Early Versus Late Spine Surgery in Severely Injured Patients-Which Is the Appropriate Timing for Surgery?

Perioperative complications in spinal trauma patients: does timing matter?

BACKGROUND

Early surgery in traumatic spinal fracture treatment may facilitate prompt mobilization, encountering affiliated complications. However, the safety and the benefits of early surgery are being questioned in spinal trauma patients. Therefore, the objective of this retrospective study is to investigate the effect of surgical timing on perioperative complications in these patients.

METHODS

Spinal trauma patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2020 in two Dutch Level-I trauma centers were included retrospectively and divided into an early (< 24 h), late (between 24 and 72 h) and delayed (> 72 h) surgical cohort. The primary outcome was the occurrence of peri-operative complications. Besides surgical timing, trauma and patient-specific factors were also analyzed as potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

A total of 394 patients were included, of whom 149 received early, 159 late and 86 delayed surgical treatment. The occurrence of perioperative complications was significantly associated with age, body mass index, comorbidities, ASA grade 3 and 4, spinal cord injury (SCI), AO Spine type C injury, additional chest injury, and surgical delay. A multivariable analysis showed that age, ASA category, AO Spine classification and SCI were significantly associated with perioperative complications. Moreover, a subsequent analysis in non-SCI patients demonstrated an association between perioperative complications and delayed surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, delayed surgical treatment is potentially associated with more perioperative complications compared to early surgery in non-SCI patients. Other possible risk factors for the occurrence of perioperative complications may be older age, ASA 3 and 4, AO spine C injury and SCI.

Time to Surgery for Subaxial Cervical Fractures: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

To identify delays for surgery to stabilize subaxial cervical fractures and the main reasons for them across Latin America.

METHODS

This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients surgically treated for subaxial cervical fractures from 13 spine centers across Latin America from January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2023. Causes of delay to surgery beyond 24 hours were documented.

RESULTS

We included 529 patients from 13 institutions in Latin American countries; 408 (77.1%) males and 121 (22.9%) females with a mean age of 43.4 (standard deviation = ±16.2). Predominantly caused by traffic accident (n = 256; 48.4%), followed by fall from height (n = 233; 44%). Mostly, suffered type C fractures (n = 348; 65.8%) and/or neurological injury (n = 384; 72.6%). The time from admission to surgery was >72 hours in 70% of the patients included (n = 375; 70.9%). More than 45% waited longer than a week (n = 257; 48.6%) for spine surgery. Only 12.5% (n = 66) of the patients received surgery in the first 24 hours from admission. The primary reasons for the surgical delay were the necessity for other surgical procedures (n = 161; 34.8%), the unavailability of surgical implants (n = 60; 13.0%), patient clinical instability (n = 55; 11.9%), and delays in referral (n = 38; 8.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

We documented significant and concerning delays in providing spinal decompression and stabilization surgery to patients with cervical spine fractures. Only 17% of patients have surgery in the recommended time <24 hours, more than half of the patients must wait for more than 72 hours, and nearly half of patients wait for longer than a week.

The Critical Management of Spinal Cord Injury: A Narrative Review

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is defined as physical damage that alters the function and structure of the spinal cord. Traumatic causes, such as vehicle accidents, falls, and violence, account for 90% of SCI cases. Recent evidence suggests that early intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring improves patient prognosis, highlighting the importance of prompt ICU admission and early decompression surgery. This review includes 50 publications selected based on specific criteria to gather evidence on the current management of SCI in acute settings. Pharmacological agents have been studied for their neuroprotective properties, offering hope for improved neurological outcomes. Several clinical trials are evaluating new pharmacological alternatives for SCI. In conclusion, the current management of acute SCI should focus on standardized treatments addressing ventilatory, cardiopulmonary, and hematologic complications, all of which directly impact long-term neurological and functional prognosis. New neuroprotective agents currently in clinical trials show promising results and should be further studied to determine their role in acute SCI management.

Early major fracture care in polytrauma-priorities in the context of concomitant injuries: A Delphi consensus process and systematic review

BACKGROUND

The timing of major fracture care in polytrauma patients has a relevant impact on outcomes. Yet, standardized treatment strategies with respect to concomitant injuries are rare. This study aims to provide expert recommendations regarding the timing of major fracture care in the presence of concomitant injuries to the brain, thorax, abdomen, spine/spinal cord, and vasculature, as well as multiple fractures.

METHODS

This study used the Delphi method supported by a systematic review. The review was conducted in the Medline and EMBASE databases to identify relevant literature on the timing of fracture care for patients with the aforementioned injury patterns. Then, consensus statements were developed by 17 international multidisciplinary experts based on the available evidence. The statements underwent repeated adjustments in online- and in-person meetings and were finally voted on. An agreement of ≥75% was set as the threshold for consensus. The level of evidence of the identified publications was rated using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

A total of 12,476 publications were identified, and 73 were included. The majority of publications recommended early surgery (47/73). The threshold for early surgery was set within 24 hours in 45 publications. The expert panel developed 20 consensus statements and consensus >90% was achieved for all, with 15 reaching 100%. These statements define conditions and exceptions for early definitive fracture care in the presence of traumatic brain injury (n = 5), abdominal trauma (n = 4), thoracic trauma (n = 3), multiple extremity fractures (n = 3), spinal (cord) injuries (n = 3), and vascular injuries (n = 2).

