Anticholinergic burden in older adult inpatients: patterns from admission to discharge and associations with hospital outcomes

Implementation of an age-friendly care initiative in an acute care setting: Overcoming challenges and measuring outcomes

BACKGROUND

The aging U.S. population requires innovative care approaches. Our medical center implemented the Age-Friendly Health Systems "4Ms" framework-what Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility-using a Plan-Do-Study-Act quality improvement approach.

METHODS

Launched in December 2019 on two inpatient units, this nurse-led project aimed to improve care for hospitalized adults aged 70+. Key interventions included enhancing documentation of patient goals, reducing high-risk medications, implementing delirium prevention strategies, and supporting mobility. Metrics tracked included 4Ms adherence, Beers® Criteria medication orders, delirium incidence, and ambulation distances.

RESULTS

Over five years, 4Ms adherence rose from 81% to 100%, Beers Criteria medication orders decreased, and ambulation distances improved while falls and delirium rates remained stable. Patient education initiatives enhanced satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The successful 4Ms initiative has expanded across all inpatient units and is being implemented system wide.

Anticholinergic burden and frailty in older inpatients: insights from analysis of admission and discharge medicines using four anticholinergic scales

BACKGROUND

Exposure to high anticholinergic burden is associated with adverse outcomes in older adults. Older adults with frailty have greater vulnerability to adverse anticholinergic effects. There is limited data on anticholinergic burden in hospitalised older adults with frailty particularly, in New Zealand. This study aimed to (i) examine exposure to anticholinergic medicines in older inpatients using multiple scales, and (ii) describe the association of patient factors such as frailty with anticholinergic exposure.

METHODS

We reviewed admission and discharge medicines of 222 older patients (≥ 65 years) in a New Zealand hospital. Sociodemographic, diagnostic and medication data were collected from electronic health records. Anticholinergic burden was quantified using the Anticholinergic Burden Classification (ABC), Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACB), Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS), and Drug Burden Index (DBI). Frailty was assessed using frailty index (FI) and the Hospital Frailty Risk score (HFRS); higher scores indicate higher frailty. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine patient factors associated with anticholinergic burden.

RESULTS

Depending on the scale used, the mean anticholinergic burden ranged from 0.65 to 1.83 on admission and 0.59 to 1.40 at discharge, with 32-74% of the patients on admission and 25-65% at discharge prescribed at least one anticholinergic medicine. About 1 in 3 patients had high anticholinergic burden on admission and discharge. On admission, being frail (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 5.16, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.57, 16.97), having history of readmission (AOR 4.96, CI 1.58, 15.59), and higher number of medicines [AOR range 1.18 CI 1.10, 1.26 (ARS scale) to 1.25 CI 1.15, 1.36 (DBI scale)] were associated with higher odds of anticholinergic exposure. At discharge, pre-frail (DBI scale: AOR = 6.58, CI 1.71-25.32) and frail patients (ACB scale: AOR = 5.73, CI 1.66, 19.70) and those with higher number of medicines [AOR range 1.18 CI 1.09, 1.29 (ARS scale) to 1.33 CI 1.20, 1.49 (DBI scale)] had higher odds of anticholinergic exposure.

CONCLUSION

A reduction in the anticholinergic burden from admission to discharge was observed in the study population yet, one-third of the study cohort were discharged with high anticholinergic medicines. Enhancing hospital prescribers' and pharmacists' awareness about anticholinergic burden and targeted interventions such as in-hospital deprescribing are needed to reduce high anticholinergic exposure in acute setting.

Anticholinergic Burden in Patients Treated for Overactive Bladder: Second-Line Therapy with Tibial Nerve Stimulation as a Solution

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a highly prevalent condition with significant associated comorbidities. Current management guidelines suggest the utilization of anticholinergic medication as a second line after nonpharmacological treatment. Tibial nerve stimulation (TNS), which has previously been thought to have been expensive and inaccessible, was relegated to a third-line therapy. However, given the recently discovered association between anticholinergic medication use and dementia as well as the recent FDA approval of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS), there may be a need to revisit management guidelines. In this commentary, we identify the two types of TNS, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) and TTNS and compare them with anticholinergics. By considering their respective efficacies, side-effects profiles, and associated costs, we make the case in this commentary for an update to guidelines that includes TNS as second-line OAB management ahead of anticholinergic medication.

