Opportunistic Computed Tomography and Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review

Low hounsfield unit values at sagittal section on computed tomography predicts vertebral fracture following short spinal fusion

BACKGROUND

Preoperative identification of osteoporosis during spine surgery is of critical importance. Additionally, the Hounsfield units (HU) measured using computed tomography (CT) have gained considerable attention. This study aimed to propose a more accurate and convenient screening method for predicting vertebral fractures after spinal fusion in elderly patients by analyzing the HU value of different range of interests of thoracolumbar spine.

METHODS

Our sample pool for analysis consisted of 137 elderly female patients aged >70 years who underwent one- or two-level spinal fusion surgery with a diagnosis of adult degenerative lumbar disease. The HU values of the anterior 1/3 of the vertebral bodies based on sagittal plane and those of vertebral bodies based on axial plane at T11-L5 were measured using the perioperative CT. The incidence of postoperative vertebral fractures with respect to the HU value was investigated.

RESULTS

Vertebral fractures were identified in 16 patients during the mean follow-up period of 3.8 years. While no significant association was found between HU value of L1 vertebral body or minimum HU value from axial plane and the incidence of the postoperative vertebral fracture, the minimum vertebral HU value of the anterior 1/3 of vertebral body from sagittal plane was associated with the incidence of the postoperative vertebral fracture. Patients with a minimum anterior 1/3 vertebral HU value of <80 had a higher incidence of postoperative vertebral fractures. The adjacent vertebral fractures occurred at the level of the vertebra with the lowest HU value, with a high probability. The existence of the vertebra with a minimum HU value of <80 within two levels of upper instrumented vertebrae was a risk factor for adjacent vertebral fracture.

CONCLUSION

HU measurement of the anterior 1/3 of vertebral body predicts the risk of vertebral fracture after short spinal fusion surgery.

A radiological study of the natural history of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH): a story of incomplete fusion

Introduction: DISH is an ankylosing disease, when fractured can be challenging to manage. A retrospective radiological study was conducted to evaluate the natural history and radiological characteristics of DISH on Computed tomography (CT).Methods: Paired CT scans with DISH that are separated at least two years apart were used to perform the following radiological measurements: Degree of disc space fusion, Osteophyte and vertebral body linear attenuation coefficients (LAC), and Osteophyte axial area size and location.Results: 164 patients were analysed with a mean duration of 4.49 years between scans. 38.14% (442/1159) of disc spaces had at least partial calcification. Most osteophytes were right sided before becoming more circumferential over time. The average fusion score was 54.17. Most of the changes in fusion occurred in the upper and lower thoracic regions. The thoracic region when compared to the lumbar region had a greater proportion of its disc spaced being fully fused. Disc level osteophyte areas were larger than Body level osteophytes. Disc osteophytes size growth rate drops over time from 10.89mm²/year in Stage 1 to 3.56mm²/year in Stage 3. Stage 3 disc spaces (-11.01HU/year) was also found to have had a reduction in their LAC over time when compared to Stage 1 disc spaces (17.04HU/year). This change in osteophyte LAC was not mirrored in the change in vertebral body LAC. We predict that the age of onset and complete thoracolumbar ankylosis of DISH to be 17.96 years and 100.59 years, respectively.Conclusion: DISH ankylosis of the spine a slow process that starts in the mid to lower thoracic region before extending cranially and caudally. After the bridging osteophyte has fully formed, remodelling of the osteophyte occurs.

Increased risks of vertebral fracture and reoperation in primary spinal fusion patients who test positive for osteoporosis by Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

While osteoporosis is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in spinal fusion patients, diagnosing osteoporosis reliably in this population has been challenging due to degenerative changes and spinal deformities. Addressing that challenge, biomechanical computed tomography analysis (BCT) is a CT-based diagnostic test for osteoporosis that measures both bone mineral density and bone strength (using finite element analysis) at the spine; CT scans taken for spinal evaluation or previous care can be repurposed for the analysis.

PURPOSE

Assess the effectiveness of BCT for preoperatively identifying spinal fusion patients with osteoporosis who are at high risk of reoperation or vertebral fracture.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort study in a multi-center integrated managed care system using existing data from patient medical records and imaging archives.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We studied a randomly sampled subset of all adult patients who had any type of primary thoracic (T4 or below) or lumbar fusion between 2005 and 2018. For inclusion, patients with accessible study data needed a preop CT scan without intravenous contrast that contained images (before any instrumentation) of the upper instrumented vertebral level.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Reoperation for any reason (primary outcome) or a newly documented vertebral fracture (secondary outcome) occurring up to 5 years after the primary surgery.

