Pain and Opioid Use: Evidence for Integrating Acupuncture Into Treatment Planning

Clinician views on acupuncture for acute pain care in a busy urban emergency department

INTRODUCTION

Opioid misuse and dependence remain critical public health issues in the U.S., contributing significantly to reduced life expectancy. Emergency departments (EDs) are key settings for implementing opioid reduction strategies when treating acute pain, such as nonpharmacologic treatment options like acupuncture. This study explored clinician-related factors influencing the integration of the Pain Elimination through Acupuncture Research and Learning (PEARL) program for pain reduction within a high-volume urban ED.

METHODS

This study employed a sequential mixed methods design, involving surveys and interviews with ED clinicians. An 11-item electronic survey was administered annually to assess clinician attitudes related to appropriateness and effectiveness of integrating acupuncture into the ED's comprehensive care plan for treatment of pain. Near the end of the 3rd year of the PEARL program, semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather in-depth insights into clinician knowledge and perceptions of the program.

RESULTS

Quantitative survey data from 99 eligible ED clinicians indicated positive perceptions of the program's appropriateness and effectiveness, and improved understanding of acupuncture referral procedures. Analysis of qualitative interviews conducted with 16 ED clinicians revealed five key themes: acupuncture as an acceptable analgesic strategy to reduce the use of opioids, patient benefits, program presence in the ED, integration challenges, and the need for continued education.

CONCLUSION

Strong acceptance of acupuncture as a feasible nonpharmacologic addition to the comprehensive pain care plan used in the ED was observed. Dedicated space, expanded acupuncture staff and hours, and ongoing training of ED staff will require institutional support to sustain acupuncture as a nonpharmacologic treatment option for ED patients.

The current state of knowledge on care for co-occurring chronic pain and opioid use disorder: A scoping review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Opioid use disorder often co-occurs with chronic pain but assessment and treatment of these co-occurring disorders is complex. This review aims to identify current treatments and delivery models for co-occurring chronic pain and opioid use disorder (OUD) documented in the scientific literature.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

METHODS

The review was conducted in six databases in June 2022 (no time limit): CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane, PubMed and Embase. The PRISMA-ScR checklist was used to guide reporting.

RESULTS

Forty-seven publications addressing the issue of co-occurring chronic pain and OUD management were included. Randomized controlled trials provide evidence for the effectiveness of opioid agonist treatments (OAT) such as methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone, as well as for combining OAT with Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement or cognitive behavioural therapy. A number of other pharmacological treatments (opioid and nonopioid), nonpharmacological treatments (e.g. physiotherapy) and service delivery models (e.g. simultaneous treatment of comorbidities, interdisciplinary and interprofessional collaboration) are also underlined. In most cases, authors recommend a combination of strategies to meet patient needs.

CONCLUSIONS

The scoping review reveals gaps in evidence-based knowledge to effectively care for co-occurring chronic pain and OUD, but several experts recommend the uptake of known 'best' practices such as integrated treatment of the multiple biopsychosocial dimensions of the co-occurring disorders as well as collaborative interdisciplinary work.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Improving services is dependent on alleviating barriers such as working in silos, the costs associated with nonpharmacological treatments, and the double stigma associated with pain in people with a substance use disorder.

Does Acupuncture Hurt? A Retrospective Study on Pain and Satisfaction during Pediatric Acupuncture

Previous studies have shown the benefit and safety of pediatric acupuncture, but it is often rejected by patients and their caregivers due to the perception of needling pain associated with acupuncture. A retrospective cohort study of 230 unique patients (1380 sessions) aged 8 to 21 underwent Kiiko Matsumoto Style acupuncture in an outpatient pain clinic. Patients completed a post-acupuncture survey, including the Faces Pain Scale-Revised and Likert-like scales about overall satisfaction, relaxation, and anxiolysis. Univariate analyses were conducted on all outcomes of interest. The mean needling pain score was 1.3 out of 10 with 57.7% of patients reporting no needling pain during their first acupuncture session. The mean score for overall satisfaction was 8.4 out of 10, relaxation was 8.2 out of 10, and anxiety reduction was 7.7 out of 10. The overall satisfaction, relaxation, and anxiolytic effect of acupuncture was increased in patients with more sessions (p = 0.003, 0.022, 0.004, respectively). There was no change in needling pain scores in patients with an increased number of acupuncture sessions (p = 0.776). Patients experience minimal needling pain during acupuncture needling and are highly satisfied with acupuncture. Those with more treatment sessions report feeling increased satisfaction and relaxation.