Anticholinergic burden among in-patients: a cross-sectional study on prevalence, determinants, and impact on mortality in Ethiopia

Background

Numerous studies report that anticholinergic burden (ACB) has been linked with several health consequences, including increased hospital admissions, prolonged hospitalization, and physical and cognitive impairment. However, low- and middle-income settings, as well as younger individuals, are underrepresented.

Objectives

To assess the prevalence and determinants of ACB, and to assess the impact of ACB on in-hospital mortality among adult in-patients at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (UOGCSH).

Design

A cross-sectional study was conducted from June to August 2022 at UOGCSH among adult in-patients.

Methods

A pre-tested questionnaire was utilized to collect data from patients and their corresponding medical charts. A consecutive sampling technique was used to select the participants. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests, as appropriate, were used to determine associations between independent variables and ACB. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox proportional hazards regression test were used to assess the impact of ACB on in-hospital mortality.

Results

A total of 420 adult in-patients, median (interquartile range) age of 38 (26, 55) years, participated in this study. Over half (58.3%) were exposed to anticholinergic medicines, with a high ACB (⩾3) seen in 11.2% of participants. High ACB was associated with higher median number of medicines per patient (p = 0.003) higher median hospital length of stay (p = 0.033), and having mental and behavioral disorders (p < 0.001). No significant association was found between ACB and in-hospital mortality (log-rank test p = 0.26, Cox regression adjusted hazard ratio: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.335-6.453, p = 0.61).

Conclusion

Among adult in-patients, a significant majority (58.3%) were subjected to medications possessing anticholinergic properties, with a noteworthy 11.2% of the study subjects exhibiting a high ACB. Participants with higher median length of hospital stay were more likely to have high ACB even in this relatively younger adult patient population.

The impact of anticholinergic burden on clinical outcomes in older hospitalised surgical patients

Polypharmacotherapy is an ever-increasing issue with an ageing patient population. Anticholinergic medications make up a large proportion of patient medication but cause significant side effects, contributing to well-documented issues within the older population and in hospital medicine. This review explores the documented impact of anticholinergic burden in older surgical patients on postoperative delirium, infection, length of stay and readmission, urinary retention, ileus and mortality. It also highlights the need for further high-quality research into anticholinergic burden management among older surgical patients to further impact practice and policy in the area.

Impact of a Comprehensive Intervention Bundle Including the Drug Burden Index on Deprescribing Anticholinergic and Sedative Drugs in Older Acute Inpatients: A Non-randomised Controlled Before-and-After Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

Implementation of the Drug Burden Index (DBI) as a risk assessment tool in clinical practice may facilitate deprescribing.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how a comprehensive intervention bundle using the DBI impacts (i) the proportion of older inpatients with at least one DBI-contributing medication stopped or dose reduced on discharge, compared with admission; and (ii) the changes in deprescribing of different DBI-contributing medication classes during hospitalisation.

METHODS

This before-and-after study was conducted in an Australian metropolitan tertiary referral hospital. Patients aged ≥ 75 years admitted to the acute aged care service for ≥ 48 h from December 2020 to October 2021 and prescribed DBI-contributing medication were included. During the control period, usual care was provided. During the intervention, access to the intervention bundle was added, including a clinician interface displaying DBI score in the electronic medical record. In a subsequent 'stewardship' period, a stewardship pharmacist used the bundle to provide clinicians with patient-specific recommendations on deprescribing of DBI-contributing medications.

RESULTS

Overall, 457 hospitalisations were included. The proportion of patients with at least one DBI-contributing medication stopped/reduced on discharge increased from 29.9% (control period) to 37.5% [intervention; adjusted risk difference (aRD) 6.5%, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -3.2 to 17.5%] and 43.1% (stewardship; aRD 12.1%, 95% CI 1.0-24.0%). The proportion of opioid prescriptions stopped/reduced rose from 17.9% during control to 45.7% during stewardship (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Integrating a comprehensive intervention bundle and accompanying stewardship program is a promising strategy to facilitate deprescribing of sedative and anticholinergic medications in older inpatients.

