Treating volume overload in acutely decompensated heart failure: established and novel therapeutic approaches

Safety and Efficacy of Istaroxime in Patients With Acute Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of istaroxime in patients with heart failure. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a search was conducted on the EMBASE and Medline databases to identify articles related to the safety and efficacy of istaroxime in patients with heart failure. The search covered the period from inception to May 31st, 2023, without any restrictions on the year of publication. The search strategy utilized relevant terms such as "istaroxime," "heart failure", "efficacy," and other related terms, along with their corresponding Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. The outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included the change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), E to A ratio (a marker of left ventricle function), cardiac index in L/min/m2, systolic blood pressure (SBP) in mmHg, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) in ml, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVDSV) in ml. For safety analysis, gastrointestinal events and cardiovascular events were assessed. A total of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis encompassing 211 patients with heart failure. Pooled analysis showed that istaroxime was effective in increasing LVEF (MD: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.91 to 1.62, p-value: 0.001), reducing E to A ratio (MD: -0.39, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.19, p-value: 0.001), increasing cardiac index (MD: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.25, p-value: 0.001), reducing LVESV (MD: -11.84, 95% CI: -13.91 to -9.78, p-value: 0.001), reducing LVEDV (MD: -12.25, 95% CI: -14.63 to -9.87, p-value: 0.001) and increasing SBP (MD: 8.41, 95% CI: 5.23 to 11.60, p-value: 0.001) compared to the placebo group. However, risk of gastrointestinal events was significantly higher in patients receiving istaroxime compared to the placebo group (RR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.53 to 4.57, p-value: 0.0005). These findings support the enhancement of heart function with istaroxime administration, aligning with previous clinical and experimental evidence.

Safety and efficacy of pulse-induced contour cardiac output monitoring in elderly patients with coronary artery disease and severe heart failure at coronary care units

Background

The optimal treatment for elderly patients with severe heart failure depends on the accurate assessment of their hemodynamic status. Due to its less invasive nature, the safety and efficacy of invasive pulse-induced contour cardiac output (PiCCO)-based hemodynamic monitoring remains uncertain.

Methods

This was a prospective observational study. Between January 2016 and July 2020, 190 elderly patients with severe heart failure were consecutively enrolled. The PiCCO group (89 patients) and non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring group (101 patients) were observed. Hospital stays results were evaluated.

Results

No significant difference in clinical data (P > 0.05) or the incidence of 1-month mortality (16.0 vs. 35.0%, P = 0.141) were observed between groups. The coronary care unit (CCU) stay was shorter in the PiCCO group than in the non-invasive group (40.0 vs. 43.0%, P = 0.049). Indicators such as low Extravascular Lung Water Index (EVLWI), high Body Mass Index (BMI), low Pulmonary Artery Pressure (PAP), and high Left Ventricular Ejection Time (LVET), were associated with favorable clinical results.

Conclusion

Early invasive PiCCO monitoring is safe in critically ill elderly patients with severe heart failure. The hospital stay was reduced using PiCCO monitoring. These encouraging PiCCO results favor its use in elderly patients with severe heart failure at CCUs.

The Effect of Early Aggressive Diuresis on Hospital Length of Stay in Acute Congestive Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Diuresis is the mainstay of treatment during hospitalization for patients admitted with congestive heart failure (CHF). Hospital length of stay (LOS) is considered an important patient outcome for CHF patients; previous studies comparing higher rates of diuresis (aggressive) versus relatively lower rates (nonaggressive) on patient outcomes have shown contradicting results. In fact, no specific guidelines to direct diuretic therapy exist. This investigation was designed to study the effect of early aggressive diuresis on hospital LOS.

METHODS

Data from 194 CHF patients (admitted to the hospital for 1 year) were collected and analyzed in a retrospective cohort study design. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on urine output achieved in the first 24 h of admission; the aggressive diuresis cohort (urine output ≥2400 mL) comprised of 29 subjects while the nonaggressive diuresis cohort (urine output ≤2400 mL) had 165 subjects. The primary endpoint was LOS.

