1
|
Tieppo EMDS, Silva GD, Silva TFFD, Araujo RSD, Oliveira MBD, Spricigo MGP, Pimentel GA, Campana IG, Castrillo BB, Mendes NT, Teixeira LS, Nunes DM, Rimkus CDM, Adoni T, Apóstolos Pereira SL, Callegaro D. Misdiagnosis in multiple sclerosis in a Brazilian reference center: Clinical, radiological, laboratory profile and failures in the diagnostic process-Cohort study. Mult Scler 2023; 29:1755-1764. [PMID: 37786965 DOI: 10.1177/13524585231199323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis remains a problem despite the well-validated McDonald 2017. For proper evaluation of errors in the diagnostic process that lead to misdiagnosis, it is adequate to incorporate patients who are already under regular follow-up at reference centers of demyelinating diseases. OBJECTIVES To evaluate multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis in patients who are on follow-up at a reference center of demyelinating diseases in Brazil. METHODS We designed an observational study including patients in regular follow-up, who were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis at our specialized outpatient clinic in the Hospital of Clinics in the University of Sao Paulo, from 1996 to 2021, and were reassessed for misdiagnosis in 2022. We evaluated demographic information, clinical profile, and complementary exams and classified participants as "established multiple sclerosis," "non-multiple sclerosis, diagnosed," and "non-multiple sclerosis, undiagnosed." Failures in the diagnostic process were assessed by the modified Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research tool. RESULTS A total of 201 patients were included. After analysis, 191/201 (95.02%) participants were confirmed as "established multiple sclerosis," 5/201 (2.49%) were defined as "non-multiple sclerosis, diagnosed," and 5/201 (2.49%) were defined as "non-multiple sclerosis, undiagnosed." CONCLUSIONS Multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis persists in reference centers, emphasizing the need for careful interpretation of clinical findings to prevent errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Macedo de Souza Tieppo
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Guilherme Diogo Silva
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Tomás Fraga Ferreira da Silva
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Roger Santana de Araujo
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mateus Boaventura de Oliveira
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mariana Gondim Peixoto Spricigo
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gabriela Almeida Pimentel
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Igor Gusmão Campana
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Bruno Batitucci Castrillo
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Natalia Trombini Mendes
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Larissa Silva Teixeira
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Douglas Mendes Nunes
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Carolina de Medeiros Rimkus
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Tarso Adoni
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Samira Luisa Apóstolos Pereira
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Dagoberto Callegaro
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luca M, Chisari CG, Zanghì A, Patti F. Early-Onset Alcohol Dependence and Multiple Sclerosis: Diagnostic Challenges. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:5588. [PMID: 34073738 PMCID: PMC8197265 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disorder characterized by the progressive disruption of the myelin sheath around the nerve fibres. The early initiation of disease-modifying treatments is crucial for preventing disease progression and neurological damage. Unfortunately, a diagnostic delay of several years is not uncommon, particularly in the presence of physical and mental comorbidities. Among psychiatric comorbidities, the role of alcohol misuse is still under debate. In this paper, we discuss a case of early-onset alcohol dependence and its possible role in delaying the initiation of a specific therapy for MS. The differential diagnosis between idiopathic and secondary neurodegenerative disorders is often challenging. When dealing with patients reporting an early-onset substance abuse (likely to present organic damage), clinicians may be prone to formulate a diagnosis of secondary neuropathy, particularly when facing non-specific symptoms. This case report highlights the need for in-depth medical investigations (including imaging) in the presence of neurological signs suggesting a damage of the central nervous system, prompting a differential diagnosis between idiopathic and secondary neurodegenerative conditions. Indeed, a timely diagnosis is crucial for the initiation of specific therapies positively affecting the outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Francesco Patti
- Section of Neurosciences, Department “GF. Ingrassia”, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia, 78, 95123 Catania, Italy; (M.L.); (C.G.C.); (A.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Delgado-García G, Méndez-Zurita VA, Bayliss L, Flores-Rivera J, Fleury A. Neurocysticercosis: mimics and chameleons. Pract Neurol 2018; 19:88-95. [PMID: 30282762 DOI: 10.1136/practneurol-2017-001788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Neurocysticercosis is the most common parasitic neurological disease worldwide, yet in Europe, it remains relatively uncommon, with many practitioners rarely seeing a case. However, immigration and international travel mean that it is becoming increasingly recognised and diagnosed in developed countries. Being a treatable condition, it is essential to be familiar with the diagnosis and to appreciate its mimics and breadth of its possible clinical presentations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Leo Bayliss
- Division of Neurology, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - José Flores-Rivera
- Division of Neurology, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico.,Demyelinating Diseases Clinic, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Agnès Fleury
- Neurocysticercosis Clinic, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico .,Neuroinflammation Unit, Institute of Biomedical Research, National Autonomous, University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|