Continuous psychophysics for two-variable experiments; A new "Bayesian participant" approach

A comparative analysis of perceptual noise in lateral and depth motion: Evidence from eye tracking

The characterization of how precisely we perceive visual speed has traditionally relied on psychophysical judgments in discrimination tasks. Such tasks are often considered laborious and susceptible to biases, particularly without the involvement of highly trained participants. Additionally, thresholds for motion-in-depth perception are frequently reported as higher compared to lateral motion, a discrepancy that contrasts with everyday visuomotor tasks. In this research, we rely on a smooth pursuit model, based on a Kalman filter, to quantify speed observational uncertainties. This model allows us to distinguish between additive and multiplicative noise across three conditions of motion dynamics within a virtual reality setting: random walk, linear motion, and nonlinear motion, incorporating both lateral and depth motion components. We aim to assess tracking performance and perceptual uncertainties for lateral versus motion-in-depth. In alignment with prior research, our results indicate diminished performance for depth motion in the random walk condition, characterized by unpredictable positioning. However, when velocity information is available and facilitates predictions of future positions, perceptual uncertainties become more consistent between lateral and in-depth motion. This consistency is particularly noticeable within ranges where retinal speeds overlap between these two dimensions. Significantly, additive noise emerges as the primary source of uncertainty, largely exceeding multiplicative noise. This predominance of additive noise is consistent with computational accounts of visual motion. Our study challenges earlier beliefs of marked differences in processing lateral versus in-depth motions, suggesting similar levels of perceptual uncertainty and underscoring the significant role of additive noise.

Precision and temporal dynamics in heading perception assessed by continuous psychophysics

It is a well-established finding that more informative optic flow (e.g., faster, denser, or presented over a larger portion of the visual field) yields decreased variability in heading judgements. Current models of heading perception further predict faster processing under such circumstances, which has, however, not been supported empirically so far. In this study, we validate a novel continuous psychophysics paradigm by replicating the effect of the speed and density of optic flow on variability in performance, and we investigate how these manipulations affect the temporal dynamics. To this end, we tested 30 participants in a continuous psychophysics paradigm administered in Virtual Reality. We immersed them in a simple virtual environment where they experienced four 90-second blocks of optic flow where their linear heading direction (no simulated rotation) at any given moment was determined by a random walk. We asked them to continuously indicate with a joystick the direction in which they perceived themselves to be moving. In each of the four blocks they experienced a different combination of simulated self-motion speeds (SLOW and FAST) and density of optic flow (SPARSE and DENSE). Using a Cross-Correlogram Analysis, we determined that participants reacted faster and displayed lower variability in their performance in the FAST and DENSE conditions than in the SLOW and SPARSE conditions, respectively. Using a Kalman Filter-based analysis approach, we found a similar pattern, where the fitted perceptual noise parameters were higher for SLOW and SPARSE. While replicating previous results on variability, we show that more informative optic flow can speed up heading judgements, while at the same time validating a continuous psychophysics as an efficient method for studying heading perception.

Target motion misjudgments reflect a misperception of the background; revealed using continuous psychophysics

Determining the velocities of target objects as we navigate complex environments is made more difficult by the fact that our own motion adds systematic motion signals to the visual scene. The flow-parsing hypothesis asserts that the background motion is subtracted from visual scenes in such cases as a way for the visual system to determine target motions relative to the scene. Here, we address the question of why backgrounds are only partially subtracted in lab settings. At the same time, we probe a much-neglected aspect of scene perception in flow-parsing studies, that is, the perception of the background itself. Here, we present results from three experienced psychophysical participants and one inexperienced participant who took part in three continuous psychophysics experiments. We show that, when the background optic flow pattern is composed of local elements whose motions are congruent with the global optic flow pattern, the incompleteness of the background subtraction can be entirely accounted for by a misperception of the background. When the local velocities comprising the background are randomly dispersed around the average global velocity, an additional factor is needed to explain the subtraction incompleteness. We show that a model where background perception is a result of the brain attempting to infer scene motion due to self-motion can account for these results.