Functional and Structural Outcomes After Retears of Arthroscopically Repaired Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Functional and Structural Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With or Without Preoperative Corticosteroid Injections

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are effective in alleviating pain in patients with rotator cuff tears, but controversy still exists regarding their potential adverse effects on clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair.

PURPOSE

To compare both the functional and the structural outcomes in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with or without preoperative CSIs.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out among patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for partial- and full-thickness tears between 2015 and 2019. The patients who received preoperative CSIs were included in the CSI group and compared with a group without preoperative CSIs (non-CSI group), matched at a ratio of 1:2 based on tear size, age, and follow-up time. Both functional evaluation and structural assessments using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed at the final follow-up. Clinical outcomes-including retear rate as the primary outcome; pain; functional scores including the Constant-Murley score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Fudan University Shoulder Score; range of motion (ROM); tendon integrity; tendon healing type; and cartilage thickness-were compared between the 2 groups with a statistical significance of P < .05 and power of 0.9.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were included in the CSI group, and 62 were included in the non-CSI group. After a mean 3-year follow-up, the 2 groups demonstrated no significant differences in retear rate; visual analog scale for pain; shoulder functional scores; and active ROM including forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation. No significant differences were observed on postoperative MRI scans of the rotator cuff tendon (tendon integrity, healing type, residual tendon attachment area, etc), cartilage thickness, and muscle atrophy.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were found at a mean 3-year follow-up in the retear rates, pain, ROM, and glenohumeral structure on postoperative MRI scans after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with or without preoperative CSIs.

Combination of autologous osteochondral and periosteum transplantation effectively promotes fibrocartilage regeneration at the tendon-bone junction of the rotator cuff in rabbits

PURPOSE

Rotator cuff tendon-bone healing often leads to scarring and low biomechanical strength, resulting in a tendency to re-tear. This study examined whether combining autologous osteochondral transplantation and periosteum transplantation increases fibrocartilage transition zone regeneration and improves biomechanical fixation.

METHODS

A total of 48 New Zealand white rabbits were divided into the periosteum, autologous osteochondral, combination of autologous osteochondral and periosteum, and control groups. The supraspinatus tendon was cut from the greater tuberosity and repaired by different transplants. A total of 12 rabbits were used for histological examination (haematoxylin and eosin staining, Masson's staining and Safranin-O staining) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after the repair, and 36 rabbits were used for biomechanical tests (maximal failure load and stiffness).

RESULTS

At 4 weeks following the operation, each group had a large tendon-bone gap with a small number of disordered collagen fibres. At 8 weeks, the tendon-bone gap was smaller than that before the operation, and the tendon-bone gap in each experimental group was smaller with neater and denser collagen fibres and chondrocytes than in the control group, with the osteochondral combined periosteum group having the best results. At 12 weeks, the typical tendon-bone transitional structure was observed in the osteochondral combined periosteum group, and more collagen fibres and chondrocytes were generated in each group. The osteochondral combined periosteum group had the largest staining area and the largest amount of cartilage. The maximum tensile strength and stiffness of each group increased over time. There was no significant difference in each group's maximum tensile strength and stiffness at 4 weeks after the operation. However, the maximum tensile strength and stiffness of the osteochondral combined periosteum group at 8 and 12 weeks after operation were significantly higher than those of other groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Histological and biomechanical results show that autologous osteochondral transplantation combined with periosteum transplantation can effectively promote the regeneration of fibrous cartilage in the tendon-bone junction of the rotator cuff. It is concluded that this technique is a new treatment method to promote tendon-bone healing in the rotator cuff.

Clinical outcomes in patients with retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff retear is a major concern after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR); however, the effects of retear remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of postoperative retear and intact tendons after ARCR.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PEDro databases for studies performed from January 2000 to June 2020. Clinical outcomes included the Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California Los Angeles shoulder (UCLA) score, pain score, range of motion, and muscle strength. Meta-analysis using random-effects models was performed on the pooled results to determine significance.

RESULTS

The initial database search yielded 3141 records. After removal of duplicates, 26 of which met the inclusion criteria. Patients in the retear group had significantly lower Constant score [- 8.51 points (95% CI, - 10.29 to - 6.73); P < 0.001], ASES score [- 12.53 points (95% CI, - 16.27 to - 8.79); P < 0.001], UCLA score [- 3.77 points (95% CI, - 4.72 to - 2.82); P < 0.001], and significantly higher pain score [0.56 cm (95% CI, 0.10 to 1.01); P = 0.02] than the intact group. In addition, the retear group had significantly lower flexion [- 10.46° (95% CI, - 19.86 to - 1.07); P = 0.03], abduction [- 14.84° (95% CI, - 28.55 to - 1.14); P = 0.03], and external rotation [- 7.22° (95% CI, - 13.71 to - 0.74); P = 0.03] range of motion, and flexion [- 1.65 kg·f (95% CI, - 2.29 to - 1.01); P < 0.001], abduction [- 1.87 kg·f (95% CI, - 3.02 to - 0.72); P = 0.001], and external rotation [- 1.66 kg·f (95% CI, - 3.25 to - 0.07); P = 0.04] muscle strength.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that retear after ARCR leads to poor clinical outcomes after surgery.