A comparison of fasciocutaneous and adipofascial methods in the reverse sural artery flap for treatment of diabetic infected lateral malleolar bursitis

Flaps for lower limb diabetic wound reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The treatment of chronic diabetic wounds includes wound dressing, debridement, flap surgery, and amputation. For suitable patients with nonhealing wounds, locoregional flaps or free flaps may be used. This paper aims to review the outcomes of flap surgery and identify the risk factors for flap loss.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. Articles reporting flap loss outcomes for flap surgery in lower limb chronic diabetic wounds were included. Case reports and case series with fewer than five patients were excluded. A subset of articles was used for revascularization subgroup analysis and another subset for meta-analysis of risk factors for flap loss.

RESULTS

In the free flap group, the total flap failure rate was 7.14% and partial flap failure rate was 7.54%. The rate of major complications requiring operative takeback was 19.0%. Early mortality was 2.76%. In the locoregional flap group, the total flap failure rate was 3.24% and partial flap failure rate was 5.36%. The rate of major complications requiring operative takeback was 13.3%. There was no early mortality. The rate of free flap loss was 18.2% with revascularization, significantly higher than 6.66% without revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings concur with previously published studies on flap loss and complications in diabetic lower limb wounds. There is an increased risk of flap loss in patients who require free flap and revascularization compared to patients who only require free flap. This could be because of the fragile and fibrotic vessels found in diabetics with comorbid atherosclerosis.

How Safe Is Reverse Sural Flap?: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue reconstruction of the lower third of the leg, the ankle, and the foot is challenging for reconstructive surgeons. The options for reconstruction are limited. Reverse sural flap is relatively easy to perform and considered a good option for reconstruction. The complication rates are variable in studies. This study aims to systemically review all available articles based on reverse sural flap focusing on complications of the flap. The overall complication of the flap helps to better understand the reliability of the flap.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar to identify cases of reverse sural artery flap.

RESULTS

A pooled analysis of 89 articles was performed, which yielded 2575 patients (2592 flaps) over a period of 19 years. Most of the cases were performed in Asian countries (1540 flaps, 59.4%) with the majority being performed in China (746 flaps, 28.8%). The most common cause for reverse sural flap surgery was trauma/postsurgical (1785/2592) followed by burn/scarring. Flap complications were recorded in 653 of 2592 flaps (25.20%). The most common complication was partial flap loss, which was recorded in 204 flaps (7.85%) followed by venous congestion (79 flaps, 3.05%). Complete flap loss was observed only in 66 participants (2.5% of all the flaps performed).

CONCLUSIONS

Reverse sural flap is reliable flap for the reconstruction of lower leg, ankle, and foot. It can give a comparable outcome as free flap when meticulously performed and, in many cases, a better result.

Non-microsurgical bipedicled reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap with preservation of medial and lateral sural cutaneous nerve: Current surgical management of skin defect after traumatic Achilles tendon rupture - A case report

INTRODUCTION

The challenging issue that still remains for reverse sural flap is the withstand of the flap against time, the width of coverage area, and the donor site morbidity such as pain after the medial or lateral sural cutaneous nerve harvested.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 55 years old male was suffered from traumatic Achilles tendon rupture for 3 months and was repaired with Krakow's technique in a medical center in Pemalang, Indonesia. After the surgery, the defect was revealed as another surgery was planned to cover the skin defect. The author had chosen the bipedicled reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap in regular basis which addressed the superiority and viability of the flap, thus the donor site morbidity was also concerned as the preservation of medial and lateral sural cutaneous nerve, which leading to good quality of life as the patient still could feel and sensate his medial and lateral leg.

DISCUSSION

The bipedicled reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap was successfully covered the skin defect on post traumatic Achilles tendon reconstruction, with retained medial sural nerve on its place, and the remaining harvested skin area was leave opened without skin graft which healed spontaneously.

CONCLUSION

Bipedicled reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap with retained medial sural nerve offer a good clinical outcome either the viability of the flap and the maintained sensation along the medial and lateral sural cutaneous nerve distribution.

Comparison of the outcomes of adipofascial and two-staged fasciocutaneous reverse sural flap in patients with lower leg trauma

BACKGROUND

Distal one - third trauma of the lower limb is a complex condition to treat. The reverse sural flap is a time tested procedure for reconstruction of such defects especially in patients where free flaps are ruled out due to comorbidities. The purpose of this study is to compare the two modifications of the classical technique of reverse sural flap (adipofascial and fasciocutaneous) which is lacking in the literature.

MATERIAL & METHODS

In this study, the authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 67 patients with lower one-third leg defects reconstructed with either adipofascial reverse sural flap (Group A, n = 37) or two-staged fasciocutaneous reverse sural flap (Group B, n = 30) in a tertiary care hospital in North India between 2015 and 2019. An evaluation of the different flap characteristics of the two variants of the reverse sural flap was done and compared. Mean follow up period was 12 months.

RESULTS

The adipofascial group showed shorter operative time, was a single-stage and with better reach and aesthetic outcome. The complications did not differ except that for the adipofascial group was associated with unstable skin graft over the flap initially which did not require any treatment.

DISCUSSION

Lower one-third defect of the lower limb has been a challenge for reconstructive surgeons all over the world. The goal of reconstruction is a functional lower limb. Although free tissue transfer is the preferred modality of treatment of such cases but it may not be possible in all cases due to various reasons. Reverse sural flap is a very lucrative local option for such reconstructions as it is easy to perform, reliable, low profile and bulk, require minimal facilities with less operative time. Adipofascial flaps represent an extremely useful modification of the reverse sural flap which is quick to perform with minimal donor site morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Adipofascial reverse sural artery flap is a good option for patients with lower limb trauma with the added advantage of being single-stage and with better donor site cosmesis as compared to the fasciocutaneous reverse sural artery flap.