1
|
Fowler Davis S, Humphreys H, Maden-Wilkinson T, Withers S, Lowe A, Copeland RJ. Understanding the Needs and Priorities of People Living with Persistent Pain and Long-Term Musculoskeletal Conditions during the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Public Involvement Project. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10061130. [PMID: 35742180 PMCID: PMC9222303 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10061130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Critiques of public involvement (PI) are associated with failing to be inclusive of under-represented groups, and this leads to research that fails to include a diversity of perspectives. Aim: The aim of this PI project was to understand the experiences and priorities of people from three seldom-heard groups whose musculoskeletal pain may have been exacerbated or treatment delayed due to COVID-19. Engaging representatives to report diverse experiences was important, given the goal of developing further research into personalised and integrated care and addressing population health concerns about access and self-management for people with musculoskeletal pain. Methods: The project was approved via Sheffield Hallam University Ethics but was exempt from further HRA approval. A literature review was conducted, followed by informal individual and group discussions involving professionals and people with lived experience of (a) fibromyalgia pain, (b) those waiting for elective surgery and (c) experts associated with the care home sector. Findings from the literature review were combined with the insights from the public involvement. Resulting narratives were developed to highlight the challenges associated with persistent pain and informed the creation of consensus statements on the priorities for service improvement and future research. The consensus statements were shared and refined with input from an expert steering group. Results: The narratives describe pain as a uniformly difficult experience to share with professionals; it is described as exhausting, frustrating and socially limiting. Pain leads to exclusion from routine daily activities and often resigns people to feeling and being unwell. In all cases, there are concerns about accessing and improving services and critical issues associated with optimising physical activity, functional wellbeing and managing polypharmacy. Exercise and/or mobilisation are important and commonly used self-management strategies, but opportunity and advice about safe methods are variable. Services should focus on personalised care, including self-management support and medication management, so that people’s views and needs are heard and validated by health professionals. Conclusions: More research is needed to explore the most effective pain management strategies, and public involvement is important to shape the most relevant research questions. Health and care systems evaluation is also needed to address the scale of the population health need. The pandemic appears to have highlighted pre-existing shortcomings in holistic pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Fowler Davis
- Organisation in Health and Care, Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK; (H.H.); (T.M.-W.); (A.L.); (R.J.C.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Helen Humphreys
- Organisation in Health and Care, Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK; (H.H.); (T.M.-W.); (A.L.); (R.J.C.)
| | - Tom Maden-Wilkinson
- Organisation in Health and Care, Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK; (H.H.); (T.M.-W.); (A.L.); (R.J.C.)
| | - Sarah Withers
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Glossop Road, Broomhall, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK;
| | - Anna Lowe
- Organisation in Health and Care, Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK; (H.H.); (T.M.-W.); (A.L.); (R.J.C.)
| | - Robert J. Copeland
- Organisation in Health and Care, Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK; (H.H.); (T.M.-W.); (A.L.); (R.J.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tran UE, Yadav K, Ali MM, Austin M, Nemnom MJ, Eagles D. An evaluation of emergency pain management practices in fragility fractures of the pelvis. CAN J EMERG MED 2022; 24:273-277. [PMID: 35132589 DOI: 10.1007/s43678-022-00265-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inadequately treated pain is associated with significant morbidity in older adults. We aimed to describe current pain management practices for patients with fragility pelvic fractures, a common emergency department (ED) presentation in older adults. METHODS We performed a health records' review of adults ≥ 65 years old who presented to two academic EDs with nonoperative fragility pelvic fractures between 01/2014 and 09/2018. The primary outcome measures were type and timing of analgesic medications. Secondary outcome measures included ancillary service consultation, ED length of stay, admission rate and rate of return to ED at 30 days. Data were reported using descriptive statistics. RESULTS We included 411 patients. The majority were female (339, 82.5%) with mean age 83.9 (SD 8.1) years. Nearly, one-third (130, 31.6%) did not receive any analgesia for their fracture. Analgesia was initiated in 123 (29.9%) patients through paramedic and nursing medical directives; 244 (59.4%) patients received physician-initiated opioids (hydromorphone 228 (55.5%); morphine 28 (6.8%)). Only 23.1% of patients received one or more ancillary services: physiotherapy (10.5%), social work (7.3%), geriatric nurse assessment (14.1%), and homecare (3.9%). Mean ED length of stay was 11.6 (SD 7.1) h; 210 (51.1%) patients were admitted; of those discharged, 45 (22.4%) returned to the ED within 30 days. CONCLUSION One in three older adults presenting to the ED with nonoperative fragility pelvic fractures receive no analgesia during the course of their prehospital and ED care. Barriers to quality care must be identified and processes implemented to ensure adequate pain management for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uyen Evelyn Tran
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Krishan Yadav
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, F658a, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada
| | | | - Michael Austin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, F658a, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada.,Regional Paramedic Program for Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Marie-Joe Nemnom
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, F658a, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada
| | - Debra Eagles