RESULTS

Median LOS for the aggressive diuresis cohort was 4 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.95-5.06) as compared to 5 days (95% CI 4.40-5.60) for the nonaggressive diuresis cohort; log-rank test showed no significant differences between the hospitalized proportions between the two cohorts over time (P = 0.67).

CONCLUSION

Hospital LOS for CHF patients treated with early aggressive diuresis was not significantly different compared to patients treated with nonaggressive diuresis.

Involvement of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor and Calcium Channel in Vascular Remodeling and Endothelial Dysfunction in Rats with Pressure Overload

Vascular remodeling is an adaptive response to various stimuli, including mechanical forces, inflammatory cytokines and hormones. In the present study, we investigated the role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) and calcium channel in carotid artery remodeling in response to increased biomechanical forces by using the transverse aortic constriction (TAC) rat model. TAC was induced on ten-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats and these models were treated with AT1R blocker olmesartan (1 mg/kg/day) or/and calcium channel blocker (CCB) amlodipine (0.5 mg/kg/day) for 14 days. After the treatment, the right common carotid artery proximal to the band (RCCA-B) was collected for further assay. Results showed that olmesartan, but not amlodipine, significantly prevented TAC-induced adventitial hyperplasia. Similarly, olmesartan, but not amlodipine, signifcantly prevented vascular infammation, as indicated by increased tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and increased p65 phosphorylation, an indicator of nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB) activation in RCCA-B. In contrast, both olmesartan and amlodipine reversed the decreased expression of endothelial nitric oxidase synthase (eNOS) and improved endothelium-dependent vasodilation, whereas combination of olmesartan and amlodipine showed no further synergistic protective effects. These results suggest that AT1R was involved in vascular remodeling and inflammation in response to pressure overload, whereas AT1R and subsequent calcium channel were involved in endothelial dysfunction.

Management of Common Cardiovascular Emergencies in Critically Ill Patients

This article reviews treatment and management of common cardiovascular emergencies in critically ill patients, focusing on acute decompensated heart failure, cardiogenic shock, pulmonary embolism, and hypertensive crisis management with inotropes, vasopressors, diuretics, and antiarrhythmic drugs. Clinicians frequently come across challenging clinical scenarios, and there is a gap between evidence-based medicine and clinical practice. Inotropic and vasopressor agents are useful in the acute setting but must be weaned off or used as a bridge for mechanical circulation support devices. Clinicians should aim to lower complications by choosing medications with respect to comorbidities and close the gap between evidence-based medicine and clinical practice.

Association of serum uric acid change with mortality, renal function and diuretic dose administered in treatment of acute heart failure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hyperuricemia is reportedly associated with poor outcome in acute heart failure (AHF). The association between changes in Uric acid (UA) levels with renal function change, diuretic doses, and mortality in patients with AHF were studied.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients hospitalized with AHF were reviewed (n = 535). UA levels were measured at admission and either at discharge or on approximately the seventh day of admission. Patients with an UA change in the top tertile were defined as having an increase (UA-increase) and were compared to those outside the top tertile (non-UA-increase). The endpoint was all-cause mortality, with a mean follow-up duration of 22.2 months. Patients in the UA-increase group presented with greater creatine increase (P < 0.001), and were administered a higher average daily dose of loop diuretic (P = 0.016) compared with the non-UA-increase group. In-hospital UA-increase was associated with higher risk of mortality even after adjusting for confounding variables including creatine change and diuretic dosage [harzard ratio (HR) 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-2.30, P = 0.042]. In patients with hyperuricemia on admission, UA-increase was associated with increased mortality (adjusted HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.38-3.52, P = 0.001). Whereas, in those without admission hyperuricemia, UA-increase had no significant association with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in UA during in-hospital treatment is associated with an increase in creatine levels and daily diuretic dose. Mortality associated with increased UA is restricted to patients who already have hyperuricemia at admission. A combination of UA levels at admission and UA changes on serial assessment during hospitalization may be additional value in the risk stratification of AHF patients.

