The effectiveness and safety of octocog alfa in patients with hemophilia A: up to 7-year follow-up of the real-world AHEAD international study

Contemporary approaches to treat people with hemophilia: what's new and what's not?

The care of people with hemophilia with access to treatment has evolved over the past 70 years, with an average life expectancy like unaffected peers. For people with hemophilia living in low- and middle-income countries, the same is not true because of the lack of access to diagnosis and treatment. It is imperative to close gaps in care that exist throughout the world. Here, we provide a narrative review of hemophilia and the treatments available to people with hemophilia A and B with the goal of achieving a hemophilia-free state. We aim to provide information on what is new and what gaps remain that preclude equitable outcomes for everyone with hemophilia. Information on the current state of hemophilia care and outcomes, the products available for the treatment of people with hemophilia, comprehensive interdisciplinary care of people with hemophilia, and the remaining gaps in care for people with hemophilia were assembled by the authors using relevant literature. Research must focus on preventing all bleeding, and new approaches to detect joint bleeding are needed. Training on and implementation of comprehensive interdisciplinary care is needed to elevate the standards of care in low- and middle-income countries. The development and introduction of improved factor replacement and nonfactor products, such as second-generation bispecific monoclonal antibodies and targeted inhibitors of the anticoagulant mechanisms along with genetic therapies, have the possibility of normalizing hemostasis and achieving health equity for people with hemophilia. Improved outcomes and, ultimately, health equity, can only be realized if diagnosis, education, and care are accessible to everyone living with hemophilia worldwide.

Pediatric Rare Diseases Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry: An International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development, Clinical Pharmacology Leadership Group-Pediatrics Working Group, Rare Diseases Subteam Whitepaper Examining the Current Landscape and Recommendations for the Future

Many new opportunities surround rare pediatric disease drug development, thanks to key advances in regulatory thinking and in the scientific community. As rare disease drug development brings challenges to the developers in terms of limited understanding of natural history, heterogeneity in drug response, as well as difficulty recruiting patients in pivotal trials, there has never been a greater need for quantitative integration. To understand how International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) member companies approach pediatric rare disease drug development, the rare pediatric subteam of the Clinical Pharmacology Leadership Group (CPLG) sponsored Pediatrics Working Group conducted a baseline survey to assess the four main pillars of this quantitative innovation, namely, biomarkers and surrogate end points, statistical methodologies, model-informed drug development, as well as public-private partnerships. The survey was administered by IQ and yielded 13 evaluable responders from represented companies. This article presents the key findings from this baseline identifying survey, highlighting the key blind spots, and providing insightful expert opinions to address those gaps. In summary, we call an urgent attention to the community on the opportunities to enhance integration and within-industry learnings from this analysis on aspects related to platform studies, end-to-end quantitative integration, and sharing of trial-level placebo data for better understanding of disease progression and more efficient trial designs. We collectively hope that these findings will stimulate discussion and debate around cross-industry sharing and collaboration to better delineate principles and further enhance the efficiency of rare pediatric disease drug development.

Comprehensive laboratory assessment of lonoctocog alfa versus octocog alfa in severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Lonoctocog alfa is a single-chain factor VIII (FVIII) molecule with high binding affinity to von-Willebrand-factor. While it is well known that its plasma activity is underestimated by one-stage clotting assays (OSCA), there is a lack of knowledge on the post-infusion performance of lonoctocog alfa in global coagulation assays or its potential impact on the haemostatic balance in vivo.

AIM

To characterize lonoctocog alfa versus octocog alfa in pre- and post-infusion samples obtained from patients undergoing repeated investigation of incremental recovery (IR).

METHODS

Eighteen patients with severe haemophilia A (lonoctocog alfa: 10, octocog alfa: 8) were included. A panel of factor-specific and global coagulation assays was applied, comprising a FVIII OSCA, two FVIII chromogenic substrate assays (CSA), rotational thrombelastography and thrombin generation (TG). Potential activation of coagulation was assessed by measuring plasma thrombin markers and levels of activated protein C.

RESULTS

Comparable IRs were found for lonoctocog alfa and octocog alfa (2.36 [IU/dL]/[IU/kg] vs. 2.55 [IU/dL]/[IU/kg], respectively). Lonoctocog alfa activities were found to be underestimated by the FVIII OSCA while also the two FVIII CSAs showed statistically significant assay discrepancies on lonoctocog alfa. Effects of both FVIII products on rotational thrombelastography were less distinct than those on TG parameters. No elevated pre- or significantly shifting post-infusion plasma levels of coagulation biomarkers were detected.

CONCLUSION

Lonoctocog alfa and octocog alfa showed comparable recovery and safety in vivo as well as similar impacts on TG in vitro. Observed assay discrepancies on lonoctocog alfa demonstrated variability of results also between different FVIII CSAs.