CONCLUSION

A total of 20 statements were developed on the timing of fracture fixation in patients with associated injuries. All statements agree that major fracture care should be initiated within 24 hours of admission and completed within that timeframe unless the clinical status or severe associated issues prevent the patient from going to the operating room.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis; Level IV.

Progress and research trends in neurogenic bladder after spinal cord injury bibliometric analysis based on web of science database: An observational study

Neurogenic bladder (NB) is a significant complication that often occurs after spinal cord injury. It results from urinary dysfunction caused by the injury, disrupting the normal neural control of the bladder and urethra. Symptoms of NB can include urinary frequency, urgency, incontinence, and retention, all of which can greatly impact the quality of life of affected individuals. While there are articles and reviews on NB, fewer specifically address NB following spinal cord injury. This study examined 1095 publications from January 1, 2000, to March 27, 2024, in the Web of Science core database using bibliometric software like VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and Bibliometrics. The analysis revealed an increasing trend in the number of publications, with the United States and China leading in research output. Professor Jeremy B. Myers from the University of Utah had the highest number of publications, while the University of Michigan and the University of Pittsburgh were the institutions with the most publications. The journal Neurourology and Urodynamics had the highest number of articles, and common keywords included management, quality of life, and dysfunction, highlighting key areas of focus for scholars.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications After Surgical Treatment of Type B and C Injuries of the Thoracolumbar Spine

BACKGROUND

Unstable thoracolumbar spinal injuries benefit from surgical fixation. However, perioperative complications significantly affect outcomes in surgicallytreated spine patients. We evaluated associations between risk factors and postoperative complications in patients surgically treated for thoracolumbar spine fractures.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter study collating data from 21 spine centers across 9 countries on the treatment of AOSpine types B and C injuries of the thoracolumbar spine treated via a posterior approach. Comparative analysis was performed between patients with postoperative complications and those without. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Among 535 patients, at least 1 complication occurred in 43%. The most common surgical complication was surgical-site infection (6.9%), while the most common medical complication was urinary tract infection (13.8%). Among 136 patients with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scalelevel A disability, 77.9% experienced at least 1 complication. The rate of complications also rose sharply among patients waiting >3 days for surgery (P<0.001), peaking at 68.4% among patients waiting ≥30 days. On multivariable analysis, significant predictors of complications were surgery at a governmental hospital (odds ratio = 3.38, 95% confidence interval = 1.73-6.60), having ≥1 comorbid illness (2.44, 1.61-3.70), surgery delayed due to health instability (2.56, 1.50-4.37), and ASIA Impairment Scalelevel A (3.36, 1.78-6.35), while absence of impairment (0.39, 0.22-0.71), ASIAlevel E (0.39, 0.22-0.67) and, unexpectedly, delay caused by operating room unavailability (0.60, 0.36-0.99) were protective.

CONCLUSIONS

Types B and C thoracolumbar spine injuries are associated with a high risk of postoperative complications, especially common at governmental hospitals, and among patients with comorbidity, health instability, longer delays to surgery, and worse preoperative neurologic status.

Time to Surgery in Spinal Trauma: A Meta-Analysis of the World's Literature Comparing High-Income Countries to Low-Middle Income Countries

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to: 1) compare time from traumatic spinal injury (TSI) to operating room (OR) in high-income countries (HICs) versus low-middle-income countries (LMICs), and 2) evaluate hospital length of stay (LOS) in HICs versus LMICs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines involving articles of all languages.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

published between 1991 and 2021, spine trauma population, single country/region, and recorded time from injury to OR. The primary outcome was time from injury to OR, and the secondary outcome was LOS. Means and standard deviations were estimated in a random effects model by DerSimonian and Laird methods.

RESULTS

Of 2367 articles, 163 met the inclusion criteria for systematic review. Regarding time from injury to OR, 23 articles were eligible for meta-analysis; 16 studies were conducted in HICs and 7 in LMICs, comprising 3819 patients with TSI. A significantly shorter mean time from injury to OR was found in HICs (1.92 days, 95% confidence interval 1.44-2.41) compared with LMICs (3.27 days, 95% confidence interval 2.27-4.27) (P = 0.020). Regarding length of stay, 14 articles were eligible for meta-analysis, 10 studies were conducted in HICs and 4 in LMICs, comprising 11,003 patients. There was no difference in LOS between HICs and LMICs (25.76 days vs. 20.48 days, P = 0.140).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with traumatic spinal injuries in HICs were more likely to undergo earlier surgery compared to patients in LMICs. No difference was found in total LOS between HICs and LMICs. While multiple factors can influence time to surgery, these findings draw attention to the global disparity in spinal trauma care.