Diuretics in the Management of Cardiorenal Syndrome

The leading cause of death worldwide is cardiovascular disease. The heart and the kidneys are functionally interdependent, such that dysfunction in one organ may cause dysfunction in the other. By one estimate, more than 60% of patients with congestive heart failure develop chronic kidney disease. Volume overload and congestion are hallmarks of heart failure, and these findings are associated with severe symptoms and poor outcomes. Given the importance of congestion, diuretics remain a cornerstone of heart failure management. However, diuretic treatment remains largely empirical, with little evidence currently available to guide decisions. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology of cardiorenal syndrome, the pharmacology of loop diuretics, mechanisms of diuretic resistance, and evidence-based treatment paradigms.

Extracorporeal ultrafiltration for acute heart failure: patient selection and perspectives

Most patients presenting with acute heart failure (AHF) show signs and symptoms of fluid overload, which are closely associated with short-term and long-term outcomes. Ultrafiltration is an extremely appealing strategy for patients with AHF and concomitant overt fluid overload not fully responsive to diuretic therapy. However, although there are several theoretical beneficial effects associated with ultrafiltration, published reports have shown controversial findings. Differences in selection of the study population and in ultrafiltration indications and protocols, and high variability in the pharmacologic therapy used for the control group could explain some of these conflicting results. Here, we aimed to provide an overview on the current medical evidence supporting the use of ultrafiltration in AHF, with a special focus on the identification of potential candidates who may benefit the most from this therapeutic option.

Pulse contour cardiac output monitoring in acute heart failure patients : Assessment of hemodynamic measurements

Background

Heart failure is known to be a major public health problem. Fluid redistribution contributes to acute heart failure; therefore, knowledge of hemodynamic parameters could be important for optimizing outcomes. The pulse contour cardiac output monitor PiCCO uses the single thermal indicator technique and pulse contour analysis to calculate hemodynamic parameters of preload, afterload, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance and extravascular lung water.

Objectives

We primarily aimed to describe values and parameters seen in acute heart failure patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and secondly to investigate associations between hemodynamic measurements and survival data.

Material and methods

In this study 420 consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary medical university hospital ICU between January 2004 and December 2009 were retrospectively investigated. The study sample was divided into two subgroups: patients monitored by PiCCO (n = 47) and those not monitored by thermodilution measurements (n = 373). No predetermined treatment algorithm based on knowledge obtained by the PiCCO monitor was used and measurements were individually interpreted by the treating physician. The PiCCO monitor measurements were carried out according to manufacturer’s directions.

Results

Patients with PiCCO monitoring were clinically in poorer health with a mean simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS2) of 45 ± 17 vs. 56 ± 20 (p < 0.01). The ICU mortality (22 % vs. 38 %, p = 0.02) and, at least as a tendency, long-term-mortality were increased in patients monitored by PiCCO (RR 1.49, 95 % CI 0.96–2.31, p = 0.08). We provide hemodynamic measurements in acute heart failure patients: cardiac index (2.7 ± 1.2 l/min/m²) was reduced, preload and extravascular lung water index (EVLWI, 11.5 ± 5.1 ml/kg body weight), representing lung edema, were increased.

Conclusion

We provide real world values for PiCCO parameters in acutely decompensated heart failure. In our study patients who were clinically in poorer health were monitored with PiCCO, resulting in increased mortality in this group. Further prospective studies to investigate the effects of treatment decisions triggered by information obtained by PiCCO monitoring for patients in acute heart failure are needed.

Renal dopaminergic system: Pathophysiological implications and clinical perspectives

Fluid homeostasis, blood pressure and redox balance in the kidney are regulated by an intricate interaction between local and systemic anti-natriuretic and natriuretic systems. Intrarenal dopamine plays a central role on this interactive network. By activating specific receptors, dopamine promotes sodium excretion and stimulates anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory pathways. Different pathological scenarios where renal sodium excretion is dysregulated, as in nephrotic syndrome, hypertension and renal inflammation, can be associated with impaired action of renal dopamine including alteration in biosynthesis, dopamine receptor expression and signal transduction. Given its properties on the regulation of renal blood flow and sodium excretion, exogenous dopamine has been postulated as a potential therapeutic strategy to prevent renal failure in critically ill patients. The aim of this review is to update and discuss on the most recent findings about renal dopaminergic system and its role in several diseases involving the kidneys and the potential use of dopamine as a nephroprotective agent.