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. .,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, F658a, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada. .,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Weaver KR, Griffioen MA, Klinedinst NJ, Galik E, Duarte AC, Colloca L, Resnick B, Dorsey SG, Renn CL. Quantitative Sensory Testing Across Chronic Pain Conditions and Use in Special Populations. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH (LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 2:779068. [PMID: 35295425 PMCID: PMC8915716 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2021.779068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Chronic pain imposes a significant burden to the healthcare system and adversely affects patients' quality of life. Traditional subjective assessments, however, do not adequately capture the complex phenomenon of pain, which is influenced by a multitude of factors including environmental, developmental, genetic, and psychological. Quantitative sensory testing (QST), established as a protocol to examine thermal and mechanical sensory function, offers insight on potential mechanisms contributing to an individual's experience of pain, by assessing their perceived response to standardized delivery of stimuli. Although the use of QST as a research methodology has been described in the literature in reference to specific pain populations, this manuscript details application of QST across a variety of chronic pain conditions. Specific conditions include lower extremity chronic pain, knee osteoarthritis, chronic low back pain, temporomandibular joint disorder, and irritable bowel syndrome. Furthermore, we describe the use of QST in placebo/nocebo research, and discuss the use of QST in vulnerable populations such as those with dementia. We illustrate how the evaluation of peripheral sensory nerve function holds clinical promise in targeting interventions, and how using QST can enhance patient education regarding prognostic outcomes with particular treatments. Incorporation of QST methodology in research investigations may facilitate the identification of common mechanisms underlying chronic pain conditions, guide the development of non-pharmacological behavioral interventions to reduce pain and pain-related morbidity, and enhance our efforts toward reducing the burden of chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen R. Weaver
- Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States,Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research (CACPR), University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States,*Correspondence: Kristen R. Weaver
| | - Mari A. Griffioen
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research (CACPR), University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States,College of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States
| | - N. Jennifer Klinedinst
- Department of Organizational Systems and Adult Health, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Elizabeth Galik
- Department of Organizational Systems and Adult Health, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ana C. Duarte
- Department of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Luana Colloca
- Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States,Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research (CACPR), University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Barbara Resnick
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research (CACPR), University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States,Department of Organizational Systems and Adult Health, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Susan G. Dorsey
- Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States,Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research (CACPR), University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Cynthia L. Renn
- Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States,Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research (CACPR), University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ledermann K, Abou Khaled O, Caon M, Berger T, Chabwine JN, Wicht J, Martin-Soelch C. An Ecological Monitoring and Management App (EMMA) for Older Adults With Chronic Pain: Protocol for a Design and Feasibility Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 10:e26930. [PMID: 34435969 PMCID: PMC8430865 DOI: 10.2196/26930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic pain is a complex problem for many older adults that affects both physical functioning and psychological well-being. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies have shown promise in supporting older persons in managing chronic conditions. Cognitive behavior therapy is recommended for older people with chronic pain. However, web-based treatment programs for chronic pain are not aimed at the needs of older people and offer standard therapies without providing tailored treatment for this population. Objective To address this problem, we aim to develop a psychological web-based intervention for ecological monitoring of daily life experiences with chronic pain called EMMA to support self-management of chronic pain in older adults. Methods The key clinical and engagement features of the intervention were established through the integration of evidence-based material from cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of chronic pain in older adults. The development process uses a co-design approach and actively involves end-users in the design process by incorporating feedback from focus groups with older adults in order to inform a user-centered intervention design. For the co-design process, we will include 10 older adults with chronic pain, who will discuss the requirements for the app in workshops in order to ensure suitability of the app for older adults with chronic pain. In order to test the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, we will include a sample of 30 older adults with chronic pain who will test all features of the intervention for a period of 8 consecutive weeks. After the trial period, validated instruments will be used to assess usability and acceptability, as well as influence on pain levels and associated physical and psychological symptoms. Participants will be invited to take part in a semistructured telephone interviews after the trial period to explore their experiences using the app. Results Digitalization of the pain diary and psychotherapeutic content has started. Recruitment of participants for the co-design workshops will start as soon as we have a functioning prototype of the electronic pain diary and EMMA intervention, which is expected to be in September 2021. The feasibility study will start as soon as the co-design process is finished and required changes have been implemented into the pain diary and the EMMA intervention. We expect to start the feasibility study early in 2022. Conclusions Required changes to assure usability and acceptability will be directly implemented in the app. EMMA brings together a strong body of evidence using cognitive behavioral and self-management theory with contemporary mHealth principles, allowing for a cost-effective intervention that can be used to target chronic pain anywhere and anytime by older adults. Given the ubiquity of mHealth interventions for chronic conditions, the results of this study may serve to inform the development of tailored self-management interventions. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/26930
