Challenges to the consolidation of pharmacovigilance practices in Brazil: limitations of the hospital pharmacist

Impact of the Role of the Clinical Pharmacist on the Underreporting of Adverse Drug Reactions at a Peruvian hospital

Background: The clinical pharmacists play a key role in the Pharmacovigilance System. They are integrated to the health team performing pharmacotherapeutic follow-up (PF), drug information, at third level care hospital. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the clinical pharmacists' role in increasing the reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions (SADRs) after including in-service training (IST) in their role, as well as to characterize the reported ADRs. Methods: A longitudinal study was performed, reports of SADRs received through medical interconsultations were evaluated, before and after applying IST, in 2 periods: January 2017 to June 2018 and July 2018 to December 2019. Results: Interconsultations after IST were increased by 168,4%; of these, 75 were ADRs reported to the Dirección General de Medicamentos, Insumos y Drogas (DIGEMID). Internal Medicine and Pneumology services reported more SADR in both periods. There was significant statistical difference in ADRs' causality (P = .001) and type (P = .009). Severe ADRs highlighted after IST (4 vs 12). The most affected organ and system in both periods was skin and appendages. Conclusion: The reporting of SADRs augmented, reflected in an increase in medical interconsultations as a modality of SADR notification, after including IST to the role of the clinical pharmacist, allowing the development of convenient FP, which led to the evaluation of SARs. A higher number of serious ADRs were reported.

Causality assessment of adverse drug reactions by applying a global introspection method in a high complexity hospital

Background

Causality assessment of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is an essential approach in pharmacovigilance. The World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Center (WHO-UMC) system has been considered one of the most adequate method for establishing causal relationship in hospitalized patients.

Objective

To describe the causality of potential ADRs in hospitalized patients assessed by the WHO-UMC system and by different healthcare professionals.

Methods

Three healthcare professionals, with different backgrounds, acted as judges to adjudicate the causality categories for potential ADRs according to WHO-UMC system, in a Brazilian high complexity hospital. Judges' agreement was evaluated by using Fleiss' and Cohen's kappa coefficients.

Results

Ninety potential ADRs identified in 300 participants were adjudicated by each judge, comprising a total of 270 assessments. Most potential ADRs were classified as probable or possible (77.8%). Fleiss´ kappa revealed slight concordance among judges (k = 0.096;CI:95%;0.01–0.18).

Conclusions

Diverse backgrounds may have influenced the results for causality assessment of ADRs by employing the WHO-UMC system. Despite the slight concordance found for the method, this result suggests potential opportunity to enrich the ADRs management by engaging multiprofessional teams in the process. Further studies should be considered to investigate the performance of methods for ADRs assessment in hospitalized patients in low- and middle-income countries.