METHODS

All study data were extracted using available coded information and CT scans from the medical records. BCT was performed at a centralized lab blinded to the clinical outcomes; patients could test positive for osteoporosis based on either low values of bone strength (vertebral strength ≤ 4,500 N women or 6,500 N men) and/or bone mineral density (vertebral trabecular bone mineral density ≤ 80 mg/cm³ both sexes). Cox proportional hazard ratios were adjusted by age, presence of obesity, and whether the fusion was long (four or more levels fused) or short (3 or fewer levels fused); Kaplan-Meier survival was compared by the log rank test. This project was funded by NIH (R44AR064613) and all physician co-authors and author 1 received salary support from their respective departments. Author 6 is employed by, and author 1 has equity in and consults for, the company that provides the BCT test; the other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

RESULTS

For the 469 patients analyzed (298 women, 171 men), median follow-up time was 44.4 months, 11.1% had a reoperation (median time 14.5 months), and 7.7% had a vertebral fracture (median time 2.0 months). Overall, 25.8% of patients tested positive for osteoporosis and no patients under age 50 tested positive. Compared to patients without osteoporosis, those testing positive were at almost five-fold higher risk for vertebral fracture (adjusted hazard ratio 4.7, 95% confidence interval = 2.2-9.7; p<.0001 Kaplan-Meier survival). Of those positive-testing patients, those who tested positive concurrently for low values of both bone strength and bone mineral density (12.6% of patients overall) were at almost four-fold higher risk for reoperation (3.7, 1.9-7.2; Kaplan-Meier survival p<.0001); the remaining positive-testing patients (those who tested positive for low values of either bone strength or bone mineral density but not both) were not at significantly higher risk for reoperation (1.6, 0.7-3.7) but were for vertebral fracture (4.3, 1.9-10.2). For both clinical outcomes, risk remained high for patients who underwent short or long fusion.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world clinical setting, BCT was effective in identifying primary spinal fusion patients aged 50 or older with osteoporosis who were at elevated risks of reoperation and vertebral fracture.

Discrepancy between DXA and CT-based assessment of spine bone mineral density

PURPOSE

Adequate bone mineral density (BMD) is necessary for success in spine surgery. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard in determining BMD but may give spuriously high values. Hounsfield units (HU) from computed tomography (CT) may provide a more accurate depiction of the focal BMD encountered during spine surgery. Our objective is to determine the discrepancy rate between DXA and CT BMD determinations and how often DXA overestimates BMD compared to CT.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 93 patients with both DXA and CT within 6 months. DXA lumbar spine and overall T scores were classified as osteoporotic (T Score  ≤ - 2.5) or non-osteoporotic (T Score > -2.5). L1 vertebral body HU were classified as osteoporotic or non-osteoporotic using cutoff thresholds of either ≤ 135 HU or ≤ 110 HU. Corresponding DXA and HU classifications were compared to determine disagreement and overestimation rates.

RESULTS

Using lumbar T scores, the CT vs DXA disagreement rate was 40-54% depending on the HU threshold. DXA overestimated BMD 97-100% of the time compared to CT. Using overall DXA T scores, the disagreement rate was 33-47% with DXA greater than CT 74-87% of the time. In the sub-cohort of 10 patients with very low HU (HU < 80), DXA overestimated BMD compared to CT in every instance.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a large discrepancy between DXA and CT BMD determinations. DXA frequently overestimates regional BMD encountered during spine surgery compared with CT. While DXA remains the gold standard in determining BMD, CT may play an important role in defining the focal BMD pertinent to spine surgery.

Evaluation of bone mineral density after instrumented lumbar fusion with computed tomography

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Computed tomography (CT) measurement of Hounsfield Units (HU) has been described as a tool for assessing BMD. For surgeons considering a revision lumbar fusion, knowledge of the BMD of the UIV is of value for surgical planning. However, the presence of metal artifact from instrumentation presents a potential confounder, and prior studies have not validated measurements of HU in this setting.

PURPOSE

To determine if HU can be measured reliably at the supra-adjacent and upper instrumented levels of a lumbar fusion.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutive series of patients who had lumbar CT scans after an instrumented posterior lumbar fusion.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Hounsfield Units at the upper instrumented vertebra and levels proximal.

METHODS

We analysed pre- and postoperative CT scans of 50 patients who underwent L2 and distal instrumented lumbar fusion whose scans were no greater than 1 year apart, obtaining HU measurements of analogous axial cuts at the upper instrumented level (immediately caudal to the halo of the pedicle screw), as well as additional control levels above the construct.

RESULTS

The HU at the pre-and postoperative UIV exhibited a strong correlation (r=0.917, p<.001), as did one (r=0.887, p<.001) and two (r=0.853, p<.001) levels above the UIV. There were significant but predictable reductions in the postoperative HU compared to preoperative at one (-9.0±26.2) and two (-12.2±30.2) levels above the UIV, as well as T12 (-13.9±42.2). There was no significant difference in HU at the UIV (4.6±34.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative HU at the UIV was strongly correlated with and not significantly different from the preoperative HU. Although the HU in the vertebrae proximal to the UIV were slightly lower postoperatively, this change was predictable using a correction factor.