1
|
Fernandes CJ, Gautham KS. Organization of care of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia-Building a high-functioning CDH program. J Perinatol 2024; 44:339-347. [PMID: 37798339 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-023-01789-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
Infants born with congenital diaphragmatic hernia have high mortality and morbidity and require coordinated multidisciplinary care for optimal outcomes. Over the past several decades numerous articles have been published on the technical aspects of the care of these patients demonstrating both the variation in management across institutions as well as the desirability and need for standardization of care. Unfortunately, none have focused on the organization of care for CDH patients encompassing the range from early prenatal diagnosis to long-term postnatal care. However, to achieve optimal care and optimal outcomes, it is important to not only have excellent technical surgical and medical care but also to have an organized, systematic, and purposefully designed program for the delivery of healthcare to infants with this condition. In this article, based on our experience and drawing on general principles of building clinical programs, we describe the important elements of an ideal CDH program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caraciolo J Fernandes
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Kanekal S Gautham
- Nemours Children's Health System, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tetreault LA, Kwon BK, Evaniew N, Alvi MA, Skelly AC, Fehlings MG. A Clinical Practice Guideline on the Timing of Surgical Decompression and Hemodynamic Management of Acute Spinal Cord Injury and the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Intraoperative Spinal Cord Injury: Introduction, Rationale, and Scope. Global Spine J 2024; 14:10S-24S. [PMID: 38632715 PMCID: PMC10964894 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231183969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Protocol for the development of clinical practice guidelines following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) standards. OBJECTIVES Acute SCI or intraoperative SCI (ISCI) can have devastating physical and psychological consequences for patients and their families. The treatment of SCI has dramatically evolved over the last century as a result of preclinical and clinical research that has addressed important knowledge gaps, including injury mechanisms, disease pathophysiology, medical management, and the role of surgery. In an acute setting, clinicians are faced with critical decisions on how to optimize neurological recovery in patients with SCI that include the role and timing of surgical decompression and the best strategies for hemodynamic management. The lack of consensus surrounding these treatments has prevented standardization of care across centers and has created uncertainty with respect to how to best manage patients with SCI. ISCI is a feared complication that can occur in the best of hands. Unfortunately, there are no systematic reviews or clinical practice guidelines to assist spine surgeons in the assessment and management of ISCI in adult patients undergoing spinal surgery. Given these limitations, it is the objective of this initiative to develop evidence-based recommendations that will inform the management of both SCI and ISCI. This protocol describes the rationale for developing clinical practice guidelines on (i) the timing of surgical decompression in acute SCI; (ii) the hemodynamic management of acute SCI; and (iii) the prevention, identification, and management of ISCI in patients undergoing surgery for spine-related pathology. METHODS Systematic reviews were conducted according to PRISMA standards in order to summarize the current body of evidence and inform the guideline development process. The guideline development process followed the approach proposed by the GRADE working group. Separate multidisciplinary, international groups were created to perform the systematic reviews and formulate the guidelines. All potential conflicts of interest were vetted in advance. The sponsors exerted no influence over the editorial process or the development of the guidelines. RESULTS This process resulted in both systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines/care pathways related to the role and timing of surgery in acute SCI; the optimal hemodynamic management of acute SCI; and the prevention, diagnosis and management of ISCI. CONCLUSIONS The ultimate goal of this clinical practice guideline initiative was to develop evidence-based recommendations for important areas of controversy in SCI and ISCI in hopes of improving neurological outcomes, reducing morbidity, and standardizing care across settings. Throughout this process, critical knowledge gaps and future directions were also defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brian K Kwon
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nathan Evaniew
- McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Mohammed Ali Alvi
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Michael G Fehlings
