1
|
Azam F, Anand S, Dragun A, Furtado K, Nguyen M, Shukla I, Hicks WH, Hall K, Akbik OS, Bagley CA. Identifying Correlation Among Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Study of PROMIS-29, ODI, and VAS in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients. World Neurosurg 2024; 181:e1059-e1070. [PMID: 37967743 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.11.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is becoming increasingly common in aging populations. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are self-reported patient surveys administered pre- and postoperatively that provide insight into patient improvement. We aim to compare 3 of the most utilized PROMs: PROMIS-29, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), to investigate whether they provide unique and independent assessments of patient outcomes when assessed longitudinally. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed a database of ASD at UT Southwestern Medical Center between 2016 and 2021. Adult patients (>18 years old) were included if they underwent long-segment (>4 levels) thoracolumbar fusion. PROMIS-29, ODI, and VAS scores were collected preoperatively and at 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, 30-, and 36-month follow-ups. Scores were recorded ±1 month of the time points. Pearson correlation coefficients for each PROM were then calculated in a pairwise fashion. RESULTS A total of 163 patients were included in our analysis. ODI and VAS showed significant covariance, with VAS Neck and VAS Back having Pearson coefficients of 0.95 and 0.94, respectively. ODI and PROMIS-29 also showed significant covariance, with Physical Function and ODI showing a Pearson coefficient of 0.95. PROMIS-29 and VAS demonstrated less correlation regarding Pain and Physical Function; however, they showed a significantly high Pearson coefficient when comparing VAS Back with PROMIS-29 Sleep and Pain Intensity (r = 0.97 and r = 0.96, respectively). CONCLUSIONS All 3 PROMs demonstrated significant correlation over 36 months, indicating that simultaneous administration of each during follow-up is redundant. The measure that provided the least unique information was ODI, as both VAS and PROMIS-29 demonstrated similar progression and assessed additional metrics. PROMIS-29 provided the same information as VAS and ODI, with extra facets of patient-reported outcomes, indicating that it may be a more comprehensive measure of longitudinal patient improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faraaz Azam
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Soummitra Anand
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Anthony Dragun
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Kailee Furtado
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Madelina Nguyen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
| | - Ishav Shukla
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - William H Hicks
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Kristen Hall
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Omar S Akbik
- Department of Neurological Surgery, CHI Health, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Carlos A Bagley
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Saint Luke's Neurological & Spine Surgery, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zuckerman SL, Lai CS, Shen Y, Kerolus MG, Ha AS, Buchanan IA, Lee NJ, Leung E, Cerpa M, Lehman RA, Lenke LG. Be Prepared: Preoperative Coronal Malalignment Often Leads to More Extensive Surgery Than Sagittal Malalignment During Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. Neurospine 2021; 18:570-579. [PMID: 34610688 PMCID: PMC8497231 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2142384.192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effect of coronal alignment on: (1) surgical invasiveness and operative complexity and (2) postoperative complications.
Methods A retrospective, cohort study of adult spinal deformity patients was conducted. Alignment groups were: (1) neutral alignment (NA): coronal vertical axis (CVA) ≤ 3 cm and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) ≤ 5 cm; (2) coronal malalignment (CM) only: CVA > 3 cm; (3) Sagittal malalignment (SM) only: SVA > 5 cm; and (4) coronal and sagittal malalignment (CCSM): CVA > 3 cm and SVA > 5 cm.
Results Of 243 patients, alignment groups were: NA 115 (47.3%), CM 48 (19.8%), SM 38 (15.6%), and CCSM 42 (17.3%). Total instrumented levels (TILs) were highest in CM (14.5±3.7) and CCSM groups (14±4.0) (p<0.001). More 3-column osteotomies (3COs) were performed in SM (21.1%) and CCSM (28.9%) groups than CM (10.4%) (p=0.003). CM patients had more levels instrumented (p=0.029), posterior column osteotomies (PCOs) (p<0.001), and TLIFs (p=0.002) than SM patients. CCSM patients had more TLIFs (p=0.012) and higher estimated blood loss (EBL) (p=0.003) than SM patients. CVA displayed a stronger relationship with TIL (p=0.002), EBL (p<0.001), and operative time (p<0.001) than SVA, which had only one significant association with EBL (p=0.010). Both SM/CCSM patients had higher readmissions (p=0.003) and reoperations (p<0.001) than CM patients.
Conclusion Amount of preoperative CM was a better predictor of surgical invasiveness than the amount of SM, despite 3COs more commonly performed in SM patients. CM patients had more instrumented levels, PCOs, and TLIFs than SM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott L Zuckerman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christopher S Lai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yong Shen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mena G Kerolus
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alex S Ha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ian A Buchanan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nathan J Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Leung
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meghan Cerpa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ronald A Lehman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|