Inheritance and innovation of the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions

Diagnostic performance of rapid on-site evaluation during bronchoscopy for lung cancer: A comprehensive meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Screening high-risk populations for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality. Bronchoscopy is a diagnostic procedure used to monitor patients suspected of having lung cancer after LDCT. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) can improve the diagnostic accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), although its diagnostic value remains unclear. In this meta-analysis, the authors evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of ROSE during bronchoscopy.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of ROSE for lung cancer during bronchoscopy. Studies evaluating the performance of ROSE and articles providing sufficient data for constructing a 2 × 2 table on a per-lesion basis were included. A meta-analysis was conducted using a bivariate random-effects model.

RESULTS

In total, 32 studies involving 8243 lung lesions were included with a pooled sensitivity of 91.8% and a pooled specificity of 94.9%. Subgroup analysis of 12 studies involving 2929 specimens from patients who underwent computed tomography revealed a pooled sensitivity of 93.8% and a pooled specificity of 96%. Further subgroup analysis of seven studies on the diagnostic outcomes of ROSE for intrathoracic or mediastinal lymph nodes through EBUS-TBNA for lung cancer staging revealed a pooled sensitivity of 90.1% and a pooled specificity of 96.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

ROSE exhibited high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing lung cancer during bronchoscopy. It also exhibited high sensitivity in detecting lung cancer in patients undergoing LDCT and higher specificity for nodal staging with EBUS-TBNA.

Diagnostic efficacy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchoscopic lung biopsy for identifying tuberculous nodules

BACKGROUND

Microbiological diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is hampered by a low pathogen burden, low compliance and unreliable sputum sampling. Although endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchoscopic lung biopsy (EBUS-TBLB) has been found to be useful for the assessment of intrapulmonary nodules in adults, few data are available for the clinical diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Here, we evaluated EBUS-TBLB as a diagnostic procedure in adult patients with radiologically suspected intrapulmonary tuberculous nodules.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients admitted with pulmonary nodules between January 2022 and January 2023 at Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital. All patients underwent EBUS-TBLB, and lung biopsy samples were obtained during hospitalization. All samples were tested for Mycobacterium tuberculosis using acid‒fast smears, Bactec MGIT 960, Xpert MTB/RIF, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and DNA (TB‒DNA) and RNA (TB‒RNA). The concordance between different diagnostic methods and clinical diagnosis was analysed via kappa concordance analysis. The diagnostic efficacy of different diagnostic methods for PTB was analysed via ROC curve.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were included in this study. Among them, 86 patients were diagnosed by EBUS-TBLB, and the overall diagnostic rate was 80.37%. In addition, 102 enrolled patients had benign lesions, and only 5 were diagnosed with lung tumours. Univariate analysis revealed that the diagnostic rate of EBUS-TBLB in pulmonary nodules was related to the location of the probe. The consistency analysis and ROC curve analysis revealed that NGS had the highest concordance with the clinical diagnosis results (agreement = 78.50%, κ = 0.558) and had the highest diagnostic efficacy for PTB (AUC = 0.778). In addition, Xpert MTB/RIF + NGS had the highest concordance with the clinical diagnosis results (agreement = 84.11%, κ = 0.667) and had the highest efficacy in the diagnosis of PTB (AUC = 0.826).

CONCLUSION

EBUS-TBLB is a sensitive and safe method for the diagnosis of pathological pulmonary nodules. Xpert MTB/RIF combined with NGS had the highest diagnostic efficacy and can be used in the initial diagnosis of PTB.

Balloon Dilatation for Bronchoscope Delivery in a Swine Model: A Novel Technique for Ultra-Peripheral Lung Field Access and Accurate Biopsy

INTRODUCTION

In transbronchial biopsy of peripheral pulmonary lesions, the bronchoscope can reach only a limited depth due to the progressive narrowing of bronchi, which may reduce the diagnostic rate. This study examined the balloon dilatation for bronchoscope delivery (BDBD) technique, employing a novel balloon device to enhance bronchoscopy into the peripheral lung areas.

METHODS

Anaesthetised swine served as our primary model. Using computed tomography (CT) scans, we positioned virtual targets characterised by a positive bronchus sign and a diameter of 20 mm beneath the pleura. The bronchoscope was navigated along the pathways determined from the CT images. We performed balloon dilatation when bronchial narrowing obstructed progress to assess whether balloon dilatation would enable the bronchoscope to enter further into the periphery.

RESULTS

We established 21 virtual targets on the CT scans. An average of 12.1 branches were identified along the pathways on the CT scans; however, bronchoscopy without BDBD only allowed access to an average of 6.7 branches. Based on 72 balloon dilatations with 3.0-mm or 4.0-mm ultra-thin bronchoscopes, there was an average increased access of 3.43 and 5.14 branches per route, respectively, with no significant BDBD complications. The bronchoscope was able to reach the planned location along all pathways, and the mean final bronchoscopic endpoints were at an average distance of 14.7 mm from the pleura. Post-procedure CT confirmed biopsy accuracy.

CONCLUSION

The BDBD technique can enhance access of a flexible bronchoscope into the peripheral lung fields, which could potentially allow more accurate transbronchial interventions for peripheral targets.

Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Cryobiopsy versus Forceps Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: A Prospective Randomised Trial

Background

Improvements in pulmonary diagnostic imaging and the development of lung cancer screening are increasing the prevalence of Solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). Fluoroscopically guided radial endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) with transbronchial forceps biopsy (TB-FB) has been the conventional diagnostic method. Transbronchial cryobiopsy (TB-CB) is an alternative biopsy method. We sought to compare transbronchial cryobiopsy to transbronchial forceps biopsy for the diagnosis of SPNs.

Methods

A prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Royal Adelaide Hospital (RAH). Patients with SPNs were randomised to either 5 transbronchial forceps biopsies or one transbronchial cryobiopsy. Complete blinding of investigators and participants was not possible, as transbronchial cryobiopsy required general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield with secondary outcomes of specimen size, diagnostic yield for subsets challenging to access with forceps and safety.

Results

The overall diagnostic yield for the 28 enrolled subjects was 76.8%(22/28). The diagnostic yield was 91.7% (11/12 patients) for transbronchial cryobiopsy and 68.8% (11/16 patients) for forceps biopsy (p=0.14). Median biopsy sizes were consistently larger for the cryobiopsy arm at 7.0mm compared to 2.5mm(p<0.0001). An eccentric EBUS image signalling the probe was adjacent to the nodule occurred in 4/28 cases, and TB-CB confirmed a diagnosis in 3/3 randomised to this arm. There were no major complications with either technique.

Conclusion

Transbronchial cryobiopsy under the guidance of fluoroscopy and radial EBUS facilitates larger biopsy specimens without a significant increase in major complications. Further research is required to confirm the effect on diagnostic yield; however, our study supports a role for TB-CB in the diagnosis of SPNs and small, nodule-adjacent biopsies.

Clinical Trial Registration Number

Reference number of R20160213(HREC/16/RAH/37).