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Krembil Neuroscience Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brush PL, Sherman M, Lambrechts MJ. Interpreting Meta-Analyses: A Guide to Funnel and Forest Plots. Clin Spine Surg 2024; 37:40-42. [PMID: 37684723 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
Meta-analyses represent the best available medical evidence. Although a powerful tool, they are not without criticisms since any bias in the original studies are then compounded when they are pooled together for the meta-analysis. Funnel plots provide a useful graphical representation of the presence of bias, and forest plots represent the heterogeneity of findings within studies included in a meta-analysis. The purpose of this review is to help readers interpret these statistical tools to better understand the findings of a meta-analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parker L Brush
- Department of Orthopeadic Surgery, The Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Parvar SY, Mojgani P, Lankarani KB, Poursaeed F, Mohamadi Jahromi LS, Mishra V, Abbasi A, Shahabi S. Barriers and facilitators to reducing low-value care for the management of low back pain in Iran: a qualitative multi-professional study. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:204. [PMID: 38233835 PMCID: PMC10792884 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17597-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder with a wide range of etiologies, ranging from self-limiting conditions to life-threatening diseases. Various modalities are available for the diagnosis and management of patients with LBP. However, many of these health services, known as low-value care (LVC), are unnecessary and impose undue financial costs on patients and health systems. The present study aimed to explore the perceptions of service providers regarding the facilitators and barriers to reducing LVC in the management of LBP in Iran. METHODS This qualitative descriptive study interviewed a total of 20 participants, including neurosurgeons, physiatrists, orthopedists, and physiotherapists, who were selected through purposive and snowball sampling strategies. The collected data were analyzed using the thematic content analysis approach. RESULTS Thirty-nine sub-themes, with 183 citations, were identified as barriers, and 31 sub-themes, with 120 citations, were defined as facilitators. Facilitators and barriers to reducing LVC for LBP, according to the interviewees, were categorized into five themes, including: (1) individual provider characteristics; (2) individual patient characteristics; (3) social context; (4) organizational context; and (5) economic and political context. The ten most commonly cited barriers included unrealistic tariffs, provider-induced demand, patient distrust, insufficient time allocation, a lack of insurance coverage, a lack of a comprehensive referral system, a lack of teamwork, cultural challenges, a lack of awareness, and defensive medicine. Barriers such as adherence to clinical guidelines, improving the referral system, improving the cultural status of patients, and facilitators such as strengthening teamwork, developing an appropriate provider-patient relationship, improving the cultural status of the public, motivating the patients, considering an individualized approach, establishing a desirable payment mechanism, and raising the medical tariffs were most repeatedly stated by participants. CONCLUSION This study has pointed out a great number of barriers and facilitators that shape the provision of LVC in the management of LBP in Iran. Therefore, it is essential for relevant stakeholders to consider these findings in order to de-implement LVC interventions in the process of LBP management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyedeh Yasamin Parvar
- Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
- Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Parviz Mojgani
- Iran-Helal Institute of Applied Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
- Research Center for Emergency and Disaster Resilience, Red Crescent Society of The Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kamran Bagheri Lankarani
- Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Fereshteh Poursaeed
- Transitional Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, College of Professional Studies, Northeastern University, Boston, USA
| | - Leila Sadat Mohamadi Jahromi
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Vinaytosh Mishra
- College of Healthcare Management and Economics, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE
| | - Alireza Abbasi
- Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
- Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Saeed Shahabi
- Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Conley B, Bunzli S, Bullen J, O’Brien P, Persaud J, Gunatillake T, Nikpour M, Grainger R, Barnabe C, Lin I. What are the core recommendations for rheumatoid arthritis care? Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Clin Rheumatol 2023; 42:2267-2278. [PMID: 37291382 PMCID: PMC10412487 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-023-06654-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Systematic r eview to evaluate the quality of the clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management and to provide a synthesis of high-quality CPG recommendations, highlighting areas of consistency, and inconsistency. Electronic searches of five databases and four online guideline repositories were performed. RA management CPGs were eligible for inclusion if they were written in English and published between January 2015 and February 2022; focused on adults ≥ 18 years of age; met the criteria of a CPG as defined by the Institute of Medicine; and were rated as high quality on the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. RA CPGs were excluded if they required additional payment to access; only addressed recommendations for the system/organization of care and did not include interventional management recommendations; and/or included other arthritic conditions. Of 27 CPGs identified, 13 CPGs met eligibility criteria and were included. Non-pharmacological care should include patient education, patient-centered care, shared decision-making, exercise, orthoses, and a multi-disciplinary approach to care. Pharmacological care should include conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), with methotrexate as the first-line choice. If monotherapy conventional synthetic DMARDs fail to achieve a treatment target, this should be followed by combination therapy conventional synthetic DMARDs (leflunomide, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine), biologic DMARDS and targeted synthetic DMARDS. Management should also include monitoring, pre-treatment investigations and vaccinations, and screening for tuberculosis and hepatitis. Surgical care should be recommended if non-surgical care fails. This synthesis offers clear guidance of evidence-based RA care to healthcare providers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol for this review was registered with Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/UB3Y7 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke Conley
- Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Samantha Bunzli
- Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD Australia
- Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD Australia
| | | | - Penny O’Brien
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Jennifer Persaud
- Arthritis and Osteoporosis Western Australia, Perth, WA Australia
- Physiotherapy Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA Australia
| | - Tilini Gunatillake
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Mandana Nikpour
- Departments of Medicine and Rheumatology Melbourne, The University of Melbourne at St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Rebecca Grainger
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
- Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand – Capital Coast and Hutt Valley, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Cheryl Barnabe
- Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Ivan Lin
- Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, Geraldton, WA Australia
- Geraldton Regional Aboriginal Medical Service, Geraldton, WA Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Davies B, Brannigan J, Mowforth OD, Khan D, McNair AGK, Tetreault L, Sadler I, Sarewitz E, Aarabi B, Kwon B, Gronlund T, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Zipser CM, Hutchinson PJ, Kurpad S, Harrop JS, Wilson JR, Guest JD, Fehlings MG, Kotter MRN. Secondary analysis of a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership to facilitate knowledge translation in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM): insights from AO Spine RECODE-DCM. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e064296. [PMID: 37463815 PMCID: PMC10357680 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore whether a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership could provide insights on knowledge translation within the field of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). DESIGN Secondary analysis of a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership process for DCM. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING DCM stake holders, including spinal surgeons, people with myelopathy and other healthcare professionals, were surveyed internationally. Research suggestions submitted by stakeholders but considered answered were identified. Sampling characteristics of respondents were compared with the overall cohort to identify subgroups underserved by current knowledge translation. RESULTS The survey was completed by 423 individuals from 68 different countries. A total of 22% of participants submitted research suggestions that were considered 'answered'. There was a significant difference between responses from different stakeholder groups (p<0.005). Spinal surgeons were the group which was most likely to submit an 'answered' research question. Respondents from South America were also most likely to submit 'answered' questions, when compared with other regions. However, there was no significant difference between responses from different stakeholder regions (p=0.4). CONCLUSIONS Knowledge translation challenges exist within DCM. This practical approach to measuring knowledge translation may offer a more responsive assessment to guide interventions, complementing existing metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Davies
- Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jamie Brannigan
