Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: A multifactorial analysis

Development of a Machine-Learning Model for Anterior Knee Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty With Patellar Preservation Using Radiological Variables

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain (AKP) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with patellar preservation is a common complication that significantly affects patients' quality of life. This study aimed to develop a machine-learning model to predict the likelihood of developing AKP after TKA using radiological variables.

METHODS

A cohort of 131 anterior stabilized TKA cases (105 patients) without patellar resurfacing was included. Patients underwent a follow-up evaluation with a minimum 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome was AKP, and radiological measurements were used as predictor variables. There were 2 observers who made the radiological measurement, which included lower limb dysmetria, joint space, and coronal, sagittal, and axial alignment. Machine-learning models were applied to predict AKP. The best-performing model was selected based on accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and Kappa statistics. Python 3.11 with Pandas and PyCaret libraries were used for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 35 TKA had AKP (26.7%). Patient-reported outcomes were significantly better in the patients who did not have AKP. The Gradient Boosting Classifier performed best for both observers, achieving an area under the curve of 0.9261 and 0.9164, respectively. The mechanical tibial slope was the most important variable for predicting AKP. The Shapley test indicated that high/low mechanical tibial slope, a shorter operated leg, a valgus coronal alignment, and excessive patellar tilt increased AKP risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that global alignment, including sagittal, coronal, and axial alignment, is relevant in predicting AKP after TKA. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing TKA outcomes and reducing the incidence of AKP.

Comparison of In Vivo Stiffness of Tendons Commonly Used for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - A Shear Wave Elastography Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

There are currently no studies investigating the in vivo stiffness of the most commonly used autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using Shear wave elastography (SWE). We hypothesize that there are differences regarding the elastic properties between the three tendons commonly used for ACLR and that they are influenced by patient-related factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

80 healthy subjects (25 females, 55 males, age: 25.33 ± 4.76 years, BMI: 23.76 ± 3.14 kg/m2, 40 semiprofessional athletes, athlete group [AG], age: 25.51 [19-29]; 40 healthy controls, control group [CG], age: 25.50 [20-29]) were recruited as participants. In addition to patient reported outcome scores, every participant underwent a standardized multimodal ultrasound protocol consisting of B-mode-ultrasound (B-US), Color Doppler-ultrasound (CD-US) and a SWE examination of the bilateral quadriceps tendon (QT), patellar tendon (PT) and semitendinosus tendon (ST).

RESULTS

The highest shear wave velocity (SWV) were observed in ST (4.88 (4.35-5.52) m/s, ST vs QT, p = 0.005; ST vs PT, p < 0.001) followed by QT (4.61 (4.13-5.26) m/s, QT vs PT, p < 0.001) and PT (3.73 (3.30-4.68) m/s). Median QT, PT and ST stiffness was significantly higher in AG compared to CG. Male subjects tend to have stiffer QT and PT than female subjects. Positive correlation with SWV was obtained for age and activity level.

CONCLUSION

There are significant differences regarding in vivo tendon stiffness between the most frequently used autograft tendon options for ACLR. The quantitative information obtained by SWE could be of particular interest for graft choice for ACLR.

Bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty with and without patellar resurfacing. A prospective single surgeon series with a minimum follow-up of 7 years

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most effective treatment for end-stage adult knee osteoarthritis, but it has been reported that patient satisfaction may vary. A malfunction of the patellofemoral joint may produce anterior knee pain (AKP) for several reasons. While some surgeons systematically resurface the patella despite the risk of potential complications such as fracture, loosening, or wear of the patella, others prefer to preserve it to reduce AKP and revision rates. This study aimed to evaluate whether patellar resurfacing had better clinical and functional outcomes, complications, and revision rates in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study, including patients who underwent bilateral simultaneous TKA in which the patella was replaced in one knee and preserved in the other, with a minimum follow-up of 7 years. We assessed clinical and functional outcomes with the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); complications and revision rates were also registered.

RESULTS

The final series consisted of 43 patients with 86 knee arthroplasties. After a mean of 7.6 years of follow-up, no significant differences were found regarding KSS (clinical: 82.8 ± 7.4 versus 83.2 ± 3.4, p = 0.92; functional 89.1 ± 8.2: versus 90.4 ± 6.8; p = 0.99), VAS (2.0 ± 0.9 versus 1.8 ± 1.0; p = 0.84), complications (10.5% versus 8.1%; p = 0.57), or revision rates (2.3% versus 2.3%; p = 0.99) when comparing patellar resurfacing versus retention.