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Ledermann
- Department of Consiliar and Liaison Psychiary, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Omar Abou Khaled
- Human Tech Institute, School of Engineering, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Maurizio Caon
- Digital Business Center, School of Management, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Berger
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Joelle N Chabwine
- Division of Neurorehabilitation, Fribourg Hospital, Fribourg, Switzerland.,Neurology Unit, Department of Neuroscience and Movement Science, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Joachim Wicht
- Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Benchetrit S, Blackham J, Braude P, Halliday R, Shipway D, Williams A, Carlton E. Emergency management of older people with cervical spine injuries: an expert practice review. Emerg Med J 2021; 39:331-336. [PMID: 34344732 DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2020-211002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Spinal fractures are the third most common traumatic injury in older people, of which cervical spine injuries make up around 15%. They are predominantly seen in people living with frailty who fall from standing height. Spinal fractures in this patient group are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality (over 40% at 1 year). For many older people who survive, their injuries will be life changing. Practice between EDs varies significantly, with no universally accepted guidelines on either assessment, investigation or management specific to older people experiencing trauma. This expert practice review examines the current evidence and emergency management options in this patient group through clinical scenarios, with the aim of providing a more unified approach to management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Philip Braude
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Ruth Halliday
- Trauma & Orthopaedic Research Team, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - David Shipway
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Adam Williams
- Department of Neurosurgery, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Akbas M, Babun H, Salem HH, Emara TH, Elmosly S, Gunduz E, Karsli B, Asik F. One-year evaluation of epiduroscopy in chronic back pain with and without radiculopathy: a retrospective study. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROSURGERY 2020. [DOI: 10.1186/s41983-019-0142-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Back pain is a frequent complaint among the individuals in the society. It significantly affects the daily activities and the social and psychological life aspects leading to an economic health burden. Epiduroscopy is a relatively new minimally invasive technique that is used as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in cases of chronic back pain.
Aim of the study
To evaluate the extent of long-term benefit of epiduroscopy in patients with refractory chronic back pain with/without radiculopathy.
Materials and methods
Retrospective data of 148 patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) and/or symptomatic lumbosacral disc prolapse who underwent epiduroscopy were collected. A 50% reduction in the visual analog scale (VAS) score was set as the primary outcome. Pre- and post-procedure analgesic use, quality of sleep, and changes in the activities of daily livings (ADLs) after 1-year follow-up were reviewed. Incidence and types of complications were recorded.
Results
The mean age of the studied sample was 56.6 years with a higher percentage of females (61.5%). Patients having radicular pain represented 45.1%. Disc prolapse was prevalent (61.5%) compared to patients with FBSS (38.5%). A reduction of 50% or more in VAS score was reached in 52.7% (p < 0.01). This reduction was more evident in younger patients (p = 0.004). There was an improvement in ADLs (p < 0.01), quality of sleep (p < 0.05), and analgesic intake (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Epiduroscopy is a relatively recent, safe, and minimally invasive tool that showed effectiveness in the difficult to treat patients with back pain with/without radiculopathy especially in FBSS.
Collapse
|
7
|
Cho C, Michailidis V, Martin LJ. Revealing brain mechanisms of mTOR-mediated translational regulation: Implications for chronic pain. NEUROBIOLOGY OF PAIN 2018; 4:27-34. [PMID: 31194026 PMCID: PMC6550104 DOI: 10.1016/j.ynpai.2018.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Revised: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 03/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
mTOR is a major regulator of protein translation. mTOR serves an important role in neural plasticity. mTOR signalling in the brain as a pathology for neurological disorder is known. mTOR signalling in the brain as a chronic pain mechanism is understudied.
In the spinal cord, altered protein transcription and translation have received a lot of recent attention for their role in neural plasticity, a major mechanism leading to the development of chronic pain. However, changes in brain plasticity are also associated with the maintenance of pain symptoms, but these cellular mechanisms remain less clear. The mechanistic/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a master regulator of protein synthesis, and controls several neuronal functions, including neural plasticity. While aberrant changes in mTOR signaling are associated with sensitization of the pain pathway (sensory neurons and spinal cord), there are various nervous system diseases that have pain as a comorbidity and altered mTOR activity in the brain. Here, we provide a brief review of mTOR changes in the brain that are associated with some neurological disorders and focus on how these changes may be relevant to the pain of the underlying condition and chronic pain itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chulmin Cho
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
| | - Vassilia Michailidis
- Deptartment of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
| | - Loren J. Martin
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
- Deptartment of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
- Corresponding author at: Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Rd., Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|