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Oliver D Mowforth
- Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Danyal Khan
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Angus G K McNair
- Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Department of General Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Lindsay Tetreault
- Department of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Bizhan Aarabi
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Brian Kwon
- Division of Spine Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Toto Gronlund
- National Institute for Health Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Academic Department of Neurological Surgery, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of)
| | - Carl Moritz Zipser
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Shekar Kurpad
- Division of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - James S Harrop
- Division of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Jefferson Health System, St Louis, Mississippi, USA
| | - Jefferson R Wilson
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James D Guest
- Department of Neurosurgery and The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, The Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark R N Kotter
- Department of Clinical Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lamloum D, Arghittu A, Ferrara P, Castiglia P, Dettori M, Gaeta M, Odone A, Campus G. A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Caries Prevention following the AGREE II Checklist. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:1895. [PMID: 37444729 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11131895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Untreated oral diseases are detrimental to overall well-being and quality of life and are in close relationship with social and economic consequences. The presence of strong evidence for caries primary and secondary prevention is a compulsory tool for the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). This paper was aimed to assess systematically the importance of clinical practice guidelines in caries prevention management considering both the adult and pediatric populations and evaluate them using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) Checklist. Records were extracted from EMBASE, SCOPUS, PubMed/Medline and seven other relevant guideline databases between 6 January and 14 February 2023. Two reviewers independently conducted the appraisal using the web-based platform My AGREE PLUS. Twenty-one guidelines/papers met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Eight CPGs included both primary and secondary prevention interventions, whereas thirteen presented a single preventive model. Overall, 12 guidelines were published in the USA. The mean AGREE II scores ranged from 35.4% to 84.3%. Of the total twenty-one included guidelines, twelve were classified as "Recommended", ranging from 56.3% to 84.3%, the others were described as "Recommended with modification", ranging from 35.4% to 68.9%. From the AGREE II analysis carried out, the CPGs included in this survey adopted a punctual methodological rigor but lacked applicative power. The present survey showed that the public, as the primary beneficiary, played a limited role in the development of the twenty-one CPGs. Hence, methodological improvement can better support high-quality CPG development in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Demetrio Lamloum
- Department of Restorative, Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Antonella Arghittu
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Pietro Ferrara
- Center for Public Health Research, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Monza, Italy
- IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20145 Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Castiglia
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Marco Dettori
- Department of Restorative, Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Maddalena Gaeta
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Anna Odone
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Campus
- Department of Restorative, Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
- Department of Cariology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai 600077, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Oliveira Dos Santos Á, Sergio da Silva E, Machado Couto L, Valadares Labanca Reis G, Silva Belo V. The use of artificial intelligence for automating or semi-automating biomedical literature analyses: a scoping review. J Biomed Inform 2023; 142:104389. [PMID: 37187321 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is a decision-making process based on the conscious and judicious use of the best available scientific evidence. However, the exponential increase in the amount of information currently available likely exceeds the capacity of human-only analysis. In this context, artificial intelligence (AI) and its branches such as machine learning (ML) can be used to facilitate human efforts in analyzing the literature to foster EBM. The present scoping review aimed to examine the use of AI in the automation of biomedical literature survey and analysis with a