Collaborative capacity and patient-centered care in the Veterans' Health Administration Community Living Centers

Early development of a contextually appropriate psychological intervention for skilled nursing facilities: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

This study describes the application of the Designing for Accelerated Translation (DART) and Intervention Mapping (IM) frameworks to the early development of a psychological intervention for depression in short-term subacute/post-acute skilled nursing facility (SNF) care.

METHOD

We conducted five focus groups with 32 SNF staff and individual interviews with 28 residents and 18 care partners. Data were analyzed using a hybrid inductive-deductive coding structure to map themes onto the DART framework (i.e. eliciting demand, user-centered design, and context-sensitive approaches). Staff and dyad members' findings were triangulated. Then, IM was used to translate qualitative findings into intervention components.

RESULTS

Participants reported demand for psychological intervention with potential benefits for both residents and care partners during a SNF stay. Second, five themes were identified to guide intervention content: fear and worry; emotional reactions to changes in independence; motivation for rehabilitation; stress and conflict complicating discharge and long-term care; and healthy coping strategies. Third, participants noted context-sensitive approaches for implementation (e.g. session length of 20-30 min). Based on findings, we identified change objectives and methods for psychological intervention.

CONCLUSION

This study provides an overview of early intervention development processes that consider implementation and dissemination in real-world SNF settings.

The Impact of Nursing Home Culture Change: An Integrative Review

OBJECTIVES

The Nursing Home Culture Change (NHCC) movement promotes a person- and relationship-centered approach and a small-scale, homelike model for NHs. The present study aimed to integrate the most recent empirical findings regarding the impact of NHCC on resident, staff, family, and organizational outcomes.

DESIGN

Integrative review.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Not applicable.

METHODS

OVID MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched for quantitative or mixed studies published in English between 2018 and 2022 and examining the effect of NHCC on resident, staff, family, and/or organizational outcomes. A narrative and tabular synthesis of the results is provided.

RESULTS

A total of 1687 references were identified. Following duplicate removal, title and abstract screening, and full-text screening, 75 studies were retained for synthesis and suggest a positive impact of NHCC on resident (eg, quality of life and neuropsychiatric function), staff (eg, job satisfaction and stress), family (eg, satisfaction and depressive symptoms), and organizational (eg, NH attractiveness and occupancy rate) outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

NHCC shows promising results in all studied outcome categories. Future research should further investigate obstacles to NHCC implementation, conduct cost-benefit analyses supported by appropriate statistical tests, and define ways to improve NH staff education as well as NH policies and regulations to better support NHCC initiatives.

Does context count? The association between quality of care and job characteristics in residential aged care and hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Within residential aged care settings, reduced quality of care (QOC), abuse, and neglect have been global phenomena which require urgent intervention. As the reported rate of these problems is much higher in aged care compared to hospital settings, we investigated whether differing job design characteristics between the two settings might explain the difference.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We used a meta-analysis to compare differences in the relationships between high job demands, low job resources, and job strain with QOC and counter-productive work behaviors (CWBs) across aged care and hospital settings.

RESULTS

Data was extracted from 42 studies (n=55 effects). QOC was negatively correlated with high job demands (ρ̅ =-.22, 95% CI: -.29:-.15, k=7), low job resources (ρ̅ = -.40, 95% CI:-.47:-.32, k=15), and job strain (ρ̅ =-.32, 95% CI: -.38:.-.25, k=22), CWBs had a positive relationship with job demands (ρ̅ =.35, 95%CI: .10:.59, k=3) and job strain (ρ̅ =.34, 95% CI: .13:.56, k=6). The association between poor QOC and low job resources was stronger in aged care (r=-.46, 95% CI:-.55:-36, k=8) than in hospital settings (r= -.30, 95% CI:-.41:-.18, k=7).

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Our findings suggest that relationships between low job resources and poor quality of care are exacerbated in residential aged care contexts. To improve care outcomes, stakeholders should improve job resources such as skill discretion, supervisory supports, and increased training and staffing levels in residential aged care.

Healthcare workers' perceptions on collaborative capacity at a Referral Hospital in Malawi

BACKGROUND

Lack of collaborative capacity results in provision of fragmented health services that do not meet the needs of patients. Collaborative capacity refers to the extent to which providers have influence over other healthcare workers' decision-making, and can be assessed by measuring perceptions of task interdependence, quality of interaction and collaborative influence. However, each healthcare worker may present differing perceptions that can influence their ability to collaborate effectively during provision of care. No studies that specifically assessed healthcare workers' perception of collaborative capacity in Malawi were identified.

AIM

To assess the perceptions of healthcare workers regarding collaborative capacity in Malawi.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a tertiary public hospital in Blantyre city, Malawi.

METHODS

The study employed a quantitative cross-sectional correlational design. The instrument used was a Care Coordination survey that had been used previously in similar studies in the United States of America. Descriptive statistics as well as univariate and multivariate analysis were computed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) program version 21.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

A total of 384 healthcare workers participated in the study, with a response rate of 100%. There were differences in perceptions of collaborative capacity based on the cadre of the respondent (p < 0.005). Medical staff reported higher mean scores on quality of interaction (2.94) and collaborative influence (2.65), whereas technical support staff reported the lowest mean scores across all three measures of collaborative capacity (≤ 2.4).

CONCLUSION

Differences in perceptions about collaborative capacity suggest the need for interventions to enhance interprofessional collaboration.

CONTRIBUTION

The study will inform strategies to promote interprofessional collaboration.