A study on prescriptions contributing to the risk of high anticholinergic burden in adults with intellectual disabilities: retrospective record linkage study

BACKGROUND

People with intellectual disabilities may face a disproportionate risk of experiencing high anticholinergic burden, and its negative sequalae, from a range of medications, and at younger ages than the general population, but there has been little previous study. Our aim was to determine the source of anticholinergic burden from prescribed medication.

METHODS

Retrospective matched observational study using record linkage. Adults with (n = 4,305), and without (n = 12,915), intellectual disabilities matched by age-, sex- and neighbourhood deprivation. The main outcome measure was the prescription of long-term (approximately 12 months use) anticholinergic medications overall (classified according to the Anticholinergic Risk Scale [ARS]), by drug class, individual drugs, and polypharmacy.

RESULTS

Adults with n = 1,654 (38.4%), and without n = 3,047 (23.6%), intellectual disabilities were prescribed medications long-term with anticholinergic effects. Of those on such drugs, adults with intellectual disabilities were most likely to be on central nervous system (62.6%), gastrointestinal (46.7%), and cardiovascular (28.4%) medications. They were prescribed more central nervous system, gynaecological/urinary tract, musculoskeletal, and respiratory medications, and less cardiovascular, infection, and endocrine medications than their matched comparators. Regardless of age, sex, or neighbourhood deprivation, adults with intellectual disabilities had greater odds of being prescribed antipsychotics (OR = 5.37 [4.40-6.57], p < 0.001), antiepileptics (OR = 2.57 [2.22-2.99], p < 0.001), and anxiolytics/hypnotics (OR = 1.28 [1.06-1.56], p = 0.012). Compared to the general population, adults with intellectual disabilities were more likely to be exposed to overall anticholinergic polypharmacy (OR = 1.48 [1.33-1.66], p < 0.001), and to psychotropic polypharmacy (OR = 2.79 [2.41-3.23], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with intellectual disabilities are exposed to a greater risk of having very high anticholinergic burden through polypharmacy from several classes of medications, which may be prescribed by several different prescribers. There is a need for evidence-based recommendations specifically about people with intellectual disabilities with multiple physical and mental ill-health conditions to optimise medication use, reduce inappropriate prescribing and adverse anticholinergic effects.

Quantifying Anticholinergic Burden and Sedative Load in Older Adults with Polypharmacy: A Systematic Review of Risk Scales and Models

BACKGROUND

Patients taking medication with high anticholinergic and sedative properties are at increased risk of experiencing poor cognitive and physical outcomes. Therefore, precise quantification of the cumulative burden of their drug regimen is advisable. There is no agreement regarding which scale to use to simultaneously quantify the burden associated with medications.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the strengths and limitations of available tools to quantify medication-related anticholinergic burden and sedative load in older adults. We discuss specific limitations and agreements between currently available scales and models and propose a comprehensive table combining drugs categorized as high, moderate, low, or no anticholinergic or sedative activity as excerpted from the selected studies.

METHODS

A targeted search was carried out using the National Library of Medicine through PubMed using medical subject heading terms and text words around the following search terms: (anticholinergic OR sedative) AND (load OR burden OR scale) for studies published between 1 January 1945 and 5 June 2021. In addition, the following databases were searched using the same terms: MEDLINE-EBSCO, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Scopus, OAIster, OVID-MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Screening by titles was followed by an abstract and full-text review. After blind evaluation, agreement between reviewers was reached to establish drug characteristics and categories.

RESULTS

After 3163 articles were identified, 13 were included: 11 assigned risk scores to anticholinergic drugs and two to sedative drugs. Considerable variability between anticholinergic scales was observed; scales included between 27 and 548 drugs. We generated a comprehensive table combining the anticholinergic and sedative activities of drugs evaluated and proposed a categorization of these drugs based on available scientific and clinical evidence. Our table combines information about 642 drugs and categorizes 44, 25, 99, and 474 drugs as high, moderate, low, or no anticholinergic and sedative activity, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Variability and inconsistency exists among scales used to categorize drugs with anticholinergic or sedative burden. In this review, we provide a comprehensive table that proposes a new categorization of these drugs. A longitudinal study will be required to validate the new proposed anticholinergic and sedative burden catalog in an evidence-based manner.