The Influence of Incision Type on Patient Satisfaction After Plate Fixation of Clavicle Fractures

Supraclavicular nerve sparing versus sacrifice during open reduction internal fixation of acute midshaft clavicle fracture

BACKGROUND

The branches of the supraclavicular nerve are often sacrificed during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for clavicle fracture. No consensus exists on whether the supraclavicular nerve should be routinely identified and protected during ORIF.

METHODS

We developed a simple method to make nerve sparing easier; Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) solution is locally injected prior to the surgical incision being made. This retrospective study enrolled 340 patients and divided them into supraclavicular-nerve-sparing (n = 45) and supraclavicular-nerve-sacrifice (n = 295) groups. Surgical outcomes-including operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative pain, union rate, time to union, functional score, paresthesia, complications, implant removal rate, and complication rate-were recorded.

RESULTS

Incisional or anterior chest wall numbness and intraoperative blood loss were significantly less (p < 0.001) in the nerve-sparing group. The operative time was similar in the two groups. No significant differences were discovered in QuickDASH score, postoperative pain score, union rate, time to union, implant removal rate, complication rate, or revision rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that the outcomes of supraclavicular nerve sparing during ORIF with WALANT can reduce postoperative incisional and anterior chest wall numbness and intraoperative blood loss without increasing the operative time or complication rate.

Regional Anesthetic and Analgesic Techniques for Clavicle Fractures and Clavicle Surgeries: Part 1—A Scoping Review

Objective. Clavicle fractures are common injuries potentially associated with significant perioperative pain. However, this region’s complex sensory innervation poses a challenge for regional anesthetic or analgesic (RA) techniques. We conducted this scoping review to summarize the current literature, particularly with regards to motor-sparing techniques. Methods. A scoping review was carried out in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute’s framework. All articles describing the use of RA for clavicle fractures or surgery were included. PubMed^®, Ovid MEDLINE^®, EMBASE^®, Scopus^®, CINAHL^®, and the Cochrane database were searched without language restrictions. Results. Database searches identified 845 articles, 44 of which were included in this review, with a combined patient total of 3161. We included all peer-reviewed publications containing clinical data and summarized the findings. Conclusions. Current evidence of RA techniques in clavicle surgery is heterogeneous, with different approaches used to overcome the overlapping sensory innervation. The literature largely comprises case reports/series, with several randomized controlled trials. Intermediate cervical plexus block is the regional technique of choice for clavicle surgery, and can provide reliable surgical anesthesia when combined with an interscalene block. Cervical plexus block can provide motor-sparing analgesia following clavicle surgery. Promising alternatives include the clavipectoral block, which is a novel motor-sparing regional technique. Further studies are required to determine the efficacy and safety of various techniques.

Does a skin incision along Langer's lines reduce complications following fixation of displaced middle-third clavicle fractures?

INTRODUCTION

Internal fixation of displaced middle-third clavicle fractures is a widely used treatment but is frequently associated with post-operative complications. The aim of this study is to investigate whether or not using a skin incision along Langer's lines, as opposed to a traditional transverse incision, reduces complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data on 108 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of mid-shaft clavicle fractures between 2014 and 2018. Either an oblique incision along Langer's lines or a transverse incision was used according to surgeon's preference. A pre-contoured diaphyseal locking plate was used in all cases. We collected data on fracture classification, minor complications (irritation from plate, chest wall numbness, superficial wound infection) and major complications (irritation from plate necessitating metalwork removal, periprosthetic fracture, deep infection, neurovascular injury and non-union). Statistical analysis was performed using multivariant regression analysis and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients underwent fixation using the oblique incision and 51 via the transverse incision. Age, gender and fracture pattern in the two groups were comparable. There were 14 minor and 6 major complications in the oblique group. In the transverse group, there were 16 minor and 5 major complications. The major complication rate was 10.5% in the oblique group and 9.8% in the transverse group. The overall major complication rate was 10.2%. No statistically significant difference in the rate of complications between the two groups was identified.

CONCLUSION

Based on our data, an incision following Langer's lines does not reduce the rate of complications following fixation of displaced middle-third clavicle fractures.

Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients?

Background

Operative management of clavicle fractures is increasingly common. In the context of explaining the risks and benefits of surgery, understanding the impact of incisional numbness as it relates to the patient experience is key to shared decision making. This study aims to determine the prevalence, extent, and recovery of sensory changes associated with supraclavicular nerve injury after open reduction and plate internal fixation of middle or lateral clavicle shaft fractures.

Methods

Eighty-six patients were identified retrospectively and completed a patient experience survey assessing sensory symptoms, perceived post-operative function, and satisfaction. Correlations between demographic factors and outcomes, as well as subgroup analyses were completed to identify factors impacting patient satisfaction.

