Coccydynia-The Efficacy of Available Treatment Options: A Systematic Review

Coccydynia: A Review of Anatomy, Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment

» Coccydynia is a painful condition affecting many patients at the terminal caudal end of the spine.» An understanding of coccyx anatomy and variations of morphology is necessary for proper diagnosis. A multifactorial etiology for pain may be responsible for this clinical entity.» Several treatment options exist. Successful outcomes for patients depend on individual patient characteristics and the etiology of pain.

Imaging findings and treatment in coccydynia - update of the recent study findings

BACKGROUND

 Coccydynia is one of the most overlooked symptoms in clinical practice. The diagnosis and radiologic findings of traumatic coccyx can be more easily detected unless it is delayed and postponed. For idiopathic coccydynia, which accounts for one third of cases, patients present with long-standing pain and multiple physician visits.

METHOD

 The keywords coccyx, coccydynia, coccygodynia were searched in PubMed, Embase, Scopus databases in the last 5 years. Research articles, reviews and case reports were analyzed. The studies conducted in the last 5 years were presented under the headings of etiology, radiologic assessment, interventional and surgical treatments.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

 The first step is dynamic X-ray of the coccyx in standing and sitting position. In this way, morphologic parameters and hypermobility causing idiopathic coccydynia can be evaluated. Morphologic and morphometric features of the coccyx described in previous CT and MR studies have explained the relationship with coccydynia. The key features are as follows: Type II coccyx morphology, subluxation of the intercoccygeal joint, presence of bony spicules. Knowledge of these definitions as well as the differential diagnosis in this anatomical region will help in reaching the correct diagnosis. The treatment of coccydynia is stepwise like the diagnosis. Conservative treatments are initiated first. Manipulations, ganglion impar block, injections, radiofrequency and shock treatments and finally coccygectomy are treatment methods reported. Radiologists should not overlook this region and should be familiar with the coccyx's morphologic appearance and the sacrococcygeal region's differential diagnosis.

KEY POINTS

  · The etiology of coccydynia usually includes trauma, obesity and female sex, special coccyx morphology, and coccygeal hypermobility.. · Coccyx fractures are defined into three groups as flexion type 1, compression type 2, and extension type 3.. · When evaluating coccydynia, the first step is a dynamic X-ray examination of the coccyx in standing and sitting position.. · Hypermobility is defined as more than 25 % posterior subluxation while sitting or more than 25° flexion while sitting.. · More than 35° posterior subluxation is considered significant hypermobility..

Radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (rESWT) for coccydynia: a prospective study of 14 patients

Background

Coccydynia is defined as pain in the coccyx. We investigated the effect of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (rESWT) in the management of coccydynia.

Methods

In this prospective study, patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with coccydynia at a sports clinic located in Thessaloniki, Greece, were eligible for rESWT treatment when they reported a visual analogue scale (VAS) pain level ≥6. Treatment sessions were once weekly and ended when VAS pain levels decreased to ≤3. Recurrence rates were documented at 3-month and 12-month follow-ups.

Results

Fourteen patients were treated using rESWT. The mean age and symptom duration of our cohort was 33.6±7.9 (range: 20-45) years and 9.4±8.5 (range: 3-36) months, respectively. The mean number of treatment sessions per patient was 6.4±1.6 (range: 4-8). The mean device pressure, frequency, and number of pulses was 1.2±0.1 (range: 1-1.4) bar, 5.0±0.1 (range: 5-6) Hz, and 2082±74.8 (range: 2000-2300) pulses, respectively. Treatment alleviated pain in all patients, and no recurrence of symptoms was reported during follow-up. There was a positive correlation between symptom duration and the number of treatment sessions (r=0.701, P=0.005). Pairwise comparison highlighted significant reductions in VAS pain levels between each stage of treatment (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Our study affirms the safety and efficacy of rESWT in managing coccydynia.