Changing trends in the use of novel oral anticoagulants and warfarin for treating non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Factor XI Inhibitors for Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism: A Review on the Rationale and Update on Current Evidence

Although anticoagulation therapy has evolved from non-specific drugs (i.e., heparins and vitamin K antagonists) to agents that directly target specific coagulation factors (i.e., direct oral anticoagulants, argatroban, fondaparinux), thrombosis remains a leading cause of death worldwide. Direct oral anticoagulants (i.e., factor IIa- and factor Xa-inhibitors) now dominate clinical practice because of their favorable pharmacological profile and ease of use, particularly in venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. However, despite having a better safety profile than vitamin K antagonists, their bleeding risk is not insignificant. This is true for all currently available anticoagulants, and a high bleeding risk is considered a contraindication to anticoagulation. As a result, ongoing research focuses on developing future anticoagulants with an improved safety profile. Several promising approaches to reduce the bleeding risk involve targeting the intrinsic (or contact activation) pathway of coagulation, with the ultimate goal of preventing thrombosis without impairing hemostasis. Based on epidemiological data on hereditary factor deficiencies and preclinical studies factor XI (FXI) emerged as the most promising candidate target. In this review, we highlight unmet clinical needs of anticoagulation therapy, outlay the rationale and evidence for inhibiting FXI, discuss FXI inhibitors in current clinical trials, conduct an exploratory meta-analysis on their efficacy and safety, and provide an outlook on the potential clinical application of these novel anticoagulants.

Should patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer discontinue fibrin clot inhibitors during bacille Calmette-Guérin?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of fibrin clot inhibitor (FCI) use on oncological outcomes in a large contemporary cohort of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) treated with adequate bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed an Institutional Review Board-approved review of patients with NMIBC treated with adequate intravesical BCG, at our institution between 2000 and 2018. FCI use at the time of BCG therapy was recorded for each patient. Patients were stratified according to use of FCI medication. Recurrence- and progression-free survival were analysed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Overall, 226 of 526 patients (43.0%) used a FCI: aspirin (205), clopidogrel (38), warfarin (18) and novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC; seven). The use of FCIs did not adversely affect either recurrence- or progression-free survival (P = 0.385 and P = 0.131, respectively). These results did not change when the impact of aspirin, clopidogrel or warfarin/NOAC use on recurrence and progression was evaluated separately. On multivariate analysis, FCI use was neither associated with tumour recurrence nor progression.

CONCLUSION

The use of FCIs was not associated with adverse oncological outcomes in a large contemporary cohort of patients receiving adequate intravesical BCG for NMIBC. Based on these results, FCIs may be safely continued during BCG immunotherapy.

Current trends in the use of anticoagulant pharmacotherapy in the United Kingdom are changes on the horizon?

INTRODUCTION

Effective stroke prevention with oral anticoagulation (OAC) reduces the risk of stroke and death among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). For most patients with AF, treatment options include vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). NOACs have been introduced as an alternative to VKAs, and their use has been steadily increasing in the United Kingdom and Europe over a decade. In randomized clinical trials, NOACs had a favorable risk-benefit profile as compared to warfarin. However, there is a concern about their long-term safety in clinical practice, especially in high-risk patients. There have been a number of registries and surveys based on the real-world patients with AF which has been conducted and published, providing data on contemporary AF management.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative review, the authors discuss current trends in the use of OAC in the United Kingdom and Europe, considering the potential directions for future anticoagulant therapy in patients with AF.

EXPERT OPINION

The increasing prevalence of AF and AF-related comorbidities proves the need for comprehensive prevention and management strategies. The challenge is the optimization of therapy for each patient. However, there are still gaps in optimal stroke prevention, and the mortality rates remain high in patients with AF.

Stroke Prevention Therapy and Prevalence of Risk Factors Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation at King Fahad University Hospital in Al Khobar: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study

Background

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice. It represents a significant health impact as it is greatly associated with increased risk of mortality and morbidity, most importantly stroke and systemic thromboembolism. 

Aim

This study aims to determine the risk factors of atrial fibrillation, to identify stroke and bleeding risk factors among patients with atrial fibrillation, to assess the trend of stroke prevention management and the influence of CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores on choosing the treatment.

Methods

This study was performed using all the medical records of 395 patients with Atrial fibrillation who were admitted between 2011-2019 at King Fahd University Hospital, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia. The review process included demographic data of the patients and the calculation of stroke and bleeding risk by CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores.

Results

The median age of the population was 72 years old. Hypertension was the most common risk factor for atrial fibrillation (78.2%), followed by diabetes mellitus (61.0%), dyslipidemia (60.0%), coronary artery disease (41.0%), myocardial infarction (18.7%), and congestive heart failure (29.4%). Regarding the management, (42.5%) of the patients were on a combination of both anticoagulants and antiplatelet therapy, while (33.2%) were on anticoagulant therapy only, (17.5%) were on antiplatelets only, and (5.8%) were not on medication. The increased use of anticoagulants and combined therapy was related to the percentage of a high-risk group of thromboembolic events reaching up to (34.5%) and (45.7%), respectively, which is statistically significant. Moreover, the prescription of warfarin declined in the last five years of our study, while the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants increased.

Conclusion

Atrial fibrillation is more prevalent in females, hypertension was the most common risk factor for atrial fibrillation, followed by diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia. Most of the studied population was categorized as a high risk of stroke and bleeding according to CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS- BLED scores. The majority of the atrial fibrillation patient were taking anticoagulants and combined treatment as a stroke prevention therapy. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant prescription increased over warfarin in recent years.