Cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty in severe varus osteoarthritis knee: A match-pair comparative study in an Asian population

A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes Between Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

We investigated a comparison of clinical outcomes between cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty. However, it is still controversial which design leads to better clinical results. In clinical settings, choosing either CR or PS is likely based on the surgeon's preferences. In this study, short-term clinical outcomes between CR and PS in patients who received a single knee prosthesis were compared using propensity score matching.

METHODS

Two hundred and twelve CR and 43 PS of a single knee prosthesis were enrolled in this study. After propensity score matching, 34 knees each in the CR and PS groups were chosen and were without significant differences in age at operation, gender, BMI, preoperative range of motion (ROM), preoperative femorotibial angle (FTA), and presence or absence of patellar replacement. Clinical scores, including ROM, Knee Society score (KSS), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), except for the sports subscale, were compared between the CR and PS groups preoperatively and two years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in FTA, ROM, or KSS. Preoperative scores for the KOOS except for the pain subscale were comparable between the groups. Postoperatively, however, the PS group had a significantly higher score in the ADL subscale compared to the CR group (PS: 89.5 vs. CR: 80.8, p = 0.017). The KOOS subscales other than activities of daily living (ADL) were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this propensity score-matched cohort study, PS showed a better outcome for the ADL than the CR design. These findings suggest that choosing either CR or PS should not depend on the surgeon's preferences. A PS design may be preferable to CR for elderly patients.

Safety and Efficacy of Single Condylar Knee Prosthesis When Treating Knee Single Compartment Osteoarthritis: A Prospective, Case-Randomized Controlled Study

Objective. The aim of this study is to explore the safety and efficacy of single condylar knee prosthesis when treating knee single compartment osteoarthritis by measuring the decrease of hemoglobin, total postoperative blood loss, maximum reduction of HCT, and knee joint activity. Methods. A total of 80 patients with knee joint single compartment osteoarthritis treated in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were studied. They were randomly assigned to a study group (n = 40) and a control group (n = 40). The study group was treated with total knee prosthesis, while the control group was treated with simple knee prosthesis. The decrease rate of hemoglobin, the amount of bleeding, and the maximum decrease of hematocrit were compared after treatment. The range of motion of knee joint was evaluated by the Fugl-Meyer motor function scale (FM-B) and Berg balance scale (BBS). Results. The decrease of hemoglobin in the study group at 24 hours, 36 hours, and 48 hours after treatment was remarkably lower ( $P$  < 0.05). The total blood loss and the maximum reduction of hematocrit(HCT) in the study group were lower ( $P$  < 0.05). The range of motion (ROM) of the knee joint in the study group at 6 and 12 months after treatment was remarkably higher than that before treatment and remarkably higher compared to the control group ( $P$  < 0.05). The FM-B scale and BBS scale of the studied cohort at 6 and 12 months after treatment were remarkably higher than those before treatment and were remarkably higher compared to the control’s ( $P$  < 0.05). Conclusion. The unicondylar knee prosthesis is safer and more effective in the treatment of noncompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee, facilitating less trauma and perioperative blood loss and enhancing the patient’s motion and balance.

Octogenarians Are the New Sexagenarians: Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Not Inferior to Posterior-Stabilized Arthroplasty in Octogenarian Patients

Purpose: The primary goal of this study was to compare survivorship and functional results in individuals aged 80 and over who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cruciate-retaining (CR) or posterior-stabilized (PS) implants. Methods: We prospectively analyzed the clinical records of two consecutive cohorts for a total of 96 implants in patients aged 80 years or over. The first cohort consisted of 59 consecutive cemented PS cases, while the second cohort comprised 37 consecutive cemented CR cases. The decision to either perform a PS or CR arthroplasty was taken based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative findings. The clinical evaluation entailed evaluating each patient’s visual analogue scale for pain (VAS), range of motion (flexion and extension), Knee Society Score (KSS), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Each patient was clinically evaluated the day before surgery (T0) and at two consecutive follow-ups at least 1 (T1) and 2 (T2) years after surgery. Implant survival was calculated using the Kaplan−Meier method. Results: Both groups showed statistically significant improvements at each follow-up compared with the preoperative values (p < 0.05). The CR group showed a higher flexion degree at T1 than the PS group (116.14 ± 5.57° versus 113.16 ± 7.66°; p = 0.048). No differences were found between the two groups regarding survival rate (chi-squared test p-value = 0.789). Three failures were noted in the CR group, while there were four in the PS group. Conclusions: This prospective clinical study demonstrates that CR and PS TKA had similar clinical outcomes in octogenarians with regard to knee function, postoperative knee pain, and other complications. Prosthesis survivorship for CR and PS TKA were both satisfactory, and in selected octogenarian patients, CR TKA should always be considered because of the reduced surgical time.