The nociceptive flexion reflex: a scoping review and proposed standardized methodology for acquisition in those affected by chronic pain

Spinal hyperexcitability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain or headache as evidenced by alterations in the nociceptive withdrawal reflex: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

The nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) is a spinal withdrawal reflex induced by painful stimulation. It is a measure of spinal hyperexcitability, which is believed to contribute to chronic musculoskeletal pain (MSKP) and headache. Previous syntheses of the evidence for alterations in the NWR in patients with chronic MSKP and headache needed a comprehensive update. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed after the Preferred Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies examining NWR-related outcome measures in patients with chronic MSKP and headache compared to pain-free controls were identified through electronic database searches and included after screening against predefined eligibility criteria. Standardized mean differences or mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Thirty-one studies were included in the systematic review and 25 in the meta-analysis. Moderate-quality evidence was found indicating lower NWR threshold (-3.68; 95% CI, -4.56 to -2.80; P < 0.001), larger NWR area (standardized mean difference = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.37-1.01; P < 0.001), and shorter NWR latency (mean difference = -13.68; 95% CI, -22.69, -4.67; P = 0.003) in patients compared to controls. These findings remained robust when performing meta-regressions based on subgroups (ie, headache, fibromyalgia, whiplash-associated disorder, and osteoarthritis). Low-quality evidence demonstrated facilitated temporal summation of NWR threshold (-2.48; 95% CI, -3.13 to -1.83; P < 0.001) in patients compared to controls. Spinal hyperexcitability as evidenced by lowered NWR threshold values and temporal summation of the NWR is present in patients with chronic MSKP and headache. No evidence was found for alterations in NWR duration and NWR magnitude. Future research is needed to address the gap in research on NWR-related outcome measures other than NWR threshold.

Methods to discriminate between nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic in children & adolescents: A systematic review of psychometric properties and feasibility

The aim of this systematic review was to identify and critically analyse the tools available for categorising pain as nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic pain in children and adolescents. Studies were included if they (i) included children and adolescents with a mean age of 0-24 years old, (ii) examined assessment tools that categorise pain as nociceptive, neuropathic or nociplastic, and (iii) examined the psychometric properties of the tools. Sensitive searches were conducted in five online databases in March 2024. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias and quality by two authors using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. The search yielded 26 studies for 11 tools. No assessment tool had evidence for all nine recommended psychometric properties. Quantitative Sensory Testing, a tool used to identify signs and symptoms of nociplastic and neuropathic pain, was the most studied tool and had moderate evidence for construct validity, criterion validity and reliability. Three self-reported questionnaires, the Self-reported Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS), Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI) and PainDETECT, had moderate evidence for construct validity and show promise as preliminary tools to identify possible neuropathic or nociplastic pain. However, they had low specificity when used in isolation. All assessment methods would benefit from further psychometric evaluation and validation in children and adolescents. PERSPECTIVE: This systematic review highlights the limited validation of pain assessment tools for children and adolescents. While Quantitative Sensory Testing and self-reported questionnaires show promise in identifying pain mechanisms, their applicability remains uncertain. Further psychometric validation is crucial to improve pain assessment and guide personalized treatment in young populations.

Evidence for spinal disinhibition as a pain-generating mechanism in fibromyalgia syndrome

Introduction

Pain phenomenology in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) shows considerable overlap with neuropathic pain. Altered neural processing leading to symptoms of neuropathic pain can occur at the level of the spinal cord, and 1 potential mechanism is spinal disinhibition. A biomarker of spinal disinhibition is impaired H-reflex rate-dependent depression (HRDD).

Objectives

This study investigated whether patients with FMS exhibit evidence of spinal disinhibition.

Methods

Thirty-one individuals with FMS and 20 healthy volunteers underwent testing of Hoffman reflex including HRDD, along with assessment of clinical signs and symptoms, pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation of pain (wind-up), and conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Small nerve fibre structure was quantified using intraepidermal nerve fibre density and corneal confocal microscopy.

