Thrombospondin-1 Plays a Major Pathogenic Role in Experimental and Human Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

RATIONALE

Extremely preterm infants develop bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a chronic lung injury that lacks effective treatment. Thrombospondin-1 is an anti-angiogenic protein that activates TGF-β1, a cytokine strongly linked to both experimental and human BPD.

OBJECTIVES

1) To examine effects of inhibiting thrombospondin-1-mediated TGF-β1 activation (LSKL) in neonatal rats with bleomycin-induced lung injury, 2) To examine effects of a thrombospondin-1-mimic (ABT-510) on lung morphology, and 3) To determine whether thrombospondin-1 and related signaling peptides are increased in lungs of human preterm infants at risk for BPD.

METHODS

From postnatal days 1-14, rat pups received daily i.p. bleomycin (1 mg/kg) or vehicle combined with daily s.c. LSKL (20 mg/kg) or vehicle. Separate animals were treated with vehicle or ABT-510 (30 mg/kg/d). Paraffin-embedded lung tissues from 47 autopsies (controls; death <28 days, n=30 and BPD at risk; death ≥28 days, n=17) performed on infants born <29 completed weeks' gestation were semi-quantified for injury markers (collagen, macrophages, 3-nitrotyrosine), thrombospondin-1 and TGF-β1.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Bleomycin or ABT-510 increased lung TGF-β1 activity and macrophage influx, caused pulmonary hypertension and led to alveolar and microvascular hypoplasia. Treatment with LSKL partially prevented abnormal lung morphology secondary to bleomycin. Lungs from human infants at-risk for BPD had increased contents of thrombospondin-1 and TGF-β1 when compared to controls. TGF-β1 content correlated with markers of lung injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombospondin-1 inhibits alveologenesis in neonatal rats, in part via up-regulated activity of TGF-β1. Observations in human lung suggest a similar pathogenic role for thrombospondin-1 in infants at-risk for BPD.

Developmental Pharmacodynamics and Modeling in Pediatric Drug Development

Challenges in pediatric drug development include small patient numbers, limited outcomes research, ethical barriers, and sparse biosamples. Increasingly, pediatric drug development is focusing on extrapolation: leveraging knowledge about adult disease and drug responses to inform projections of drug and clinical trial performance in pediatric subpopulations. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling and extrapolation aim to reduce the numbers of patients and data points needed to establish efficacy. Planning for PK-PD and biomarker studies should begin early in the adult drug development program. Extrapolation relies on the assumption that both the underlying disease and the mechanism of action of the drug used to treat that disease are similar in adults and pediatric subpopulations. Clearly, developmental changes in PK and PD need to be considered to enhance the quality of PK-PD modeling and, therefore, increase the success of extrapolation. This article focuses on the influence of differences in PD between adults and pediatric subpopulations that are highly relevant for the use of extrapolation.

Impact of Regulatory Incentive Programs on the Future of Pediatric Drug Development

Surveys evaluating industry experience with performing pediatric studies under the Best Pharmaceutical for Children Act (BPCA) and Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) regulatory regime were conducted by Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development (Tufts CSDD) in 2000, 2006, and 2016. These survey results are being used to assess the future impact of regulatory incentive programs on generating pediatric specific labeling information and development of age-appropriate drug formulations. A second perspective will be provided through the experience and expertise of neonatal/pediatric clinicians and researchers with a focus on the urgent need for the study of new and existing drugs in this vulnerable population (especially with 90% of drugs in neonates still being used off-label). This group will also address the impact of existing regulations and the likely trajectory of future pediatric drug development efforts after nearly 2 decades of regulatory incentives (both mandatory and voluntary). Finally, this review will provide input on approaches that are needed to continue to advance pediatric drug development with an emphasis on rare diseases.

Response biomarkers in neonatal intervention studies

BackgroundUp to 90% of all drugs used in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have not been clinically tested for safety and efficacy. To promote drug development for neonates, the pharmaceutical industry is moving toward rigorous testing, necessitating the need to development, and validating biomarkers in neonates to predict their response. The objective of this review is to evaluate the quality of the response biomarker reporting in neonatal clinical trials.MethodsA validated literature search strategy was applied. Prospective neonatal intervention studies reporting response biomarkers published in 2014 were included. The data were extracted independently and in duplicate using a data-extraction form.ResultsFollowing the full-text review, 167 published prospective neonatal trials were included; 35% (59/167) reported the use of response biomarkers. In these 59 trials, we identified 275 biomarkers used to measure the response (pharmacodynamics and safety) reported as primary or secondary outcomes. Heart rate and oxygen saturation were the most commonly reported. Measurement and instrumentation data were often not provided.ConclusionWe identified a huge variability in the selection, measurement, and reporting of neonatal response biomarkers in prospective intervention studies. Reporting initiatives are needed to reduce research waste and improve the reproducibility of biomarker use in neonatal intervention studies.

Juvenile Nonclinical Safety Studies in Support of Pediatric Drug Development

A pediatric assessment is now a required component of every drug marketing application in North America, Europe, and Japan, unless a waiver has been granted previously. Nonclinical juvenile toxicity studies are often required as part of this assessment. The protocols for juvenile toxicity studies are best devised in consultation with the regulatory authorities. It is important to submit the pediatric investigation plan (PIP) or pediatric study plan (PSP) early, in order not to delay the marketing authorization of the drug in adults. The choice of species and the design of juvenile toxicity studies are based on a series of complex considerations, including the therapeutic use of the drug, age at which children will be treated, duration of treatment, and potential age- or species-specific differences in efficacy, pharmacokinetics, or toxicity.

Role of Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology in Pediatric Approval and Labeling

Dose selection is one of the key decisions made during drug development in pediatrics. There are regulatory initiatives that promote the use of model-based drug development in pediatrics. Pharmacometrics or quantitative clinical pharmacology enables development of models that can describe factors affecting pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics in pediatric patients. This manuscript describes some examples in which pharmacometric analysis was used to support approval and labeling in pediatrics. In particular, the role of pharmacokinetic (PK) comparison of pediatric PK to adults and utilization of dose/exposure-response analysis for dose selection are highlighted. Dose selection for esomeprazole in pediatrics was based on PK matching to adults, whereas for adalimumab, exposure-response, PK, efficacy, and safety data together were useful to recommend doses for pediatric Crohn's disease. For vigabatrin, demonstration of similar dose-response between pediatrics and adults allowed for selection of a pediatric dose. Based on model-based pharmacokinetic simulations and safety data from darunavir pediatric clinical studies with a twice-daily regimen, different once-daily dosing regimens for treatment-naïve human immunodeficiency virus 1-infected pediatric subjects 3 to <12 years of age were evaluated. The role of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling (PBPK) in predicting pediatric PK is rapidly evolving. However, regulatory review experiences and an understanding of the state of science indicate that there is a lack of established predictive performance of PBPK in pediatric PK prediction. Moving forward, pharmacometrics will continue to play a key role in pediatric drug development contributing toward decisions pertaining to dose selection, trial designs, and assessing disease similarity to adults to support extrapolation of efficacy.