Results

Ninety percent of patients experienced sensory changes post-operatively. Numbness was the most common symptom (64%) and complete resolution occurred in 32% of patients over an average of 19 months. Patients who experienced burning were less satisfied overall with the outcome of their surgery whereas those who were informed of the risk of sensory changes pre-operatively were more satisfied overall.

Conclusions

Post-operative sensory disturbance is common. While most patients improve, some symptoms persist in the majority of patients without significant negative effects on satisfaction. Patients should always be advised of the risk of persistent sensory alterations around the surgical site to increase the likelihood of their satisfaction post-operatively.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04770-z.

Comparison of patient reported outcomes following clavicle operative fixation using supraclavicular nerve sparing and supraclavicular nerve sacrificing techniques- A cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Supraclavicular nerve injury is one of the common complications after clavicle open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) affecting up to 55% of patients. There is debate about whether sparing supraclavicular nerves improves functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to compare numbness, patient-reported outcomes and surgical time in patients undergoing clavicle ORIF using supraclavicular nerve sparing and supraclavicular nerve sacrificing techniques.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study with prospective survey of 108 patients with clavicular fractures treated with ORIF at a level 1 trauma centre. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) ORIF with supraclavicular nerve sparing techniques and 2) ORIF with supraclavicular nerve sacrificing techniques. Questionnaires were conducted and subjective numbness around supraclavicular nerve distribution was our primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, a numeric rating scale for pain and satisfaction with treatment and surgical time.

RESULTS

An overall response rate of 92% was achieved with an average follow-up of 16 months. There were 20 patients in the supraclavicular nerve sparing group and 79 patients in the supraclavicular nerve sacrificing group. 76% of all patients experienced numbness post-operatively and 91% of these patients experienced persistent numbness at final follow-up. There was no significant difference between the groups for age, gender, time to follow-up and mechanism of injury. Patients in the supraclavicular nerve sparing group had significantly less numbness at final follow-up (35% vs 86%, P < 0.001; OR=0.21 95%CI 0.11-0.40). There was no significant difference in the QuickDASH score nor the NRS for pain and function. Sparing supraclavicular nerves did not result in a significantly longer operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that identification and protection of the supraclavicular nerves result in significantly less numbness following clavicle ORIF but does not affect patient reported functional outcomes.

Comparison of the effectiveness of oblique and transverse incisions in the treatment of fractures of the middle and outer third of the clavicle

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic supraclavicular nerve injury is frequent during surgical repair of clavicle fractures through a transverse incision. The use of an oblique incision may be a potential approach to avoiding this complication. This study compared the clinical effectiveness of oblique and transverse incisions in the treatment of fractures in the middle and outer thirds of the clavicle.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included patients with fracture of the mid-to-outer third of the clavicle between August 2011 and August 2016. We allocated the patients into 2 groups based on their choice of treatment: oblique incision (n = 62) and transverse incision (n = 64). We compared the following parameters between the 2 groups: operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative fracture healing time, incision size, clinical complications, postoperative subjective satisfaction, and shoulder function.

RESULTS

Operative time, postoperative fracture healing time, postoperative shoulder function (Constant-Murley and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand [DASH] scores), and clinical complications did not differ significantly between groups (all P > .05). The oblique incision group had less intraoperative blood loss (41.4 ± 16.4 vs. 65.3 ± 10.4 mL, P < .001) and smaller surgical incisions (3.6 ± 1.6 vs. 10.3 ± 2.6 cm, P < .001). The oblique incision group showed better outcomes for postoperative satisfaction (85.5% vs. 64.1%, P = .015), absence of shoulder numbness at the last follow-up (89.3% vs. 70.3%, P = .010), and satisfaction with the scar (90.3% vs. 3.1%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Oblique incisions have several advantages over transverse incisions: less bleeding, smaller incisions, less iatrogenic injury to supraclavicular nerves, and higher patient satisfaction. These 2 approaches have equivalent effects on recovery of shoulder joint function.

Midshaft clavicle fractures: Current concepts

Clavicle fractures are common fractures and the optimal treatment strategy remains debatable. The present paper reviews the available literature and current concepts in the management of displaced and/or shortened midshaft clavicle fractures.

Operative treatment leads to improved short-term functional outcomes, increased patient satisfaction, an earlier return to sports and lower rates of non-union compared with conservative treatment. In terms of cost-effectiveness, operative treatment also seems to be advantageous.

However, operative treatment is associated with an increased risk of complications and re-operations, while long-term shoulder functional outcomes are similar.

The optimal treatment strategy should be one tailor-made to the patient and his/her specific needs and expectations by utilizing a shared decision-making model.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:374-380. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170033