Results

Patients with FMS had significantly impaired HRDD at 1 Hz (P = 0.026) and 3 Hz (P = 0.011) and greater wind-up ratio (P = 0.008) compared with healthy controls. Patients with the most impaired HRDD also had the most inefficient CPM but HRDD was not associated with wind-up. Both HRDD and CPM were most impaired in patients with a shorter duration of disease.

Conclusion

We demonstrate for the first time that people with FMS show evidence of spinal disinhibition, which is most dominant in shorter duration of disease and may represent a putative mechanism of pain generation in FMS. Identifying people with impairment of central pain processing at an early stage may provide opportunities for targeted mechanistically directed interventions. Longitudinal studies are warranted to tease out the precise contribution of these mechanisms.

Can assessment of human assumed central sensitisation improve the predictive accuracy of the STarT Back screening tool in acute low back pain?

BACKGROUND

The STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) is recommended to provide risk-stratified care in low back pain (LBP), yet its predictive value is moderate for disability and low for pain severity. Assessment of human assumed central sensitisation (HACS) in conjunction with the SBT may improve its predictive accuracy.

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether assessment of HACS in acute LBP improves the predictive accuracy of the SBT for LBP recovery at six months in people with acute non-specific LBP.

DESIGN

A prospective longitudinal study.

METHOD

Data were drawn from the UPWaRD study. One hundred and twenty people with acute non-specific LBP were recruited from the community. Baseline measures included SBT risk status, nociceptive flexor withdrawal reflex, pressure and heat pain thresholds and conditioned pain modulation. Primary outcome was the presence of LBP (pain numeric rating scale ≥1 and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score ≥3) at six-month follow-up. Regression coefficients were penalised using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator technique to select predictor variables. Internal validation was performed using ten-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS/FINDINGS

SBT risk status alone did not predict the presence of LBP at six months (area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.58). Adding measures of HACS to the SBT did not improve discrimination for whether LBP was present at six months (AUC = 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the suboptimal predictive accuracy of the SBT, administered during acute LBP, for LBP recovery at six months. Assessment of HACS in acute LBP does not improve the predictive accuracy of the SBT.

Pain Catastrophizing Moderates the Relationship Between Pain Sensitivity and Clinical Pain in Adolescents With Functional Abdominal Pain

Pain catastrophizing has been linked to amplified pain sensitivity assessed using quantitative sensory testing (QST) in adults; pediatric data are limited, particularly in youth with functional abdominal pain (FAP). With increasing use of QST to evaluate somatosensory function and predict pain outcomes, we examined the associations between QST and clinical pain in adolescents with FAP and tested the moderating effects of pain catastrophizing. Seventy-seven adolescents (mean age 16.6 years, 85.7% female, 72.7% White, 90.8% non-Hispanic) who fulfilled diagnostic criteria for FAP completed QST assessment (pressure pain threshold and tolerance, heat pain threshold, conditioned pain modulation) and measures of abdominal pain intensity, pain interference, and pain catastrophizing. Adjusting for age and sex, only higher heat pain threshold was associated with higher abdominal pain intensity (Beta per 1-standard deviation = .54, P = .026). Contrary to hypothesis, for youth with higher pain catastrophizing, higher pressure pain tolerance was associated with greater abdominal pain intensity, but associations were not significant for youth with lower catastrophizing (P = .049). Similarly, for those with higher pain catastrophizing (in contrast to lower pain catastrophizing), higher pressure pain thresholds and tolerance were associated with higher pain interference (P = .039, .004, respectively). Results highlight the need to investigate the influence of pain catastrophizing on QST. PERSPECTIVE: This study demonstrated unexpected findings of pain catastrophizing moderating the relationships between pressure pain threshold and tolerance, and clinical pain in adolescents with FAP. This raised questions regarding our understanding of psychological contributions to QST findings in pediatric populations with chronic pain.

