasible and effective in patients with relapsed/refractory AML

ABSTRACT

The B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypomethylating agents has been approved for first-line treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive treatment. VEN-containing treatment strategies may also be effective in relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML; however, comparative studies with conventional therapies for fit patients as a bridge-to-transplant strategy are limited. Using propensity score matching (PSM), we compared 37 patients with R/R AML, who received VEN-based salvage therapy as bridge to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT), with 90 patients from the German Study Alliance Leukemia AML registry, who were treated with non-VEN-containing salvage therapy according to their treating physician's choice (TPC). The overall response rate among VEN patients was higher than the TPC control cohort (62% vs 42%; P = .049). Overall, 73% of VEN-treated patients vs 63% of TPC patients were bridged to allo-HCT (P = .41). After a median follow-up of 34.3 months for the VEN and 21.0 months for the TPC cohort, the median overall survival (OS) were 15.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6 to not evaluable) and 10.5 months (95% CI, 6.8-19.6; P = .15), respectively. PSM revealed a trend toward improved OS for VEN patients (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.41-1.22; P = .20). Median event-free survival was significantly longer in the VEN cohort (8.0 months) than the TPC cohort (3.7 months; P = .006). Our data suggest that VEN-based salvage therapy is a safe and effective bridge to allo-HCT for this difficult-to-treat AML patient population.

Azacitidine-venetoclax versus azacitidine salvage treatment for primary induction failure or first relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia patients

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of venetoclax-azacitidine (VEN-AZA) with AZA in the real-life for patients with first relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (R/R AML).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed R/R AML patients treated with VEN-AZA at the Institut Paoli Calmettes between September 2020 and February 2022. We compared them to a historical cohort of patients treated with AZA between 2010 and 2021.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients treated with VEN-AZA were compared with 140 patients treated with AZA. There were more favourable cytogenetics (25.7% vs. 8.6%; p = 0.01) and less FLT3-ITD mutated AML (8.8% vs. 25.5%; p = .049) in the VEN-AZA group. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 7.4% and the overall 90-day mortality was 20%, with no difference between the groups. The complete remission rate was 48.6% in the VEN-AZA group versus 15% (p < .0001). The composite complete response rate was 65.7% in the VEN-AZA group versus 23.6% (p < .0001). OS was 12.8 months in the VEN-AZA group versus 7.3 months (p = 0.059). Patients with primary refractory AML, poor-risk cytogenetics, prior hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) and FLT3-ITD mutated AML had lower response and survival rates.

CONCLUSION

VEN-AZA was associated with a better response rate and a longer survival than AZA monotherapy in AML patients who relapsed after or were refractory to intensive chemotherapy.

Venetoclax combined chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of venetoclax (VEN) in combination with chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Method

To compare the efficacy and/or safety of VEN+chemo versus chemotherapy alone for AML, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were used to searching up to June 2023. Comparisons included complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs).

Result

A total of 9 articles were included, including 3124 patients. The baseline characteristics between two patient groups were similar. The combined analysis showed that compared with the group receiving chemo alone, the VEN+chemo group exhibited higher rates of CR, CRi, MLFS and ORR. Additionally, the VEN+chemo group had longer event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) durations. The incidence rates of AEs and serious AEs (SAEs) were similar between the two groups, but the early 30-day mortality rate was lower in the VEN+chemo group than in the chemo alone group.

Conclusion

The VEN+chemo therapy demonstrates significant efficacy and safety profile in AML patients. However, more prospective studies are needed in the future to provide more accurate and robust evidence for treatment selection in patients.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023439288, identifier CRD42023439288.

Limited Efficacy of Venetoclax Combination Regimens in Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Extramedullary Relapse

The recently approved BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) has achieved promising outcomes in new and relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although its use is not well established in R/R AML with extramedullary disease (EMD), some reports have shown promising outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed 11 patients of R/R AML with EMD (with (n = 4) or without (n = 7) concurrent marrow involvement), who were treated with VEN plus decitabine (n = 9) or low-dose cytarabine (n = 2) between May 2020 and October 2020 in Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. The median number of prior treatment lines was 3 (1-6), and most (n = 9, 81.8%) had multiple sites of EMD. Nine patients (81.8%) received concurrent therapy for extramedullary (EM) involvement sites with radiotherapy (RT) (n = 4), surgery (n = 1), and both of them (n = 4). Among 11 patients, 4 patients (36.4%) had either marrow or EM responses to VEN combination; EM response was seen in 1 patient (9.1%, partial response) who had received concurrent RT (25 Gy, 10 fx) during the 1st cycle of VEN combination, and other 3 patients showed marrow response without EM response. After median follow-up of 27.0 months, the median overall survival was estimated to be 5.4 months. To conclude, VEN combination regimens have shown only modest efficacy in EM recurrence of AML with little impact on eliciting EM response.