view to establishing the state-of-the-art and identifying knowledge gaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS Comprehensive searches of the main databases were performed for articles published up to June 2022 and studies were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted from the included articles and the findings categorized. RESULTS The total number of records retrieved from the databases was 12,145, of which 273 were included in the review. Classification of the studies according to the use of AI in evaluating the biomedical literature revealed three main application groups, namely assembly of scientific evidence (n=127; 47%), mining the biomedical literature (n=112; 41%) and quality analysis (n=34; 12%). Most studies addressed the preparation of systematic reviews, while articles focusing on the development of guidelines and evidence synthesis were the least frequent. The biggest knowledge gap was identified within the quality analysis group, particularly regarding methods and tools that assess the strength of recommendation and consistency of evidence. CONCLUSION Our review shows that, despite significant progress in the automation of biomedical literature surveys and analyses in recent years, intense research is needed to fill knowledge gaps on more difficult aspects of ML, deep learning and natural language processing, and to consolidate the use of automation by end-users (biomedical researchers and healthcare professionals).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eduardo Sergio da Silva
- Federal University of São João del-Rei, Campus Centro-Oeste Dona Lindu, Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
| | - Letícia Machado Couto
- Federal University of São João del-Rei, Campus Centro-Oeste Dona Lindu, Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
| | | | - Vinícius Silva Belo
- Federal University of São João del-Rei, Campus Centro-Oeste Dona Lindu, Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Martin-Gill C, Panchal AR, Cash RE, Richards CT, Brown KM, Patterson PD. Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Prehospital Evidence-Based Guidelines. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2023; 27:121-130. [PMID: 36369888 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2142992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Evidence-based guidelines that provide recommendations for clinical care or operations are increasingly being published to inform the EMS community. The quality of evidence evaluation and methodological rigor undertaken to develop and publish these recommendations vary. This can negatively affect dissemination, education, and implementation efforts. Guideline developers and end users could be better informed by efforts across medical specialties to improve the quality of guidelines, including the use of specific criteria that have been identified within the highest quality guidelines. In this special contribution, we aim to describe the current state of published guidelines available to the EMS community informed by two recent systematic reviews of existing prehospital evidenced based guidelines (EBGs). We further aim to provide a description of key elements of EBGs, methods that can be used to assess their quality, and concrete recommendations for guideline developers to improve the quality of evidence evaluation, guideline development, and reporting. Finally, we outline six key recommendations for improving prehospital EBGs, informed by systematic reviews of prehospital guidelines performed by the Prehospital Guidelines Consortium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Martin-Gill
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ashish R Panchal
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Rebecca E Cash
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Kathleen M Brown
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - P Daniel Patterson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ansari S, Kelbrick M, Paduret G, Diaz N, Menzel R, Rogers R, Wareham C, Griffiths C, Jugon S, Tidy K, Johnson S, Mann N, Tanner J, Millward T, Latif S. Clinical practice guideline for clozapine use in patients with
COVID
‐19. PROGRESS IN NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY 2023. [DOI: 10.1002/pnp.779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Saba Ansari
- Dr Ansari is a Specialty Registrar (ST5); Dr Kelbrick is a Consultant Psychiatrist; Dr Paduret is a Core Trainee Year 2; Ms Diaz is a Physical Health Advanced Nurse Practitioner; Ms Menzel is a Pharmacist; Ms Rowena Rogers is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Ms Wareham is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Dr Griffiths is a Senior Research and Evaluation Fellow; Ms Jugon is a EIP operations Manager; Ms Tidy is a CMHT Operations Manager; Ms Johnson is a Ward Matron; Dr Mann, Dr Tanner, Dr Millward, Dr
| | - Marlene Kelbrick
- Dr Ansari is a Specialty Registrar (ST5); Dr Kelbrick is a Consultant Psychiatrist; Dr Paduret is a Core Trainee Year 2; Ms Diaz is a Physical Health Advanced Nurse Practitioner; Ms Menzel is a Pharmacist; Ms Rowena Rogers is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Ms Wareham is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Dr Griffiths is a Senior Research and Evaluation Fellow; Ms Jugon is a EIP operations Manager; Ms Tidy is a CMHT Operations Manager; Ms Johnson is a Ward Matron; Dr Mann, Dr Tanner, Dr Millward, Dr