CONCLUSION

In the context of total knee arthroplasty, patellar replacement did not demonstrate statistically significant differences concerning patellar retention in clinical nor functional outcomes, AKP, complications, or revision rates after a minimum of 7 years of follow-up.

Isolated lateral-sided knee pain in total knee arthroplasty. A review

Isolated lateral-sided knee pain is a unique problem following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Reported causes include soft tissue impingement against extruded cement, an overhanging tibial tray, remnant osteophytes rubbing against the iliotibial band (ITB), popliteal tendon impingement, fabella syndrome, and synovial tissue impingement in the lateral gutter. In addition, iliotibial band traction syndrome secondary to guided motion Bi-cruciate stabilizing knee arthroplasty has been recognized as a new clinical entity. Initial work up should include ruling out the most common causes of painful TKA including infection, aseptic loosening, and instability. Radiographs and CT scan are utilized to identify potential source of pain. Ultrasound evaluation (with elicited probe tenderness) can increase diagnostic accuracy. Ultrasound guided local anesthetic injections can confirm the source of pain. Anti-inflammatory medications, physical therapy with ITB stretches, and therapeutic local steroid injections are initial treatment modalities. Satisfactory resolution of symptoms may require surgical intervention directed at the specific cause and may avoid the morbidity associated with revision TKA.

Meta-analysis of factors influencing anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a mature procedure recommended for correcting knee osteoarthritis deformity, relieving pain, and restoring normal biomechanics. Although TKA is a successful and cost-effective procedure, patient dissatisfaction is as high as 50%. Knee pain after TKA is a significant cause of patient dissatisfaction; the most common location for residual pain is the anterior region. Between 4% and 40% of patients have anterior knee pain (AKP).

AIM

To investigate the effect of various TKA procedures on postoperative AKP.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane from January 2000 to September 2022. Randomized controlled trials with one intervention in the experimental group and no corresponding intervention (or other interventions) in the control group were collected. Two researchers independently read the title and abstract of the studies, preliminarily screened the articles, and read the full text in detail according to the selection criteria. Conflicts were resolved by consultation with a third researcher. And relevant data from the included studies were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 software.

RESULTS

There were 25 randomized controlled trials; 13 were comparative studies with or without patellar resurfacing. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the experimental and control groups (P = 0.61). Six studies were comparative studies of circumpatellar denervation vs non-denervation, divided into three subgroups for meta-analysis. The two-subgroup meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the experimental and the control groups (P = 0.31, P = 0.50). One subgroup meta-analysis showed a significant difference between the experimental and control groups (P = 0.001). Two studies compared fixed-bearing TKA and mobile-bearing TKA; the results meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the experimental and control groups (P = 0.630). Two studies compared lateral retinacular release vs non-release; the meta-analysis showed a significant difference between the experimental and control groups (P = 0.002); two other studies compared other factors.

CONCLUSION

Patellar resurfacing, mobile-bearing TKA, and fixed-bearing TKA do not reduce the incidence of AKP. Lateral retinacular release can reduce AKP; however, whether circumpatellar denervation can reduce AKP is controversial.

Anterior knee pain and sit-up tests predicts patients' satisfaction and improvement in quality of life after anterior stabilized total knee replacement without patellar resurfacing

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess patient satisfaction and identify risk factors for dissatisfaction after anterior stabilised conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing, using the Goodman score.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from our institutional database from 1 January 2018 to 1 March 2021. Patients who underwent TKA with the Vanguard® Cruciate Retaining Anterior Stabilized Knee System (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) without patellar replacement were included. Patients with other bearing surfaces (posterior stabilised or medial congruent) or diagnosed with infection or instability were excluded. Patients' reported outcomes, body mass index (BMI), passive range of motion, the timed up-and-go test, sit-up test, and algometry were assessed. Patients were also asked if they had anterior knee pain. Satisfaction was assessed using the Goodman scale, and logistic multivariate regression was used to identify variables associated with dissatisfaction and perceived improvement in quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 131 TKA patients were included in the study. The median satisfaction score was 100 (interquartile range [IQR], 87.5 to 100), with the 75-point threshold at the 90th percentile according to Section A of Goodman. Section B of Goodman showed that 113 TKA patients (86.26%) reported "great improvement" or "more than I ever dreamed." Multivariate logistic regression revealed that anterior knee pain (OR 5.16, 95% CI 1.24 to 21.39), the sit-up test (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.81), and BMI (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.99) were significantly associated with patient dissatisfaction and a worse perceived improvement in quality of life. The receiver operating characteristics curve for the models had areas under the curve of 0.83 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.97) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.94), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Anterior stabilised TKA without patellar resurfacing can achieve 90% satisfaction and 86% improvement in quality of life. To improve these results, it is essential to prevent and treat anterior knee pain and enhance quadriceps strength.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III (retrospective cohort study).