A Successful Bridge Therapy Combining Hypomethylating Agents with Venetoclax for Adult Patients with Newly Diagnosed or Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Recently, the combination of VEN-HMA has been shown to achieve durable responses in patients with both newly diagnosed (ND) and R/R-AML. We retrospectively evaluated the post-allo-HCT outcomes of 50 patients who received VEN-HMA therapy. In total, 10 were ND and 40 were R/R and, at the time of HCT, the median age was 53 years. In the ND- and R/R-AML groups, the percentage of patients who achieved CR/CRi or MLFS was 90% and 92.5%, respectively. In all, after a median follow-up of 13.7 months, the probabilities of overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year were 63.7%, 59.3%, 28.5%, and 12.2%, respectively. In addition, the cumulative incidences of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and moderate-severe chronic GVHD at 1 year were 28.4% and 37.4%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the factors associated with a statistically significant impact on OS were VEN-HMA cycle (p = 0.021), ELN risk group (p = 0.041), and the response to VEN-HMA therapy before allo-HCT (p = 0.003). Although 80% of our patients had R/R-AML and 30% underwent a second allo-HCT, our data still suggest that allo-HCT following VEN-HMA therapy is a safe and effective treatment option.

Venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents versus intensive chemotherapy for hematological relapse of myeloid malignancies after allo-HSCT

Introduction

Since allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is considered one of the curative treatments for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), hematological relapse following allo-HSCT remained a crucial concern for patients' survival.

Methods

We retrospectively compared patients who received venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents (VEN+HMA, n=23) or intensive chemotherapy (IC, n=42) for hematological relapse of myeloid malignancies after allo-HSCT. HMA selection included decitabine (n=2) and azacitidine (n=21), and combined donor lymphocyte infusion was administered to 21 and 42 patients in VEN+HMA and IC groups, respectively.

Results

Median age of all patients was 39 (16-64) years old. Overall response rates, including complete response (CR), CR with incomplete recovery of normal neutrophil or platelet counts (CRi) and partial response (PR), were not significantly different between VEN+HMA and IC groups (60.1% versus 64.3%, P=0.785). CR/CRi rate was 52.2% in VEN+HMA and 59.5% in IC group (P=0.567). The rate of relapse after response was 66.7% in VEN+HMA group and 40.7% in IC group (P=0.176). Median overall survival was 209.0 (95%CI 130.9-287.1) days for VEN+HMA group versus 211.0 (95%CI 28.7-393.3) days for IC group (P=0.491). The incidence of lung infection (17.4% versus 50.0%, P=0.010), thrombocytopenia (73.9% versus 95.2%, P=0.035) and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) (50.0% versus 13.0%, P=0.003) was significantly higher in IC group.

Discussion

In conclusion, VEN+HMA is not inferior to IC regimen in terms of improving response and survival, and is associated with a lower incidence of adverse events and aGvHD. However, further research is required to enhance long-term survival.

Venetoclax with decitabine versus decitabine monotherapy in elderly acute myeloid leukemia: a propensity score-matched analysis

Venetoclax (VEN) combined with azacitidine (AZA) or decitabine (DEC) has been approved for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unfit for intensive chemotherapy based on the pivotal VIALE-A trial. However, this trial only compared AZA + VEN with AZA monotherapy. Therefore, we compared the outcomes of consecutive older adults (65 years or older) with newly diagnosed AML who received DEC (n = 230) or DEC + VEN (n = 74) after propensity score matching to construct a one-to-one matched cohort by the nearest neighbor algorithm. The median overall survival was longer in the DEC + VEN group than in the DEC group (13.4 months vs. 8.3 months, p = 0.01). The median event-free survivals were 8.6 and 5.8 months in the DEC + VEN and DEC groups, respectively (p = 0.02). The response rate (complete response, complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery, and morphologic leukemia-free state) was significantly higher in the DEC + VEN group than in the DEC group (70.3% vs. 24.3%, p < 0.01). The 30-day (2.7% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.17) and 60-day (9.5% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.16) mortality rates did not differ between the two groups, nor did the median hospitalization and transfusion rates (hospitalization: 23 days vs. 21 days, p = 0.20; red blood cells: 3.2 units/month vs. 3.5 units/month, p = 0.73; platelets: 2.7 units/month vs. 2.3 units/months, p = 0.48). Of those who received DEC + VEN and became leukemia-free, 29% underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation and had excellent survival outcomes (one-year survival: 79.4%; one-year non-relapse mortality: 13.3%). This study is the first to provide real-world evidence that DEC + VEN has superior outcomes to DEC monotherapy.

A real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) events for venetoclax

BACKGROUND

Venetoclax (VEN) is the first selective small molecule Bcl-2 inhibitor approved by FDA and used in adult chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) and some acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the long-term safety of VEN in large sample population was unknown. This study evaluated the adverse events (AEs) of VEN from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) since its approval in 2016 by data mining.

METHODS

The disproportionality analyses, including four algorithms of reporting odd ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), bayesian configuration promotion neural network (BCPNN), and multi item gamma poisson shrinker (MGPS), were employed to quantify the signals of VEN-associated AEs.

RESULTS

From the FAERS database, a total of 8,379,682 reports were collected during the study period. After removing the duplication, the number of reports with VEN as the primary suspect (PS) was 19,107. The 19,107 cases of AEs involved 27 organ systems, 256 significant PTs which conforming to the four algorithms. Unexpected serious AEs, such as pleural effusion, splenic infarction, atrial fibrillation, skin squamous cell carcinoma, etc., have signals. The median time of occurrence of AEs related to VEN was 31 days (inter quartile range [IQR] 7-131 days), and half of the reported AEs occurred within 1 month after administration.

CONCLUSION

Our research has found new significant AEs signals of VEN, which improved its safety information in real-world after marketing approval, and contributed to its risk control of use in clinic.