| | - Gabriela Paduret
- Dr Ansari is a Specialty Registrar (ST5); Dr Kelbrick is a Consultant Psychiatrist; Dr Paduret is a Core Trainee Year 2; Ms Diaz is a Physical Health Advanced Nurse Practitioner; Ms Menzel is a Pharmacist; Ms Rowena Rogers is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Ms Wareham is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Dr Griffiths is a Senior Research and Evaluation Fellow; Ms Jugon is a EIP operations Manager; Ms Tidy is a CMHT Operations Manager; Ms Johnson is a Ward Matron; Dr Mann, Dr Tanner, Dr Millward, Dr
| | - Natasha Diaz
- Dr Ansari is a Specialty Registrar (ST5); Dr Kelbrick is a Consultant Psychiatrist; Dr Paduret is a Core Trainee Year 2; Ms Diaz is a Physical Health Advanced Nurse Practitioner; Ms Menzel is a Pharmacist; Ms Rowena Rogers is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Ms Wareham is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Dr Griffiths is a Senior Research and Evaluation Fellow; Ms Jugon is a EIP operations Manager; Ms Tidy is a CMHT Operations Manager; Ms Johnson is a Ward Matron; Dr Mann, Dr Tanner, Dr Millward, Dr
| | - Rose Menzel
- Dr Ansari is a Specialty Registrar (ST5); Dr Kelbrick is a Consultant Psychiatrist; Dr Paduret is a Core Trainee Year 2; Ms Diaz is a Physical Health Advanced Nurse Practitioner; Ms Menzel is a Pharmacist; Ms Rowena Rogers is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Ms Wareham is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Dr Griffiths is a Senior Research and Evaluation Fellow; Ms Jugon is a EIP operations Manager; Ms Tidy is a CMHT Operations Manager; Ms Johnson is a Ward Matron; Dr Mann, Dr Tanner, Dr Millward, Dr
| | - Rowena Rogers
- Dr Ansari is a Specialty Registrar (ST5); Dr Kelbrick is a Consultant Psychiatrist; Dr Paduret is a Core Trainee Year 2; Ms Diaz is a Physical Health Advanced Nurse Practitioner; Ms Menzel is a Pharmacist; Ms Rowena Rogers is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Ms Wareham is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Dr Griffiths is a Senior Research and Evaluation Fellow; Ms Jugon is a EIP operations Manager; Ms Tidy is a CMHT Operations Manager; Ms Johnson is a Ward Matron; Dr Mann, Dr Tanner, Dr Millward, Dr
| | - Claire Wareham
- Dr Ansari is a Specialty Registrar (ST5); Dr Kelbrick is a Consultant Psychiatrist; Dr Paduret is a Core Trainee Year 2; Ms Diaz is a Physical Health Advanced Nurse Practitioner; Ms Menzel is a Pharmacist; Ms Rowena Rogers is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Ms Wareham is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Dr Griffiths is a Senior Research and Evaluation Fellow; Ms Jugon is a EIP operations Manager; Ms Tidy is a CMHT Operations Manager; Ms Johnson is a Ward Matron; Dr Mann, Dr Tanner, Dr Millward, Dr
| | - Chris Griffiths
- Dr Ansari is a Specialty Registrar (ST5); Dr Kelbrick is a Consultant Psychiatrist; Dr Paduret is a Core Trainee Year 2; Ms Diaz is a Physical Health Advanced Nurse Practitioner; Ms Menzel is a Pharmacist; Ms Rowena Rogers is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Ms Wareham is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Dr Griffiths is a Senior Research and Evaluation Fellow; Ms Jugon is a EIP operations Manager; Ms Tidy is a CMHT Operations Manager; Ms Johnson is a Ward Matron; Dr Mann, Dr Tanner, Dr Millward, Dr
| | - Sue Jugon
- Dr Ansari is a Specialty Registrar (ST5); Dr Kelbrick is a Consultant Psychiatrist; Dr Paduret is a Core Trainee Year 2; Ms Diaz is a Physical Health Advanced Nurse Practitioner; Ms Menzel is a Pharmacist; Ms Rowena Rogers is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Ms Wareham is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Dr Griffiths is a Senior Research and Evaluation Fellow; Ms Jugon is a EIP operations Manager; Ms Tidy is a CMHT Operations Manager; Ms Johnson is a Ward Matron; Dr Mann, Dr Tanner, Dr Millward, Dr
| | - Katy Tidy
- Dr Ansari is a Specialty Registrar (ST5); Dr Kelbrick is a Consultant Psychiatrist; Dr Paduret is a Core Trainee Year 2; Ms Diaz is a Physical Health Advanced Nurse Practitioner; Ms Menzel is a Pharmacist; Ms Rowena Rogers is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Ms Wareham is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Dr Griffiths is a Senior Research and Evaluation Fellow; Ms Jugon is a EIP operations Manager; Ms Tidy is a CMHT Operations Manager; Ms Johnson is a Ward Matron; Dr Mann, Dr Tanner, Dr Millward, Dr
| | - Sara Johnson
- Dr Ansari is a Specialty Registrar (ST5); Dr Kelbrick is a Consultant Psychiatrist; Dr Paduret is a Core Trainee Year 2; Ms Diaz is a Physical Health Advanced Nurse Practitioner; Ms Menzel is a Pharmacist; Ms Rowena Rogers is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Ms Wareham is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Dr Griffiths is a Senior Research and Evaluation Fellow; Ms Jugon is a EIP operations Manager; Ms Tidy is a CMHT Operations Manager; Ms Johnson is a Ward Matron; Dr Mann, Dr Tanner, Dr Millward, Dr
| | - Nick Mann
