1
|
Weiss E. No Bones About It: Sex Is Binary. ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR 2024; 53:1595-1608. [PMID: 38565789 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-024-02851-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Anthropologists have led the way in formulating techniques that reveal skeletal differences between males and females. Understanding of physical differences in the pelvis related to childbirth, hormonal impacts on bones, and extensive comparative studies have provided anthropologists with an array of traits and measurements that help them estimate sex using just bones. Forensic anthropologists and bioarcheologists are improving their ability to differentiate males and females by increasing research on a variety of postcranial bones and through the use of molecular data, especially new methods called proteomics, to identify sex in prepubescent juveniles. As remains from more cultures and time periods are studied, sex identification will continue to improve, because skeletal sex differences are in large part biologically determined. Yet, anthropologists have also been at the forefront of arguing that sex lies on a spectrum. Anthropologists who view sex as on a spectrum may deter sex identification progress; from their perspective, an individual of an undetermined sex may just be a nonbinary individual. Anthropologists who consider sex is on a spectrum are coming to this conclusion in part because they are looking for anatomical ideals, mistaking pathology for variation, and confusing independent variables with dependent variables. Nonetheless, anthropologists need to continue to improve sex identification techniques to reconstruct the past accurately, which may reveal less strict sex roles than previously presumed and help with the identification of crime victims. Forensic anthropologists should also increase their efforts to identify whether individuals have undergone medical procedures intended to change one's gender due to the current rise in transitioning individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Weiss
- Department of Anthropology, San José State University, One Washington Square, San José, CA, 95192-0113, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kahn NF, Asante PG, Coker TR, Kidd KM, Christakis DA, Richardson LP, Sequeira GM. Demographic Differences in Gender Dysphoria Diagnosis and Access to Gender-Affirming Care Among Adolescents. LGBT Health 2024. [PMID: 38190267 DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2023.0273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The goal of this article was to identify demographic differences in receipt of gender dysphoria (GD) diagnosis and access to gender-affirming care (GAC) among adolescents whose gender identity and/or pronouns differed from their sex assigned at birth. Methods: Data were from 2444 patients who were 13-17 years old and had a documented gender identity and/or pronouns that differed from their sex assigned at birth in the electronic health record. Adjusted logistic regression models explored associations between demographic characteristics (sex assigned at birth, gender identity, race and ethnicity, language, insurance type, rural status) and presence of GD diagnosis and having accessed GAC. Results: The average predicted probability (Pr) of having received a GD diagnosis was 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.60-0.63) and of having accessed GAC was 0.48 (95% CI = 0.46-0.50). Various significant demographic differences emerged. Notably, Black/African American youth were the least likely to have received a GD diagnosis (Pr = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.33-0.54) and accessed GAC (Pr = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.22-0.43). Although there were no significant differences in GD diagnosis by insurance type, youth using Medicaid, other government insurance, or self-pay/charity care were less likely to have accessed GAC compared with youth using commercial/private insurance. Conclusion: Results indicate significant differences in both receipt of GD diagnosis and accessing GAC by various demographic characteristics, particularly among Black/African American youth. Identification of these differences provides an opportunity to further understand potential barriers and promote more equitable access to GAC among adolescents who desire this care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole F Kahn
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Peter G Asante
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Tumaini R Coker
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kacie M Kidd
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Dimitri A Christakis
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Laura P Richardson
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Gina M Sequeira
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|