Patella Denervation With Circumferential Electrocautery in Primary Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effectiveness of patella rim electrocautery "denervation" versus no denervation in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial. Patients aged 40 years or older, due to undergo a TKA who did not have patella resurfacing (usual care) were randomized with or without circumferential patella electrocautery. This was undertaken according to a randomly generated sequence of treatment allocation that was placed into numbered, sealed opaque envelopes. Participants were blinded to treatment allocation. There was no crossover. The primary outcome was Oxford Knee Score at 1 year postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were Bartlett Patella Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and 12-Item Short Form Survey. Linear regression analyses were performed with adjustments by age, sex, and baseline (preoperative) scores. There were 142 participants recruited, of which 49 (35%) were allocated to the denervation intervention. Recruitment was stopped early when interim statistical analyses confirmed adequate numbers in both groups despite an imbalance in early treatment allocation rates due to the randomization method. The mean patient age was 71 years (range, 50 to 85) and 51% (n = 74) were women.

RESULTS

No difference in Oxford Knee Score was detected at 1 year (mean difference [MD] 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.28 to 5.03). No difference was detected in Bartlett Patella Score (MD 0.490; 95% CI -1.61 to 2.59) or 12-Item Short Form Survey (MD 0.196; 95% CI -2.54 to 2.93). A statistically significant difference in WOMAC was detected, but at a level less than the minimal clinically important difference for WOMAC (MD 4.79; 95% CI 1.05 to 8.52).

CONCLUSION

No clinically relevant benefit was detected from patella rim electrocautery in patients undergoing TKA who did not have patella resurfacing (including no benefit in terms of anterior knee pain). This treatment is therefore not recommended for clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1.

Computer-based analysis of different component positions and insert thicknesses on tibio-femoral and patello-femoral joint dynamics after cruciate-retaining total knee replacement

BACKGROUND

Positioning of the implant components and tibial insert thickness constitute critical aspects of total knee replacement (TKR) that influence the postoperative knee joint dynamics. This study aimed to investigate the impact of implant component positioning (anterior-posterior and medio-lateral shift) and varying tibial insert thickness on the tibio-femoral (TF) and patello-femoral (PF) joint kinematics and contact forces after cruciate-retaining (CR)-TKR.

METHOD

A validated musculoskeletal multibody simulation (MMBS) model with a fixed-bearing CR-TKR during a squat motion up to 90° knee flexion was deployed to calculate PF and TF joint dynamics for varied implant component positions and tibial insert thicknesses. Evaluation was performed consecutively by comparing the respective knee joint parameters (e.g. contact force, quadriceps muscle force, joint kinematics) to a reference implant position.

RESULTS

The PF contact forces were mostly affected by the anterior-posterior as well as medio-lateral positioning of the femoral component (by 3 mm anterior up to 31 % and by 6 mm lateral up to 14 %). TF contact forces were considerably altered by tibial insert thickness (24 % in case of + 4 mm increase) and by the anterior-posterior position of the femoral component (by 3 mm posterior up to 16 %). Concerning PF kinematics, a medialised femoral component by 6 mm increased the lateral patellar tilt by more than 5°.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that regarding PF kinematics and contact forces the positioning of the femoral component was more critical than the tibial component. The positioning of the femoral component in anterior-posterior direction on and PF contact force was evident. Orthopaedic surgeons should strictly monitor the anterior-posterior as well as the medio-lateral position of the femoral component and the insert thickness.