- Dr Ansari is a Specialty Registrar (ST5); Dr Kelbrick is a Consultant Psychiatrist; Dr Paduret is a Core Trainee Year 2; Ms Diaz is a Physical Health Advanced Nurse Practitioner; Ms Menzel is a Pharmacist; Ms Rowena Rogers is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Ms Wareham is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Dr Griffiths is a Senior Research and Evaluation Fellow; Ms Jugon is a EIP operations Manager; Ms Tidy is a CMHT Operations Manager; Ms Johnson is a Ward Matron; Dr Mann, Dr Tanner, Dr Millward, Dr
| | - James Tanner
- Dr Ansari is a Specialty Registrar (ST5); Dr Kelbrick is a Consultant Psychiatrist; Dr Paduret is a Core Trainee Year 2; Ms Diaz is a Physical Health Advanced Nurse Practitioner; Ms Menzel is a Pharmacist; Ms Rowena Rogers is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Ms Wareham is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Dr Griffiths is a Senior Research and Evaluation Fellow; Ms Jugon is a EIP operations Manager; Ms Tidy is a CMHT Operations Manager; Ms Johnson is a Ward Matron; Dr Mann, Dr Tanner, Dr Millward, Dr
| | - Tim Millward
- Dr Ansari is a Specialty Registrar (ST5); Dr Kelbrick is a Consultant Psychiatrist; Dr Paduret is a Core Trainee Year 2; Ms Diaz is a Physical Health Advanced Nurse Practitioner; Ms Menzel is a Pharmacist; Ms Rowena Rogers is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Ms Wareham is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Dr Griffiths is a Senior Research and Evaluation Fellow; Ms Jugon is a EIP operations Manager; Ms Tidy is a CMHT Operations Manager; Ms Johnson is a Ward Matron; Dr Mann, Dr Tanner, Dr Millward, Dr
| | - Shahid Latif
- Dr Ansari is a Specialty Registrar (ST5); Dr Kelbrick is a Consultant Psychiatrist; Dr Paduret is a Core Trainee Year 2; Ms Diaz is a Physical Health Advanced Nurse Practitioner; Ms Menzel is a Pharmacist; Ms Rowena Rogers is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Ms Wareham is a Community Mental Health Nurse; Dr Griffiths is a Senior Research and Evaluation Fellow; Ms Jugon is a EIP operations Manager; Ms Tidy is a CMHT Operations Manager; Ms Johnson is a Ward Matron; Dr Mann, Dr Tanner, Dr Millward, Dr
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Butler H, Chrisanthopoulos V, Harous A, Eattimoottil SS, Senthilkumaran D, Tanious P, Wang B, Arruzza E. A scoping review of clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2022; 53:728-736. [PMID: 36184269 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2022.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is characterised by the onset of pneumothorax with no evidence of trauma or associated co-morbidities. Several clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been published regarding the management of PSP. Inconsistency in imaging protocols across clinics globally may indicate variability in the recommendations within these guidelines. We aimed to support clinical decision making with an assessment of CPGs regarding PSP diagnosis. METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews was utilised. A systematic search of databases Medline, Embase, and Scopus was conducted. Manual searches of the grey literature and guideline-focused databases was undertaken Inclusion criteria included English-language CPGs pertaining to the management of PSP. Publications were independently extracted and critically appraised by two reviewers using the AGREE-II tool. Recommendations were assessed and tabulated. RESULTS Eight CPGs met the eligibility criteria. 16 recommendations were identified relating to assessment of medical history, physical examination, assessment of clinical stability, posterior-anterior chest X-ray (CXR) on held inspiration, computed tomography following inconclusive CXR, and ultrasound to complement other imaging modalities. CONCLUSION There is universal agreement on the exclusion of expiratory and lateral images in the conventional radiographic series, suggesting that these clinical behaviours may be influenced by local preferences or inhibitors to knowledge translation. This scoping review has summarised the key recommendations of CPGs regarding PSP diagnosis and assessed the methodological quality of the current evidence-base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Butler
- UniSA Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Victoria Chrisanthopoulos
- UniSA Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Andreas Harous
- UniSA Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Stalin Saji Eattimoottil
- UniSA Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Darshna Senthilkumaran
- UniSA Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Philopater Tanious
- UniSA Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Bing Wang
- UniSA Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Elio Arruzza
