Medial Meniscus Root Repair

Comparing Surgical Techniques for Meniscal Tears: A Systematic Review of Radiographic and Functional Outcomes

Meniscal tears are a common orthopedic injury. The management approaches for meniscal tears include both surgical and non-surgical procedures; however, the majority of the surgeons opt for various surgical interventions. This systematic review aimed to compare the outcomes of different surgical techniques for meniscal tears. The systemic search was carried out in various databases including PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Scopus. Studies that investigated surgical techniques for meniscal repair and published between 2010 to 2023 were included. Out of the 7,421 potential studies identified from databases and Google Scholar search, only 17 studies were included in our systemic review. The follow-up periods ranged from 6 weeks to 123 months. Adverse effects were reported in some studies, including joint line tenderness, swelling, and loss of flexion, while others reported no significant adverse events. Pull-out repair and refixation techniques demonstrated better clinical outcomes and slower arthritic progression than partial meniscectomy. Mason-Allen stitches and simple stitches yielded comparable results, and both inside-out and all-inside techniques had similar clinical and functional outcomes. This systematic review provides valuable insights into the outcomes of different surgical techniques for meniscal tears. Further studies with longer follow-up periods may help assess the long-term effectiveness of these surgical techniques.

Clinical factors associated with successful meniscal root repairs: A systematic review

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature to determine what clinical factors influence patient outcomes after meniscal root repairs.

METHODS

A systematic review of multiple databases was performed. The inclusion criteria included English language, studies evaluating clinical and/or radiographic factors related to meniscal root repair outcomes, medial or lateral posterior root repairs, and human studies. The exclusion criteria included meniscectomy studies, meniscal body studies, technique descriptions, studies reporting only failure rate of meniscal repairs, multiligament repairs, abstracts, controlled laboratory studies, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews.

RESULTS

Five studies were included for final analysis including four case series and one retrospective cohort study. A total of 178 patients in the five studies underwent posterior meniscal root repair (179 knees total). The mean age was 51.4 years. The mean duration of follow-up was 34.5 months. The mean Moga quality rating for case series studies was 15 points (83.3%) and NOS score for the retrospective comparative study was 8. Body mass index (BMI) was not associated with outcomes in 3/3 studies assessing BMI. Increased age was associated with worse outcome in 1/5 studies and had no association in 4/5 studies. Knee varus >5° was associated with worse outcomes in 3/3 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for poor clinical outcomes after posterior meniscal root repair include pre-existing high-grade (Outerbridge grade ≥ 3) chondral lesions and severe varus knee alignment (>5°) for medial root repairs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review.