Alcohol use and the pain system

The World Health Organization's epidemiological data from 2016 revealed that while 57% of the global population aged 15 years or older had abstained from drinking alcohol in the previous year, more than half of the population in the Americas, Europe, and Western Pacific consumed alcohol. The spectrum of alcohol use behavior is broad: low-risk use (sensible and in moderation), at-risk use (e.g., binge drinking), harmful use (misuse) and dependence (alcoholism; addiction; alcohol use disorder). The at-risk use and misuse of alcohol is associated with the transition to dependence, as well as many damaging health outcomes and preventable causes of premature death. Recent conceptualizations of alcohol dependence posit that the subjective experience of pain may be a significant contributing factor in the transition across the spectrum of alcohol use behavior. This narrative review summarizes the effects of alcohol at all levels of the pain system. The pain system includes nociceptors as sensory indicators of potentially dangerous stimuli and tissue damage (nociception), spinal circuits mediating defensive reflexes, and most importantly, the supraspinal circuits mediating nocifensive behaviors and the perception of pain. Although the functional importance of pain is to protect from injury and further or future damage, chronic pain may emerge despite the recovery from, and absence of, biological damage (i.e., in the absence of nociception). Like other biological perceptual systems, pain is a construction contingent on sensory information and a history of individual experiences (i.e., learning and memory). Neuroadaptations and brain plasticity underlying learning and memory and other basic physiological functions can also result in pathological conditions such as chronic pain and addiction. Moreover, the negative affective/emotional aspect of pain perception provides embodied and motivational components that may play a substantial role in the transition from alcohol use to dependence.

Longitudinal Changes and Associations Between Quantitative Sensory Testing and Psychological Factors in Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses-Based Data Synthesis

Whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) represent a multifactorial condition often accompanied by altered nociceptive processing and psychological factors. This systematic review on acute and chronic WAD aimed to investigate the relationship between quantitative sensory testing (QST) and psychological factors and quantify whether their trajectories over time follow a similar pattern to disability levels. Eight databases were searched until October 2022. When 2 prospective studies examined the same QST or psychological variable, data synthesis was performed with random-effects meta-analysis by pooling within-group standardized mean differences from baseline to 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. From 5,754 studies, 49 comprising 3,825 WAD participants were eligible for the review and 14 for the data synthesis. Altered nociceptive processing in acute and chronic WAD, alongside worse scores on psychological factors, were identified. However, correlations between QST and psychological factors were heterogeneous and inconsistent. Furthermore, disability levels, some QST measures, and psychological factors followed general positive improvement over time, although there were differences in magnitude and temporal changes. These results may indicate that altered psychological factors and increased local pain sensitivity could play an important role in both acute and chronic WAD, although this does not exclude the potential influence of factors not explored in this review. PERSPECTIVE: Acute WAD show improvements in levels of disability and psychological factors before significant improvements in nociceptive processing are evident. Facilitated nociceptive processing might not be as important as psychological factors in chronic WAD-related disability, which indicates that chronic and acute WAD should not be considered the same entity although there are similarities. Nonetheless, pressure pain thresholds in the neck might be the most appropriate measure to monitor WAD progression.

Nociceptive flexion reflex in small fibers neuropathy and pain assessments†

BACKGROUND

The nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) is a polysynaptic and multisegmental spinal reflex that develops in response to a noxious stimulus and is characterized by the withdrawal of the affected body part. The NFR possesses two excitatory components: early RII and late RIII. Late RIII is derived from high-threshold cutaneous afferent A-delta fibers, which are prone to injury early in the course of diabetes mellitus (DM) and may lead to neuropathic pain. We investigated NFR in patients with DM with different types of polyneuropathies to analyze the role of NFR in small fiber neuropathy (SFN).

METHODS

We included 37 patients with DM and 20 healthy participants of similar age and sex. We performed the Composite Autonomic Neuropathy Scale-31, modified Toronto Neuropathy Scale, and routine nerve conduction studies. We grouped the patients into large fiber neuropathy (LFN), SFN, and no overt neurological symptom/sign groups. In all participants, NFR was recorded on anterior tibial (AT) and biceps femoris (BF) muscles after train stimuli on the sole of the foot, and NFR-RIII findings were compared.

