Decreased postoperative gluteus medius muscle cross-sectional area measured by computed tomography scan in patients with intertrochanteric fractures nailing

Skeletal muscle tissue composition ratio in patients with hip fracture: Comparison of fractured side and non-fractured side

BACKGROUND

The extent of asymmetry in the muscle tissue composition ratios with hip fractures has not been clarified.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there is a difference in the muscle tissue composition ratios between the fractured and non-fractured sides of the trunk and thighs immediate measurement.

METHODS

Forty-four patients (84.6 ± 7.0 years) were included. Computed tomography images were used for measurements. The muscle tissue composition ratio was measured using muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and attenuation coefficient (Hounsfield units; HU). Defined each HU attenuation range as follows: low-density muscle (LDM), low-quality muscle tissue with fat infiltration, normal-density muscle (NDM), muscle contractor tissue, and intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), fat infiltration tissue. The CSA of each muscle tissue was expressed as a percentage: %LDM, %NDM, and %IMAT. A paired t-test was performed for comparison.

RESULTS

The %LDM on the fractured side was higher in the thigh and erector spinae. The %NDM on the fractured side was lower in the thigh. There was no significant difference in the %IMAT for all muscles.

CONCLUSION

The thigh on the fractured side showed asymmetry with low %NDM and high %LDM. This characteristic captures a characteristic of muscle tissue that may have importance in hip fracture etiology.

Risk factors for contralateral hip refractures in patients aged over 80 years with intertrochanteric femoral fractures

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify which of the risk factors would contribute to the contralateral fracture in very elderly patients after intramedullary nail fixation.

Methods

Clinical data of 227 intertrochanteric fracture patients aged 80 years or older were retrospectively reviewed. Intramedullary nails (IMNs) were used on all of the patients. Potential risk factors for contralateral hip refractures were determined using univariate and logistic regression analyses.

Results

Contralateral hip refractures occurred in 11 patients (4.84%). Univariate analysis revealed that age, gender, body mass index, fracture classification, hematocrit, D-dimer, and CRP level were not associated with contralateral fractures (P > 0.05). However, neurological diseases, cardiovascular disease, and visual impairments were significantly associated with contralateral fractures (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis further revealed that neurological diseases (OR 4.25, P = 0.044) and visual impairments (OR 5.42, P = 0.015) were independent risk factors associated with contralateral refractures.

Conclusion

To prevent contralateral refractures, more attention should be paid to elderly intertrochanteric fracture patients with underlying neurological disease and visual impairments.

Iatrogenic gluteus medius muscle insertion injury while trochanteric entry nailing due to trochanteric fractures: a comparative study in forty patients with gray-scale ultrasound and shear-wave elastography

INTRODUCTION

Trochanteric entry nailing potentially causes damage to the gluteus medius (GM) tendon. The aim of this study is to determine the amount of iatrogenic damage to the tendon during reaming by measuring the thickness and stiffness of the GM muscle in patients with trochanteric fractures who are treated with trochanteric entry nails using gray-scale ultrasound (GSUS) and shear-wave elastography (SWE).

METHODS

Thickness and stiffness values of bilateral GM muscles in 40 patients with trochanteric fractures treated with PFN-A were measured using GSUS and SWE at post-operative sixth week or later. Harris Hip Scores and bilateral active hip abduction measurements of the patients were recorded. The data was analyzed using statistical methods to assess the extent and amount of iatrogenic injury that occurred during trochanteric entry.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients was 70. Thirty-three fractures occurred with low-energy trauma. In the SWE evaluation, there was no statistically significant difference between ipsi- and contralateral GM muscle thickness measurements or ipsi- and contralateral GM muscle stiffness measurements. Also, the difference between the clinical evaluation results of the ipsi- and contralateral hip functions was not statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we used the Harris Hip Score and hip abduction range of motion in addition to SWE and GSUS in order to assess the patients' functional status. There are studies in the literature that report significant injury to the GM tendon with cephalomedullary nailing. The majority of these studies are cadaver studies with only clinically irrelevant or uncertain evidence. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the potential negative effects of the iatrogenic damage to the bone-tendon junction during nailing, by measuring the stiffness (consistency) and atrophy of the GM muscle alongside the functional evaluation.

CONCLUSION

We have found no statistically significant difference between operated and intact side GM muscles in terms of stiffness, atrophy, and functional evaluation in patients with TFs treated using PFN-A. The results of our study should not be interpreted as trochanteric entry nailing does not cause any damage on the GM tendon.

Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes

Objectives

This study aims to assess the functional outcomes, static-dynamic postural stability of patients and evaluate electromyographic activity of gluteus medius (GMed) muscle during gait and spatiotemporal parameters of gait in patients after antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) of femoral shaft fractures with trochanter tip entry.

Patients and methods

Sixteen patients (15 males, 1 female; mean age 34.8±15.2 years; range, 18 to 58 years) who were treated with an antegrade trochanteric IMN between January 2009 and July 2013 and eight healthy male controls (mean age 39.3±9.8 years; range, 27 to 57 years) were included in this retrospective study. Muscle strength, static and dynamic postural stability and fall risk were evaluated. In addition, spatiotemporal parameters of gait were assessed using a validated wireless inertial sensing device and a wireless electromyography (EMG) device was used to measure electromyographic activity of GMed muscle in both groups.

Results

There were significant differences in muscle strength, functional and dynamic balance test scores between operated and intact sides (one-leg hop test score p=0.009, balance test scores p<0.001-0.033). There were significant differences in functional and quality of life physical function test scores between groups (one-leg hop test score p=0.014). However, no significant differences were found in EMG results, dynamics balance, and statics postural stability test scores between groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion

After isolated femur fracture, patients treated with antegrade trochanteric IMN demonstrated good static and dynamic stability and poor functional outcomes compared to controls. In conclusion, patients with antegrade trochanteric IMN have good balance but poor functional performance; however, further studies are needed to find out the primary reason for these results.

Does the duration to bipolar hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture influence on postoperative muscular strength?

BACKGROUND

The primary purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative muscular strength and functional performance between early versus late bipolar hip arthroplasty (BHA) intervention for femoral neck fracture classified by the duration from the onset to surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients who could walk at 12 months or more after BHA were enrolled into this study. We examined the muscular strength of hip flexion, extension, abduction, and knee extension of these patients. Time of one-leg standing, timed up and go test, pain grade by visual analog scale, and Barthel index were also evaluated as functional indices. We classified these patients into two groups by the duration from the onset to surgery, namely: within 3 days until BHA (early OP) and more than 4 days (late OP) to compare these indices at the latest follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean days until operation were 2.3 days in the early-OP group and 5.9 days in the late-OP group, showing a significant difference between the two groups. Muscular strength and other functional indices were also found to have no significant differences between these two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the delay to operate might not severely compromise the muscular strength around the hip joint for least 1.5 years among ambulatory patients.