Peripheral patellar denervation has a better effect in reducing postoperative anterior knee pain than patellar resurfacing in TKA

Patellar resurfacing (PR) and peripheral patellar denervation (PD) are common surgical treatments for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of study was to compare preventive effect on postoperative anterior knee pain (AKP) between PR and peripheral PD in TKA. A total of 202 patients who underwent unilateral TKA were randomized into 3 groups: T, TPD, and TPR. Patients in T group received simple TKA, patients in TPD group received TKA combined PD while patients in TPR group received TKA combined PR. Incidence, intensity, and presentation time of AKP and clinical outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. The incidence of AKP was significantly lower and the intensity of AKP and patients' satisfaction score were significantly better at 3 months after surgery in group TPD and TPR compared with group T. Compared with group TPR, the intensity of AKP was significantly better at 3 months after surgery in group TPD. There were no significant difference in Oxford knee score, range of motion (ROM), patellar score, knee society score (KSS) and activities of daily living (ADL) score among 3 groups in the follow-up period. Both PD and PR can effectively reduce the intensity and incidence of AKP after TKA and improve patients' satisfaction at 3 months after TKA. Additionally, PD is more effective on alleviating AKP than PR.

Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study

Objective

Robot‐assisted surgery has been promoted worldwide in recent years. The development of a domestic orthopaedic robot and its clinical application are therefore of great significance. This study aimed to compare the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of domestic robot‐assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA‐TKA) with conventional manual total knee arthroplasty (CM‐TKA).

Methods

A total of 77 patients who underwent primary single‐sided TKA from June to December 2020 were prospectively enrolled; resulting in the inclusion of 72 patients. The patients were randomly divided into the RA‐TKA group (37 cases, with TKA being assisted by the Yuanhua Orthopaedic Robotic System) and the CM‐TKA group (35 cases, with TKA being performed using conventional tools). Knee function was evaluated by the knee range of motion (ROM), the American Knee Society Score (KSS), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Postoperative radiographic results were evaluated by full‐length weight‐bearing X‐rays of the lower limb and anteroposterior and lateral X‐rays of the knee were obtained preoperatively and at 90 days postoperative. The operative duration, blood loss, postoperative knee function, radiographic outcomes, and incidence of complications were compared by Student's t‐test, Mann–Whitney U test, or chi‐square test. Serum levels of inflammatory markers before the operation and 1, 3, and 30 days after the operation were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation was significantly longer in the RA‐TKA group than in the CM‐TKA group (154.3 vs 115.2 min, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in blood loss (933 vs 863 ml, p = 0.519) between the two groups. The knee ROM, KSS, and WOMAC were significantly improved in both groups 90 days after the operation compared with before the operation (p < 0.05), but there were no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis was not statistically different between the two groups. In the radiographic findings at 90 days postoperatively we found the frequency of lateral tibial component (LTC) angle outliers was significantly lower in the RA‐TKA group (3.0% vs 29.4%, p = 0.003). The neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was significantly lower in the RA‐TKA group than in the CM‐TKA group on day 1 after surgery (9.9 vs 12.7, p = 0.024).

Conclusions

RA‐TKA requires more time than CM‐TKA, which may be related to the learning curve and intraoperative registration. The short‐term postoperative knee functional outcomes had no differences between the two groups, and RA‐TKA improved the accuracy of tibial component alignment. Further follow‐up studies are required to investigate the long‐term outcomes.

No difference between resurfaced and non-resurfaced patellae with a modern prosthesis design: a prospective randomized study of 250 total knee arthroplasties

PURPOSE

Despite numerous well-conducted studies and meta-analyses, the management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between patients with and without patellar resurfacing and to determine the influence of resurfacing on patellar tracking with a "patella-friendly" prosthesis.

METHODS

A single-centered prospective randomized controlled study was performed between April 2017 and November 2018. Two hundred and forty-five consecutive patients (250 knees) scheduled for TKA were randomized for patellar resurfacing or patella non-resurfacing. All patients received the same total knee prosthesis and were evaluated clinically and radiologically, including the International Knee Society Score (KSS knee and function), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), anterior knee pain (AKP), pain when climbing stairs, patellar tilt, and patellar translation.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-nine knees were available for clinical evaluation and 221 knees for radiographic analysis. The revision rate for patellofemoral cause was 3.1% (7 cases) with no difference between the groups (p = 0.217). There was no difference in survival rate between patellar resurfacing (88.3%) and non-resurfacing (85.3%) after 24 months (p = 0.599). There were no differences in KSS functional component (p = 0.599), KSS knee component (p = 0.396), FJS (p = 0.798), and AKP (p = 0.688) at a mean follow-up of 18 months. There was twice as much stair pain for the non-resurfacing group (17.1% versus 8.5%) (p = 0.043). There was patellar tilt in 43% of resurfaced knees (n = 50/116) versus 29% in non-resurfaced knees (n = 30/105) (p = 0.025); however, there was more patellar translation in the non-resurfaced group (21.0% versus 7.8%) (p < 0.001). There were no specific complications attributed to the patellar resurfacing procedure. There were four secondary patellar resurfacing procedures (3.6%) in the non-resurfaced group after a mean of 10 ± 7 months (1-17) postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

There is no superiority of patellar resurfacing or non-resurfacing in terms of clinical or radiological outcomes at mid-term. Secondary patellar resurfacing is rare. There is not enough evidence to recommend systematic patellar resurfacing with a "patella-friendly" prosthesis.