- UniSA Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jazayeri SB, Maroufi SF, Ghodsi Z, Ghawami H, Pourrashidi A, Amirjamshidi A, Mojtahedzadeh M, Arabkheradmand J, Farahbakhsh F, Shabany M, Faghih-Jouibari M, Fehlings MG, Kwon BK, Harrop JS, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Adopting Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pharmacologic Management of Acute Spinal Cord Injury from a Developed World Context to a Developing Global Region. ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE 2022; 25:353-359. [PMID: 35943014 DOI: 10.34172/aim.2022.58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proper utilization of high-quality clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) eliminates the dependence of patients' outcomes on the ability and knowledge of "individual" health care providers and reduces unwarranted variation in care. The aim of this study was to adapt/adopt two CPGs for pharmacologic management of acute spinal cord injury (SCI) using guideline adaptation methods. METHODS This study was conducted based on the ADAPTE process. Following establishment of an organizing committee and choosing the health topics, we appraised the quality of the CPGs using the Appraisal of Clinical Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II). Then, the authors extracted and categorized suggestions according to Population, Intervention, Professions, Outcomes and Health care setting (PIPOH). The decision-making process was based on systemic evaluation of each suggestion, utilizing a combination of AGREE II scores, the quality of supporting evidence for or against each suggestion and the triad of feasibility, acceptance and adoptability for the Iranian health-care context. RESULTS Two guidelines were included in the adaptation process. Based on high-quality of these guidelines and the feasibility and adoptability evaluation of the organizing committee, we decided to adopt the suggestion of both guidelines. Overall, seven suggestions were extracted from the source guidelines. CONCLUSION This work provides a framework to apply guidelines for acute SCI to the developing regions of the world. Attempts should be made to implement these suggestions in order to improve the health outcomes of Iranian SCI patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Behnam Jazayeri
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Farzad Maroufi
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zahra Ghodsi
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Heshmatollah Ghawami
- Neuropsychology Division, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | | | - Mojtaba Mojtahedzadeh
- Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Director of Fellowship Program in Clinical Pharmacy and Critical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy
| | | | - Farzin Farahbakhsh
- Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Shabany
- Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Morteza Faghih-Jouibari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- University of Toronto Spine Program and Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian K Kwon
- International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Orthopaedics, Division of Spine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - James S Harrop
- Department of Neurological and Orthopedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
- Visiting Professor, Spine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Amiri M, Alavinia SM, Omidvar M, Pakosh M, Catharine Craven B. Systematic reviews in spinal cord injury: A step-by-step guide for rehabilitation science learners and clinicians. J Spinal Cord Med 2021; 44:S40-S51. [PMID: 34038338 PMCID: PMC8604513 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1923261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has created opportunity for multiple rehabilitation science learners and clinicians to critically evaluate and synthesize published research in the field of spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE To provide a step-by-step guide for rehabilitation science learners and clinicians outlining how to conduct rigorous systematic reviews in the field of SCI. RESULTS Steps for conducting a systematic review (SR) include: (1) formation of the SR team consisting of interprofessional experts; (2) formulation of the research question(s) with patient/population/problem, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) specification; (3) determination of inclusion and exclusion criteria; (4) development of SR protocol and registration; (5) development of the search strategies (database specific); (6) screening of titles and abstracts (level 1 screening), and full-texts (level 2 screening); (7) quality assessment of the included studies; (8) data extraction; (9) summary of findings and discussion; and, (10) dissemination of results. CONCLUSIONS The enclosed ten steps for conducting SRs in SCI rehabilitation research have the potential to significantly improve the quality of evidence synthesis and the associated inferences. The importance of assembling team with diverse expertise is emphasized to assure a quality product with the potential to influence practice and inform the content of clinical practice recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammadreza Amiri
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S. Mohammad Alavinia
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Correspondence to S. Mohammad Alavinia, KITE Research Institute - Toronto Rehab - University Health Network, 520 Sutherland Drive, Toronto, ONM4G3V9, Canada; Ph: 416-597-3422x6167.
| | - Maryam Omidvar
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maureen Pakosh
- Library & Information Services, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|