RESULTS

We identified 11 patients with LFN, 15 with SFN, and 11 with no overt neurological symptoms or signs. The RIII response on the AT was absent in 22 (60%) patients with DM and 8 (40%) healthy participants. The RIII response on the BF was absent in 31 (73.8%) patients and 7 (35%) healthy participants (P = .001). In DM, the latency of RIII was prolonged, and the magnitude was reduced. Abnormal findings were seen in all subgroups; however, they were more prominent in patients with LFN compared to other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The NFR-RIII was abnormal in patients with DM even before the emergence of the neuropathic symptoms. The pattern of involvement before neuropathic symptoms was possibly related to an earlier loss of A-delta fibers.

Noxious radiant heat evokes bi-component nociceptive withdrawal reflexes in spinal cord injured humans-A clinical tool to study neuroplastic changes of spinal neural circuits

Investigating nocifensive withdrawal reflexes as potential surrogate marker for the spinal excitation level may widen the understanding of maladaptive nociceptive processing after spinal cord injury (SCI). The aim of this prospective, explorative cross-sectional observational study was to investigate the response behavior of individuals with SCI to noxious radiant heat (laser) stimuli and to assess its relation to spasticity and neuropathic pain, two clinical consequences of spinal hyperexcitability/spinal disinhibition. Laser stimuli were applied at the sole and dorsum of the foot and below the fibula head. Corresponding reflexes were electromyography (EMG) recorded ipsilateral. Motor responses to laser stimuli were analyzed and related to clinical readouts (severity of injury/spasticity/pain), using established clinical assessment tools. Twenty-seven participants, 15 with SCI (age 18-63; 6.5 years post-injury; AIS-A through D) and 12 non-disabled controls, [non-disabled controls (NDC); age 19-63] were included. The percentage of individuals with SCI responding to stimuli (70-77%; p < 0.001), their response rates (16-21%; p < 0.05) and their reflex magnitude (p < 0.05) were significantly higher compared to NDC. SCI-related reflexes clustered in two time-windows, indicating involvement of both A-delta- and C-fibers. Spasticity was associated with facilitated reflexes in SCI (Kendall-tau-b p ≤ 0.05) and inversely associated with the occurrence/severity of neuropathic pain (Fisher's exact p < 0.05; Eta-coefficient p < 0.05). However, neuropathic pain was not related to reflex behavior. Altogether, we found a bi-component motor hyperresponsiveness of SCI to noxious heat, which correlated with spasticity, but not neuropathic pain. Laser-evoked withdrawal reflexes may become a suitable outcome parameter to explore maladaptive spinal circuitries in SCI and to assess the effect of targeted treatment strategies. Registration: https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00006779.

Exploring the effect of capsaicin-induced central sensitization on the upper limb nociceptive withdrawal reflex threshold

The nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) threshold is commonly employed in the lower limb to assess clinical and experimentally induced pain. However, no studies to date have investigated changes in spinal nociception in the upper limb, via the NWR threshold, following experimentally induced central sensitization (CS). We tested the hypothesis that experimentally induced CS of the C5-C6 spinal segment significantly reduces NWR thresholds in muscles of the upper limb. Upper limb NWR thresholds from 20 young, healthy adults were assessed by applying noxious electrical stimuli to the right index finger and recording muscle activity from the biceps brachii (BI), triceps brachii (TRI), flexor carpi ulnaris (WF), and extensor carpi radialis longus (WE) muscles via surface electromyography. Topical cream (either 0.075% capsaicin, or control) was applied to the C5-C6 dermatome of the lateral forearm (50 cm²). NWR thresholds were compared at baseline, and four 10-min intervals after topical application. WF muscle NWR thresholds were significantly reduced in the capsaicin session compared to control, while TRI muscle NWR thresholds were significantly reduced 40 min after capsaicin application only (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences for BI or WE muscle NWR thresholds. We observed poor to moderate test-retest reliability for all upper limb NWR thresholds, a key contributor to the selective reduction in NWR thresholds among muscles. Accordingly, while our findings demonstrate some comparability to previously reported lower limb NWR studies, we concurrently report limitations of the upper limb NWR technique. Further exploration of optimal parameters for upper limb NWR acquisition is needed.