Influence of patellar denervation on anterior knee pain and knee function following total knee replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reached mixed results regarding the effects of patellar denervation with electrocautery (PD) on total knee replacement (TKR). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize all available literatures to investigate the influence of PD on postoperative anterior knee pain (AKP) and knee function after TKR.

METHODS

Electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase, were searched from their inception to March 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCT) comparing PD and non-patellar denervation (NPD) in TKR were selected, and the Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the quality of included trials. AKP prevalence was defined as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 12 RCTs and one quasi-RCT enrolled 1895 knees proved eligible. PD knees had significantly lower AKP prevalence than NPD knees (odds ratio [OR] = 0.54; 95% confidence intervals [95% CI], 0.36-0.81; p = 0.003). There was no difference between PD and NPD in terms of visual analogue scale for knee pain and range of motion, American knee society knee score, American knee society function score, patellar feller score, Oxford knee score for knee function. The results of subgroup analysis based on follow-up duration and patella resurfacing were in accordance with the results. PD knees were not associated with a higher risk of complication or revision.

CONCLUSION

PD can significantly reduce the AKP prevalence following TKR without increasing the risk of complication and revision. Although the pain relief effect of PD may not be associated with improved knee function after TKR, this procedure is preferred in both patella resurfacing and patella non-resurfacing TKR.

Biomechanical Consequences of Tibial Insert Thickness after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Musculoskeletal Simulation Study

The thickness of the tibial polyethylene (PE) insert is a critical parameter to ensure optimal soft-tissue balancing in the intraoperative decision-making procedure of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is a paucity of information about the kinetic response to PE insert thickness variations in the tibiofemoral (TF) joint, and subsequently, the secondary effects on the patellofemoral (PF) biomechanics. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of varying PE insert thickness on the ligament and TF compressive forces, as well as on the PF forces and kinematics, after a cruciate-retaining TKA. A previous patient-specific musculoskeletal model of TKA was adapted to simulate a chair-rising motion in which PE insert thickness was varied with 2 mm increments or decrements compared to the reference case (9 mm), from 5 mm up to 13 mm. Greater PE insert thickness resulted in higher ligament forces and concurrently increased the TF compressive force by 21% (13 mm), but slightly unloaded the PF joint with 7% (13 mm) while shifting the patella distally in the trochlear groove, compared to the reference case. Thinner PE inserts showed an opposite trend. Our findings suggest that the optimal PE insert thickness selection is a trade-off between the kinetic outcomes of the TF and PF joints.

Literature review of the causes of pain following total knee replacement surgery: prosthesis, inflammation and arthrofibrosis

Adverse knee pain occurs in 10–34% of all total knee replacements (TKR), and 20% of TKR patients experience more pain post-operatively than pre-operatively. Knee pain is amongst the top five reasons for knee replacement revision in the United Kingdom. The number of TKRs is predicted to continue increasing due to the ageing population.

A narrative literature review was performed on the different causes of pain following TKR. A database search on Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar was conducted to look for articles related to TKR, pain, and cause. Articles were selected based on relevance, publication date, quality of research and validation. Relevant sections were added to the review.

One hundred and fourteen articles were identified and potential causes of TKR pain included: arthrofibrosis, aseptic loosening, avascular necrosis, central sensitization, component malpositioning, infection, instability, nerve damage, overstuffing, patellar maltracking, polyethylene wear, psychological factors and unresurfaced patella.

It is important to tailor our approach to address the individual causes of pain. Certain controllable risk factors can be managed pre-operatively to minimize post-operative pain. Risk factors help to predict adverse pain outcomes and identify specific causes.

There are multiple causes of pain following TKR. Some factors will require further extensive studies, and as pain is a commonly attributed reason for TKR revision, its underlying aetiologies should be explored. Understanding these factors helps to develop effective methods for diagnosis, prevention and management of TKR pain, which help to improve patient outcomes.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:534-543. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200031