Employment of vasopressin receptor antagonists in management of hyponatraemia and volume overload in some clinical conditions

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Hyponatraemia, the most common electrolyte imbalance occurring in hospitalized subjects, is usually classified as hypovolaemic, euvolaemic or hypervolaemic. Hyponatraemia is a predictor of death among subjects with chronic heart failure and cirrhosis. The inappropriate secretion of the antidiuretic hormone (AVP) seems to be of pivotal importance in the decline of serum sodium concentration in these clinical conditions. The objective of this review was to summarize recent progress in management of hyponatraemia in SIADH, cirrhosis and heart failure.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted on the topics of hyponatraemia and vasopressin receptor antagonists, using PubMed, pharmaceutical company websites and news reports. The information was evaluated for relevance and quality, critically assessed and summarized.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The initial treatment of severe hyponatraemia is directed towards the prevention or management of neurological manifestations and consists of an intravenous infusion of hypertonic saline. Fluid restriction is indicated in oedematous states. Diuretics alone or in combination with other specific drugs remain the main strategy in the management of volume overload in heart failure. In resistant cases, ultrafiltration can lead to effective removal of isotonic fluid preventing new episodes of decompensation; however, aquapheresis is associated with increased costs and other limits. In several trials, the efficacy of vasopressin receptor antagonists in euvolaemic patients (inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion) or in hypervolaemic hyponatraemia (chronic heart failure, cirrhosis) has been evaluated. It was found that vaptans, which promote aquaresis, were superior to a placebo in raising and maintaining serum sodium concentrations in these subjects.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

Combined with conventional therapy, vasopressin receptor antagonists (AVP-R antagonists) are able to increase the excretion of electrolyte-free water and the sodium concentration. Further studies are needed to assess efficacious outcomes of aquaresis compared with aquapheresis and with conventional therapy.

Editor's Choice- Call to action: Initiation of multidisciplinary care for acute heart failure begins in the Emergency Department

The Emergency Department is the first point of healthcare contact for most patients presenting with signs and symptoms of acute heart failure (AHF) and thus, plays a critical role in AHF management. Despite the increasing burden of AHF on healthcare systems in general and Emergency Departments in particular, there is little guidance for implementing care and disease management programmes. This has led to an urgent call for action to prioritize and improve the management of patients with AHF presenting to the Emergency Department. At a local level, hospitals are urged to develop and implement individual multidisciplinary AHF management programmes, which include detailed care pathways and the monitoring of management adherence, to ensure that care is based on the pathophysiology and causes of AHF. Multiple disciplines, including emergency medicine, hospital medicine, cardiology, nephrology and geriatrics, should provide input into the development of a multidisciplinary approach to AHF management in the ED and beyond, including in-hospital treatment, discharge and follow-up. This will ensure consensus of opinion and improve adherence. The benefits of standardized, multidisciplinary care have been shown in other areas of acute and chronic diseases and will also provide benefit for AHF patients presenting to Emergency Departments.

Decongestion in acute heart failure

Congestion is a major reason for hospitalization in acute heart failure (HF). Therapeutic strategies to manage congestion include diuretics, vasodilators, ultrafiltration, vasopressin antagonists, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and potentially also novel therapies such as gut sequesterants and serelaxin. Uncertainty exists with respect to the appropriate decongestion strategy for an individual patient. In this review, we summarize the benefit and risk profiles for these decongestion strategies and provide guidance on selecting an appropriate approach for different patients. An evidence-based initial approach to congestion management involves high-dose i.v. diuretics with addition of vasodilators for dyspnoea relief if blood pressure allows. To enhance diuresis or overcome diuretic resistance, options include dual nephron blockade with thiazide diuretics or natriuretic doses of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Vasopressin antagonists may improve aquaresis and relieve dyspnoea. If diuretic strategies are unsuccessful, then ultrafiltration may be considered. Ultrafiltration should be used with caution in the setting of worsening renal function. This review is based on discussions among scientists, clinical trialists, and regulatory representatives at the 9th Global Cardio Vascular Clinical Trialists Forum in Paris, France, from 30 November to 1 December 2012.