Readmission and Associated Factors in Surgical Versus Non-Surgical Management of Spinal Epidural Abscess: A Nationwide Readmissions Database Analysis

Risk Factors for Readmission Following Surgical Decompression for Spinal Epidural Abscesses: An Analysis of 4595 Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to (1) compare baseline demographics of patients undergoing surgery for SEA who were/were not readmitted; (2) identify risk factors for 90-day readmissions; and (3) quantify 90-day episode-of-care health care costs.

BACKGROUND

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA), while rare, occurring ~2.5-5.1/10,000 admissions, may lead to permanent neurologic deficits and mortality. Definitive treatment often involves surgical intervention via decompression.

METHODS

A search of the PearlDiver database from 2010 to 2021 for patients undergoing decompression for SEA identified 4595 patients. Cohorts were identified through the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), ICD-10, and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Baseline demographics of patients who were/were not readmitted within 90 days following decompression were aggregated/compared, identifying factors associated with readmission. Using Bonferroni correction, a P -value<0.001 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Readmission within 90 days of surgical decompression occurred in 36.1% (1659/4595) of patients. While age/gender were not associated with readmission rate, alcohol use disorder, arrhythmia, chronic kidney disease, ischemic heart disease, and obesity were associated with readmission. Readmission risk factors included fluid/electrolyte abnormalities, obesity, paralysis, tobacco use, and pathologic weight loss ( P <0.0001). Mean same-day total costs ($17,920 vs. $8204, P <0.001) and mean 90-day costs ($46,050 vs. $15,200, P <0.001) were significantly higher in the readmission group.

CONCLUSION

A substantial proportion of patients (36.1%) are readmitted within 90 days following surgical decompression for SEA. The top 5 risk factors in descending order are fluid/electrolyte abnormalities, pathologic weight loss, tobacco use, pre-existing paralysis, and obesity. This study highlights areas for perioperative medical optimization that may reduce health care utilization.

Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Debridement and Decompression for Brucellar Thoracic Spinal Epidural Abscess: A Minimally Invasive Alternative to Open Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Thoracic spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare but dangerous condition, and traditional surgical methods are accompanied by extensive trauma and approach-related complications. Here we introduce the technique of full-endoscopic transforaminal debridement and decompression and evaluate its feasibility for treating brucellar thoracic SEA.

METHODS

We performed thoracic full-endoscopic transforaminal decompression and debridement on two patients with neurological deficits caused by brucellar SEA, which is mainly composed of granulation tissue rather than pus. Postoperative MRI was conducted to confirm the presence of any residual abscess compressing the nerves. Frankel grading was employed to assess the recovery of neurological function, and complications were documented.

RESULTS

There were no occurrences of dural tear, postoperative hematoma, or pulmonary complications. Their neurological function had significantly improved after surgery, and postoperative MRI confirmed no residual abscess compressing the spinal cord. During the 2-year follow-up, one patient achieved complete recovery (from Frankel-C to Frankel-E), while another patient improved from Frankel-A to Frankel-D. Neither patient experienced infection recurrence, instability, nor kyphotic deformity.

CONCLUSION

We described the novel application of transforaminal endoscopic surgery in brucellar thoracic granulomatous SEA and preliminarily indicated the feasibility of this technique as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery.

Patients Follow-up for Spinal Epidural Abscess as a Critical Treatment Plan Consideration

INTRODUCTION

 Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare process with significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Treatment includes an extended course of antibiotics with or without surgery depending on the clinical presentation. Both non-operative and surgically treated patients require close follow-up to ensure the resolution of the infection without recurrence and/or progression of neurologic deficits. No previous study has looked specifically at follow-up in the SEA population, but the review of the literature does show evidence of varying degrees of difficulty with follow-up for this patient population.

METHODS

 This retrospective review looked at follow-up for 147 patients with SEA at a single institution from 2012 to 2021. Statistical analyses were performed to assess differences between groups of surgical versus non-surgical patients and those with adequate versus inadequate follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixty-two of 147 (42.2%) patients had inadequate follow-up (less than 90 days) with their surgical team, and 112 of 147 (76.2%) patients had inadequate follow-up (less than 90 days) with infectious disease (ID). The primary statistically significant difference between patients with adequate versus inadequate follow-up was found to be surgical status with those treated surgically more likely to have adequate follow-up than those treated non-operatively.

CONCLUSION

Improved follow-up in surgical patients should be considered as a factor when deciding on surgical versus non-operative treatment in the SEA patient population. Extra efforts coordinating follow-up care should be made for SEA patients.