Situating HIV Stigma in Health Facility Settings: A Qualitative Study of Experiences and Perceptions of Stigma in 'Clinics' among Healthcare Workers and Service Users in Zambia

International bioethics, Ubuntu and HIV testing in Sub-Saharan Africa: an evaluation of Zambia's HIV testing policy

International bioethical principles place considerable weight on individual rights and autonomy. They require informed consent for both treatment and diagnostic testing. Although individual rights are widely valued, in some non-Western contexts, they receive relatively less weight than other moral values. In particular, the communitarian African philosophy of Ubuntu places a greater emphasis on the collective good of the community than it does on individual rights. In this paper, we explore differences between an Ubuntu-based bioethics and international bioethical principles through the lens of Zambia's Universal Routine HIV Testing Services Policy. We find that both the written form of the testing policy and its practical implementation violate standard international bioethical principles of informed consent. However, we show that the policy and its implementation are compatible with an Ubuntu-based bioethics. We conclude with a suggestion that Ubuntu-based bioethics also better capture actual clinical practice in Western contexts than standard bioethical principles based on autonomy and individual rights.

Communities Started the End of the HIV Epidemic: Experiences With and Recommendations for Conducting Community-Engaged HIV Implementation Research

ABSTRACT

Communities of people living with or impacted by HIV have been at the forefront of HIV research, from identifying the health priorities to advocating for the development and implementation of interventions that benefit affected populations and individuals. Community engagement is considered fundamental for successful implementation of science projects. However, researchers have acknowledged the limited guidance on community engagement for implementation science research. Some recommendations have been made for community engagement in implementation sciences, but conducting HIV implementation research must consider the unique challenges of addressing the stigma and disenfranchisement of the populations affected. Despite the specific difficulties for community-engaged implementation science research, there are successful experiences and lessons learned that could support future fruitful experiences. This publication aims to share recommendations for community-engaged HIV implementation research based on the expertise of community-academic partnerships. These recommendations include the perspectives of academic and community partners. Community engagement in HIV implementation research will be needed beyond ending the epidemic. The future of community engagement in research may lay in embracing the constant change and securing the mechanisms to respond to it.

Patients' and specialists' perspectives on health care quality and on people living with HIV health-related quality of life in Spain: a cross-sectional survey

Spain was close to meeting the 90-90-90-treatment target set by UNAIDS. However, data on health care quality regarding people with HIV and their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after the COVID-19 pandemic onset is scarce. By considering the perspective of people with HIV and HIV specialists, we aimed to determine some aspects of the quality of care in Spain, such as access to health resources or satisfaction with primary and speciality care, and assess people with HIV health-related quality of life. Ex post facto cross-sectional surveys were administered to 502 people with HIV and 101 HIV clinicians. Unmet needs related to healthcare system and healthcare resources access and to antiretroviral treatment administered by hospital pharmacies were detected. There was also room for improvement in the primary care service delivery and in various aspects concerning people's with HIV HRQoL. About one-fourth of them experienced stigmatisation in the healthcare setting, which was significantly related to HRQoL. Women, heterosexual participants and those with problems accessing the healthcare system scored poorer in the HRQoL scales. Moreover, according to our data, HIV specialists did not seem to be fully aware of patients' with HIV needs and overestimated their HRQoL.

Stigmatizing clinical setting erodes physician-patient interaction quality for sexual minority men through perceived HIV stigma and HIV infection concerns in Zambia

This study investigated whether perceived HIV stigma and HIV infection concerns among healthcare providers (HCPs) mediate the association between stigmatizing clinical setting and their interaction quality with sexual minority men (SMM) patients in Zambia. In 2021, a cross-sectional survey was conducted with 91 HCPs offering HIV-related services to SMM in Zambia. Path analysis was conducted to examine the potential mediation effect of "perceived HIV stigma" and "HIV infection concern" among HCPs in the association between "stigmatizing clinical setting" and their "interaction quality with SMM". Mediators i.e., "perceived HIV stigma" and "HIV infection concern" among HCPs, were associated positively with the stigmatizing clinical setting (β = 0.329, p < .01, β = 0.917, p < 0.01), and negatively with physician-patient interaction quality (β = -0.167, p = 0.051; β = -0.126, p < 0.05). Stigmatizing clinical setting had a significant and negative indirect effect on HCPs interaction quality with SMM through increased perceived HIV stigma (z = -1.966, p < 0.05) and increased HIV infection concern (z = -1.958, p = 0.050). To improve physician-patient interaction quality, stigma reduction interventions among HCPs, who serve SMM in Zambia, should target development of development of inclusive policies and the cultivation of cultural norms that are supportive and respectful to SMM, and protection of HCPs from enacted stigma due to offering care to SMM.

Physician-Patient Interaction Quality Mediates the Association Between HIV-Related Stigma and HIV-Prevention Behaviors Among Sexual Minority Men in Zambia

HIV-related stigma is a major challenge to HIV prevention for sexual minority men (SMM) in Zambia, but little is known about the underlying mechanisms. This study aimed to investigate whether physician-patient interaction quality mediates the relationship between HIV-related stigma and HIV-prevention behaviors among SMM. Data were collected using a cross-sectional survey from 194 SMM (aged: mean = 24.08, SD = 4.27) across four districts in Zambia between February and November 2021. Participants were asked about their demographic characteristics, HIV-related stigma, SMM-related stigma, physician-patient interaction quality, HIV-testing intention, and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Path analysis was used to test the mediation effect of physician-patient interaction quality in the associations of HIV-related stigma/SMM-related stigma with HIV-testing intention and current PrEP use. Higher self-reported physician-patient interaction quality was negatively associated with HIV-related stigma (β = - 0.444, z = - 2.223, p < 0.05), and positively associated with HIV-testing intention (β = 0.039, z = 5.121, p < 0.001) and current PrEP use (β = 0.008, z = 2.723, p < 0.01). HIV-related stigma among SMM had a significant and negative indirect effect on HIV-testing intention (β = - 0.017, z = - 2.006, p < 0.05), and current PrEP use (β = - 0.004, z = - 2.009, p < 0.05) through physician-patient interaction quality. Contrary to our expectations, SMM-related stigma did not have a significant and negative indirect effect on HIV prevention behaviors through physician-patient interaction quality. Health interventions need to improve physician-patient interaction quality by offering healthcare provider training, targeting HIV-related stigma in healthcare settings, and devising inclusive healthcare policies to promote HIV prevention efforts.